UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
While testing the 4.0 - 5.0 upgrade path, I've created (under 5.0) a UFS1 partition and installed 4.0 onto it. After booting the 4.0 from it, kernel complained about ``numdirs is zero, try using an alternate superblock'' for / partition -- I've tried what it suggests (by fsck -b 32, etc.) but the

Link failure in ata driver

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
Kernels with the following configuration do not link: # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives linking kernel.debug ata-all.o: In function `ata_boot_attach': ata-all.o(.text+0x1590): undefined reference to `ata_raid_attach'

Re: Problems building GENERIC with DP2 on ThinkPad 600E

2002-12-06 Thread Andrea Campi
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:41:57AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: I have been trying to install DP2 on my old ThinkPad 600E. It almost works, but I can't build a new kernel. I'd like to build a custom kernel, but don't seem to be able to do so. You might want to check with the ACPI mailing list;

UPDATING error

2002-12-06 Thread Andy Farkas
$FreeBSD: src/UPDATING,v 1.228 2002/10/30 20:11:07 imp Exp $ To upgrade from 4.x-stable to current suggests: cd src/sys/boot ; make install [6] This does not work. You need to: cd src/sys/boot ; make all install [6] -- :{ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy Farkas System Administrator

Re: Link failure in ata driver

2002-12-06 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Kris Kennaway wrote: ata-all.o: In function `ata_boot_attach': ata-all.o(.text+0x1590): undefined reference to `ata_raid_attach' ata-all.o(.text+0x1594): undefined reference to `ata_raid_attach' Yes, I've seen it there is two other issues I'd like to fix also, I'll ask re@ for

success report of gcc3.2.1

2002-12-06 Thread Vallo Kallaste
Hi The new binutils and gcc3.2.1 release hit the tree recently, nice to see everything is moving forward. I would like to tell the importers that XFree86-4, KDE3 and GNOME2 built without a hitch for me. Here's my list without GNOME2, latter was built only for testing purposes and deleted promptly

Re: cvsup weird problem

2002-12-06 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:22:50PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2002-12-05 21:33, leafy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:32:01PM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: Delete src/contrib/gcc/INSTALL Cannot delete /usr/src/contrib/gcc/INSTALL: Directory not empty

nvidia drivers hate me

2002-12-06 Thread Doug Barton
The native nvidia drivers work great in RELENG_4 with my geforce 4 mmx, but in -current they hate me. I just upgraded to the latest -current and I'm using XFree compiled on -current, no joy. It's always the same error: panic: bremfree: bp 0xc7751bb8 not locked I've tried both with and without

Re: nvidia drivers hate me

2002-12-06 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Doug Barton wrote: The native nvidia drivers work great in RELENG_4 with my geforce 4 mmx, but in -current they hate me. I just upgraded to the latest -current and I'm using XFree compiled on -current, no joy. It's always the same error: panic: bremfree: bp 0xc7751bb8 not

RE: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Petr Holub
Hi, While testing the 4.0 - 5.0 upgrade path, I've created (under 5.0) a UFS1 partition and installed 4.0 onto it. After booting the 4.0 from it, kernel complained about ``numdirs is zero, try using an alternate superblock'' for / partition -- I've tried what it suggests (by fsck -b 32,

Re: nvidia drivers hate me

2002-12-06 Thread Maxime Henrion
Doug Barton wrote: The native nvidia drivers work great in RELENG_4 with my geforce 4 mmx, but in -current they hate me. I just upgraded to the latest -current and I'm using XFree compiled on -current, no joy. It's always the same error: panic: bremfree: bp 0xc7751bb8 not locked This is not

Re: nvidia drivers hate me/ too!

2002-12-06 Thread Rob
Maxime Henrion wrote: Doug Barton wrote: The native nvidia drivers work great in RELENG_4 with my geforce 4 mmx, but in -current they hate me. I just upgraded to the latest -current and I'm using XFree compiled on -current, no joy. It's always the same error: panic: bremfree: bp

Re: DP-2 and Nvidia Geforce 4

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 23:25, Rob wrote: Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 22:46, Rob wrote: Rob wrote: Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 17:04, Rob wrote: Is there any solution to the above combo other than just waiting? I think

gcc 3.2.1 prerelease/release core dumps on compiling OOo and Mozilla

2002-12-06 Thread Anton Yudin
Hi Is it possible to build OOo on -current? gcc core dumps periodically when i compile big things ... Hardware is ok ... (on 4.7 stable no problems). P.S. please CC me, i'm not subscribed P.P.S. sorry my bad english To Unsubscribe: send

