Re: What's with NFS?

2002-04-10 Thread M. Warner Losh
mergemaster is needed to update your /etc files. Vauge hints of this can be found in the updating file: 20010918: Peter has committed his new kthread nfs client/server code. NFS may be unstable after this date. 20010319: portmap had changed name to rpcbind for maximum

mktime() doesn't fix deadzones...

2002-04-10 Thread Sean Chittenden
I haven't read POSIX yet, but mktime() fails on the boundary condition blackholes when timezones change. I just filed a patch for the PostgreSQL port so that it deals with this problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=36954 I believe that Linux and SunOS handle this automatically

Re: What's with NFS?

2002-04-10 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Tuesday, 9 April 2002 at 22:56:33 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 07:04:34PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: Since a recent upgrade to one of my development systems, I can't use nfsd. I've completely reinstalled /etc, set all appropriate knobs in rc.conf. rpcbind

Current in Production

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Knight
Howdy, I'd just like to thank the FreeBSD team for an outstanding job. I've got a FreeBSD-current system in production running an Intranet that has just exceeded one year's uptime. Admittedly, the snapshot I built was 30/10/2000, but it does go to show that current can indeed be used for

Re: compiling the kernel (LINT) with icc, open problem

2002-04-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 9 Apr, aaron wrote: Hmmm... BTW I would be very interested how icc compares to gcc32. Seems both have code to optimize for MMX, SSE, and the nice vector stuff in recent i386 processors. Feel free to send results. :-) This might not be such an issue with the kernel but I thouhgt it

Re: libkern/quad.h

2002-04-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: quad.h contains: ---snip--- /* * XXX * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use * both compilers. */ #if

Re: libkern/quad.h

2002-04-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote: quad.h contains: ---snip--- /* * XXX * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use * both compilers. */ #if __GNUC__ = 2 typedef

Re: LOOKUP_SHARED is default now

2002-04-10 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:06:19 -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote: Right, sorry. There was some minimal discussion about this on arch quite a while ago. Basically, it allows namei to return leafs locked with shared locks instead of exclusive locks when a flag is set. This not only reduces

Re: libkern/quad.h

2002-04-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 10 Apr, Bruce Evans wrote: * XXX * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use * both compilers. Is this still valid? Does someone really use gcc 1 to compile FreeBSD? This

Re: libkern/quad.h

2002-04-10 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 10 Apr, David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: quad.h contains: ---snip--- /* * XXX * Compensate for gcc 1 vs gcc 2. Gcc 1 defines ?sh?di3's second argument * as u_quad_t, while gcc 2 correctly uses int. Unfortunately, we still use

Re: mktime() doesn't fix deadzones...

2002-04-10 Thread Brian Somers
Hi, I've cc'd -standards as I think this would be of interest there. IMHO the SQL code you quote in the PR should fail with an ``invalid time'' error. Personally I like the fact that mktime() returns -1 - it allows date's -v option to act sanely, although I must admit it was a PITA to get

Re: libkern/quad.h

2002-04-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote: As for other occourences of the use of __GNUC__ without a check if it is defined: I will wrap them as soon as I review my own patches again. Other occurrences are mostly correct. __GNUC__ is 0 in cpp expressions if it is used without it being

Re: mktime() doesn't fix deadzones...

2002-04-10 Thread Sean Chittenden
[please trim current from the CC list on reply] IMHO the SQL code you quote in the PR should fail with an ``invalid time'' error. There's some truth to that... but Apr 7th 2am -8:00 isn't an invalid datetime. It isn't correct, Apr 7th 3am -7:00 is the correct time, but they're identical

$B!*9-9p!*!!3FpJsDs6!$N$40FFb(B

2002-04-10 Thread $B%o%s%@!<%i%$%U(B
$B!!FMA3$N%a!<%k$NG[?.?<$/$*OM$S?=$7>e$2$^$9!#(B $B!!$3$l$O(BWEB$B>e$K%"%I%l%9$r8x3+$5$l$F$$$kJ}$rBP>]$KG[?.$7$F$$$k9-9p(B $B!!%a!<%k$G$9!#:#8e0l@Z$N%a!<%kG[?.ITMW$NJ}$O$3$N%a!<%k$r$=$N$^$^(B $B!!$4JV?.$/$@$5$$!#(B $B!!7G<(HD$KEj9F$9$k$h$j8z2LE*$G$9!*(B

sftp troubles

2002-04-10 Thread Michael Nottebrock
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]:/usr/home/lofi sftp [user]@[host] Connecting to [host]... [user]@[host]'s password: sftp get nonexistentfile Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory Segmentation fault (core dumped) --- snip Anyone else seeing this? Yesterday's current with base-system

Re: sftp troubles

2002-04-10 Thread zhuravlev alexander
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:26:19PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]:/usr/home/lofi sftp [user]@[host] Connecting to [host]... [user]@[host]'s password: sftp get nonexistentfile Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Re: LOOKUP_SHARED is default now

2002-04-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:00:13PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: A good place for this to be documented is the NAMEI OPERATION FLAGS section of the namei(9) manual page. I don't believe this option will exist long enought for it to need to be documented. Jeff changed the default, but left the

Bug in m_split() ?

2002-04-10 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
System Administrator wrote: Your message To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bug in m_split() ? Sent:Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:16 -0700 did not reach the following recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:23:21 -0700 The e-mail system was

rshd on 5.0-DP1

2002-04-10 Thread Orrie
In giving the iso 5.0-DP1 a try I ran into the following. I have a clean and was wanting to create a simple trust between two systems using rsh and /.rhosts authentication (yea, i know rsh is bad but our silly software can run over ssh yet). So, I did the usual steps: created /root/.rhosts

Re: Current in Production

2002-04-10 Thread Jim Bryant
Do you own a Harley? Do the Mosh Pit? You definitely like riding the edge of insanity... -current is always in a state of flux... I say you lucked out... FreeBSD is killer stuff, but, I personally wouldn't risk a job on the odds of getting a stable -current when I needed one... Chris

RE: Current in Production

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Knight
Howdy, I would have lucked out if it wasn't reliable :-) If you do all the right things, such as follow the commit logs and test, test, test, you can get a snapshot of current that will prove reliable for a certain number of tasks. It had three months of testing before going into production, so