wi0: tx failed, retry limit exceeded

2003-02-26 Thread C. Kukulies
I moved my server to new hardware and upgraded to 5.0-current ( 3 weeks ago) pppoe and my ADSL link is up and running since yesterday but my local wireless home network still refuses to work. I have a PCI pccard adapter with an ELSA (Lucent Orinoco) WLAN PCMCIA card which worked flawlessly under

sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread C. Kukulies
My ASUS board has a SiS 963 chip and I would like to get rid from the extra 3COM card I have presently in my system. Is there a chance to get the built in 100MBit network adapter in the chipset working somehow? -- Christoph Kukulies To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

TCP is still broken

2003-02-26 Thread Tim Robbins
This program, based on one from the Apache 2 configure script, still causes -current to lock up solid despite the recent bug fixes to the tcptw code. Explicitly closing connected_s before returning from main() seems to avoid the problem. #include stdio.h #include unistd.h #include sys/types.h

Re: Sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Is there a chance to get the built in 100MBit network adapter in the chipset working somehow? I thought I've fixed the support so it should work ? If not, do you have a pciconf -lv output for me ? Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in

VESA modes with i815?

2003-02-26 Thread Philip Paeps
Hi guys! I've recently had my Matrox VGA board die on me (don't know why, it just died), and since then I've been doomed to use the on-board i815 chip to get the phosphors in my monitor to light up. This works fine with 'small consoles', and even with VESA_800x600, but when I type 'vidcontrol

Re: Sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, Is there a chance to get the built in 100MBit network adapter in the chipset working somehow? I thought I've fixed the support so it should work ? If not, do you have a pciconf -lv output for me ? It works on -current for me... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send

Re: mac_mls still panics

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Robert Watson wrote: Question on both of these: could you inspect the struct ifnet pointer on the mbuf and see what interface they originated from? Also, the dumps are still showing NULL local variables where it should not be possible -- does manual inspection of the variables in the debugger

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Maxime Henrion
Jake Burkholder wrote: Apparently, On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:49:16PM +0100, Maxime Henrion said words to the effect of; Morten Rodal wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:28:09PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote: [snip a lot of the patch] @@ -1431,7 +1442,8 @@

Re: SB Live goes silent after pcm commit

2003-02-26 Thread Philip Paeps
On 2003-02-26 01:49:14 (+0100), Olivier Houchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 11:13:23PM +0100, ?yvind Rakv?g wrote: I believe the commit Feb 20 17:31:11 2003 UTC on src/sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c broke something. With a kernel built from 17:00 sources sound works,

Re: Sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:26:08AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, Is there a chance to get the built in 100MBit network adapter in the chipset working somehow? I thought I've fixed the support so it should work ? If not, do you have a pciconf -lv output for me ? Martin Here you are:

signals still broken ?

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Makonnen
# uname -a FreeBSD kokeb.ambesa.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #8: Tue Feb 25 16:45:54 EST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/daemon/build/current/obj/daemon/build/current/src/sys/QUARK i386 The following program is stuck in pause(3) forever. I have reproduced the bug in 5.0-RELEASE, but 4.7-STABLE

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread Andrew Boothman
My experience with the FBSD boot manager is virtually zero, so I can't address it's workings, but I use GRUB as a booter just because it gets me out of so many jams like yours -- if something isn't where you thought it was you can point GRUB at your disks and let it do the looking for you. The

Re: Sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:8:0: class=0x02 card=0x chip=0x905010b7 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3COM Corp, Networking Division' device = '3C905-TX Fast Etherlink XL PCI 10/100' class= network subclass = ethernet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02

SMBus support...

2003-02-26 Thread Paul A. Howes
All, My motherboard has SMBus support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:3:class=0x0c0500 card=0x24c28086 chip=0x24c38086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801DB (ICH4) SMBus Controller' class= serial bus subclass = SMBus ...but there is no driver. I

Re: SMBus support...

2003-02-26 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 07:08:22AM -0500, Paul A. Howes wrote: My motherboard has SMBus support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:31:3:class=0x0c0500 card=0x24c28086 chip=0x24c38086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82801DB (ICH4) SMBus Controller' class

Re: Sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:33:06PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:8:0: class=0x02 card=0x chip=0x905010b7 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3COM Corp, Networking Division' device = '3C905-TX Fast Etherlink XL PCI 10/100' class= network

RE: SMBus support...