Re: Link failure in ata driver

2002-12-06 Thread GuRU
Out of da blue Kris Kennaway aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Kernels with the following configuration do not link: # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives linking kernel.debug ata-all.o: In function `ata_boot_attach':

Re: Status of file locking over NFS

2002-12-06 Thread Anthony Volodkin
Hey, I tried the following. Anyone know what these errors mean? divine# rpc.statd rpc.statd: svc_tp_create: Could not register prog 100024 vers 1 on udp6 rpc.statd: svc_tp_create: Could not register prog 100024 vers 1 on udpr rpc.statd: cannot create udp service divine# rpc.lockd rpc.lockd:

Re: 2nd ether device wont config

2002-12-06 Thread Dhee Reddy
FWIW. i have a similar setup except that the fxp is replaced by rl. All i did was to change ifconfig_ed1 to ifconfig_ed0 in rc.conf. for some strange reason, when i installed(sysinstall), the ed card was detected as ed1 and not as ed0 but on subsequent boots (after i changed

Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:59:11PM +0100, Petr Holub wrote: Hi, While testing the 4.0 - 5.0 upgrade path, I've created (under 5.0) a UFS1 partition and installed 4.0 onto it. After booting the 4.0 from it, kernel complained about ``numdirs is zero, try using an alternate superblock''

Re: FW: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread phk
In message 006501c29d44$33a8e980$2603fb93@kloboucek, Petr Holub writes: Hi Poul, there's discussion in the -current list which we had before a while. I think answer to this is 'yes' but I'm not 100% sure so I wanted to check it with you. Thanks very much, Petr [...] I've discussed this issue

OHCI patch - please test [was Re: USB issues with Apollo KT133A mobo]

2002-12-06 Thread Josef Karthauser
Hi all, If you're an ohci user can you please test this patch out for inclusion in 5.0. I need to know that it doesn't break anything - the reports are that it fixes broken ohci :). Joe -- Josef Karthauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.josef-k.net/ FreeBSD (cvs meister, admin and

pcm remaining problem (possible ACPI too)

2002-12-06 Thread Clive Lin
Hi, Since rescent -CURRENT is stable enough, I have the chance to find out remaining pcm problem. My MP box no more has double fatal fault and turns into random sleep. The random sleep happens after pcm having its own problem. uname -av is FreeBSD cartier.home 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD

Re: OHCI patch - please test [was Re: USB issues with Apollo KT133Amobo]

2002-12-06 Thread Andrew Gordon
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote: If you're an ohci user can you please test this patch out for inclusion in 5.0. I need to know that it doesn't break anything - the reports are that it fixes broken ohci :). I've been running it since you posted the patch a couple of days ago. I

no subject

2002-12-06 Thread John Chase
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Another INVARIANTS panic with ata driver

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
I got this on one of the gohan machines overnight. These machines have failing disks -- I get a lot of hard read errors, but the INVARIANTS panic could better be replaced by something else. I reported another instance of this to sos a few weeks ago but didn't hear a reply. Kris ad0: hard error

mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread James Satterfield
mozilla-devel port fails to build on current. I would imagine this is already known, but I haven't seen any posts on the mailing list. snip jsdtoa.c cc -o jsdtoa.o -c -DOSTYPE=\FreeBSD5\ -DOSARCH=\FreeBSD\ -DOJI -DEXPORT_JS_A PI -DJS_USE_SAFE_ARENA -I../../dist/include/js -I../../dist/include

Re: Another INVARIANTS panic with ata driver

2002-12-06 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Kris Kennaway writes: I got this on one of the gohan machines overnight. These machines have failing disks -- I get a lot of hard read errors, but the INVARIANTS panic could better be replaced by something else. I reported another instance of this to sos a few weeks ago but didn't

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system still dead, or does it come back to life? If the system does not

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Marc Recht
mozilla-devel port fails to build on current. I would imagine this is already known, but I haven't seen any posts on the mailing list. ign -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED I'd bet that -march=pentium4 is your problem. Try with -march=pentiumpro (the default).

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Marc Recht wrote: mozilla-devel port fails to build on current. I would imagine this is already known, but I haven't seen any posts on the mailing list. ign -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED I'd bet that -march=pentium4 is your problem.

