This fixes it, thanks.
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you try this patch please ?
Index: geom_mbr.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/geom/geom_mbr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -r1.28 geom_mbr.c
---
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 05:06:06PM -0500, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whoop. Ok, here's a new patch. I think this covers all the cases.
I've done some testing and it appears to do the right thing, please
look it over (the last patch had
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:08:28PM +, redjupiter wrote:
Hi All,
I installed FreeBSD 5.0 RC1 and everything seems to be working just
fine. I recompiled the kernel with extra hardware including IPSEC ,
netgraph, ipfilter and ipfw support. Againseem sto be working just fine
and find and
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:53:17PM -0600, Ryan Sommers wrote:
Yah, there isn't a secure dist. I'm doing a full install now, to see if
it hits it. I don't understand why only installing base would work on
4.7 but not on 5.0.
I believe it's called 'crypto' not 'secure'. I'm not sure why you ran
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work.
First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte problem, but it
didn't solve the problem.
Finally, after slogging through an insane amount of debugging
Hey, Matt
While you're at it, could you have a look at PR kern/46176 ? =)
At least would you tell me if you have the same problem with your
device(s)
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 11:32, Matthew Dillon wrote:
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony
Hello *,
Few minutes ago I tried to install FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT (kernel
2002.12.19) with Intel SRCU31A RAID Controller (firmware 2.34.00-R030) .
After unsuccessful try to do it via 'sysinstall', I tried to install
FreeBSD to IDE drive and access Intel RAID Controller. I was unsuccessful
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:32:23AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work.
First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte problem, but it
didn't solve the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Rodrigues writes:
Hi,
I just did a cvsup and rebuilt my kernel, and now my kernel
panics upon bootup. I don't have a serial console, so I wrote
down the error messages that I saw:
I saw this one in the middle of some GEOM debug
Tekram DC 390 works under sym(4)... Except 390T which is powered by AMD...
Cliff Sarginson:
Perhaps you need try to play with disk geometry in fdisk... Try to see
what geometry is 1st disk and try set something same on 2nd.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FROM:JULIUS EZE
SUBJECT:BUSINESS PROPOSAL.
DATE:19TH DECEMBER 2002.
House 34/35
Sanisu Fafuwa Street,
Victoria Island,
Lagos.
RE:TRANSFER OF SIXTY FOUR MILLION DOLLARS ( $64 000 000.00)
Dear Sir
I am an auditor by profession,During the last December, I
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:59:37AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Windows .. fine, I installed Linux .. fine. Then I installed
FreeBSD...fine *but* the SCSI BIOS on bootup complains that the disk
geometry is all cockeyed, and it looks that way from
To see if it was related to installing in a vmware vm I whipped out the
laptop last night and ran an install. Sure enough I ran into the same
problem on the laptop when trying to install only base + linux
compatability. When it gets to installing linux compatability it
complains about libssl not
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 07:22:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Rodrigues writes:
Hi,
I just did a cvsup and rebuilt my kernel, and now my kernel
panics upon bootup. I don't have a serial console, so I wrote
down the error messages that I saw:
I
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 07:56:02PM +0600, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote:
Tekram DC 390 works under sym(4)... Except 390T which is powered by AMD...
Cliff Sarginson:
Perhaps you need try to play with disk geometry in fdisk... Try to see
what geometry is 1st disk and try set something same on 2nd.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Rodrigues writes:
Do you know what the ar: FreeBSD check1 failed error message
is caused by?
I think it is the ata-raid driver mumbling under its breath when
it doesn't find anything for it to do.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
Hey, Matt
While you're at it, could you have a look at PR kern/46176 ? =)
At least would you tell me if you have the same problem with your
device(s)
The umass cam interaction is questionable.
I've seen lots of problems caused
Thus spake Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
:Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
:I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
:than I do anyway. :-)
:
:The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
:would make sense to
Hi,
Running 5.0-RC as of yesterday on i386. background fsck was in progress,
but other than that system was idle. Logged in as root on the console, had
cd'd to a ports directory. (note that it panics almost instantly when
using the console, but lasts upto 10 minutes when in use over ssh)
Running
:
:On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
: Hey, Matt
:
: While you're at it, could you have a look at PR kern/46176 ? =)
:
: At least would you tell me if you have the same problem with your
: device(s)
:
:The umass cam interaction is questionable.
