Re: Sysctl

2000-04-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Jeremy writes: : Before you get too enthusiastic about adding description strings to the : declarations, you might like to work out: : 1) How to store the descriptions so they are accessible to sysctl(8), :but don't bloat the loaded kernel image. : 2) How

Re: Integrating QMAIL in the world

2000-04-13 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
We argue about this a lot. Nobody has, as yet, ever done the work to make "bindist" a meta-package which depends (perhaps selectively) on sub-packages like groff, sendmail, gcc, et al. to achieve the required state of "bundling by default but not by requirement" in FreeBSD. This is despite the

Re: Integrating QMAIL in the world

2000-04-13 Thread Brad Knowles
At 11:21 PM -0700 2000/4/12, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: They subsequently disappeared into the same black hole which swallows so many prospective volunteers, it seems, and all that was left to mark the event was the echos of thread in the mail archives. :-) Sorry, my fault. I

unsubscribe freebsd-current

2000-04-13 Thread Vlad Dymchenko
unsubscribe freebsd-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Thomas T. Veldhouse
Maybe I missed something - but I think you want "YES" instead of "true". It says true in /etc/defaults/make.conf. That is why I used it instead of YES or yes. Tom Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are correct. We seem to have some odd conventions. "YES" in rc.conf and "TRUE" in

Re: pcic problem in CURRENT

2000-04-13 Thread vova
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On the same hardware : 3.4 and 4.0 sees pcic0 on 0x3e2, but with CURRENT kernel don't see it : and don't say anything about pcic when booted with -v : : But when I've changed ioaddr of pcic

Re: Strange phenomen accessing a CDROM contents under linuxerator

2000-04-13 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2412 01:35], Walter Brameld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I see the same thing on 4.0-STABLE, so far only using linux-netscape. When I go to select a directory for download, or when accessing an HTML file to be opened, certain directories always appear to be missing. Only one that comes to

panic: vm_object_shadow: source object has OBJ_ONEMAPPING set.

2000-04-13 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, when using a linux java app (SAP PlatinGUI 46Cb2) I get the above panic. FreeBSD -current. Kernel+mods in sync. Linux from ports. Linux-Java-JDK 1.2.2 from blackdown as of yesterday. Backtrace see crash.txt. Kernelconfig see nihil. Any thoughts anyone? Bye! Michael Reifenberger

Re: Netscape 6 Linux pre-release, got it going.

2000-04-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 12:17:03AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote: I don't think pam is a development tool, which makes linux_devtools the wrong port. I also don't think we need pam in any other port if it's ... In this case, you are right. The problem is generally that linux ports

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kris Kennaway writes: : rc.conf cares about the value of the variable. make.conf does not (for : most of them), and just cares whether the variable is set at all : (i.e. they're not booleans) Is that still true? I've been seeing more and more things that used to be

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote: Is that still true? I've been seeing more and more things that used to be .if !defined(NOFOO) morph into .if !defined(NOFOO) ${NOFOO} != "no" ${NOFOO} != "NO" Like where? I certainly didn't come across any of these when I did a sweep

Re: 4.0, OpenSSL and MD5 (fwd)

2000-04-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote: bsd.libnames.mk: .if defined(NOSHARED) ${NOSHARED} != "no" ${NOSHARED} != "NO" is where I saw it.Warner Okay, thats probably the single case in the tree then :-) Kris In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. --

Re: MLEN and crashes

2000-04-13 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 3/04, John Polstra wrote: [don't allocate big structs on kernel stack] Many years ago, I wrote a tool that analysed stack requirements by parsing the assembler output from the compiler. It determined the stack frame requirements and built a call flow graph to determine total stack depth.