Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:26:34AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 03:32:56AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: ... :) And I hoped a programmer who knows the source could find out and fix very quickly. sorry, i missed the offending line number in your previous email. I

5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.1R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.1. FreeBSD 5.1

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:51:07PM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: Is there anyone actually successfully using raidframe and if yes, what kind of hardware? RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation.

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Bob Willcox
I am successfully using a Mylex DAC1164PVX RAID controller on 5-CURRENT: mlx0: Mylex version 5 RAID interface port 0x2000-0x207f mem 0xf800-0xfbff,0xec91-0xec91007f irq 5 at device 8.0 on pci2 mlx0: controller initialisation in progress... mlx0: initialisation complete. mlx0:

Re: vm-related panic with 5.1RC1

2003-06-02 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 11:26:12 +0200 (CEST) Martin Blapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I just got this panic during compile of openoffice Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x68 fault code= supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer =

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. FreeBSD 5.2

IPv4 problems with an driver

2003-06-02 Thread Joris Vandalon
Hi there, I'm having some troubles with my an (cisco 350) device under current. it seems like ipv4 is not workint perfectly. ipv6 seems to work fine though. here the ping statistics to my gateway over ipv4 and ipv6 - --- 192.168.2.1 ping statistics --- 100 packets transmitted, 67 packets

Mailinglistenverwalter: : ML-(un)subscribe

2003-06-02 Thread Majordomo
-- Ihre E-Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Kommando subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] muss überprüft werden. Hierzu wird eine weitere E-Mail mit einem Authentifizierungschlüssel an folgende Adresse geschickt: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

subscribe newsletter@laserhotline.de

2003-06-02 Thread Majordomo
-- ACHTUNG: Ihre E-Mail-Adresse wurde noch NICHT in die Mailingliste [EMAIL PROTECTED] eingetragen! Bitte bestätigen Sie die Eintragung nun wie folgt beschrieben:

Mailinglistenverwalter: : auth

2003-06-02 Thread Majordomo
-- Willkommen, Ihre Anmeldung zu [EMAIL PROTECTED] war erfolgreich. Wenn Sie sich von der Liste wieder austragen möchten, benutzen Sie einfach das WWW-Interface oder schicken Sie eine E-Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED], mit leerem Betreff und folgender Zeile in der Nachricht: unsubscribe [EMAIL

Mailinglistenverwalter: : auth

2003-06-02 Thread Majordomo
-- Bei der Bearbeitung Ihrer Eintragung ist ein Fehler aufgetreten: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ist bereits auf der Liste [EMAIL PROTECTED] eingetragen. - An error occurred while processing your subscribe request: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is already subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vm-related panic with 5.1RC1

2003-06-02 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi all, I just got this panic during compile of openoffice Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x68 fault code= supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0271f4d stack pointer

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Areas requiring immediate testing I already reported to -current that I wasn't able to umount a msdosfs slice a while ago (umount failed with busy and the slice was still mounted), last week I had the possibility

confirm subscribe to phpwizard@rent-a-phpwizard.de

2003-06-02 Thread phpwizard-help
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. To confirm that you would like [EMAIL PROTECTED] added to the phpwizard mailing list, please send an empty reply to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usually, this happens when you just hit the reply button.

confirmation required -- for Disquiet.com subscription

2003-06-02 Thread Disquiet.com
To complete your Disquiet.com email subscription, you must confirm your request by replying to this message. Be sure to include this phrase: ['j9r3,a1] If you did not request, or do not want, a subscription to the free Disquiet.com email newsletter, please accept this apology and ignore

Eh..

2003-06-02 Thread Erik Paulsen Skaalerud
Can someone find out who's trying to add the freebsd mailinglist to other mailinglists? This is getting annoying. Erik. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Confirm your subscription to: Fashions of India Newsletter

2003-06-02 Thread Fashions of India
A few minutes ago, you entered your email address at http://www.fashions-of-india.com to be added to our mailing list. This list has a double optin feature so you must visit the URL listed below to confirm your subscription. Sincerely, The Fashions of India Team

Trolling and forge subscribes.