2003-02-26 Thread Paul A. Howes
Sergey, Thanks! Where is this documented? -- Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sergey A. Osokin Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:10 AM To: Paul A. Howes Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMBus support... Try to use device

Re: pcm breakage

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
I'm definitely seeing this, and I assumed it's related to my witness complain about cmi (though it only started recently -- but, then, this message has only been added recently, afaik). I have no sound problems, though. In between crashes for other problems, that is. La Temperanza wrote: I

Re: Sis chipset

2003-02-26 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: I have two network cards plugged in. But board has the builtin 100MBit, Soeren, it's the same board I sent to you. I will lookup in the bios (later) if I have disabled the on board NIC inadvertently (if that's possible) but at present make world is

panics and sometimes hard freezes as of recent builds

2003-02-26 Thread Donn Miller
occurs on occasion with network activity. gtk-gnutella, which generates a lot of network activity, used to make the machine freeze solid, or panic/reboot. The following occured while using slrn during a buildworld. Was not running X at the time, although most of the time, the panics/freezes

Re: SB Live goes silent after pcm commit

2003-02-26 Thread Øyvind Rakvåg
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 01:49, Olivier Houchard wrote: The pcm driver is compiled into the kernel, i haven't tested loading as module. dmesg|grep pcm: pcm0: Creative EMU10K1 port 0x9400-0x941f irq 5 at device 13.0 on pci0 pcm0: TriTech TR28602 ac97 codec Soundcard: Soundblaster

MINCYLGRPS (was: 4-stable releases on -current?)

2003-02-26 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:52:02PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:02:19PM +0200, John Hay wrote: [...] Ok, with the patches below I can get to where it tries to build the fixit floppy in release.10. It breaks because the floppy is too small. I must still check to

Re: SMBus support...

2003-02-26 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 07:33:40AM -0500, Paul A. Howes wrote: Sergey, Thanks! Where is this documented? Looks like its not yet documented. If it works for you - i can make a patch for NOTES and ichsmb(4). Please notify me. Try to use device ichsmb, maybe its helps you. This is your

Re: [Fwd: mkisofs | burncd not working in 5.0 ?]

2003-02-26 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:56:25 +0100 David Vidal Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander Leidinger wrote: Please try the patch in from the mail to -current with the Message-ID [EMAIL PROTECTED] and report if it works for you. I've applied the patch included here, but it leads to an

Re: What broke X between 5.0R and recent current?

2003-02-26 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Mon, 2003/02/24 at 17:28:57 -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: So I got a new Dell laptop, ATI Radeon 7500. Installed FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE, X 4.2.1, and KDE right off the FreeBSD Mall CD-ROM. I configured X from the installation setup and was happily running X and KDE @ 1400x1050. Cool. Then

Re: OpenSSL should define OPENSSL_THREADS?

2003-02-26 Thread Mark Murray
Jacques A. Vidrine writes: Should the OpenSSL in FreeBSD be defining OPENSSL_THREADS? I think you may be right. OpenSSL 0.9.7's out-of-the box configure creates an opensslconf.h that would define OPENSSL_THREADS on FreeBSD. Mark supplied the opensslconf.h's that are used in the FreeBSD

lock order reversal

2003-02-26 Thread Geoffrey
Good day ladies and gents Cvsupping and rebuilding a 5.0 current box to release Monday resulted in the following curiousness: lock order reversal 1st 0xc1190068 process lock (process lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2 112 2nd 0xc11ac934 filedesc structure (filedesc structure)

Re: signals still broken ?

2003-02-26 Thread Tim Robbins
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:25:39AM -0500, Mike Makonnen wrote: The following program is stuck in pause(3) forever. I have reproduced the bug in 5.0-RELEASE, but 4.7-STABLE behaves as expected: the child resumes upon receiving SIGCONT. I spent a while trying to decipher the 5.x signal code and

Re: signals still broken ?

2003-02-26 Thread Tim Robbins
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 01:10:03AM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:25:39AM -0500, Mike Makonnen wrote: The following program is stuck in pause(3) forever. I have reproduced the bug in 5.0-RELEASE, but 4.7-STABLE behaves as expected: the child resumes upon receiving

SCHED_ULE oddities

2003-02-26 Thread Vallo Kallaste
Hi Just for fun I tried out SCHED_ULE once again, using todays source. What I got was really odd situation that my newly installed kernel (and modules) didn't find the way to disk and loader complained about missing kernel on next boot. The /boot/kernel directory was simply missing and /

HyperThreading not working?