Re: FW: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I've discussed this issue with Poul-Henning Kamp. You need fsck from at least 4.7. Is this handled by fsck/setup.c,v 1.17.2.4 commit? Yes, this looks like the correct commit. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20

Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Matthew Dillon
:.. :=20 : I've discussed this issue with Poul-Henning Kamp. You need fsck : from at least 4.7. :=20 :... (Ruslan Ermilov writes): :Is this handled by fsck/setup.c,v 1.17.2.4 commit? Yes, I believe so. -Matt Matthew Dillon

/usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread James Satterfield
The lcms port fails it's build time tests on current with a P4. I believe this builds on non-P4 systems running current. snip building static lcms library building shared library liblcms.so.1 ranlib liblcms.a cd /usr/ports/graphics/lcms/work/lcms-1.09/src/../testbed /usr/bin/env CFLAGS=-O

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:27:10AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Kirk McKusick wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system still dead, or does it come back to life? If the system does not come back to life

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ James Satterfield ]-- | The lcms port fails it's build time tests on current with a P4. I believe | this builds on non-P4 systems running current. Builds fine on my athlon under current. -- Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet| | Andrew Milton

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 13:41, James Satterfield wrote: The lcms port fails it's build time tests on current with a P4. I believe this builds on non-P4 systems running current. Same thing as your mozilla-devel issue. Like Marc mentioned, don't use -march=pentium4. I think I recall hearing it's

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread David Rhodus
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 01:39 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote: Kirk McKusick wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system still dead, or does it

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:52:11PM -0500, David Rhodus wrote: On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 01:39 PM, Archie Cobbs wrote: Kirk McKusick wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread James Satterfield
lcms still fails build tests when compiled with CPUTYPE?=i686 and no CFLAGS set. James. - Original Message - From: Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: James Satterfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:47 AM Subject: Re:

Re: FW: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson wri tes: On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I've discussed this issue with Poul-Henning Kamp. You need fsck from at least 4.7. Is this handled by fsck/setup.c,v 1.17.2.4 commit? Yes, this looks like the correct commit. --

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
David Rhodus wrote: Softupdates is enabled on /usr and /var but not /. Why does softupdates not get enabled on / , by default on the install? I disabled softupdates on / back when having it enabled caused disk full problems during 'make installworld,' and never re-enabled it. FYI at this

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Nate Lawson wrote: Does the background fsck process continue to run, or does the whole system come to a halt? If the fsck process continues to run, what happens when it eventually finishes? Is the system still dead, or does it come back to life? If the system does not come back to life

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 06), David Rhodus said: Why does softupdates not get enabled on / , by default on the install? Softupdates updates on-disk structures in the background, and background fsck cannot relink unreferenced files into lost+found, so you run the risk of losing both the original

Re: Another INVARIANTS panic with ata driver

2002-12-06 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Andrew Gallatin wrote: Kris Kennaway writes: I got this on one of the gohan machines overnight. These machines have failing disks -- I get a lot of hard read errors, but the INVARIANTS panic could better be replaced by something else. I reported another instance of

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Dan Nelson wrote: Why does softupdates not get enabled on / , by default on the install? Softupdates updates on-disk structures in the background, and background fsck cannot relink unreferenced files into lost+found, so you run the risk of losing both the original and backup copies of

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: Reproduced it again just now. After pulling the plug and rebooting I didn't touch the box. It booted normally, started background fsck, and the HDD light was blinking as expected. After about 10 seconds, rather suddenly the HDD light stopped

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Julian Elischer
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: David Rhodus wrote: Softupdates is enabled on /usr and /var but not /. Why does softupdates not get enabled on / , by default on the install? I disabled softupdates on / back when having it enabled caused disk full problems during 'make

Re: cvsup weird problem

2002-12-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-12-06 10:05, Sean LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case, my installworld doesn't work, and I wonder if that's why. I did the following: make buildworld make buildkernel make installkernel rebooted, and did mergemaster -p and make installworld as defined in handbook and

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Nate Lawson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: To copy the 'ps' debugger output, I'd have to manually copy it all, so here are just a few highlights: Proc State - fsck_ufs 0004000 norm[SLPQ nbufbs c036e5b0][SLP] fsck 0004002 norm[SLPQ wait c124dce8][SLP]

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
From: Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:57:13 -0800 (PST) CC: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: pcm remaining problem (possible ACPI too)

2002-12-06 Thread Clive Lin
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:00:44AM +0800, Clive Lin wrote: Hi, Since rescent -CURRENT is stable enough, I have the chance to find out remaining pcm problem. My MP box no more has double fatal fault and turns into random sleep. The random sleep happens after pcm having its own problem.

