Re: One more question (different now)

On Thu, 11 May 2000 03:58:57 +0200, Bernd Luevelsmeyer wrote: > The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores. Can you give us details? Do I just hunt Amazon.com for "C99", or does it have a proper title? I need this one. Thanks, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: It seems that SCSI code still use block devices

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just got from recent kernel: > > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a > Device char-major=13 minor=131072 opened in block mode, convert to char mode with >/dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01 > > The suggestion is strange indeed, /de

Re: One more question (different now)

David Malone wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > From the C99 draft (n869.txt): > > Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up > cash to get a copy? The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores. Draft vers

It seems that SCSI code still use block devices

Just got from recent kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Device char-major=13 minor=131072 opened in block mode, convert to char mode with /dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01 The suggestion is strange indeed, /dev/da0s1a ALREADY IS character device. It means that kernel mounting code itself s

Re: One more question (different now)

On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > From the C99 draft (n869.txt): Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up cash to get a copy? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the

Re: One more question (different now)

On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote: > > It actually worked! Now I will go and see what this uintptr_t > > actually is :-) > > Its an unsigned integer type which is the same size as a pointer (i.e. its > safe to cast a pointer to uintptr_t without

Re: One more question (different now)

On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote: > > On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote: > > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > > >> > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > >> > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was > >> > > that added -W

ITS Brochure

Title: ITS Internet Site P.O.

Re: One more question (different now)

On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote: > You can suppress the warning if you cast to uintptr_t first. Pretty ugly > though. For (almost) full uglyness and correctness, you have to cast to "volatile void *" first, then back via "void *": #define unvolstructfoop(sfp) \ ((struct foo *)(void *

Re: EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE

> >> This is dangerous for the OSM. When the i2o OSM shuts an IOP > >> down, it is history. It will stop doing any work at all; network, > >> disk, console, mouse, whatever. I reserve that for really, really > >> shutdown/reset. > > > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "dangerous".

Re: One more question (different now)

On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: >> > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was >> > > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. >> > >> > Or we should

Re: EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE

On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote: ... >> This is dangerous for the OSM. When the i2o OSM shuts an IOP >> down, it is history. It will stop doing any work at all; network, >> disk, console, mouse, whatever. I reserve that for really, really >> shutdown/reset. > > I'm not sure I understand what

Re: unknown:

< said: > Something else I've noticed in the mean time is that PnP devices like > my printer - that are also on buses that are probed for PnP devices - > end up being probed twice at boot time. Delete the `at isa? port blah' cruft from your config file. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman

Re: One more question (different now)

On Tue, 9 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < >said: > > > So does: > > > bzero((void *)&trash, sizeof(junk_t)); > > > So, how do I make everyone happy? > > Put a comment on that line indicating that a warning is expected. Someone's ie driver has lines like this. This does not make me hap

Re: a better idea for package dependencies

On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:29:12AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Hopefully some day, parts of the /usr/src bits will be installed with the > pkg_* utils, but today only things in /usr/ports are used with the pkg_* > utils. ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/packages/ :-) [ For those that

Re: EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE

On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote: > > >> Sorry to bother y'll, but; > > >> > > >> Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel > > >> code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be > > >> gone. > > > > > > It's still used in the s

Re: One more question (different now)

On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > > The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was > > > that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. > > > > Or we should just delete it from the options. > > Ugh.