Now that I'm having much better luck with -current, I haven't had
the time to go back and look into arla. Also, since that time
there has been a fair amount of progress with openafs support for
freebsd, and for my own purposes that would be an easier sell to
my managers anyway. [not that I
this is almost the complete report, i get the on this list already
mentioned error message
fatal: ssh_msg_send: write
when i try to use password (pam?) authentication to my current box (same
effect from anywhere).
As the title says, public_key authentication works. This effect started to show
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:34:35PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
When I was looking into this, I was talking with Andrea Campi about
some changes he had for arla on -current. He was also very busy at
the time, but maybe he still has that around. (I'm in the middle
I used to have patches
Have an existing partition with UFS1 on it. How can i update/convert it
to UFS2?
It is safe make it that way:
dump -0 -f /store/arch.usr /usr
shutdown now
umount -a /usr
mount /
mount /store
newfs -O2 /dev/ad0s2e
restore -f /store/arch.usr
/store is fat32 partition.
Andrea Campi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:34:35PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
When I was looking into this, I was talking with Andrea Campi about
some changes he had for arla on -current. He was also very busy at
the time, but maybe he still has that around. (I'm
I've updated today's -current (HEAD). I got this messages after
rebooting. Is it OK?
Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked @ ../../../geom/geom_mbr.c:118
Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked @ ../../../geom/geom_slice.c:298
Lock GEOM topology not exclusively locked @
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jun Kuriyama writes:
I've updated today's -current (HEAD). I got this messages after
rebooting. Is it OK?
No, it's not, but your system is almost certainly unharmed.
Fixed a second a go.
Thanks!
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL
When I put KDE 3.0.5 on my 5.0-RC1 box it took just about 20 hours (600mhz
with 384MB PC100... backup box ;)) but it runs faster (as compared to KDE on
a 4.7-RELEASE). Im willing to give up a bit more comiple time to get better
performance out of my apps. =)
-Nick Harm Hale
- Original
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Vitaly Markitantov wrote:
Have an existing partition with UFS1 on it. How can i update/convert it
to UFS2?
It is safe make it that way:
dump -0 -f /store/arch.usr /usr
shutdown now
umount -a /usr
mount /
mount /store
newfs
The current ata driver on pc98 has a problem. I think that the
following patch solves the problem. Please review it. This change
must be in RELENG_5_0 branch.
Index: sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c
===
RCS file:
Hi
I have a problem getting CURRENT to find my ISA SMC Ultra ethernet
card. No matter what I do I can't stop the kernel finding a third
sio device on top of the memory and interrupt that the ed card
occupies. The kernel correctly registers its surprise at finding
the third sio device since no
I really wish somebody could tell us conclusively when to use
the compat geometry and when not ?
Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ?
Does it depend on the size of the disks ?
Does it also affect SCSI disks ?
Poul-Henning
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro
writes:
The current ata
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ?
Does it depend on the size of the disks ?
Only for the internal IDE controller. The internal IDE controller on
pc98 uses the fixed geometry which is 8 heads and 17 sectors. If the
size of the disk is larger
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro
writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ?
Does it depend on the size of the disks ?
Only for the internal IDE controller. The internal IDE controller on
pc98 uses the fixed geometry which is
It seems Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it only for ATA/IDE disks ?
Does it depend on the size of the disks ?
Only for the internal IDE controller. The internal IDE controller on
pc98 uses the fixed geometry which is 8 heads and 17
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess the correct pseudocode then is:
if (disk is ata
unit 4
size 65535C x 8H x 17S x 512B) {
use 8/17 geometry
}
Is this correctly understood ?
So this would not affect an IDE
On 2002-12-16 23:24, Gary Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:45 AM 12/17/2002 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I still have the Pentium 133 with 64 MB or memory that I used to run
5.0-CURRENT until a few weeks ago. I haven't got any real numbers,
but the general `feel' of the system was
On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted
UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs.
