Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Bakul Shah
Until pppd is taught to create the interface if one doesn't exist, this information needs to be in /usr/src/UPDATING. pppd doesn't need to be taught to create the interface. Rather it needed to learn to check for ppp support in a non-stupid way. The following patch should do it as well

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:16:32PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: Until pppd is taught to create the interface if one doesn't exist, this information needs to be in /usr/src/UPDATING. pppd doesn't need to be taught to create the interface. Rather it needed to learn to check for ppp support

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:43:57PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: It's a moderately common case in -CURRENT, when kernel structure sizes change, and you build a new kernel without new modules, and a module refuses to load. It's not technically correct. The old message might not be either, but

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: -- stage 4: building everything.. -- === share/doc/usd/13.viref out of memory *** Error code 255 This is because the kernel was old on beast

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:43:57PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: It's a moderately common case in -CURRENT, when kernel structure sizes change, and you build a new kernel without new modules, and a module refuses to load. It's not technically correct. The old message

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:35:22PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: If someone who actually uses pppd could test it, perferably in both sceneios, I'll see about getting it commited. Here's a new patch that gives the user more of a hint at how to add PPP support and only loads the module if they are

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:35:22PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: If someone who actually uses pppd could test it, perferably in both sceneios, I'll see about getting it commited. Here's a new patch that gives the user more of a hint at how to add PPP support and only

Re: Installing from CD and MAKEDEV

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jun Kuriyama writes: At Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:10:53 + (UTC), kuriyama wrote: I've created install CD with make iso.1 (with sources few hours before). I'm trying to install fresh current box with this

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Bakul Shah
Here's a new patch that gives the user more of a hint at how to add PPP support and only loads the module if they are actully root. How's this look? I still don't like it. How to explain I don't think it is pppd's responsibility to muck with modules. It is like mount kldloading a disk

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 05:34:15PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: Here's a new patch that gives the user more of a hint at how to add PPP support and only loads the module if they are actully root. How's this look? I still don't like it. How to explain I don't think it is pppd's

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: This isn't going to have an effect on the ability to use kernel ppp for other things. The tty orientation of pppd and the outdated, unmodular design on ppp(4) have taken care of that. This patch gives people the functionality they want (pppd just working) without any

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:05:57PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: This isn't going to have an effect on the ability to use kernel ppp for other things. The tty orientation of pppd and the outdated, unmodular design on ppp(4) have taken care of that. This patch gives

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:20:33PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 07:05:57PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Depending on the value of sysctl kern.module_path, if the if_ppp module does not exist, and one of the path components is writeable, then this would permit you to

Local DNS lookup by sshd?

2002-10-25 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, When logging into a current 5.0 system via ssh, I see the following written to the system console (the 'xxx's are my whiteout): ... kernel: Connection attempt to UDP xxx.58.184.35:53 from xxx.58.184.35:49253 ... kernel: Connection attempt to UDP xxx.58.184.35:53 from xxx.58.184.35:49254

Re: Local DNS lookup by sshd?

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Wemm
John De Boskey wrote: Hi, When logging into a current 5.0 system via ssh, I see the following written to the system console (the 'xxx's are my whiteout): ... kernel: Connection attempt to UDP xxx.58.184.35:53 from xxx.58.184.35:492 53 ... kernel: Connection attempt to UDP

RE: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
From: Terry Lambert [mailto:tlambert2;mindspring.com] Brooks Davis wrote: This isn't going to have an effect on the ability to use kernel ppp for other things. The tty orientation of pppd and the outdated, unmodular design on ppp(4) have taken care of that. This patch gives people

For the painfully shy 13729

2002-10-25 Thread I like this really ! i265MEJR1gLsABWX
ARE YOU TOO SHY TO PICK UP THE PHONE? I was, but the big recruiters were ALWAYS on the phone. NOT FOR ME! As a result, big downlines were always out of my reach. But I found something FREE where I joined and sat back and watched 26 people join my downline before I did ANYTHING-in less than

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Bakul Shah
Brooks Davis wrote: This isn't going to have an effect on the ability to use kernel ppp for other things. The tty orientation of pppd and the outdated, unmodular design on ppp(4) have taken care of that. This patch gives people the functionality they want (pppd just working) without any

