Re: devfs question

2001-10-27 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being non-existant be improved? Barely, because without /dev, how do you plan to open the console ?

Re: devfs question

2001-10-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Silbersack w rites: On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being non-existant be improved? Barely, because without

Re: devfs question

2001-10-27 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: An error message would be sufficient; my concern was that someone might run into this and spend hours trying to figure out which of X variables was the problem. Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init die and have

Re: -CURRENT freeze under high load

2001-10-27 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:30:47PM +0100, David Malone wrote: Anyway, both ways I can trigger the bug (find . -type f | xargs mutt, and actually running fetchmail -a) do generate a LOT of work, so it's actually possible that your diagnosis (mbuf exhaustion) is correct; trouble is, this

XFmail and libc.so.3

2001-10-27 Thread Riccardo Torrini
To upgrade from xfree-3 to xfree-4 I removed all my installed ports but I lost mail program (I use XFMail, sorry for this :-) It compile and install fine but crashes with this message: The application crashed due to fatal error All unfinished messages were saved _: Report the bug with all the

Re: -CURRENT freeze under high load

2001-10-27 Thread David Malone
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote: Anybody has any idea how to properly fix? Can you test the following patch? David. Index: uipc_usrreq.c === RCS file:

kernel panic in getnewvnode

2001-10-27 Thread Steve Kargl
Kernel is from 20 Oct 2001 sources. I was running cvsup grabbing the latest sources into a clean /usr/src directory. Softupdate were enabled and vfs.vmiodirenable=1. -- Steve GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public

hmm... (fwd)

2001-10-27 Thread Matthew Jacob
Actually- not alpha. Happened under i386, so it seems like it might be more related to the general console changes.. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 16:43:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jonathan Lemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL

Re: device.hints PCI detection conflict

2001-10-27 Thread Nickolay Dudorov
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bootverbose shows that second copy of devices appearse on ASUS CUSL2-C or TUSL2-C: atkbdc-: atkbdc0 already exists, using atkbdc1 instead sc-: sc0 already exists, using sc1 instead vga-: vga0 already exists, using

Re: devfs question

2001-10-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:32:07 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init die and have the kernel print the message. /sbin/init cannot print the message when there is no /dev/console can it ? Yes, it can, if the kernel

Re: devfs question

2001-10-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Garrett Wollman w rites: On Sat, 27 Oct 2001 11:32:07 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Right, but the only way to get an error message is to let /sbin/init die and have the kernel print the message. /sbin/init cannot print the message when there

Re: device.hints PCI detection conflict

2001-10-27 Thread
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:14:13 +0600, Nickolay Dudorov wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bootverbose shows that second copy of devices appearse on ASUS CUSL2-C or TUSL2-C: atkbdc-: atkbdc0 already exists, using atkbdc1 instead sc-: sc0

device.hints PCI detection conflict

2001-10-27 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Bootverbose shows that second copy of devices appearse on ASUS CUSL2-C or TUSL2-C: atkbdc-: atkbdc0 already exists, using atkbdc1 instead sc-: sc0 already exists, using sc1 instead vga-: vga0 already exists, using vga1 instead vga-: line is especially dangerous since cause fake second VGA

adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Hi, how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR. Index: bsd.cpu.mk === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk,v retrieving revision 1.2.2.4 diff -u

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Jerry A!
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:00:44PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: : Hi, : : how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp : processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR. Shouldn't Athlons and AthlonXPs be able to use i686 (pentiumpro) instruction set optimizations?

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 04:23:13PM -0400, Jerry A! wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:00:44PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: : Hi, : : how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp : processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR. Shouldn't Athlons and AthlonXPs be

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Peter Wemm
Jerry A! wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:00:44PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: : Hi, : : how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp : processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR. Shouldn't Athlons and AthlonXPs be able to use i686 (pentiumpro)

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Greg Childers
Shouldn't Athlons and AthlonXPs be able to use i686 (pentiumpro) instruction set optimizations? No. They are different cpu cores that have different optimization strategies. Yes, all Athlons can use i686 code while the k6's can't. Further, without doing any scientific testing, I would

Re: adding athlon xp to bsd.cpu.mk

2001-10-27 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 02:30:40 +0200 (CEST), Cyrille Lefevre wrote: Peter Wemm wrote: Jerry A! wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 10:00:44PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: : Hi, : : how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp : processor type ? if needed, I