sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-11-08 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Upgrade of port audio/id3lib - stdc++ wchar support missing

2002-11-08 Thread Jens Rehsack
David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote: You could try the patch I've attached: cd /usr/src zcat c++-wchar.diff.gz | patch cd gnu/lib/libstdc++ make make install Can you ask Kris to try this on the ports cluster before we commit it? I wonder how many

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Mark Murray
IMVHO, the perl wrapper should be removed altogether, and the perl port's use.port symlink-creating feature should be used instead. M Can someone explain why the perl wrapper needs to be hardlinked to perl5.6.1? The problem I am seeing is this: USE_PERL5=yes in a port adds the following

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-08 Thread Sid Carter
On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:29:43 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Mitsuru Thanks Mitsuru Index: machdep.c Mitsuru === Mitsuru RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/machdep.c,v Mitsuru

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Doug Rabson
On Thursday 07 November 2002 9:42 pm, Tim Kientzle wrote: Terry Lambert asked: Any chance we could get rid of all externally visable symbols that are not defined as being there by some standard, and not just __sF, since we are breaking the FORTRAN compiler and other third party code

Deadlock during buildworld

2002-11-08 Thread Andrea Campi
Hi all, for months now I've been having a reproducible hang under load (make -j4 buildworld on a uniprocessor with plenty of RAM). I transcribed some info which might be useful to debug it; it seems to me this is a deadlock (am I right?). I'll leave the laptop in ddb so I can provide more info.

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 05:02:14PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Horen wrote: You stated Typing blind starts X again. Can you tell us what you mean by this? o It restarts X, as if you typed startx Exactly that. The problem is clearly in the X11 code, then, since it is not

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: That revision doesn't change the structure, just how it is defined, so binary compatibility is not an issue. As for source compatibility, just use the DBREG_DRX macro, which exists in both -STABLE and -CURRENT (it was merged

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote: As for source compatibility, just use the DBREG_DRX macro, which exists in both -STABLE and -CURRENT (it was merged into -STABLE two years ago). It's too bad source compatibility hasn't been preserved. Indeed. Argument d is not properly

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Horen wrote: On FreeBSD 4.6 or 4.7 works, on FreeBSD 5.0 it doesn't work. Don't you think it is OS related. ? I even installed Linux RedHat 8.0 ( gcc 3.2x ) code. It works. Only on FreeBSD 5,0 , it doesn't work. Install X from FreeBSD 4.6 or 4.7 on FreeBSD 5.0... plain enough? -- Terry To

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Ray Kohler
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 02:45:04 2002 Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:39:35 -0700 (MST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Doug Rabson wrote: It _would_ be a good idea to document any internal library symbols used by macros. Removing such symbols is a good way to break existing compiled applications. Library design involves a lot of tradeoffs. In the windows world, all this is handled by having a strict

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Ray Kohler
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 04:15:04 2002 To: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 08:58:44 + From: Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] IMVHO, the perl wrapper should be removed altogether, and the perl port's

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Krzysztof Jdruczyk
Horen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Posted a week ago the question, didn't get any reaction. Everything with current from last night works fine but killing X or logging out ends in a black screen. No way to activate the display without reboot. Remote login is fine. Typing blind works too. I

Re: cvs commit: src/secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile.inc

2002-11-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Upgrades from RELENG_4 and pre-static __sF systems should be working again. On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 04:47:51AM -0800, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ru 2002/11/08 04:47:51 PST Modified files: secure/lib/libcrypto Makefile.inc Log: DON'T EVER PUT THIS BACK! Pointy hat to:

Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
Hello, I've just seen the release of FreeBSD-NVIDIA driver for FreeBSD-4.7 Will this driver work with -CURRENT ?¿ PS: http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=freebsd_1.0-3203 -- JFRH. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:11:08PM +0100, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote: Hello, I've just seen the release of FreeBSD-NVIDIA driver for FreeBSD-4.7 Will this driver work with -CURRENT ?¿ PS: http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=freebsd_1.0-3203 The README file found at the

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 23:52, Erik Trulsson wrote: The README file found at the above URL claims that: quote FreeBSD -STABLE versions older than 4.7 and FreeBSD -CURRENT are not supported. end quote So I guess the answer is no. It is of course possible that it might work anyway even if

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella
Erik Trulsson wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:11:08PM +0100, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote: Hello, I've just seen the release of FreeBSD-NVIDIA driver for FreeBSD-4.7 Will this driver work with -CURRENT ?¿ PS: http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=freebsd_1.0-3203 The