5.0 disklabel warnings against 4.7 disk

2002-10-25 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, I've (re)scanned my -current folder for issues related to the following but didn't see a good match. Pointing out my blindness is allowed if this was discussed... I have a system onto which I installed a 4.7-RC a couple of weeks ago. I then upgraded that newly installed system to

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

/usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290

2002-10-25 Thread Sean Kelly
When booting my system, I get the following after samba-2.2.6 starts: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: inp 1st inp @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290 2nd inp @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290 This is with a kernel from Fri Oct 25 23:27:50 CDT 2002 (about an hour ago). it looks

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-25 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 14:15, John Baldwin wrote: Well, here's the thing. If libgtop is intended to be used only with live kernels then it might be a better idea to use xvnode's that you get with from the kernel. Alternatively, you could grab the inode and dev number the same way the sysctl

Re: /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290

2002-10-25 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Sean Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-25 ] [ Subjecte: /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290 ] When booting my system, I get the following after samba-2.2.6 starts: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: inp 1st inp @ /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:290 2nd inp @

Re: is src/UPDATING up to date

2002-10-25 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2002-10-25 07:28 +, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Hi I was twiddling with my yesterday's current, I was trying to make release to see how things were going, and I saw at the top of UPDATING that : In addition, IDE write caching is currently disabled by default due to

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Loren James Rittle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Yet, the FP hardware is actually configured by default to provide : `long double' as: : : #define LDBL_MANT_DIG 53 : #define LDBL_MIN_EXP(-16381) : #define LDBL_MAX_EXP16384 : : Indeed, FP code

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-25 Thread Nate Lawson
On 24 Oct 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: I committed my patch to libgtop and libgtop2 a while ago. It should work on both -CURRENT, not so -CURRENT, and -stable. Checkout patch-ah in libgtop/files. Works like a champ on -CURRENT from Monday. Thanks for taking care of that. -Nate To

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Gerhard H=E4ring wrote: : : make installworld dumps core at installing passwd (4.5-RELEASE). : : : Brooks Davis: : : Are you running a current kernel at this point?

Re: Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-25 Thread Julian Elischer
yep that fixes it.. On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Try backing out phk's src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c 1.416 Does that help? Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Anyways, two questions for FreeBSD maintainers. How should gcc, as : : provided from the FSF, describe the long double FP format for : : FreeBSD/i386 4.x? Shall we assume that no changes for FreeBSD 5.x : :

gcc 3.2.1 optimization bug with BitchX

2002-10-25 Thread drogoh
I know I should be posting this to the gcc people or ports list, but so far all I and the current BitchX coder (nuke) have seen this on is -CURRENT. quoted from an e-mail with nuke: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0804b0f1 in aliascmd (command=0x813ebc8 0,

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Mike Barcroft writes: stage 4: building everything.. -- === usr.sbin/pkg_install/info cc1: warnings being treated as errors

how2 enable pppd support on current

2002-10-25 Thread suken woo
at title: best regards To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Installing from CD and MAKEDEV

2002-10-25 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:10:53 + (UTC), kuriyama wrote: I've created install CD with make iso.1 (with sources few hours before). I'm trying to install fresh current box with this CD. But I got MAKEDEV returned non-zero status dialog after extracting dists. It seems cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV

Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Please try the rev 1.418 of vfs_subr.c db tr v_incr_usecount(c1d76cb8,,c037b472,863,cc34a92c) at v_incr_usecount+0x48vrele(c1d76cb8,c1c90a00,c036cc7a,6,100) at vrele+0xb0 addaliasu(c1d76cb8,402,c1cb6200,cc34a9c0,c1d73b00) at addaliasu+0x1ad

Re: mi_switch deadlock?

2002-10-25 Thread Lamont Granquist
okay, any idea what i'm looking for then? something is locking the whole system up... On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote: my -current box keeps freezing about every 24h. i broke into the kernel and forced a panic and found lots of

Re: Installing from CD and MAKEDEV

2002-10-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jun Kuriyama writes: At Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:10:53 + (UTC), kuriyama wrote: I've created install CD with make iso.1 (with sources few hours before). I'm trying to install fresh current box with this CD. But I got MAKEDEV returned non-zero status dialog after

Re: how2 enable pppd support on current

2002-10-25 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Fri, 25.10.2002, × 11:32, suken woo ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: at title: best regards assuming you have /boot/kernel/if_ppp.ko or compiled in ppp interface. # ifconfig ppp0 create To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message -- Vladimir B.