2003-02-26 Thread Slawek Zak
Hi, I'm in the process of installing 5.0-RELEASE-p3 on a Dell PowerEdge 2600 server. It has two HyperThreading Xeon 2.4Ghz processors, but HyperThreading is not working in FreeBSD. I guess that four processors should be visible in the system after boot. Yes - I've enabled `Logical Processors' in

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread Darryl Okahata
walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, IIRC, I just went thru this myself (although it's all so routine now I can't even remember what I do to bail out anymore) when I installed XP on a brand new disk and then installed FBSD afterwards. I got the MBR screwed up just like you, then ran

Re: Ethernet (xl) will not transmit or receive

2003-02-26 Thread Kevin Oberman
From: Lucky Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:07:45 -0800 Kevin wrote: I updated my 5.0 system built in late January to RELENG_5_0 on Sunday and the Ethernet was not working. I tried again last night with no change in behavior. The system is an AMD K6-2 on an ASUS

Re: ata dumps broken again

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Top-of-tree -CURRENT: db call doadump Dumping 639 MB ata1: resetting devices .. mi_switch(c4fad9ec,f,f,1c,5f74e) at mi_switch+0x21b ithread_schedule(c48fb380,1,c4faea50,e99cf84c,c025850c) at ithread_schedule+0xf6 sched_ithd(f) at

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread George Hartzell
Andrew Boothman writes: [...] It's possible I guess that we both suffered from the same problem. I'd be inclined to think that it must be operator error over something wrong with sysinstall since I've not seen people complaining of these problems before, yet there must be loads of

Re: TCP is still broken

2003-02-26 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: This program, based on one from the Apache 2 configure script, still causes -current to lock up solid despite the recent bug fixes to the tcptw code. Explicitly closing connected_s before returning from main() seems to avoid the

ATA Tagged Queuing working again?

2003-02-26 Thread Matthias Schuendehuette
Hi Soeren, Hi all, it seems to me that ATA TQ is working again with -current as of yesterday :-) My disk is on atapci0: VIA 82C686b UDMA100 controller port 0xc000-0xc00f \ at device 7.1 on pci0 It's an ad0: 43979MB IBM-DTLA-307045 [89355/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Even if it's

can't load if_gif.ko

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
It seems something has gone wrong on current wrt if_gif: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# ifconfig gif0 create ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE: Invalid argument [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# kldload if_gif kldload: can't load if_gif: No such file or directory It works for vlan, so that's not a general module/ifmodule

can't load if_gif.ko

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
It seems something has gone wrong on current wrt if_gif: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# ifconfig gif0 create ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE: Invalid argument [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# kldload if_gif kldload: can't load if_gif: No such file or directory It works for vlan, so that's not a general module/ifmodule

Re: X server stops working after recent 5.0-RELEASE - 5.0-CURRENTupgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Paul Mather wrote: Yesterday evening I upgraded a Gateway 450 laptop from 5.0-RELEASE-p3 to 5.0-CURRENT. Unfortunately, as a byproduct of that upgrade, I can no longer start X. Instead, it now aborts with Signal 10. :-( [...] Has anyone else experienced problems with X

UDMA66 vs ATAPI_DEVICE(atadev)?

2003-02-26 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Hi Soren, After recent ATA commits, my Promise UDMA66 controller is now running its drives in PIO4 mode. Previously, UDMA66 was working fine. Here's a dmesg snippet: atapci0: Promise UDMA66 controller port 0xdf00-0xdf3f,0xdfe0-0xdfe3,0xdfa8-0xd faf,0xdfe4-0xdfe7,0xdff0-0xdff7 mem

RE: HyperThreading not working?

2003-02-26 Thread John Baldwin
On 26-Feb-2003 Slawek Zak wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of installing 5.0-RELEASE-p3 on a Dell PowerEdge 2600 server. It has two HyperThreading Xeon 2.4Ghz processors, but HyperThreading is not working in FreeBSD. I guess that four processors should be visible in the system after boot. Yes

Re: UDMA66 vs ATAPI_DEVICE(atadev)?