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:08:32PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Unfortunately (in the sense that both of you duplicated effort), Alfred independently came up with a similiar patch which went in as $PORTSDIR/emulators/wine/files/patch-context_i386 and which I already fed upstream to the Wine

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:04:01PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote: Fine, but if included as is in Wine because, it will break compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism... Sorry for the phrasing, remove the spurious because to make sense of it :) -- Pierre Beyssac

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pierre Beyssac wrote: Fine, but if included as is in Wine because, it will break compatibility with Net/OpenBSD because DBREG_DRX is a FreeBSDism... that's why I surrounded my patch with a #ifdef DBREG_DRX (which seems cleaner than a #ifdef __FreeBSD__). Sheesh. PHK, now

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], G erald Pfeifer writes: Sheesh. PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before. Please consider reverting That has been considered, and I don't think it is a sensible solution,

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-11-08 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: a queston about ACL acl_type_t

2002-11-08 Thread Chris Faulhaber
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:17:39AM +0800, kai ouyang wrote: Hi, I am trying to understand the ACL implementation in FreeBSD-Current. I have a question about ACL. in acl.h, there are some acl_type_t value macro: /* * Possible valid values for acl_type_t arguments. */ #define

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Horen
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Horen wrote: On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Horen wrote: On FreeBSD 4.6 or 4.7 works, on FreeBSD 5.0 it doesn't work. Don't you think it is OS related. ? THere are a lot of MS-DOS programs that won't run on FreeBSD; I don't think that's

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Willem van Engen
Hmm, not for me (yet?). Part of dmesg: VESA: v3.0, 16384k memory, flags:0x1, mode table:0xc03bb322 (122) VESA: NVidia VESA: NVidia Riva TNT A0 agp0: VIA 82C597 (Apollo VP3) host to PCI bridge mem 0xe000-0xe3ff at device 0.0 on pci0 agp0: allocating GATT for aperture of

Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current

2002-11-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:20:14 -0500 (EST) Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder how it works for Solaris (you can see both the non-underscore and single-underscore symbols resolve to the same thing)? Perhaps their stubs in libc

setfacl requirements?

2002-11-08 Thread Dan Pelleg
I'm trying to use setfacl - just the example that's in the manpage. All I ever get is: setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported getfacl seems to work fwiw. Same results on UFS and UFS2 filesystems. I have UFS_ACL, also tried UFS_EXTATTR. -current as of about a week ago. Any

Re: setfacl requirements?

2002-11-08 Thread Chris Faulhaber
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:38:17AM -0500, Dan Pelleg wrote: I'm trying to use setfacl - just the example that's in the manpage. All I ever get is: setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported getfacl seems to work fwiw. Same results on UFS and UFS2 filesystems. I have

Re: setfacl requirements?

2002-11-08 Thread Dan Pelleg
Chris Faulhaber writes: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:38:17AM -0500, Dan Pelleg wrote: I'm trying to use setfacl - just the example that's in the manpage. All I ever get is: setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported getfacl seems to work fwiw. Same

Re: setfacl requirements?

2002-11-08 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Dan Pelleg wrote: I'm trying to use setfacl - just the example that's in the manpage. All I ever get is: setfacl: acl_get_file() failed: Operation not supported This error generally results from three cases: (1) UFS_ACL isn't enabled (2) Extended attributes aren't

__printf0like not working?

2002-11-08 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi, I just doscovered, that the -Wformat feature does not work for warn() and err(), but works for printf() und Co. Was the __printf0like feature not patched into the actual gcc? harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 02:45:04 2002 : Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:39:35 -0700 (MST) : To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING : From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Martin Faxer
[ sorry for not getting the in-reply-to correct, i'm no longer subscribed to current@ ] the nvidia supplied drivers appear to work fine except for libGL* which are compiled on an older system and thus give: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1: Undefined symbol __sF any way to

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Martin Faxer
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:30:19PM +0100, Martin Faxer wrote: [ sorry for not getting the in-reply-to correct, i'm no longer subscribed to current@ ] the nvidia supplied drivers appear to work fine except for libGL* which are compiled on an older system and thus give:

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Martin Faxer
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Martin Faxer wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:30:19PM +0100, Martin Faxer wrote: i apologize for not reading current@ a bit more :) i found the __sF thread now :) another apology, since this is my 3rd mail in a very short period of time! however, i

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Willem van Engen
Does your kernel module load correctly? I get complaints about an unsupported memory range [see my previous post for more details]. I'm building a kernel with 'option PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE' now to see if that helps. And about __sF, could an LD_PRELOAD with a __sF 'stub' be a workaround?

