>cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
>-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
>-ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -include
>opt_global.h -mno-fp-regs -Wa,-mev56 ../../nfs/nfs_syscalls.c
>../../n
>
> :Env:
> :
> :Yesterday I went to a friends house for installing a box from the freebsd
> :3.0-release cdrom (I have also the src and obj very current on another cd
> :to do a quick make installword :-).
> :
> :He has :
> :1 hd master (A) + 1 cdrom slave on primary ch.
> :1 hd master (B) + 1 zi
At 17.49 17/02/99 -0800, you wrote:
>:everything was fine after adding a boot config with 1:wd(2,a)kernel
>Look at the disklabel for wd2s2. If the 'disk:' field in the label
>says wd1 that may be your problem.
I think is our installer that have some problems :-)
Btw I'll check it, but
:Env:
:
:Yesterday I went to a friends house for installing a box from the freebsd
:3.0-release cdrom (I have also the src and obj very current on another cd
:to do a quick make installword :-).
:
:He has :
:1 hd master (A) + 1 cdrom slave on primary ch.
:1 hd master (B) + 1 zip atapi slave on sec
Env:
Yesterday I went to a friends house for installing a box from the freebsd
3.0-release cdrom (I have also the src and obj very current on another cd
to do a quick make installword :-).
He has :
1 hd master (A) + 1 cdrom slave on primary ch.
1 hd master (B) + 1 zip atapi slave on secundary ch
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
...
> We then tried to boot with the 3.1 and the 4.0 boot floppies. Neither was
> able to find the SCSI controller or the ethernet device. Of course, we find
> it odd that 2.2.8 found the devices ok, but newer releases do not. As far
> as I can tell
Hi,
I don't control the options used to build the distribution
kernels during a 'make release'. Jordan is responsible for
that.
I don't have any problems building my local kernel since
the only nfs options I have are:
options NFS #Network Filesystem
options
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:12:59 EST, "John W. DeBoskey" wrote:
> Just fyi, current as of 2pm EST.
>
> ../../nfs/nfs_syscalls.c:92: warning: `nfsrv_zapsock' declared `static' but
> never defined
> *** Error code 1
I get this when I set ``option NFS_NOSERVER''. If I disable the option,
my kernel
Hi,
Just fyi, current as of 2pm EST.
Thanks,
John
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK
-include opt_glob
Hello-
I've been trying to get 3.1 or 4.0 to run on a Compaq Professional Workstation
6000 with dual PII-300s, using the built-in symbios 53c875 SCSI controller, and
the built-in "ThunderLan" ethernet adapter. The machine works perfectly with
2.2.8, but we'd like to get it running 3.1 (or 4.0 if
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I've been using -O2 kernels for over a year. Works fine as far as I
> can tell.
I've had a few failures with -O2 ages ago, though I can't guess how long ages
was - I definitely remember tracing one problem down to '-O' vs. '-O2', I
stick to '-0' now religiously.
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Lucky you. -O2 *does* break world for many people. Eventually, it
> might break your world too, and there is a great chance you'll first
> spam -current before changing -O2 to -O and trying again. Or there
> would, if we stopped hitting on this nail.
:At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote:
:>[...]
:>No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things
:>before.
:
:I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I
:haven't dared try it for the kernel though...
:
:--
:Bob Bishop (0118) 97
Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote:
> >[...]
> >No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things
> >before.
>
> I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I
> haven't dared try it for the kernel though...
Lucky you. -
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 08:46:49AM -0500, tc...@staff.circle.net wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dil...@apollo.backplane.com]
> > :What's the chance that our kernel adaptations for PIIs
> > :is partly at fault?
> > :
> > :-Troy Cobb
> > : C
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 12:19:07AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :maxusers 256
>
> Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior
> to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic
> distribution -- and everything started working again.
>
T
At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote:
>[...]
>No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things
>before.
I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I
haven't dared try it for the kernel though...
--
Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 in
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> Amancio Hasty wrote...