2003-02-26 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Andrew Gallatin wrote: After recent ATA commits, my Promise UDMA66 controller is now running its drives in PIO4 mode. Previously, UDMA66 was working fine. Here's a dmesg snippet: atapci0: Promise UDMA66 controller port 0xdf00-0xdf3f,0xdfe0-0xdfe3,0xdfa8-0xd

Re: can't load if_gif.ko

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Cran
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:30:30PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: It seems something has gone wrong on current wrt if_gif: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# ifconfig gif0 create ifconfig: SIOCIFCREATE: Invalid argument [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# kldload if_gif kldload: can't load if_gif: No such file or

Re: can't load if_gif.ko

2003-02-26 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Bruce Cran [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-02-26 ] [ Subjecte: Re: can't load if_gif.ko ] On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:30:30PM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: It seems something has gone wrong on current wrt if_gif: [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# ifconfig gif0 create ifconfig:

Re: X server stops working after recent 5.0-RELEASE - 5.0-CURRENTupgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Paul Mather wrote: Yesterday evening I upgraded a Gateway 450 laptop from 5.0-RELEASE-p3 to 5.0-CURRENT. Unfortunately, as a byproduct of that upgrade, I can no longer start X. Instead, it now aborts with Signal 10. :-(

Re: can't load if_gif.ko

2003-02-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:12:59PM -0600, Juli Mallett wrote: It's easy to change kldload to have something like Failed to load module, but changing the result of strerror(errno) isn't possible in this case. It is possible, however, to check for obtuse errno values being used that we KNOW

Re: can't load if_gif.ko

2003-02-26 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-02-26 ] [ Subjecte: Re: can't load if_gif.ko ] On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:12:59PM -0600, Juli Mallett wrote: It's easy to change kldload to have something like Failed to load module, but changing the result of strerror(errno) isn't

Re: UDMA66 vs ATAPI_DEVICE(atadev)?

2003-02-26 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Soeren Schmidt writes: ATAPI_DEVICE is used on those controllers that cannot do ATAPI DMA, the test here is bogusly reversed, I'll fix asap... Aha! Thanks! Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: X server stops working after recent 5.0-RELEASE - 5.0-CURRENTupgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Paul Mather wrote: Yesterday evening I upgraded a Gateway 450 laptop from 5.0-RELEASE-p3 to 5.0-CURRENT. Unfortunately, as a byproduct of that upgrade, I can no

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread Darryl Okahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Hartzell) wrote: I'm pretty sure that it's not operator error on my part, since it happened several times. I suspect that there aren't that many people playing with 5.0 that don't install the standard boot stuff, and so that path isn't exercised too much. I

(no subject)

2003-02-26 Thread Marcel Nyström
subscribe freebsd-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

build busted in xlint: stat.h related?

2003-02-26 Thread Andrew Gallatin
I just tried to buildworld, and xlint crapped out like this: === usr.bin/xlint/llib lint -cghapbx -Cposix /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/llib/llib-lposix lint -cghapbx -Cstdc /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/llib/llib-lstdc llib-lposix: llib-lstdc: stdio.h(79): warning: struct __sFILEX never defined [233] Lint

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread George Hartzell
Darryl Okahata writes: [...] I installed 5.0 with the booteasy MBR on my IBM laptop, and it worked fine. The problem I had was that *ANY* MBR-based boot program interfered with IBM's special product recovery software, and so I instead decided to just use Win2K/XP's boot mechanism

Re: build busted in xlint: stat.h related?

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Barcroft
Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just tried to buildworld, and xlint crapped out like this: === usr.bin/xlint/llib lint -cghapbx -Cposix /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/llib/llib-lposix lint -cghapbx -Cstdc /usr/src/usr.bin/xlint/llib/llib-lstdc llib-lposix: llib-lstdc: stdio.h(79):

Re: X server stops working after recent 5.0-RELEASE - 5.0-CURRENT upgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:15:44PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: First off, I have no idea what might have caused X to break on your systems. I guess I'm lucky to have not run into such problems... Would you mind doing a binary search (using date tags) to determine which commit

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Cran
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:06:35PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote: I was recently a participant in a thread in another forum where all sorts of people, including a well respected gcc developer, said categorically that the latest (stock) gcc produces correct code with -O2 in all cases on ia32. If

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-02-26 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools

Low swap kernel panic

2003-02-26 Thread Thierry Herbelot
Hello, while recompiling all of my ports (portupgrade -a -f), I've had my notebook panic with the following messages (see at the bottom). I have a limited amount of swap (paging out of a 64Meg file : swapfile=/usr/swap0 in /etc/rc.conf), and I was running KDE at the time : noticing a

