On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
well, what about exporting a directory w/o exporting a filesystem ?
which is usefull somethimes. possible too ?
Add the directory to exports and HUP mountd. (I think that in the
kernel the exports are at a filesystem level, so
[shifting conversation to -current .. ]
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Anders Andersson wrote:
on Tor, Jun 22, 2000 at 01:46:34pm +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote:
Yes, it has been working quite stably here too. Besides, one must do
a "tunefs -n enable" for every partition that he or she wants
Hi
I cvsup'd last night(wed) and some trouble compiling(buildworld) occured.
cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I- -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/i386-freebs
d -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as/i386-freebsd/../../libbfd/i386 -I/usr/src/g
On Jun 22, 10:30am, Adrian Chadd wrote:
} Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep
}
} [shifting conversation to -current .. ]
}
} On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Anders Andersson wrote:
} on Tor, Jun 22, 2000 at 01:46:34pm +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote:
}
}
I would like to commit the patch below to -current and 4-stable in a
little while. It allows KLDs to be compiled without optimization.
Any objections/comments/anything?
No objections. I fixed this in my version a few hours after it was
broken last September, and removed the inline
On Jun 22, 2:21am, Don Lewis wrote:
} Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep
} On Jun 22, 10:30am, Adrian Chadd wrote:
} } Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep
} }
} } [shifting conversation to -current .. ]
} }
} } On
At 10:30 AM +0200 2000/6/22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I like this. Would anyone object if this was brought over from NetBSD ?
If you're asking for a vote, you've got mine.
--
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:30 AM +0200 2000/6/22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I like this. Would anyone object if this was brought over from NetBSD ?
If you're asking for a vote, you've got mine.
Hmm, Kirk has valid points for leaving a softupdates filesystem
: Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
Not WinModems as such (the USB link is too slow to feed the DSP, but
they do have proprietary protocols).
3COM modems are safe though. They are class compliant.
Nick
usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know. How can you
tell
Thus spake Kevin Day ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
This is probably similar to this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=6187
Not sure. I don't think so.
Alex
--
cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
I've integrated fsck and fsck_ffs into my local world tree, and
make buildworld/installworld seems to work ok. I've shifted the
tarball and diff to http://www.freebsd.org/~adrian/fsck/ . Can
people please prod it and see what I've missed ?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
Adrian Chadd
"Jun" == Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jun Building world failed on my machine... (with USA_RESIDENT=NO)
Jun Does IDEA stuff compiled by default?
See the Mikko's workaround : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-
Éric Jacoboni « No
On 2000-06-22 11:54 +0200, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:30 AM +0200 2000/6/22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I like this. Would anyone object if this was brought over from NetBSD ?
If you're asking for a vote, you've got mine.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:39:55AM +0200, Mikko Tyolajarvi wrote:
Same for me (fresh cvsup)... From the FAQ : "You can try to config
OpenSSL so as not to use IDEA by using './config no-idea'". But i've
no idea (what's a joke...) on how to do that with 'make buildworld'.
Me too. I
Hi again,
Sorry, it was hardware related.
Apologies
/linnet
Stefan Lindgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi,
after the config changes atapi-all.o isn't compiled anymore. Every other
atapi-*/ata-* has a representation in /sys/compile/IDENT/Makefile.
After looking at /sys/conf/files.i386 I'm a little bit confused:
---snip---
dev/ata/ata-all.c count ata
dev/ata/ata-disk.c
Hi,
I'm using the "-F" option of tail for some files which get rotated away.
After the changes to use kqueue/kevent it didn't work as expected
anymore. tail exits after the file gets rotated.
Perhaps it didn't wait long enough to see the new file: I did a "tail
test.txt" in one terminal and a
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:34:47PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Ok, I have put up a web page that will track my efforts.
http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSDSmp/
Your first patchset contains only i386 code.
What is the timeframe for alpha relative to i386?