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 13:59, James Satterfield wrote: lcms still fails build tests when compiled with CPUTYPE?=i686 and no CFLAGS set. It builds just fine on my P4 at work. I have nothing CFLAGS or CPUTYPE related in /etc/make.conf. It builds with -O -pipe and -march=pentiumpro. Joe -- PGP

Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's?

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:06:03 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Petr Holub [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: UFS1 created by 5.0 is incompatible with 4.0's? X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match

Re: /usr/ports/graphics/lcms fails test on current with P4

2002-12-06 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:59:16AM -0800, James Satterfield wrote: lcms still fails build tests when compiled with CPUTYPE?=i686 and no CFLAGS set. James. Worked just fine yesterday on PII-233, albeit with the previous (prerelease) 3.2.1 system compiler. (20021009) I use -march=pentium2. --

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Sam Leffler
Finally, one more bit of info: I have WITNESS enabled in this kernel and get this message during boot: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1330: could sleep with dc0 locked from /usr/src/sys/pci/if_dc.c:691 if_attach does a malloc with M_WAITOK. If the attach happens inside a lock in the driver's

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
The loss of files under soft updates is possible if your editor fails to fsync the new file before unlinking the old file. The `vi' editor always does an `fsync' after writing the new copy and before removing the old copy. I have not checked with other editors such as emacs to see if they properly

What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread leafy
Hi, CPUTYPE=pentium4 is know to be broken. What is the known working highest CPUTYPE then? pentium3 or pentium2? JY To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Kirk McKusick wrote: by the syncer who is also blocked. Could you please run the following command on your system and send me the results: sysctl vfs.lodirtybuffers sysctl vfs.hidirtybuffers sysctl vfs.numdirtybuffers both before and after the lockup. If you cannot run

Re: cvsup weird problem

2002-12-06 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 13:11:51, osa (Sergey A. Osokin) wrote about Re: cvsup weird problem: SAO Any other idea? :-) Remove src/contrib/gcc/INSTALL/ and sup checkouts directory simultaneously, this usually fixes such errors ;) Delete src/contrib/gcc/INSTALL Cannot delete

no psm interrupt; lock order reversal

2002-12-06 Thread Valentin Nechayev
5.0-RC of 2002.12.05.12.00.00-UTC Lock order reversal without panic: lock order reversal 1st 0xc2e30708 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ /var/HEAD/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:939 2nd 0xc033c3c0 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @ /var/HEAD/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:424 Bigger problem that

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 06), Kirk McKusick said: The main reason for not using soft updates on the root filesystem was because of the delay between removing files and having the space show up. The result was that world installs on the root filesystem often failed if the root was nearly full

Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 07), leafy said: Hi, CPUTYPE=pentium4 is know to be broken. What is the known working highest CPUTYPE then? pentium3 or pentium2? p3 has been working for me for quite a while. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:19:23AM -0800, James Satterfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mozilla-devel port fails to build on current. I would imagine this is already known, but I haven't seen any posts on the mailing list. I've built it yesterday together with a lots of other stuff. Using other

Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread Cliff L. Biffle
On Friday 06 December 2002 01:11 pm, leafy wrote: CPUTYPE=pentium4 is know to be broken. What is the known working highest CPUTYPE then? pentium3 or pentium2? Well, I know this isn't quite what you were asking, but I wanted to let the group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable

ATACD issues slowly coming back...

2002-12-06 Thread Cliff L. Biffle
I mentioned earlier on the list that the ATA issues I'd been having with 4.7 had disappeared since installing 5.0. They're still much less frequent -- i.e. I can burn CDs now -- but I just got one of the old messages and wanted to submit it for your perusal. cliff50 kernel: acd0: READ_BIG -

Re: ATACD issues slowly coming back...

2002-12-06 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Cliff L. Biffle wrote: I mentioned earlier on the list that the ATA issues I'd been having with 4.7 had disappeared since installing 5.0. They're still much less frequent -- i.e. I can burn CDs now -- but I just got one of the old messages and wanted to submit it for your perusal.

Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread Yann Berthier
On Fri, 06 Dec 2002, Cliff L. Biffle wrote: On Friday 06 December 2002 01:11 pm, leafy wrote: CPUTYPE=pentium4 is know to be broken. What is the known working highest CPUTYPE then? pentium3 or pentium2? Well, I know this isn't quite what you were asking, but I wanted to let the group

Re: nvidia drivers hate me

2002-12-06 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Maxime Henrion wrote: Doug Barton wrote: The native nvidia drivers work great in RELENG_4 with my geforce 4 mmx, but in -current they hate me. I just upgraded to the latest -current and I'm using XFree compiled on -current, no joy. It's always the same error: panic:

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
From: Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:01:20 -0800 (PST) CC: Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread Paul Murphy
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:29:37 -0700 Cliff L. Biffle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable using the athlon-tbird optimizations. Not to mention smokingly fast. Is that just a -CURRENT thing, I can't see anything like that in -STABLE's LINT. --

Re: Status of file locking over NFS

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Anthony Volodkin wrote: Hey, I tried the following. Anyone know what these errors mean? divine# rpc.statd rpc.statd: svc_tp_create: Could not register prog 100024 vers 1 on udp6 rpc.statd: svc_tp_create: Could not register prog 100024 vers 1

LOR: filedesc structure - pipe mutex

2002-12-06 Thread Lars Eggert
On today's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xc6948234 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:901 2nd 0xc691f380 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:1239 Debugger(witness_lock) Stopped at Debugger+0x5a: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0

Lock order reversal with UMA and VFS

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
I got this overnight on the gohan cluster. Machine is still in DDB if further debugging is necessary. Kris login: lock order reversal 1st 0xc577212c vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ /local0/src-client/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:939 2nd 0xc046a560 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:29:55PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote: mozilla-devel port fails to build on current. I would imagine this is already known, but I haven't seen any posts on the mailing list. ign -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED I'd bet that

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julian Elischer wrote: most systems follow / with their swap region.. you can boot from fixit, or picoBSD floppy and use disklabel -e to exend the root partition then you can use growfs to add the new space to your root fs. Hmm.. I tried that and it didn't seem to work. The disklabel

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Marc Recht
-march=pentiumpro is not the default, -mcpu=pentiumpro is. Anyway, I Nope, -march=pentiumpro is added, if the CPUTYPE is i686 (the default). At least if I had read examples/etc/make.conf and bsd.cpu.mk correctly. doubt this is the cause of the problem. It's more likely to be a stale

Re: DP-2 and Nvidia Geforce 4

2002-12-06 Thread Rob
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: Sorry, just got power back after the ice storm. What modules do you have loaded. I had the following, and the nv driver started right up: Section Module Loaddbe Loaddri Loadextmod Loadglx Loadpex5

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:09:04AM +0100, Marc Recht wrote: -march=pentiumpro is not the default, -mcpu=pentiumpro is. Anyway, I Nope, -march=pentiumpro is added, if the CPUTYPE is i686 (the default). At least if I had read examples/etc/make.conf and bsd.cpu.mk correctly. The CPUTYPE is not

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread James Satterfield
Marc Recht wrote: -march=pentiumpro is not the default, -mcpu=pentiumpro is. Anyway, I Nope, -march=pentiumpro is added, if the CPUTYPE is i686 (the default). At least if I had read examples/etc/make.conf and bsd.cpu.mk correctly. doubt this is the cause of the problem. It's more likely to

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Julian Elischer
I put a copy of / in /usr then from the fixit, I mounted /usr as / and ran growfs from there.. the trick is to not do it while / is mounted. On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: most systems follow / with their swap region.. you can boot from fixit, or picoBSD

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Marc Recht
The CPUTYPE is not i686 by default. Stupid me... Of course, you're right. Marc Premature optimization is the root of all evil. -- Donald E. Knuth To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Marc Recht
There is no default CPUTYPE. If there is no CPUTYPE, and you are on i386, -mcpu=pentiumpro gets added (top of bsd.cpu.mk). Oops! Yes, you're right. I think I got confused by the #CPUTYPE?=i686 in the example make.conf. Marc Premature optimization is the root of all evil. -- Donald E. Knuth To

Re: What is the highest 'safe' CPUTYPE for intel?