> >
> > SGI is releasing GLX 8)
> >
> > http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990216/ca_silicon_2.html
> >
> > Have Fun,
> > Amancio
> >
> > P.S.: If companies start dumping large packages is going to weight us down
> > :(
>
Julian Elischer said:
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> > You may try my patch at http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi, which would allow
> > linux threads to run on SMP.
>
> I've gone through these patches and I can see that they are really needed
> for SMP where address spaces are shared
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -include
opt_global.h -mno-fp-regs -Wa,-mev56 ../../nfs/nfs_syscalls.c
../../nfs/n
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > I usually keep -O to just '-O' - I had been upping it recently, but then it
> > started breaking even some of my simple programs, so leasson learn't, it's
> > staying at just '-O' from now on in... (safety first? :-)
>
> -O2 works fine too. -O3 does
Greetings,
I also have a Creative Labs Sound Blaster PCI128 installed, and though I
followed your instructions below I am not havine what I would call
promising results.
At 12:21 PM 1/10/99 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>you need a -current system with the "pcm" device, then
I am running 3.1-STAB
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 06:15:06PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 February 1999 at 9:24:31 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> >> If I have a /etc/defaults/rc.conf, then my /etc/rc.conf won't be consulted.
> >
> > Wrong. You need to read just a bit FURTHER into that file before
> > jumpi
[ CC trimmed ]
tc...@staff.circle.net wrote in message ID
:
> I've had it at MAXUSERS=256 on both the P5 and the P6. The P5 stays
> stable, the P6 doesn't. If I reduce MAXUSERS to 128 then these
> heavily loaded boxen will fall over due to out of MBUFs errors, or
> so I believe.
If you are runn
Try reducing maxusers to 128. If you have mbuf problems, override
NMBCLUSTERS ( making it 4096 or 8192 should be sufficient ). Sometimes
network mbuf problems on heavily loaded machines are due to too-large
default buffer sizes - if net.inet.tcp.sendspace or recvspace is greater
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dil...@apollo.backplane.com]
> :What's the chance that our kernel adaptations for PIIs
> :is partly at fault?
> :
> :-Troy Cobb
> : Circle Net, Inc.
> : http://www.circle.net
>
> With what config? Have you tried
> I've gone through these patches and I can see that they are really needed
> for SMP where address spaces are shared.
>
> There are details I didn't get, such as where is the per-processor
> pde pointed, (i.e. where is the per processor KVM range) and is there a
> single page table for each proce
> who's looked at this.
Tor Egge, he has been very helpful during the development of the code. The
pmap change was a result of discussions with him.
> It looks to me that this is serious stuff
> spliting the pmap out of the vmspace structure is a big change.
> caertainly a logical move but req
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 11:48:15 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Is anyone else using the NFS_NOSERVER option successfully?
Bleh, I should have mentioned that the kernel builds fine if I remove
the NFS_NOSERVER option.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubsc
Hi folks,
I have the following pertinent options in my kernel config:
options FFS #Fast filesystem
options FFS_ROOT#FFS usable as root device
options MFS #Memory filesystem
options NFS #Ne
:I'm seeing different responses depending on hardware.
:
:On regular Pentium 166 machines, I almost NEVER get
:a panic. On brand-new Pentium II 350s, I get a panic
:every 6-9 hours. This happens when both kernels are
:configured the same for maxusers. It happens when
:both machines are under the
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
> : Not to stop you in your tracks, but I would really love to see
> : somebody (more capable than the PAO people) work out a power
> : management architecture for us before we have too many more
> : hacks in this area...
>
> I'd have to agree that a unifie
Go to http://lt.tar.com/ and see? transcript? of a successful installation of
StarOffice 5.0. It should help you.
ad...@worldbank.org wrote:
> I'm running 4.0-current as of late last week, elf kernel.? Everything works
> great - no problems.? I understand that the Linux kernel threads stuff is no
33 matches
Mail list logo