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Ray Kohler
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 11:30:05 2002 Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:27:32 -0700 (MST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ray Kohler

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 02:45:04 2002 : Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 00:39:35 -0700 (MST) : To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Subject: Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:17:00PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: Yes, but this is too painful. If we were going to do this, the time for the pain was 6-9 months ago, not just before the release. All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the

CF-PCMCIA Adapter + CF-Card

2002-11-08 Thread Stephan Holtwisch
Hi, i had a similar problem as reported by Tomi Vainio on 27.09.2002 with a CF-PCMCIA Adapter and a Sandisk 64MB CF Card with NEWCARD on a - -current of ~ 20.09.2002: (This is a Thinkpad X20) pccard0: Allocation failed for cfe 0 ata2 at port 0x100-0x10f irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard0

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ Steve Kargl ]-- | | I agree with Dan. Let's do it now. My understanding is | that 5.0 will be an early adopter release and production | systems should run 4.7{8,9,..} until 5.1 is released. | | To accomplish the change, I think we need to do: | 1. Install a

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 04:16:11AM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: 6. Assume Crash Position. Thanks for your important contribution to a discussion which is addressing a rather serious problem. Here's the important part of the Ghost... thread. The following 4.7 libs make reference to

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-08 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, David Rhodu wrote: Sidcarter wrote: Hi Folks, I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes immediately after loading the modules. The error message is here

UFS2 extended attribute corruption woes

2002-11-08 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
I've been dealing for some weeks now with having my system unexpectedly lock up and be unreachable via Ctrl-Alt-Esc, and tracked it down as far as the daily script or trying to relabel the entire filesystem until recently. Imagine my relief when rwatson suggests to try using the serial

Re: CF-PCMCIA Adapter + CF-Card

2002-11-08 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, On todays Current i get on Insertion: pccard0: Allocation failed for cfe 0 ata2 at port 0x100-0x10f irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 ad4: 61MB SanDisk SDCFB-64 [490/8/32] at ata2-master BIOSPIO On todays Current i get on Boot: pccard0: Allocation failed for cfe 0 ata2 at

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote: I've seen that... so, the only possibility we've got is to cry loudly at NVIDIA people and ask them to make a driver for -CURRENT (I shouldn't install -CURRENT on my home computer :( I run -CURRENT on my systems (which is where

Re: USB problem (Who owns USB code in -current?)

2002-11-08 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Dear Hackers, i'm replying to myself, because i think i might have found some more information on the problem. i would appreciate if any USB expert would care to comment on this. please take a look at http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/usb/24505201.pdf and look for USB Dribble section. Let me

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
Recompile your kernel with options PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Willem van Engen wrote: Hmm, not for me (yet?). Part of dmesg: VESA: v3.0, 16384k memory, flags:0x1, mode table:0xc03bb322 (122) VESA: NVidia VESA: NVidia Riva TNT A0 agp0: VIA 82C597

phoenix works on -current!

2002-11-08 Thread Ray Kohler
I've sent mail to phoenix@ , but I thought I'd let this list know as well. Native phoenix works fine on -current for me, in spite of the Makefile claims. Install the perl5 port on a recent -current and phoenix will build and run perfectly. (And if it doesn't, I'm sure phoenix@ would like to know

sparc64 bootable snapshot iso availability?

2002-11-08 Thread Vallo Kallaste
Hi I have opportunity to test sparc64 installer and if time permits, OS itself for upcoming weekend. The boxes are Netra T1's with two different ethernet interfaces (2 eri and 4 qfe) and as usual SCSI disks and ATAPI cdrom. I did short sweep over sparc64 documents available online and found that

Re: Wine-2002.10.07 port on FreeBSD 5.0-current

2002-11-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [021108 05:29] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], G erald Pfeifer writes: Sheesh. PHK, now we have the situation where user programs require #ifdefs to be portable among the BSDs when this was not required before. Please consider reverting

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:54:37AM -0500, Ray Kohler wrote: Then we're back to the problem of there being a complete stale perl in the base system after a 4.X-5.X upgrade, but then, I've always thought that clean out the cruft ought to be a mandatory step in upgrading. Yes, it's already a

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Ray Kohler
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 16:15:05 2002 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:02:58 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:54:37AM -0500,

Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-08 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 10:27:47PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote the words in effect of: Hello, I have been searching mailing lists and my friend Google for information about a acpid (like apmd) implementation for FreeBSD, but I have found nothing. Does one exist anywhere, or has anyone

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : so this doesn't affect fresh installs, correct? It is only a : problem when mixing older 4.x and 5.0 libraries/binaries with : __sF-free libc (if I

