sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Barcroft
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The correct fix is to unbreak getbsize() so that it takes an `int *' as its first arg like it used to. The interface change and the above change just give a header length that is not directly usably by any of its users. The header length is what must be

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
I made a mballoc kernel thread that fills up mbufs and mbuf clusters when number of mbufs/clusters of its general list is under low watermark along with suggestions that Mr. Milekic has made around late November. http://redjade.org/doc/patches/mballoc_kproc.diff It seems useful until and even

Re: ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:... : is never a problem with its bounds). Other users of getbsize() in the : src tree but perhaps not ones in ports have been broken to match the : interface breakage. The usual breakage is to cast the size_t to int : without checking bounds. : :Agreed. Not a single consumer actually wants a

Merhaba;

2002-12-29 Thread www.erotikmagaza.com
Sevgili internet kullanicilari; Bu mail sizlere rahatsizlik verdiyse çok çok özür diliyoruz. Biz Erotik ürün satan bir firmayiz. Avrupada insanlarin erotik marketlerden satin alarak gerek ihtiyaçlarinda gerekse hediyelik esya olarak güvenle kullandiklari erotik ürünleri ithal ederek ülkemizde

Re: panic: lockmgr: draining against myself

2002-12-29 Thread Ian Dowse
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], ryan beasley writes: panic: lockmgr: draining against myself I've just checked in revision 1.426 of vfs_subr.c which may solve this, but I was not able to reproduce it myself. Could you or anybody else who has seen this panic try the above revision to see if it

missing support for std::wstring breaks stuff on -CURRENT

2002-12-29 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
hello people, as several other people already noted -current doesn't support std::wstring. this is a real pitty as more and more programs tend to use this. you can test with this simple case: % cat wchar.cc #include string int main(int, char *[]) { std::wstring test(Ltest); } % c++

pxeboot on RC1 or later ?

2002-12-29 Thread Arun Sharma
I'm trying to debug a kernel problem with the RC1 install CD (I get a hang) - basically playing with various kernel options and putting debug printfs. pxeboot sounded like just the thing I needed - burning CDs or floppies being too cumbersome for me. I've followed the recipe and get to the point

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Dag-Erling Smorgrav: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- I don't think it is fixed, we are still getting reports 4600 lines long... Please someone do

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 02:35:49AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: I made a mballoc kernel thread that fills up mbufs and mbuf clusters when number of mbufs/clusters of its general list is under low watermark along with suggestions that Mr. Milekic has made around late November.

Re: editting disklabels

2002-12-29 Thread walt
Willem Jan Withagen wrote: Hi, I'm trying to edit my disklabels to create some swap on just all of them, however when I try to do so, I get: --- files# disklabel -w -B ad4s1 auto disklabel: ioctl DIOCSDINFO: open partition would move or shrink --- This is in single user

Re: ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Andy Farkas
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: === sbin/swapon cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/tinderbox/ia64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function `swaplist': /home/tinderbox/ia64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c:246: warning: field width is not type int (arg 3)

what is interference?

2002-12-29 Thread redjupiter
HI guys, Hope someone is awake :-) watching my dmesg I saw the following: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Dec 29 22:40:09 byblos kernel: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) what the heck is this? I am using RC1 and

Re: what is interference?

2002-12-29 Thread Brandon S. Allbery
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 19:06, redjupiter wrote: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Dec 29 22:40:09 byblos kernel: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) what the heck is this? Most probably it's -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 32016

Re: what is interference?

2002-12-29 Thread redjupiter
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 19:06, redjupiter wrote: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Dec 29 22:40:09 byblos kernel: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) what the heck is this? Most probably

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Kyunghwan Kim
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:47:35PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: I don't really know what to tell you because I'm working on the exact same thing (and I mentionned in the Emails you brought up that I would be) except just keep your code and go ahead and finish what you had intended but I

Re: pxeboot on RC1 or later ?

2002-12-29 Thread Matthew Emmerton
I'm trying to debug a kernel problem with the RC1 install CD (I get a hang) - basically playing with various kernel options and putting debug printfs. pxeboot sounded like just the thing I needed - burning CDs or floppies being too cumbersome for me. I've followed the recipe and get to the

Re: mballoc kernel thread

2002-12-29 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 09:35:28AM +0900, Kyunghwan Kim wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 06:47:35PM -0500, Bosko Milekic wrote: I don't really know what to tell you because I'm working on the exact same thing (and I mentionned in the Emails you brought up that I would be) except just

(anti-)Foot-shooting in GEOM (Re: editting disklabels)

2002-12-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 03:05:18PM -0800, walt wrote: The GEOM code is still changing every day so things are not yet in finished condition. If I understand correctly phk will eventually make it possible to do what you want, but he's not there quite yet. I think phk should disable that

Re: what is interference?

2002-12-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:06:08AM +, redjupiter wrote: HI guys, Hope someone is awake :-) watching my dmesg I saw the following: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Dec 29 22:40:09 byblos kernel: pid 2612 (interference), uid 1001: exited on signal

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Mike Barcroft
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The correct fix is to unbreak getbsize() so that it takes an `int *' as its first arg like it used to. The interface change and the above change ... Agreed. Not a single consumer actually wants a size_t and

RCNG diskless booting bug in /etc/rc.d/fsck

2002-12-29 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, I recently updated my world to a releng5 source tree from 12/27. I noticed that almost all of the RCNG scripts work perfectly for diskless (PXE) booting. There is one minor problem that can easily be fixed. Upon booting the rc scripts immediately initiate ‘fsck’ of file systems.

cron/crontab openlog() cleanup

2002-12-29 Thread John De Boskey
Hi, While debugging a problem recently I had all.log enabled in syslog.conf. One of the things I noted was the messages coming from cron where the ident string was the fully qualified pathname: Dec 29 21:00:00 xxx4 /usr/sbin/cron[7409]: (root) CMD (newsyslog) Dec 29 21:00:00 xxx4

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:21:22AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote: === sbin/swapon cc1: warnings being treated as errors /tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function `swaplist': /tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c:246: warning: field width is not type int (arg 3) Can someone

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:21:22AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote: === sbin/swapon cc1: warnings being treated as errors /tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function `swaplist': /tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c:246: warning:

ia64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Peter Wemm
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:17:05PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: Thus spake Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:21:22AM +, Mike Barcroft wrote: === sbin/swapon cc1: warnings being treated as errors /tinderbox/sparc64/src/sbin/swapon/swapon.c: In function

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-29 ] [ Subjecte: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure ] I'm not sure if your patch will solve the problem. The offending code is here: 240 if (lflag) { 241 char buf[32]; 242

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * De: Craig Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-12-29 ] [ Subjecte: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure ] I'm not sure if your patch will solve the problem. The offending code is here: 240 if (lflag) { 241

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-12-29 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Right. The complaint is that hlen is 64 bits and the printf() expects the field length specifier to be an int. The same goes for getbsize(hlen, ...), so I'm not sure why the compiler didn't complain about a type mismatch. I guess it just coerced

Trouble building X on fresh 5.0-RC2 install?

2002-12-29 Thread walt
I've installed RC2 on my new ASUS A7V8X/AthlonXP and the whole thing went very well except for building XFree. X does compile with no complaints but when I attempt to run it I get unresolved symbol errors and then a coredump. I'm not asking for a fix here, really, so I won't bother you with