Re: Lack of real long double support (was Re: libstdc++ does notcontain fabsl symbol)

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Loren James Rittle wrote: ... Anyways, that work exposed some issues. ... It is easy to generate, with arithmetic, a long double value outside the *exponent* range above no matter how the precision is set; it is not truncated to Inf until it is actually cast to a

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Wesley Morgan: I just finished a build of mozilla-devel, and the fonts look just as gorgeous as they do in Konqueror. If anyone is having problems with these What's in your font path ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD

Re: Lack of real long double support

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Loren James Rittle wrote: : : ... Anyways, that work exposed some issues. : : We have this in the system header: : : #define

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Terry Lambert: This looks similar to a well known problem that could occur with nominally proportional spacing fonts in X programs that incorrectly assumed monospacing for characters, and also on nominally fixed I just made an experience. I logged in on my STABLE machine coming

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Adam Weinberger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It was brought to my attention today by erk! that the way to solve the problem is to remove the mozilla-fonts package. It worked for me... I'm investigating why this is so. - -Adam - -- Adam Weinberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

could sleep with pcm0:play:1 locked

2002-10-25 Thread Sean Kelly
I'm running 5.0-CURRENT from about 15 minutes ago. I'm running with snd_emu10k1.ko and snd_pcm.ko loaded from loader.conf. When I attempt to do anything with audio, I get counld sleep messages. edgemaster# head -1 /dev/audio ^C edgemaster# dmesg|tail -1 /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1311: could

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Ollivier Robert wrote: According to Terry Lambert: This looks similar to a well known problem that could occur with nominally proportional spacing fonts in X programs that incorrectly assumed monospacing for characters, and also on nominally fixed I just made an experience. I logged in

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Adam Weinberger: It was brought to my attention today by erk! that the way to solve the problem is to remove the mozilla-fonts package. It worked for me... I'm investigating why this is so. Works for me too. Thanks a lot ! -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=-

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-25 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:53:38PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: peter@ has been working busily in a Perforce branch to fix a lot of crap and it's by no means a small amount of work that he's done so far, especially taking into account the amount of testing and debugging he seems to be doing.

Re: Floating point problems

2002-10-25 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-24 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Floating point problems ] Thanks. This makes the main bug clear. The PCB_NPXINITDONE bit in the state was not being restored. This was confusing to debug because gdb doesn't understand this bug so it shows the

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Floating point problems

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Edwards
I can also confirm that my X server has been rock solid since applying the patch. I think Bruce deserves a lollipop. Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * De: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-24 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Floating point problems ] Thanks. This makes the main

5.0-20021025-CURRENT snapshot

2002-10-25 Thread John De Boskey
This will be the last post on this topic. A new 5.0-20021025-CURRENT snapshot is available via anonymous ftp at usw2.freebsd.org: /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20021025-CURRENT New snaps will appear each day if the build completes without errors. Enjoy! John To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: === share/doc/usd/13.viref out of memory *** Error code 255 Can you update the kernel and rtld on this machine as indicated in UPDATING? Otherwise, we'll see this same failure forever. Also, is there any way I can talk you out of building LINT on alpha in

Re: Installing from CD and MAKEDEV

2002-10-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jun Kuriyama writes: At Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:10:53 + (UTC), kuriyama wrote: I've created install CD with make iso.1 (with sources few hours before). I'm trying to install fresh current box with this CD. But I got MAKEDEV returned non-zero status dialog after

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-25 Thread John Baldwin
On 25-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:13, Nate Lawson wrote: On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current? This is the patch I used to get it building the other day: cat

Re: Floating point problems

2002-10-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 03:43:03 -0700 Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, this fixes every reproducable hang I've had with X and related. AOL Bye, Alexander. -- The dark ages were caused by the Y1K problem. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Matt Loschert
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Ollivier Robert wrote: According to Adam Weinberger: It was brought to my attention today by erk! that the way to solve the problem is to remove the mozilla-fonts package. It worked for me... I'm investigating why this is so. Works for me too. Thanks a lot ! --

Re: mozilla-devel problems

2002-10-25 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Matt Loschert: Me too. Thanks! The CURRENT machine I've tested is rather old, world/kernel is from Sep. 18th. On an October, 20th CURRENT machine, mozilla just segfaults. During its reading of all fonts available, it get a segv... Any idea ? ...