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 12:17:00PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: : On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : : Yes, but this is too painful. If we were going to do this, the time : for the pain was 6-9

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Here's the fun part. The following 5.0 libraries have the same : version number as their 4.x counterparts. Try running a 4.x : app linked against one of these libaries on a 5.0 machine. You : should also note that

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-08 Thread John De Boskey
- Nate Lawson's Original Message - On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, David Rhodu wrote: Sidcarter wrote: Hi Folks, I just did a cvsup and installed a kernel. I have been trying this from the past few days with the same error. I am copying this by hand, since it crashes immediately after

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 04:22:24PM -0500, Ray Kohler wrote: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 8 16:15:05 2002 Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:02:58 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Horen wrote: Now the missing facts: 4.x binaries will not run on 5.0, lib.c inconsistency. You are not running the most recent 5.x. We can't help you, I think. Identical XFree86 sources compiled nativly on 4.6, 4.7 and 5.0. 4.6-4.7: no problem 5.0: logout from X blocks the

Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Daniel Eischen wrote: By default, ti_jump_table entries contain pointers to dummy function like _return_zero if no threading library is loaded. When the threading library is loaded, ti_jump_table is populated with new pointers to functions implemented in threading library library. GDB did

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Martin Faxer wrote: the nvidia supplied drivers appear to work fine except for libGL* which are compiled on an older system and thus give: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1: Undefined symbol __sF any way to get around this? Yes. Run a newer version of -current. Warner

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: +---[ Steve Kargl ]-- | | I agree with Dan. Let's do it now. My understanding is | that 5.0 will be an early adopter release and production | systems should run 4.7{8,9,..} until 5.1 is released. | | To accomplish the change, I think we

Re: USB problem (Who owns USB code in -current?)

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: 1. Hardware: Attach the USB device into a USB port closer to the root hub. 2. Software: Detect the CRC/Timeout error and count exceeded and attempt to re-queue the packets while changing the length of the packets. Changing the length of the packets will change the

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Matthew N. Dodd wrote: Recompile your kernel with options PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE Given the number of times that this comes up, can we change that to PCI_ALLOW_ACTUALLY_SUPPORTED_IO_RANGE_WHICH_IS_NON_DEFAULT_TO_BE_ANNOYING ? Thanks. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Ray Kohler wrote: Yes, it's already a mandatory step (remove old includes, or you can't build C++ programs). I mean *all* the cruft -- old modules and config files, deprecated binaries and man pages, even old shlibs if it's safe. You need a registration system which can subsume all

Re: acpid implementation?

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
Hiten Pandya wrote: I have been searching mailing lists and my friend Google for information about a acpid (like apmd) implementation for FreeBSD, but I have found nothing. Does one exist anywhere, or has anyone started out on something without telling anyone? :) Why do you need an

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Matthew N. Dodd wrote: Recompile your kernel with options PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE Given the number of times that this comes up, can we change that to PCI_ALLOW_ACTUALLY_SUPPORTED_IO_RANGE_WHICH_IS_NON_DEFAULT_TO_BE_ANNOYING ? I think the

getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-08 Thread Anti
how are you supposed to get rid of devfs? building a kernel without it won't boot since there are no devices... shouldn't there be a ./MAKEDEV all or something underneath the devfs mount so you can boot without it? or am i missing something? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
M. Warner Losh wrote: My plan is as follows: 1) Restore __sF to libc for 5.0. 2) Fix 4.x binaries so that __sF isn't referened in new binaries. This should have been done in Aug 2001, but wasn't. Depending on how things go, __sF will be removed in

Re: XFree

2002-11-08 Thread Horen
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Horen wrote: Now the missing facts: 4.x binaries will not run on 5.0, lib.c inconsistency. You are not running the most recent 5.x. We can't help you, I think. Identical XFree86 sources compiled nativly on 4.6, 4.7 and 5.0.

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : so this doesn't affect fresh installs, correct? It is only a : problem when mixing older 4.x and

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anti writes: how are you supposed to get rid of devfs? You're not. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-08 Thread Mark Murray
I mean *all* the cruft -- old modules and config files, deprecated binaries and man pages, even old shlibs if it's safe. I agree with you, and I was giving an example that a lesser form of this is already required during the upgrade. It would be VERY useful if someone could develop a

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : : so

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

fetch hates me! (panic)

2002-11-08 Thread Krzysztof Jdruczyk
I was trying to do 'portupgrade portupgrade' today and my -CURRENT system rebooted. Strange - I haven't seen such behaviour before. I believe it wouldn't happen before my last upgrade (it was 30-10-2002 -CURRENT system, and I cvsup'ed it on 6-11-2002) After reboot I retried portupgrade - samre