-Steve
- Original Message -
From: Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vitaly Markitantov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 6:54 AM
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Steven Ames wrote:
On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted
UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs.
-Steve
Maybe dumpfs(8) will help you.
-- Aurelien
msg48915/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Great I was waiting for this for too long. I'm going to install
this on my 11/70 emulator as soon as it compiles again :-)
How about a HP-65 port?
harti
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matt Dillon wrote:
MD
MD--
MD Rebuilding the temporary
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to
leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could
join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal
with other people.
I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or,
whoever wants it, for that matter.
Thank you,
This is cross-compiled, isn't it? Or you guys have too much
patience otherwise.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0800, Matt Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
I have a CURRENT system that is panicing on me every couple of days. I have
enabled crash dumps in the rc.conf file, but when the system is rebooted,
savecore doesn't find any core files on the swap partition. The system has
128M RAM installed, and the swap partion is ~512M.
I am using a
Huh. Interesting. The IP_FW_ADD test threw me but now that I
look at the code more closely it is only there because IP_FW_ADD
is a valid SOPT_GET op as well as a SOPT_SET op. But FLUSH and friends
are SOPT_SET only. Now I see how it works :-)
* Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to
leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could
join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal
with other people.
Damn, isn't it a little early for april fool?
Cheers,
Emiel
***LIMITED TIME SALE - ALL LISTS 50% OFF
MUST MENTION SALE WHEN ORDERING***
--
UNLIMITED USE LISTS . . .DOWNLOAD WITHIN MINUTES.
--
NEW LISTS: TRAVEL MEDIA, SCIENCE PROFESSORS,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:23:15AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Huh. Interesting. The IP_FW_ADD test threw me but now that I
look at the code more closely it is only there because IP_FW_ADD
is a valid SOPT_GET op as well as a SOPT_SET op. But FLUSH and friends
are SOPT_SET
Emiel Kollof wrote:
* Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to
leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could
join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal
with other people.
Damn, isn't it a little early for april
Emiel Kollof wrote:
Someone claiming to be Matt Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to
leave FreeBSD and flame in another project. Maybe I could
join OpenBSD, the seem to share my views on how to deal
with other people.
Damn, isn't it a
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Windows .. fine, I installed Linux .. fine. Then I installed
FreeBSD...fine *but* the SCSI BIOS on bootup complains that the disk
geometry is all cockeyed, and it looks that way from what it says.
It warns any non-DOS O/S may have problems using it.
Matt Dillon wrote:
Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and
flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share
my views on how to deal with other people.
I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or, whoever wants
it, for that
Is it okay to add INTR_MPSAFE for all INTR_TYPE_NET drivers?
mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that
it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock.
Or is there any unresolved related issues?
--
Kyunghwan Kim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Ray Kohler wrote:
What's the status of the issue where devices with open partitions can't
have their boot sectors written to? I know phk@ was working on it a
while back but it's something I'd like to see fixed soon, maybe before
release?
I've been using the following:
I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and proceeded
to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package.
Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it stopped and said that
/usr/X11R6/bin/mkhtmlindex could not be found. Sure enough the file was
Kyunghwan Kim writes:
Is it okay to add INTR_MPSAFE for all INTR_TYPE_NET drivers?
NO!
mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that
it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock.
Or is there any unresolved related issues?
Yes, the mbuf allocator must
:
:Matt Dillon wrote:
: Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and
: flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share
: my views on how to deal with other people.
:
: I hereby give maintainership of all my code to Warner, or, whoever wants
:
On 17-Dec-2002 Long, Scott wrote:
I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and proceeded
to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package.
Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it stopped and said that
/usr/X11R6/bin/mkhtmlindex could not
John Baldwin wrote:
On 17-Dec-2002 Long, Scott wrote:
I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and
proceeded
to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package.
Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it stopped and said that
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that
it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock.
Or is there any unresolved related issues?