Hyperactive ICH2 sound (with workaround)

2003-02-26 Thread Craig Boston
On a recently compiled current the sound from an Intel 82801BA integrated sound chip seems to be accelerated (high pitched and too fast). While it's amusing to listen to certain songs this way, I don't think it should be the default mode of operation ;) Relevant dmesg output: pcm0: Intel

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hi, Just a little question: Does -march=k6-2 implies -m3dnow? Or -march=pentiumpro implies -mmmx? I always thought that when I use -march it will enable other porcessor specific optimizations like mmx and 3dnow (if available). Thanks, Nuno Teixeira On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at

make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foobar seems to be broken

2003-02-26 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Seems that for some reason gengenrtl is not built when doing 'make build-tools' in gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools. As a result 'make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foobar' is broken. Below is the output of 'make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=alpha' of recent HEAD on 4.7-STABLE/i386 ===

Volunteer with genuine i386 cpu lots of time wanted.

2003-02-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Is there anybody out there who can try to run a straight -current on a _real_ i386 class CPU ? Ie, not a i486, not a Cyrix, not an AMD but a genuine Intel i386DX (SX would be but too suicidal to be informative). I am also not interested in people running heavily modified source trees, it is

Yet another ATA-related Kernel trap 12 :-(

2003-02-26 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Setup: Fujitsu MPG3409AT E disk on external CMD649 controller (the only HD). Kernel trap while booting with timeout for ad0 device. Setting hw.ata.ata_dma=0 solves the problem. Sources last cvsupped last night (after the last ATA-related commits). Dmesg output attached, but that's about all I can

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries,

RE: HyperThreading not working?

2003-02-26 Thread Trish Lynch
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote: On 26-Feb-2003 Slawek Zak wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of installing 5.0-RELEASE-p3 on a Dell PowerEdge 2600 server. It has two HyperThreading Xeon 2.4Ghz processors, but HyperThreading is not working in FreeBSD. I guess that four processors

Re: HyperThreading not working?

2003-02-26 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Trish Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2003-02-26 ] [ Subjecte: RE: HyperThreading not working? ] On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote: On 26-Feb-2003 Slawek Zak wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of installing 5.0-RELEASE-p3 on a Dell PowerEdge 2600 server. It has

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread Darryl Okahata
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Hartzell) wrote: Only differences are which partition we mark active and what boot loader lives there. True, but that's the key point: ... and what boot loader lives there. There are times when not touching the boot loader is desirable. While GRUB, booteasy, and

Re: make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foobar seems to be broken

2003-02-26 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Most likely, some of your sources have modification date pointing to the future, or your computer's date is old. On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:59:28AM +0600, Max Khon wrote: hi, there! Seems that for some reason gengenrtl is not built when doing 'make build-tools' in gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools. As

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Does -march=k6-2 implies -m3dnow? Or -march=pentiumpro implies -mmmx? I always thought that when I use -march it will enable other porcessor specific optimizations like mmx and 3dnow (if available). IIRC, 166 and 180 Mhz PPros don't support MMX.

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Jens Rehsack
Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Nuno Teixeira wrote: Does -march=k6-2 implies -m3dnow? Or -march=pentiumpro implies -mmmx? I always thought that when I use -march it will enable other porcessor specific optimizations like mmx and 3dnow (if available). IIRC, 166 and 180 Mhz

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread George Hartzell
Darryl Okahata writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Hartzell) wrote: Only differences are which partition we mark active and what boot loader lives there. True, but that's the key point: ... and what boot loader lives there. There are times when not touching the boot loader is

Re: Vinum R5 [was: Re: background fsck deadlocks with ufs2 and big disk]

2003-02-26 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Friday, 21 February 2003 at 10:00:46 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 02:28:45PM -0800, Darryl Okahata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vallo Kallaste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll second Brad's statement about vinum and softupdates interactions. My last experiments with

Re: Vinum R5 [was: Re: background fsck deadlocks with ufs2 and big disk]

2003-02-26 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Friday, 21 February 2003 at 1:56:56 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Vallo Kallaste wrote: The crashes and anomalies with filesystem residing on R5 volume were related to vinum(R5)/softupdates combo. The vinum R5 and system as a whole were stable without softupdates. Only one problem remained

