Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-26 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: Greg Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'. Why?

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-26 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 26 March 2001 at 18:19:06 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: Greg Lehey wrote: On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: The Portmapper

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-26 Thread Brian Somers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:46:22AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 23:11:56 +, Brian Somers wrote: 1. Ppp is in -auto mode (or a ``set mode auto'' has been done). Here, ppp configures the interface as soon as it sees the ``set ifaddr'' line and

Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2}

2001-03-26 Thread Falco Krepel
I sent a patch request: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25730 -- Falco KrepelPhone: +49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 7 276 GMD-FOKUS Fax:+49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 8 276 Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10589 Berlin

Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2}

2001-03-26 Thread Falco Krepel
I have sent a patch request: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=25730 -- Falco KrepelPhone: +49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 7 276 GMD-FOKUS Fax:+49-(0)30 - 34 63 - 8 276 Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 31 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10589 Berlin

Re: newcard/cardbus instabilities

2001-03-26 Thread Mike Smith
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes: : This looks OK, though you might want to disable the pccard support, since : it's known to be broken right now. pccard support is not broken right now. If there's a "known" issue, I sure don't know about it. Oh, sorry, I'm obviously out

Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2}

2001-03-26 Thread Mike Smith
Hi. I have diskless-PC which was used /boot/pxeboot. But latest FreeBSD-current is output below messages and some fsck_nfs problem. WARNING: MFS is being phased out in preference for md devices WARNING: Please see mdconfig(8) for details WARNING: Continuing in 15 seconds Does

Re: midi causes panic on boot? (update)

2001-03-26 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello Jim, On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:20:04PM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote: I get a slightly different backtrace, but was able to use my palm pilot as the serial console. I have had this same problem for quit a while (about a month). I suspect a locking issue related to Seigo Tanimura's commit on

** HEADS UP **: bsd.man.mk changes

2001-03-26 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed. The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still supported, for backwards compatibility. The plan is to MFC this feature after 4.3 release, and start the deorbit sequence

Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2}

2001-03-26 Thread Falco Krepel
This is a fine solution. I hope it's OK when I add this to my patch request. But I have two remarks. 1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp. This

buildworld dies

2001-03-26 Thread Salvo Bartolotta
Dear FreeBSD'ers with sources as of today, ~ 15:40 GMT (from the dutch mirror), my buildworld dies thus: === sbin/adjkerntz^M cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/sbin/adj kerntz/adjkerntz.c^M cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall

Re: ** HEADS UP **: bsd.man.mk changes

2001-03-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hi! The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed. The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9] syntax is still supported, for backwards compatibility. The plan

Re: ** HEADS UP **: bsd.man.mk changes

2001-03-26 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:28:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hi! The syntax for declaring manual pages has been changed. The manual pages to be installed can now be listed in a single MAN variable. The old MAN[1-9]

NFS over IPv6 is a reason????

2001-03-26 Thread Mike O'Dell
gee - being like SysV is more comprehensible than worrying about IPv6 -mo To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: NFS over IPv6 is a reason????

2001-03-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 04:46:45PM -0500, Mike O'Dell wrote: gee - being like SysV is more comprehensible than worrying about IPv6 Perhaps if you're living in 1994 :-) Kris PGP signature

Re: telnet broken with auto-negotiation of encrypt/decrypt change

2001-03-26 Thread Robert Watson
It's been a couple of days since you sent this e-mail -- did this change get MFC'd as yet, or are we still waiting for approval? Just want to make sure it gets in before the release. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport

Re: ** HEADS UP **: bsd.man.mk changes

2001-03-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Pentchev writes: : I welcome the changes, but don't think the old version should be : removed: third party software uses it, and it would not serve any : purpose to break them. : : I'm definitely with Kris on this one; and I know of at least two other :

Fixing ypbind with TI-RPC

2001-03-26 Thread Bill Paul
Ok. Friday I sat down and tried to make the -m option to ypbind work correctly using the new TI-RPC code. Unfortunately, my test machine chose that day to eat itself. Even more unfortunately, it was an AMD 900Mhz Thunderbird. Today, I started working on another box and managed to get things to

page fault in mpu.c

2001-03-26 Thread Jim Bloom
I finally tracked down the page fault I was seeing while probing the mpu. The mutex was not being initialized before it was used. I have included a patch below which fixes the problem. Will someone please review the style and commit the fix. Thanks. Jim Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: mpu.c

Re: Fixing ypbind with TI-RPC

2001-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 16:05] wrote: Ok. Friday I sat down and tried to make the -m option to ypbind work correctly using the new TI-RPC code. Unfortunately, my test machine chose that day to eat itself. Even more unfortunately, it was an AMD 900Mhz Thunderbird. Today, I

Re: Fixing ypbind with TI-RPC

2001-03-26 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 19:57] wrote: * Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010326 16:05] wrote: Why can't you just enable sigio on the reply socket, send all the requests with a 0 timeout and then wait for a signal to either interrupt the sending or to notify you when you

Re: Whatever happened to CTM?

2001-03-26 Thread Chuck Robey
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote: unfortunatly my provider cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location the ctm machine is located at. At this time I do not know yet when it will have access again. Surely FreeBSD Inc (or whatever it is that owns the

is 'make release' broken?

2001-03-26 Thread Juriy Goloveshkin
Making fixit floppy. disklabel: ioctl DIOCWLABEL: Operation not supported by device Warning: Block size restricts cylinders per group to 6. Warning: 1216 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated /dev/md0c: 2880 sectors in 1 cylinders of 1 tracks, 4096 sectors 1.4MB in 1 cyl groups (6

Re: Whatever happened to CTM?

2001-03-26 Thread Ulf Zimmermann
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:26:34AM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote: unfortunatly my provider cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location the ctm machine is located at. At this time I do not know yet when it will have access

Re: Fixing ypbind with TI-RPC

2001-03-26 Thread Bill Paul
Why can't you just enable sigio on the reply socket, send all the requests with a 0 timeout and then wait for a signal to either interrupt the sending or to notify you when you complete sending? Your solution seems awfully complex for what seems to be a simple problem; doing a

heads up, CAM error recovery changes committed

2001-03-26 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I won't repeat the commit message here, but the new CAM error recovery code has been committed to -current. Note that error printouts are now a little more descriptive, so don't be alarmed at that. If there are any problems with the new code, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], or to [EMAIL

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes: : Play the ball, not the man. : : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for : us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point. I see no reason

Re: newcard/cardbus instabilities

2001-03-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Smith writes: : The problem that Johny was seeing was that 'device pccard' causes broken : interrupt delivery for cardbus cards. If that's meant to work, I can see : if I can reproduce it locally. It is ment to work and works for me on my VAIO all the time.

Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2}

2001-03-26 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Falco Krepel writes: : 1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart : clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to : use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp. This could be done with : a variable (e.g.

Re: use md device in /etc/rc.diskless{1,2}

2001-03-26 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Warner Losh wrote: WLIn message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Falco Krepel writes: WL: 1. For example you could use the diskless boot procedure for smart WL: clients with a small disk used as swap space. So I think it is better to WL: use swap instead of malloc for var,dev, and tmp.