2003-06-02 Thread Mark Murray
Can someone find out who's trying to add the freebsd mailinglist to other mailinglists? This is getting annoying. PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO ANY OF THESE TROLLS! Turn on your filters, train your spam-assassins etc. Please DON'T contribute to the traffic. The best way to make a troll go away is to

Re: Fatal trap on RELENG_5_1 SMP

2003-06-02 Thread Robert Watson
Could you build your kernel with options DDB and debugging symbols, and when the kernel drops to the debugger on this panic, copy and past the stack trace into an e-mail? Alternatively, or perhaps as well, extract the information with a core. There are some excellent instructions on generating

subscribe {current,chat}@freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Jason Stryker
___ / _|_ _ ___| | __ | |_| | | |/ __| |/ / | _| |_| | (__| |_| \__,_|\___|_|\_\ _ _ _ __ _ _| | | | '_ \| | | | | | | |_) | |_| | | | | .__/ \__,_|_|_| |_| _ _ | |__ ___ _ __ _

subscribe {current,chat}@freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Jason Stryker
___ / _|_ _ ___| | __ | |_| | | |/ __| |/ / | _| |_| | (__| |_| \__,_|\___|_|\_\ _ _ _ __ _ _| | | | '_ \| | | | | | | |_) | |_| | | | | .__/ \__,_|_|_| |_| _ _ | |__ ___ _ __ _

subscribe {current,chat}@freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Jason Stryker
___ / _|_ _ ___| | __ | |_| | | |/ __| |/ / | _| |_| | (__| |_| \__,_|\___|_|\_\ _ _ _ __ _ _| | | | '_ \| | | | | | | |_) | |_| | | | | .__/ \__,_|_|_| |_| _ _ | |__ ___ _ __ _

subscribe {current,chat}@freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Jason Stryker
___ / _|_ _ ___| | __ | |_| | | |/ __| |/ / | _| |_| | (__| |_| \__,_|\___|_|\_\ _ _ _ __ _ _| | | | '_ \| | | | | | | |_) | |_| | | | | .__/ \__,_|_|_| |_| _ _ | |__ ___ _ __ _

subscribe {current,chat}@freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Jason Stryker
___ / _|_ _ ___| | __ | |_| | | |/ __| |/ / | _| |_| | (__| |_| \__,_|\___|_|\_\ _ _ _ __ _ _| | | | '_ \| | | | | | | |_) | |_| | | | | .__/ \__,_|_|_| |_| _ _ | |__ ___ _ __ _

Polishing touch

2003-06-02 Thread arno
Hello, just in case re@ or a maintainer finds this worhtwhile : from my /etc/rc.conf : ifconfig_tap0=lladdr 00:90:27:3f:12:9f apm_enable=YES apmd_enable=YES This gives me in dmesg-a (today's CVS) : 1) Setting hostname: M. module_register: module if_tap already exists! Module if_tap

Re: Polishing touch

2003-06-02 Thread Nicolai Petri
On Sunday 01 June 2003 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Hi Arno just in case re@ or a maintainer finds this worhtwhile : 1) Setting hostname: M. module_register: module if_tap already exists! Module if_tap failed to register: 17 can't re-use a leaf (if_tap_debug)! tap0:

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Scott Long
Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 09:00:13 -0400 (EDT) Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Areas requiring immediate testing I already reported to -current that I wasn't able to umount a msdosfs slice a while ago (umount failed with busy and the slice was still mounted), last

Re: Polishing touch

2003-06-02 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Sunday 01 June 2003 18:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: module_register: module if_tap already exists! Module if_tap failed to register: 17 can't re-use a leaf (if_tap_debug)! FWIW, same thing happens for if_tun. -- | Michael Nottebrock| KDE on FreeBSD |

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 11:46:34 -0600 Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've mounted many MSDOS filesystems recently without problems. Do have any other information about this? Did you verify that there were no open vnodes on the filesystem? I just copied 13 GB from the msdosfs to an ufs

GEOM buildworld failure

2003-06-02 Thread David Magda
Getting the following message on a buildworld: mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_stats.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_ctl.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_ctl.c:48:27:

Re: GEOM buildworld failure

2003-06-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
This is already be fixed. In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Magda writes: Getting the following message on a buildworld: mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/lib/libgeom /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_getxml.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_stats.c /usr/src/lib/libgeom/geom_xml2tree.c

i2c modules not hooked up to the build?