2002-12-06 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 05:10:11PM -0500, Paul Murphy wrote: On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 14:29:37 -0700 Cliff L. Biffle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: group know that the world and kernel seem quite stable using the athlon-tbird optimizations. Not to mention smokingly fast. Is that just a

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julian Elischer wrote: I put a copy of / in /usr then from the fixit, I mounted /usr as / and ran growfs from there.. the trick is to not do it while / is mounted. / wasn't mounted yet when I ran growfs: I ran growfs after booting single user mode but before mounting any disks.. perhaps

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Kirk McKusick wrote: OK, it looks like my hypothesis on having a small number of buffers and running out of them is the problem. I enclose below a patch which should check for the problem arising and help to mitigate it. I would appreciate you dropping it into your kernel and seeing if it

New lock order reversal - vnode interlock

2002-12-06 Thread Dan Nelson
I haven't seen this one reported yet. FreeBSD dan.emsphone.com 5.0-RC FreeBSD 5.0-RC #228: Thu Dec 5 17:28:33 CST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/DANSMP i386 lock order reversal 1st 0xc2d454b0 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @ ../../../ufs/ffs/ffs_snapshot.c:1876 2nd

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 07), Marc Recht said: -march=pentiumpro is not the default, -mcpu=pentiumpro is. Anyway, I Nope, -march=pentiumpro is added, if the CPUTYPE is i686 (the default). At least if I had read examples/etc/make.conf and bsd.cpu.mk correctly. There is no default CPUTYPE. If

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote: David Rhodus wrote: Softupdates is enabled on /usr and /var but not /. Why does softupdates not get enabled on / , by default on the install? I disabled softupdates on / back when having it enabled caused disk full problems during 'make

x86 FPU discard question..

2002-12-06 Thread Julian Elischer
As part of shuting down a thread and discarding it, we want to throw away any floating point context there may be. Currently this saves out the floating point state to make the fpu be declared 'unused'. However we dont't need any fpu state saved. Is there any way to just mark it as 'unused'

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
I suggest that we drag Thomas-Henning von Kamptz into this discussion as he was one of the main authors of growfs. He is copied on my reply. Kirk McKusick =-=-=-=-=-= From: Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
From: Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 15:23:36 -0800 (PST) CC: Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Kirk McKusick
Adding a two minute delay before starting background fsck sounds like a very good idea to me. Please send me your suggested change. Kirk McKusick =-=-=-=-= Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:44:45 -0800 From: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kirk McKusick

Re: backgroud fsck is still locking up system (fwd)

2002-12-06 Thread Archie Cobbs
Kirk McKusick wrote: I suggest that we drag Thomas-Henning von Kamptz into this discussion as he was one of the main authors of growfs. He is copied on my reply. Thanks. FYI, I finally fixed things by doing what Julian suggested, which is to copy / to /usr, reboot with /usr mounted as /,

Re: LOR: filedesc structure - pipe mutex

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:36:49PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote: On today's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xc6948234 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:901 2nd 0xc691f380 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:1239

Re: LOR: filedesc structure - pipe mutex

2002-12-06 Thread Lars Eggert
On 12/6/2002 6:22 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 02:36:49PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote: On today's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xc6948234 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:901 2nd 0xc691f380 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @

Re: mozilla-devel port on current

2002-12-06 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:26:52 +0200 Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've built it yesterday together with a lots of other stuff. Using other -march values than i686 is unofficially claimed to be unsupported (kan@freebsd). As others I'll bet the -march=p4 is causing problems, i686 works

Re: LOR: filedesc structure - pipe mutex

2002-12-06 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:18:03PM -0800, Lars Eggert wrote: I'm getting this too: Have you gotten this before today? I haven't, and I'm wondering if I see it because I'm running with jhb@'s witness patch for the other LOR. Does your kernel have that patch, too? (Excuse me if that

Re: LOR: filedesc structure - pipe mutex

2002-12-06 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: I'm getting this too: Local package initialization:lock order reversal 1st 0xc449ad34 filedesc structure (filedesc structure) @ /local0/src-client/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:901 2nd 0xc4146780 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @

Re: Upgrade of port audio/id3lib - stdc++ wchar support missing

2002-12-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:29:19AM +0100, Marcin Dalecki wrote: Hmm... at some point in time it may perhaps just make perfect sense to replace the libstdc++ by the STLport library as the standard C++ library? The gnu libstdc++ is really somehoe hopeless. No thanks. Please lobby the GCC guys

Re: Upgrade of port audio/id3lib - stdc++ wchar support missing

2002-12-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 07:36:18PM -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: You could try the patch I've attached: cd /usr/src zcat c++-wchar.diff.gz | patch cd gnu/lib/libstdc++ make make install ... Attached is the patch This would pull files off the vendor branch; and before doing that I'd

  1   2   >