mergemaster is needed to update your /etc files. Vauge hints of this
can be found in the updating file:
20010918:
Peter has committed his new kthread nfs client/server code.
NFS may be unstable after this date.
20010319:
portmap had changed name to rpcbind for maximum
I haven't read POSIX yet, but mktime() fails on the boundary condition
blackholes when timezones change. I just filed a patch for the
PostgreSQL port so that it deals with this problem.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=36954
I believe that Linux and SunOS handle this automatically
On Tuesday, 9 April 2002 at 22:56:33 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:04:34PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
Since a recent upgrade to one of my development systems, I can't use
nfsd. I've completely reinstalled /etc, set all appropriate knobs in
rc.conf. rpcbind
Howdy,
I'd just like to thank the FreeBSD team for an outstanding job.
I've got a FreeBSD-current system in production running an Intranet that has
just exceeded one year's uptime. Admittedly, the snapshot I built was
30/10/2000, but it does go to show that current can indeed be used for
On 9 Apr, aaron wrote:
Hmmm... BTW I would be very interested how icc compares to gcc32.
Seems both have code to optimize for MMX, SSE, and the nice vector stuff
in recent i386 processors.
Feel free to send results. :-)
This might not be such an issue with the kernel but I thouhgt it
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
*/
#if
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
*/
#if __GNUC__ = 2
typedef
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:06:19 -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
Right, sorry. There was some minimal discussion about this on arch quite
a while ago. Basically, it allows namei to return leafs locked with
shared locks instead of exclusive locks when a flag is set.
This not only reduces
On 10 Apr, Bruce Evans wrote:
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
* both compilers.
Is this still valid? Does someone really use gcc 1 to compile FreeBSD?
This
On 10 Apr, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
quad.h contains:
---snip---
/*
* XXX
* Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument
* as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use
Hi,
I've cc'd -standards as I think this would be of interest there.
IMHO the SQL code you quote in the PR should fail with an ``invalid
time'' error.
Personally I like the fact that mktime() returns -1 - it allows
date's -v option to act sanely, although I must admit it was a PITA
to get
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
As for other occourences of the use of __GNUC__ without a check if it is
defined: I will wrap them as soon as I review my own patches again.
Other occurrences are mostly correct. __GNUC__ is 0 in cpp expressions
if it is used without it being
[please trim current from the CC list on reply]
IMHO the SQL code you quote in the PR should fail with an ``invalid
time'' error.
There's some truth to that... but Apr 7th 2am -8:00 isn't an invalid
datetime. It isn't correct, Apr 7th 3am -7:00 is the correct time,
but they're identical
$B!!FMA3$N%a!<%k$NG[?.?<$/$*OM$S?=$7>e$2$^$9!#(B
$B!!$3$l$O(BWEB$B>e$K%"%I%l%9$r8x3+$5$l$F$$$kJ}$rBP>]$KG[?.$7$F$$$k9-9p(B
$B!!%a!<%k$G$9!#:#8e0l@Z$N%a!<%kG[?.ITMW$NJ}$O$3$N%a!<%k$r$=$N$^$^(B
$B!!$4JV?.$/$@$5$$!#(B
$B!!7G<(HD$KEj9F$9$k$h$j8z2LE*$G$9!*(B
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]:/usr/home/lofi sftp [user]@[host]
Connecting to [host]...
[user]@[host]'s password:
sftp get nonexistentfile
Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
--- snip
Anyone else seeing this? Yesterday's current with base-system
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:26:19PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]:/usr/home/lofi sftp [user]@[host]
Connecting to [host]...
[user]@[host]'s password:
sftp get nonexistentfile
Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
A good place for this to be documented is the NAMEI OPERATION FLAGS
section of the namei(9) manual page.
I don't believe this option will exist long enought for it to need to be
documented. Jeff changed the default, but left the
System Administrator wrote:
Your message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug in m_split() ?
Sent:Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:16 -0700
did not reach the following recipient(s):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:21 -0700
The e-mail system was
In giving the iso 5.0-DP1 a try I ran into the following. I have a
clean and was wanting to create a simple trust between two systems
using rsh and /.rhosts authentication (yea, i know rsh is bad but our
silly software can run over ssh yet). So, I did the usual steps:
created /root/.rhosts
Do you own a Harley? Do the Mosh Pit? You definitely like riding the edge of
insanity...
-current is always in a state of flux... I say you lucked out...
FreeBSD is killer stuff, but, I personally wouldn't risk a job on the odds of getting
a stable -current when I needed one...
Chris
Howdy,
I would have lucked out if it wasn't reliable :-)
If you do all the right things, such as follow the commit logs and test,
test, test, you can get a snapshot of current that will prove reliable for a
certain number of tasks. It had three months of testing before going into
production, so
21 matches
Mail list logo