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Rhett Monteg Hollander
Nuno Teixeira wrote: Hi, Just a little question: Does -march=k6-2 implies -m3dnow? Or -march=pentiumpro implies -mmmx? Pentium Pro doesn't support MMX; -march=pentiumpro (aka -march=i686) enables compiling with main i686 instruction set, no MMX\SSE or whatever. I always thought that

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread shogun70
I have never emailed this list, and am only reading it to see how 5.0-RELEASE is shaping up. Sorry if I'm repeating stuff or commenting out of turn. This problem sounds like the one I've had on several occasions when repartitioning my HDD. My Windows2000 boot.ini invariably needs to be

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Luis M. Zuccolo
Hello, I'm interested in applying this patch, because I've never done such precedure. Is anybody able to explane me, step by step, what should I do? Thanks in advance. On Wednesday 26 February 2003 08:01, Maxime Henrion wrote: Jake Burkholder wrote: Apparently, On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Mezz bsdforums.org
I'm interested in applying this patch, because I've never done such precedure. Is anybody able to explane me, step by step, what should I do? Thanks in advance. % tar xfvz NVIDIA_FreeBSD-1.0-3203.tar.gz % fetch http://mu.org/~mux/patches/nvidia.patch % patch -p0 nvidia.patch % cd

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Anti
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:06:54 +0100 Jens Rehsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to

Re: Yet another ATA-related Kernel trap 12 :-(

2003-02-26 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Vladimir Kushnir wrote: Setup: Fujitsu MPG3409AT E disk on external CMD649 controller (the only HD). Kernel trap while booting with timeout for ad0 device. Setting hw.ata.ata_dma=0 solves the problem. Sources last cvsupped last night (after the last ATA-related commits). Dmesg output

Re: patch for the nVidia driver and -CURRENT

2003-02-26 Thread Luis M. Zuccolo
Thanks Mess On Thursday 27 February 2003 02:55, Mezz bsdforums.org wrote: I'm interested in applying this patch, because I've never done such precedure. Is anybody able to explane me, step by step, what should I do? Thanks in advance. % tar xfvz NVIDIA_FreeBSD-1.0-3203.tar.gz % fetch

Re: OpenSSL question for id_function()

2003-02-26 Thread Lev Walkin
Craig Rodrigues wrote: return static_castunsigned long(pthread_self()); pthread_self() returns something of type pthread_t. This code works under Linux, because pthread_t is mapped to an integer value. However, on FreeBSD, pthread_t is a pointer to struct pthread, so this code does not

ata dumps broken again

2003-02-26 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Top-of-tree -CURRENT: db call doadump Dumping 639 MB ata1: resetting devices .. mi_switch(c4fad9ec,f,f,1c,5f74e) at mi_switch+0x21b ithread_schedule(c48fb380,1,c4faea50,e99cf84c,c025850c) at ithread_schedule+0xf6 sched_ithd(f) at sched_ithd+0x38 Xintr15() at Xintr15+0x6c --- interrupt, eip =

-O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries, which includes parts of Mesa). Has anybody else run into

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Jens Rehsack
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries, which includes parts of Mesa).

Re: Checksum offload support for Intel 82550/82551

2003-02-26 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, I can't easily drop everything and slap together a test setup with exactly the right software and hardware I need to debug everyone's particular problem. That's clear. (This bug only occurs in -CURRENT as of 30 seconds ago and on an UltraSPARC 10 with 16 if_dc interfaces and I need

Re: Checksum offload support for Intel 82550/82551

2003-02-26 Thread Bill Paul
I think my problem is not that hard. This bug only occurs when you are using CURRENT (or 5.0 RELEASE) from (I think) the point where BPF changed. Actually, there's something else than changed. The ng_fec module tries to set ifp-if_output to ng_fec_output() so that it can do some output

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries,

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Fred Souza
I was recently a participant in a thread in another forum where all sorts of people, including a well respected gcc developer, said categorically that the latest (stock) gcc produces correct code with -O2 in all cases on ia32. If it doesn't, the gcc folks would like a bug report. I use -O3

Re: -O2 considered harmful

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries,

Re: NTLDR missing after 5-RELEASE install

2003-02-26 Thread Andrew Boothman
George Hartzell wrote: Andrew Boothman writes: [...] I didn't really change much about my system when I installed FreeBSD. Windows is installed on the whole of the first HDD, and FreeBSD on the whole of the second. Prior to installing 5.0, the second disc had an old installation of 4.6