Will each i386 code step
Adrian Chadd wrote:
[shifting conversation to -current .. ]
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Anders Andersson wrote:
on Tor, Jun 22, 2000 at 01:46:34pm +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote:
Yes, it has been working quite stably here too. Besides, one must do
a "tunefs -n enable" for every
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mike Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did a 'cvsup' of 4.0-RELENG and the soft update links in
/usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs got deleted. Created them again, ran cvsup
again, and they got deleted again. Anyone know what's going on?
I just found out about this
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Julian Elischer wrote:
[snip NetBSD making softupdates a mount option]
They obvioulsly DIDN'T discuss this with Kirk!
this is not what he wants and for good reason..
see the long discussion son this topic in the archives.
I've read the mail archives as to why. If
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 05:25:55PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the "-F" option of tail for some files which get rotated away.
After the changes to use kqueue/kevent it didn't work as expected
anymore. tail exits after the file gets rotated.
Perhaps it didn't wait long
Greg Lehey wrote:
What do people think about adding a -e option to umount(8) to eject a
removable medium where possible?
Yes!
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
[EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes:
: Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back that
addressed the last problem I understood he had.
How can you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes:
: a larger issue. It is not the loader's job to detect the underlying
: hardware configuration.
:
: Actually, in a broad fashion, it _is_. This is why the loader
: understands PCI and PnP, for example.
How hard would it be to add usb
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes:
: As far as the loader is concerned, though, neither of these are on the
: boot path, so we can typically wait until the kernel's up and we can use
: some "real real" drivers. 8)
Well, I have seen boards that support booting off pccard devices...
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes:
: : Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
:
: usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
:
: They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back that
:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Wes Peters wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
What do people think about adding a -e option to umount(8) to eject a
removable medium where possible?
Yes!
For what it's worth, there's a port, ports/sysutils/eject, which is made
to do this. I'm not one to deny a simple
On Thursday, 22 June 2000 at 10:07:38 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:34:47PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Ok, I have put up a web page that will track my efforts.
http://apollo.backplane.com/FreeBSDSmp/
Your first patchset contains only i386 code.
What is
On 2000-Jun-22 15:22:12 -0500, Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a very good idea to enable softupdates by default
when a new filesystem is created. Modify newfs to do this and use
tunefs only if you want to _disable_ softupdates on a filesystem.
My only concern with
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Jeremy write
s:
Whilst the solution to this appears obvious (if you can't allocate a
block, but there are free blocks on the to-be-commited list, wait for
free space to become available), actually implementing it is quite
difficult if you want to avoid
I have a proposed patch to ls that fixes bin/19354 and makes things
more consistent. Comments?
/assar
Index: extern.h
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/ls/extern.h,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -w -r1.13 extern.h
--- extern.h
Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000, Julian Elischer wrote:
[snip NetBSD making softupdates a mount option]
They obvioulsly DIDN'T discuss this with Kirk!
this is not what he wants and for good reason..
see the long discussion son this topic in the archives.
I've read the
Peter Jeremy writes:
On 2000-Jun-22 15:22:12 -0500, Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a very good idea to enable softupdates by default
when a new filesystem is created. Modify newfs to do this and use
tunefs only if you want to _disable_ softupdates on a filesystem.
The softupdates license has changed to 2-clause BSD-style with no
more restrictions on use.
The files were repocopied into their "natural" locations (sys/ufs/ffs)
so that symlinks are no longer required. This has been done retroactively
to all older branches that have the soft updates code.
Hi,
For the last while (several months), whenever I try to build
a RELENG_4 release from my -current box, it fails building gcc.
As -current is supposed to be "fluid" for the next several months,
I wanted to make a set of -current and -stable CDs now.
The current build was fine. To build
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
change. :)
OCVS? (Or was it OVCS? I can never recall...)
--
Daniel C.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Wemm writes
:
Because fsck is supposed to be able to do things more intelligently when it
knows the *previous* mount state, not the current state. ie: if a disk was
last mounted in softupdates mode, fsck is supposed to do stuff differently
(possibly doing as
38 matches
Mail list logo