Yes, the mbuf allocator must occasionally call kmem_malloc(),
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
It appears that you are getting all those errors (BAD block)
because fsck thinks that your filesystem is smaller than it
really is. If you do a dumpfs on the filesystem and check
the size (about line 5), I expect that you will find that
all those bad
On 17-Dec-2002 Scott Long wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On 17-Dec-2002 Long, Scott wrote:
I just did a fresh install of RC1+ onto my workstation machine and
proceeded
to build X. A previous package install had installed the perl package.
Unfortunately, during the build of the X fonts, it
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:53:00AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that
it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock.
Or is there any unresolved related
Please send me a `dumpfs /usr | head -50' output of the filesystem
under the current system. Then clean it up with fsck and run the
same command again. Finally, boot up under the old kernel and
get the output both before and after fsck cleaning. What I am
looking for is changes in the reported
tunefs(8) appears to do a mount/MNT_RELOAD of an fs even when it doesn't
perform any action. To reproduce:
mount -r /usr
tunefs -n enable /usr
[repeat]
Is this a bug?
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
This type of thing caused the division of the BSD projects in
the first place, and hurts the project over all and is the primary reason
that Linux has such a better market position then BSD.
I love FreeBSD. I dunno why. I just do. I'm no expert, but it sits
right with me. It is a shame that
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Kyunghwan Kim writes:
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:53:00AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:31:31PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
mbuf and bpf routines are all mp-safe, so it seems that
it is safe to make network device drivers out of Giant lock.
Or is
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:47:23AM -0500, Steven Ames wrote:
On a related topic... how do you tell which of your filesystems are mounted
UFS1 -vs- UFS2? 'mount -v' just says ufs.
dumpfs filesystem | grep UFS
--
Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See - the thing is - I'm an absolutist. I mean, kind
:You know the person by name/alias, then? Who is it?
:
I do not know who it is, he posts through anonymous proxies.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Hi,
There's trouble in the /etc/rc.d/ipfw script in how it changes things
versus the 4.7 /etc/rc.network script when it comes to NAT in certain
configurations.
For example, on my home gateway box, rc.conf contains:
# Network address translation:
natd_enable=YES
natd_interface=
Hi All,
I installed FreeBSD 5.0 RC1 and everything seems to be working just
fine. I recompiled the kernel with extra hardware including IPSEC ,
netgraph, ipfilter and ipfw support. Againseem sto be working just fine
and find and configured my hardware.
However, SSHD started complaining about
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 22:42:07 -0600
From: Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Aurelien Nephtali [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: panic: ffs_blkfree: freeing free block
In the last episode (Dec 16), Aurelien Nephtali said:
Hi,
I got a panic today which occured
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Today for the fun of it I decided to try installing RC1 on VMware
running in Win2K. (very bored today). Everything goes fine until the
ports installation. I choose all the default options, I have it running
in a 256mb of RAM 10gb virtual disk environment. Like I said up until
the ports
I'm not sure this is correct way to create MS-DOS fs image and
mounting it.
% dd if=/dev/zero of=test.flp bs=1024 count=1440
1440+0 records in
1440+0 records out
1474560 bytes transferred in 0.044105 secs (33432904 bytes/sec)
% sudo mdconfig -a -t vnode -f test.flp
md1
% sudo newfs_msdos -f 1440
On 17 Dec 2002 16:35:50 -0600, Ryan Sommers [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm wondering what it's doing because it isn't copying over ports
very fast.
It's slow because it's creating lots of very small directories.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:Matt Dillon wrote:
: Thanks to my dear friend Warner Losh. I've decided to leave FreeBSD and
: flame in another project. Maybe I could join OpenBSD, the seem to share
: my views on how to deal with other people.
:
: I hereby give
I built world+kernel about an hour ago ( Dec 17 about 23:00 UTC)
and the kernel hangs in the middle of printing phk's GEOM diagnostics:
ad0: 76319MB ST380021A [155061/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
ad2: 42934MB WDC WD450AA-00BAA0 [87233/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66
acd0: CD-RW R/RW 4x4x24 at
You want email addresses; we've got lots of fresh ones.