:I've seen lots of
:
: Note that my other UMASS device, a compact flash reader, has always
: worked fine with just the Quirk entry. I really need a USB expert to
: tell me what is going on :-)
:
:The problem is that an umass bulk only umass device is allowed to stall the
:comunication pipe on an
On 19-Dec-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote:
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work.
First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte problem, but it
didn't solve the problem.
You don't need the
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
: Hey, Matt
:
: While you're at it, could you have a look at PR kern/46176 ? =)
:
: At least would you tell me if you have the same problem with your
:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:24:09PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 19-Dec-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote:
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work.
First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte
: didn't solve the problem.
:
: You don't need the 6-byte quirk entries anymore. The umass(4) driver
: automatically handles 6-byte commands (converting them to 10-byte commands)
: and has done so for a while now. You should at least try removing the
: 6 byte quirk for now.
:
:I tought
On 19-Dec-2002 Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:24:09PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 19-Dec-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote:
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony disk-on-key I just bought didn't work.
First I added a
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:49:16PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 19-Dec-2002 Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 12:24:09PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On 19-Dec-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote:
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out
why the Sony
This commit is crashing my -current box on boot when it
goes to check for a core. I get the panic:
Negative bio_offset (-1024) on bio ...
Userland probably should not be allowed to panic the box
in that way.
-Matt
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon w
rites:
This commit is crashing my -current box on boot when it
goes to check for a core. I get the panic:
Negative bio_offset (-1024) on bio ...
Userland probably should not be allowed to panic the box
in that way.
Backtrace ?
:
: Eh? For ATAPI and UFM devices we never send a 6 byte command to the
: device that can fail, only 10 byte commands.
:
:I believed this was a SCSI over bulk only device.
:
:--
:B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup
:
:In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon w
:rites:
:This commit is crashing my -current box on boot when it
:goes to check for a core. I get the panic:
:
:Negative bio_offset (-1024) on bio ...
:
:Userland probably should not be allowed to panic the box
:in that way.
:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon w
rites:
:
:In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon w
:rites:
:This commit is crashing my -current box on boot when it
:goes to check for a core. I get the panic:
:
:Negative bio_offset (-1024) on bio ...
:
:Userland probably
It took a hellofalong time pulling my hair out trying to figure out why the
Fumerola disk-on-key I just bought didn't work.
First I added a Quirk entry for the standard 6-byte problem, but it didn't solve
the problem.
Finally, after slogging through an insane amount of debugging (I
-
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
This is a real mess but I finally got it to work. (Note
to John: both quirk entries are absolutely necessary,
everything stalls and dies without them).
Problem #1: RA_NO_CLEAR_UA quirk required in umass.c.
Problem #2: RA_NO_CLEAR_UA quirk code is broken,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The panic described in 46176 has happened to me on -current. On
-stable I have managed (very easily) to get the CAM layer vs UMASS
layer into a confused state where the CAM
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:24:28PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 09:06:19AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The panic described in 46176 has happened to me on -current. On
-stable I have managed (very easily) to get the
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Yes, this is a USB DiskKey - UMASS storage, SCSI over bulk only device.
I've done some further testing on both -current and -stable. I cannot
get the device to work unless I have the quirk entry in scsi_da.c.
-Current has a quirk
I have been recently experimenting with FreeBSD-current and have noticed a bug in dc
network driver that it doesn't set the ethernet address
correctly (I have seen this problem reported before on current, but I was hoping it
could be fixed before 5.0-release). I am trying to find a
fix myself
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:25:40PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
if (csio-ccb_h.flags CAM_CDB_POINTER) {
cmd = (unsigned char *) csio-cdb_io.cdb_ptr;
} else {
cmd = (unsigned char *) csio-cdb_io.cdb_bytes;
:
: -Current has a quirk table for umass.c and already has a flag which
: disables the residue test. The patch for current thus does not require
: #if 0'ing out that code, only a quirk entry. Since I don't need any
: hacks beyond what is there already I am going to commit the
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Running 5.0-RC as of yesterday on i386. background fsck was in progress,
but other than that system was idle. Logged in as root on the console, had
cd'd to a ports directory. (note that it panics almost instantly when
using the console, but lasts
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Running 5.0-RC as of yesterday on i386. background fsck was in progress,
but other than that system was idle. Logged in as root on the console, had
cd'd to a ports directory. (note that it panics almost instantly when
using the console, but lasts
:First, the calculation of dataphysend is totally bogus.