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-25 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: It does?! v_tag is a pointer to kernel memory, you can't read that from userland! You would get a SIGSEGV and die as soon as you do the 'strcmp()'. That's why I #ifdef'd the whole chunk out. Also,

Re: libgtop port and v_tag changes

2002-10-25 Thread John Baldwin
On 25-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: On 25-Oct-2002 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 19:13, Nate Lawson wrote: On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: Speaking of v_tag, can you fix the devel/libgtop port on current? This

pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Dave Evans
Is anyone using pppd on CURRENT. somewhere between may and October it seems to have broken. My KERNEL is GENERIC, my sources are dated cvs -D2002-10-20, but I now get a message about needing facilities in the kernel. However, the kernel has many ppp entry points, I haven't modified GENERIC which

Re: df problems ?

2002-10-25 Thread Dave Evans
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: Alexey Zelkin wrote: Folks, I have dual boot machine with -STABLE and -CURRENT (both have own boot slices and few slices are shared between them.) I don't know all the details, but -CURRENT recently changed the way information is recorded in the

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 06:15:55PM +, Dave Evans wrote: Is anyone using pppd on CURRENT. somewhere between may and October it seems to have broken. My KERNEL is GENERIC, my sources are dated cvs -D2002-10-20, but I now get a message about needing facilities in the kernel. However, the

Re: kernel broken? (devfs maybe?)

2002-10-25 Thread Julian Elischer
that fixes it.. thanks On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Please try the rev 1.418 of vfs_subr.c db tr v_incr_usecount(c1d76cb8,,c037b472,863,cc34a92c) at v_incr_usecount+0x48vrele(c1d76cb8,c1c90a00,c036cc7a,6,100) at vrele+0xb0

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Bakul Shah
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 06:15:55PM +, Dave Evans wrote: Is anyone using pppd on CURRENT. somewhere between may and October it seems to have broken. My KERNEL is GENERIC, my sources are dated cvs -D2002-10-20, but I now get a message about needing facilities in the kernel. However,

Re: ACPI errors and then panic

2002-10-25 Thread Nate Lawson
Thank you for the reply. On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: Hi, # ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem. Ok, I didn't know that. From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACPI errors and then panic Date:

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:41:33AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: Until pppd is taught to create the interface if one doesn't exist, this information needs to be in /usr/src/UPDATING. pppd doesn't need to be taught to create the interface. Rather it needed to learn to check for ppp support in a

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Bakul Shah wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 06:15:55PM +, Dave Evans wrote: Is anyone using pppd on CURRENT. somewhere between may and October it seems to have broken. My KERNEL is GENERIC, my sources are dated cvs -D2002-10-20, but I now get a message about

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-10-25 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

HEADS UP: you need to install a new kernel before an installworld.

2002-10-25 Thread Peter Wemm
Due to sigaction(2) syscall number changes, doing a 'make installworld' without having booted a new kernel would be rather messy. For example, if you tried to reboot with the old kernel, /sbin/init and /bin/sh would get a signal and abort. That would be bad. I've added an anti-foot-shooting

Re: Coredump from pkg_add + analysis

2002-10-25 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Nate Lawson wrote: There's a bit of a layering problem with the ftp/fetch semantics. _fetch_close() is used to shutdown the connection (and handles reference counting but the connection caching is done at the ftp layer. Either the connection cache should be moved to the

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: pppd doesn't need to be taught to create the interface. Rather it needed to learn to check for ppp support in a non-stupid way. The following patch should do it as well as making pppd do the right thing when support isn't compiled in, but a module is available. It should

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:58:57PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: pppd doesn't need to be taught to create the interface. Rather it needed to learn to check for ppp support in a non-stupid way. The following patch should do it as well as making pppd do the right thing

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:41:33AM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: Until pppd is taught to create the interface if one doesn't exist, this information needs to be in /usr/src/UPDATING. pppd doesn't need to be taught to create the interface. Rather it

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Brooks Davis wrote: If someone who actually uses pppd could test it, perferably in both sceneios, I'll see about getting it commited. Try running you program when the module is there, but fails to load. You got rid of the failure message that it used to print. No, it just let the

Re: pppd not working on latest current 2002-10-20

2002-10-25 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: patch should do it as well as making pppd do the right thing when support isn't compiled in, but a module is available. It should make things work with a GENERIC kernel. I disagree with auto-loading of modules for anything, but especially in setuid programs like pppd.