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Sidcarter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in vm86 mode fault virtual address = 0x9fdc8 ^^^ That's a region of memory right before the 640K mark, and your BIOS is trying to use it. This used to work, but revision 1.544 of

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : All the ports are going

Re: Kernel not booting....Immediate crash

2002-11-08 Thread Terry Lambert
David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Sidcarter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in vm86 mode fault virtual address = 0x9fdc8 ^^^ That's a region of memory right before the 640K mark, and your BIOS is trying to use it. This used to work, but

DND-VIRUSMELDUNG / Email zerstoert/deletet/cancellato

2002-11-08 Thread antivirus
Multilingual message - scroll down! Deutsch: --- Die Antivirus checkroutine unseres Mailservers (ms.dindi.com) hat festgestellt, dass Sie von [EMAIL PROTECTED] (diese Adresse könnte gefälscht sein!!) eine

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 04:16:06PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: I'd love for there to be a way to know which binaries use __sF. The following script run on your bin, sbin, lib, and libexec directories does a pretty decent job of finding files that contain refrences to __sF and listing the ports

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread eculp
Quoting Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 04:16:06PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: | I'd love for there to be a way to know which binaries use __sF. | | The following script run on your bin, sbin, lib, and libexec directories | does a pretty decent job of finding

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:22:13PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, I did remove the $ from $*. I thought it was running too fast :-) You're supposed to pass it a list of files not run it in a directory. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:05:23PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 04:16:06PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: I'd love for there to be a way to know which binaries use __sF. The following script run on your bin, sbin, lib, and libexec directories does a pretty decent job of

Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.subr

2002-11-08 Thread Doug Barton
Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 09:06:15AM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote: gordon 2002/11/08 09:06:15 PST Modified files: etc rc.subr Log: Diff reduction to NetBSD: Fix a minor grammer nit. Get rid of _echo that uses logger and just

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-08 Thread Anti
and if you must? dual boot 4.7 here so was able to create the devices easy enough from there and all is well, but i'd like to do it on some other boxes where this isn't an option... On Sat, 09 Nov 2002 00:14:08 +0100 Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Please add me to your mailing list, thank you

2002-11-08 Thread Christopher J Olson
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:45:00PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote the words in effect of: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Matthew N. Dodd wrote: Recompile your kernel with options PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE Given the number of times that this comes up, can we change that

Re: Will official-NVIDIA-driver for 4.7 work with -CURRENT ?

2002-11-08 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:09:10PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: P.S. hw.pci should moved somewhere global, but donno how this can be done or even if it is possible to do. I think you just need a SYSCTL_DECL(_hw_pci) in scope. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is

Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc.subr

2002-11-08 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:26:13PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: I'm not sure I like this change actually... having the debug output go to syslog is very useful if you don't have a console on the system for whatever reason. I agree. It's also usefull when you're in an X session or other console

Re: rc.d and sysctl.conf

2002-11-08 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:36:01PM -0800, Bill Fenner wrote: [ snip ] The update to the /etc/rc.d infrastructure keeps the ability to run twice, but does not actually run it twice. I started creating an /etc/rc.d/sysctl-last that would run /etc/rc.d/sysctl lastload, but realized that I

Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING

2002-11-08 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 6:13 PM -0500 11/8/02, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : All the ports are going to be rebuilt for the release anyways, : so this doesn't affect fresh installs, correct? It

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 06:14:09PM -0600, Anti wrote: and if you must? dual boot 4.7 here so was able to create the devices easy enough from there and all is well, but i'd like to do it on some other boxes where this isn't an option... Perhaps you could explain why it's not an option. Kris

I'm mostly off email

2002-11-08 Thread Julian Elischer
My normal server is offline. Anything sent to me in the last day or so will be in a queue waiting for it to come back online... meanwhile, I have undiverted my freebsd mail and am reading it on hub.. So if you are waiting for me to respond to something you sent today... contact me again.

Re: getting rid of devfs...

2002-11-08 Thread Julian Elischer
Ok here are some thought about devfs 1/ devices are coming and going and becoming more portable 2/ disk partitioning schemes are also multiplying 3/ devices such as usb or bluetooth nets can be configured in arbitray ways 4/ there are more than 256 types of device in the world. With these in

Re: Deadlock during buildworld

2002-11-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Andrea Campi wrote: Hi all, for months now I've been having a reproducible hang under load (make -j4 buildworld on a uniprocessor with plenty of RAM). I transcribed some info which might be useful to debug it; it seems to me this is a deadlock (am I right?). I'll leave

  1   2   >