On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:48:26PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
This would help removing the ugly property that priority-based
have, which is that one process can starve the rest of the system.
Only broken priority-based schedulers have that
Apparently, On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:48:26PM +1100,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Don't know how interesting this can be, but i am writing
(no plans to commit it, unless people find it interesting)
some code to implement a
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Julian Stacey wrote:
I can only hope that our illustrious congress has grown as tired of
spam as I have and will fix the law to simply ban it.
-Matt
That would help, (most SPAM I receive even in Germany is from
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
On 21-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
the original priority should be somewhere and accessible,
either directly or through some function. Otherwise how
do we know what to pass to tsleep() ?
It's whatever the
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:54:16AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
MEXTFREE results in a call to _mext_free() which is only defined within
subr_mbuf.c, and is not static. Should the prototype be moved into
sys/mbuf.h, or should MEXTFREE be moved into subr_mbuf.c, or is it ok
like this?
It
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:48:26PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
Most of the changes here are to fix style bugs. In the NEW_SCHED case,
the relative weights for each priority are determined by the niceweights[]
table. kg-kg_estcpu is limited only by
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Bosko Milekic wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:54:16AM -0700, Chad David wrote:
MEXTFREE results in a call to _mext_free() which is only defined within
subr_mbuf.c, and is not static. Should the prototype be moved into
sys/mbuf.h, or should MEXTFREE be moved into
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Jake Burkholder wrote:
Apparently, On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:48:26PM +1100,
Bruce Evans said words to the effect of;
Index: kern_synch.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c,v
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 08:43:49 +0200 (SAT)
John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 13-Dec-2001 Mike Heffner wrote:
| mikeh 2001/12/13 15:46:45 PST
jhay ...
| Log:
| Connect lukemftp to the build as the default ftp client. Lukemftp
| supports most of the previous features of
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I'm starting to get spam since I joined this list, and the spam is
:coming from freebsd.org. If I'm reading the headers right, it's coming
:in through a freebsd.org mail server.
Ha. In the last two weeks the amount of personal spam I receive
install -C -c -m 644 -o root -g wheel tr_TR.ISO8859-9.out /usr/share/locale/tr_
TR.ISO8859-9/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES
install -C -c -m 644 -o root -g wheel uk_UA.ISO8859-5.out /usr/share/locale/uk_
UA.ISO8859-5/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES
install:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 09:32:53AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
UA.ISO8859-5/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES
install: /usr/share/locale/uk_UA.ISO8859-5/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES: \
No such
file or directory
*** Error code 71
Stop in /usr/src/share/msgdef.
*** Error code 1
Stop in
I would suggest that we use a 'modified' subscription method,
where simply being mentionned in the list is enough to subscribe..
Now, before you laugh.. there's a twist..
any address found in the archives is automatically subscribed
and that includes in the text.. also any mail not subscribed it
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
I would suggest that we use a 'modified' subscription method,
where simply being mentionned in the list is enough to subscribe..
Now, before you laugh.. there's a twist..
any address found in the archives is automatically subscribed
and that
Title: dvd-ad
Wish You Could Copy DVD
Movies?
Now
You Can!
Click
Here For Details
===REMOVE ME
15 matches
Mail list logo