:You can just take the physical address and add (len - 1)
:to it. You have to take the virtual address, add len - 1
:to it, and convert it to a physical address. I can
:crash my machine simply by doing a
God, my
This is the first patch I've ever submitted.
In fact, I can't even take credit for it - some body submitted it to a
newsgroup last year. But I think it should be integrated into the vesa.c
code.
If anyone has time to read over it, I'd appreciate any suggestions, an
help with the one question
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:27:59PM +1100, Darren Reed wrote the words in effect of:
Well someone has blown my cover from developers and has asked here
what I was trying to be more surrepticious about!
In some email I received from Sam Leffler, sie wrote:
A teeny-weeny issue I would like to
Apparently, On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 03:26:36AM +,
Mike Barcroft said words to the effect of;
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
Maybe we should put in the release notes, that:
PFIL_HOOKS is required for IPFILTER
The right thing is to force the dependency in the code (I don't think
there's a way to express it to config). The ipfilter code should probably
have something like
#ifndef PFIL_HOOKS
#error You must specify
I fixed a serious DMA physical address translation bug in OHCI today.
Look on the lists today for this message. Message and patch enclosed.
Note that this fixes one bug in FreeBSD's implementation and a second
bug that is NetBSD/OpenBSD specific. I would appreciate it if someone
Maybe we should put in the release notes, that:
PFIL_HOOKS is required for IPFILTER
The right thing is to force the dependency in the code (I don't think
there's a way to express it to config). The ipfilter code should probably
have something like
#ifndef PFIL_HOOKS
#error You must
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Ooh. you get an all-zero address. Mine comes up with
I have this problem on a card. That's good since I introduced it into
the kernel :-(
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Has anyone else run into the following when trying to run ntpd on sparc?
Dec 20 05:51:37 panther2 ntpd[416]: bind() fd 5, family 2, port 123, addr
216.136.204.96, in_classd=0 flags=1 fails: Can't assign requested address
Dec 20 05:51:41 panther2 ntpd[416]: sendto(216.136.204.18): Bad file
In the last episode (Dec 19), User Phrackbox said:
I have been recently experimenting with FreeBSD-current and have
noticed a bug in dc network driver that it doesn't set the ethernet
address correctly (I have seen this problem reported before on
current, but I was hoping it could be fixed
On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its
knees by doing
# cat /dev/io
While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would normally be
doing, is it really something that should bring the system down?
--
Sean Kelly | PGP KeyID: D2E5E296
I have been running 5.0 for a while and decided to
install 5.0-RC1 on a Pentium 100 with 2GB HDD and 16MB
ram that was lying around. I am seeing this weird
situation where:
- installation aborts with the message Loading Module
if_awi.ko Failed BayStack 660 and Others and hangs up
after the
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:51:48 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dirk Meyer) said:
Dirk Maxim Sobolev wrote,
Perhaps we could just branch out current state of the tree and unlock
it for normal use, while allow to commit onto the RE branch only after
Dirk Moving the tags can give us fine
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:59:54 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Has anyone else run into the following when trying to run ntpd on sparc?
Dec 20 05:51:37 panther2 ntpd[416]: bind() fd 5, family 2, port 123, addr
216.136.204.96, in_classd=0 flags=1 fails: Can't assign requested address
The port
Hi all,
Since yesterday I cannot login to my CURRENT machine anymore
after a world and reboot ...
I really hope this doesn't got MFC'd to RELENG_5_0 ...
debug1: rcvd SSH_CMSG_AUTH_TIS
debug3: mm_pam_init_ctx
debug3: mm_request_send entering: type 42
debug3: monitor_read: checking request 42
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote:
On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its
knees by doing
# cat /dev/io
While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would normally be
doing, is it really something that should bring the system down?
On 20 Dec, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi all,
Since yesterday I cannot login to my CURRENT machine anymore
after a world and reboot ...
I really hope this doesn't got MFC'd to RELENG_5_0 ...
snip debug
I got this tonight on my ultra. I thought it was sparc64 specific, glad
I saw your post.
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Sid Carter thusly...
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:51:48 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dirk Meyer)
said:
Dirk I have 29 updates/committs in the queue, waiting for the freeze is over.
Dirk No offense, I know the problems, but I think the freeze is way to
63 matches
Mail list logo