Face it, there's no way you're going to extract 400 million email addresses
with some flimsy email extractor program you downloaded from the web.
You're lucky if you can extract 2 million in a year!
Our email addresses are even targeted in
Joe Kelsey wrote:
OK, this is a bug. The semantics don't conform to POSIX.
...
I rather imagine the correct thing to do is to root it in the FS,
and, without a leading '/', treat it as relative to the process
current directory.
Basically, this is not a two line fix... it's a lot of
John Baldwin wrote:
This has nothing to do with /dev/random. Please stop with the constant
FUDing Terry.
| Revision 1.296 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Sun Jan 14
| 10:11:10 2001 UTC (23 months ago) by jhb
| Branch: MAIN
| Changes since 1.295: +2 -2 lines
| Diff to previous
Chris Doherty wrote:
p.s. I somehow suspect that embedded systems vendors aren't installing from
the CDROM.
why is this an issue?
1) supporting every computer made since 1964 is NetBSD's job, not
FreeBSD's.
2) I'm scared that 5.0 is going to be unpleasantly slow on my p2-366, let
Is there anyway of doing this? the boot disk is recognizing the card, but
is followed by:
device_probe_and_attach: ed1 attach returned 6
My first guess is that its conflicting with the existing fxp0 device that
was detected before it, since its sharing the IRQ, but dont' know how to
debug
* De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-17 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: 80386 out of GENERIC ]
Apparently, one of the primary markets for FreeBSD is embedded
devices.
Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and
removing lots of things in the kernel, to make
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Juli Mallett wrote:
Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and
removing lots of things in the kernel, to make things fit, and to
make things do their jobs, can't be bothered to use the appropriate
CPU settings?
Not sure where you got that from Terry's post, but...
As a
* De: David Cuthbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-17 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: 80386 out of GENERIC ]
Juli Mallett wrote:
Are you implying that these people, who are undoubtedly adding and
removing lots of things in the kernel, to make things fit, and to
make things do their jobs,
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 09:05:40AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I suppose it would be a good idea to include an alternatvie i386
kernel on the CD-ROM. There may be a space issue, of course. How
many people participating in this thread have
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a problem getting CURRENT to find my ISA SMC Ultra ethernet
card. No matter what I do I can't stop the kernel finding a third
sio device on top of the memory and interrupt that the ed card
occupies. The kernel correctly registers its
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 06:44:56PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
Think it has something to do with this one:
46353 unrarCALL open(0xbfbf98e3,0,0xbef6d8)
46353 unrarNAMI ../rar/sample.rar
46353 unrarRET open 3
46353 unrarCALL flock(0x3,0x6)
46353 unrarNAMI
:
:Does anyone know why this person is trying to (poorly) impersonate MD?
Probably because I lambast him mercilessly for being such a whimp.
It's
kinda sad, actually. He's probably not making any friends with the
people running the blind proxies he abuses to post, either.
But still, would it be impossible to have both a GENERIC and a GENERIC386
kernel in the distribution?
Or is the whole system compiled in non-386 mode?
Even so, if just one site. www.386.freebsd.org were having a 386-enabled
version available, wouldn't that make everybody happy?
Leif
To
On 18-Dec-2002 (06:52:54/GMT) Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is due to lack of rpc.lockd running on the nfs client and/or
server.
Yes, I tryed on a nfs mounted dir from my -CURRENT home machine.
This means that this is a pilot error? Again? :-(
I'm sorry. I think that I must sleep a little
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:19:13 -0800
From: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kirk McKusick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: backgroud fsck is still locking
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:20:21AM +0100, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
On 18-Dec-2002 (06:52:54/GMT) Kris Kennaway wrote:
This is due to lack of rpc.lockd running on the nfs client and/or
server.
Yes, I tryed on a nfs mounted dir from my -CURRENT home machine.
This means that this is a pilot
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Christian Brueffer wrote:
Suspend works ok on my Thinkpad R32. Which version do you have?
A21e
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
81 matches
Mail list logo