2003-06-02 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, is there a specific reason why the i2c modules aren't hooked up to the build in sys/modules/Makefile? diff -u -r1.324 Makefile --- Makefile2003/05/31 18:36:40 1.324 +++ Makefile2003/06/01 19:11:36 @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ gnufpu \ hea \ hfa \ + i2c \

Re: Fatal trap on RELENG_5_1 SMP

2003-06-02 Thread Magnus J
Hello I've rebuilt the kernel with these debug-options, and now I'm having difficulty reproducing the problem. That was not an issue before. Everytime I did 'shutdown', it crashed. Will continue trying. Any suggestions? Regards Magnus --- Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: Could you

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Petri Helenius
RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it will be fixed before 5.2. Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place... Pete

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-01 20:12:52 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-06-01 20:12:52 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-01 20:15:32 - building world TB --- cd

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-01 20:15:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-06-01 20:15:41 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-01 20:18:17 - building world TB

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Scott Long
Petri Helenius wrote: RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it will be fixed before 5.2. Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place... Pete Just

Re: Native JDK with libthr/libkse

2003-06-02 Thread Narvi
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On (2003/06/01 00:50), Daniel Eischen wrote: I just built jdk13 a couple of days ago. No problem whatsoever. You guys must have rotten karma or something. Did you already have a native JDK installed? I built the native 1.4.1 JDK two weeks

installing kernel with securelevel set to 2

2003-06-02 Thread Rory Arms
FreeBSD-current@ I just tried installing a kernel after compiling May 31st source and figured I would have to reboot to a lower securelevel, as I'm running with kern.securelevel set to 2. However, it slipped my mind and i've noticed it installed anyhow. Has this behavior changed? I thought

Re: Native JDK with libthr/libkse

2003-06-02 Thread Andy Fawcett
On Sunday 01 June 2003 02:03, Christopher Johnson wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What are the above error messages? Sorry, I've never been able to build native java for FreeBSD. # cd /usr/ports/java/jdk13 # make

Re: installing kernel with securelevel set to 2

2003-06-02 Thread Rory Arms
I think I answered my own question. The kernel isn't installed with immutable flags to begin with -- So, my question is, why is this? I thought the advantage of making the kernel immutable was to better protect the system if root was compromised? I searched the archives regarding this, but

ftp.freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Julian Elischer
Just a quick note.. I noticed that packages-5-current directlry just got cleared out. (I guess a new set of packages is on the way). (bummer I was just upgrading a package from it :-) While it was almost empty I noticed that there is one file left dated May 8 in the All directory.. Whoever is

Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s

2003-06-02 Thread Doug Barton
Personally I think it would make more sense for gdbe init to pull the sectorsize from the fs for the user. But, I'm not volunteering to write the code. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: ftp.freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Julian Elischer
too late.. you already got it :-) This brings up a question.. How do we find out who to contact for each mirror etc.? I notice cvsup14 has been unreachable for a month now.. On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: Just a quick note.. I noticed that packages-5-current directlry just

Re: ftp.freebsd.org

2003-06-02 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.06.01 14:57:41 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: This brings up a question.. How do we find out who to contact for each mirror etc.? In the handbook :) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors-ftp.html

Re: Polishing touch

2003-06-02 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello, just in case re@ or a maintainer finds this worhtwhile : from my /etc/rc.conf : ifconfig_tap0=lladdr 00:90:27:3f:12:9f apm_enable=YES apmd_enable=YES This gives me in dmesg-a (today's CVS) : 1)

Re: Polishing touch

2003-06-02 Thread arno
module_register: module if_tap already exists! Module if_tap failed to register: 17 can't re-use a leaf (if_tap_debug)! tap0: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 ether 00:90:27:3f:12:9f bit I just compiled if_tap into my kernel, and I nowehere asked

Problems building today's world

2003-06-02 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
I've just cvsupped the latest -CURRENT, and it dies on me in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc: === gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc c++ -O -pipe -std=iso9899:1999 -I/usr/obj/src/FreeBSD/5-CURRENT-ZAPHOD/src/i386/legacy/usr/include -I/src/FreeBSD/5-CURRENT-ZAPHOD/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/lib

VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

2003-06-02 Thread Hiten Pandya
Gang, My fingers have been itching to do this since the day phk@ planted this idea in my brain (re: cdevsw initialisations). Basically, it changes the vfsops to use C99 sparse format, just like cdevsw. It removes a lot of junk default initialisations, and duplication. Just like phk@ said in

Re: Problems building today's world

2003-06-02 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Monday, 2 June 2003 at 10:54:06 +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: I've just cvsupped the latest -CURRENT, and it dies on me in gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc: *sigh* Yes, of course I saw the dialogue between DES and obrien, and the subsequent commit, so I re-supped and cvs updated and it still

i386-P4 make world from 06.01.2003 source failed: (csu/i386-elf)ISO CB89 long long error

2003-06-02 Thread none
System: i386 P4 5.1-BETA2 (cvsup 06.01.2003.2114CDT) cd /usr/src cvsup standard-supfile make world . . . cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -elf -Wall -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../../libc/include -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-02 04:00:10 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-06-02 04:00:10 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-02 04:02:05 - building world TB --- cd

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-02 04:08:37 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-06-02 04:08:37 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-02 04:10:30 - building world TB --- cd

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-02 04:17:15 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-06-02 04:17:15 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-02 04:18:50 - building world TB --- cd

Remove absolute symlink in $MAKEOBJDIR

2003-06-02 Thread Jun Kuriyama
In usual buildworld, we have absolute symbolic links in $MAKEOBJDIR. This causes built $MAKEOBJDIR can use to install the world on other boxen only if same /usr/src (or etc.) location and same $MAKEOBJDIR. I'm using this patch for months to avoid this situation. (1) Copy man pages rather than

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-02 04:25:20 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-06-02 04:25:20 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-02 04:26:47 - building world TB --- cd

Re: Remove absolute symlink in $MAKEOBJDIR

2003-06-02 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:13:55PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: Index: bin/csh/Makefile === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/csh/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.30 diff -u -r1.30 Makefile --- bin/csh/Makefile 2 May 2003 06:39:13

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-06-02 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-06-02 05:20:34 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-06-02 05:20:34 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-06-02 05:22:27 - building world TB

Re: Remove absolute symlink in $MAKEOBJDIR

2003-06-02 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 02:13:55PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: In usual buildworld, we have absolute symbolic links in $MAKEOBJDIR. This causes built $MAKEOBJDIR can use to install the world on other boxen only if same /usr/src (or etc.) location and same $MAKEOBJDIR. I'm using this patch

Re: Remove absolute symlink in $MAKEOBJDIR

2003-06-02 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Sun, 1 Jun 2003 23:33:04 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: I prefer the ln's over cp. Are you sure this is the only reason for the same $MAKEOBJDIR requirement? Also, typically one sets MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX, not MAKEOBJDIR. Are you sure you're using the right one for what you're wanting to do?

malloc non-sleepablelocks held messages for nvidia.ko at boottime

2003-06-02 Thread none
I have no apparent problems using the NVIDIA_FreeBSD-1.0-3203 driver, but under 5.1-BETA I see the following messages, which I assume are informational only, but I don't really know what it is that they are trying to tell me: Jun 2 01:43:16 kern.info freebsd2 syslogd: kernel boot file is

Pedantic and Werror together...

2003-06-02 Thread Pete Carah
pedantic and Werror together cause problems again... I presume we really need the quad type here. (or is this one due to a compiler upgrade?) -- Pete --- === lib/csu/i386-elf rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 11:46:34 -0600 Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've mounted many MSDOS filesystems recently without problems. Do have any other information about this? Did you verify that there were no open vnodes on the filesystem? Simply mounting, reading and umount the fs works:

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Mark Sergeant
-snip- Monday, 02. June 2003, 09:16:59 {0} FreeBSD 5.1-BETA [Magelan:~] (6) [EMAIL PROTECTED] # cp /mnt/ftpchroot-test.sh /tmp/ Monday, 02. June 2003, 09:17:12 {0} FreeBSD 5.1-BETA [Magelan:~] (7) [EMAIL PROTECTED] # umount /tmp umount: unmount of /tmp failed: Device busy Monday, 02.

Re: vm-related panic with 5.1RC1

2003-06-02 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, This is exactly the panic I am seeing on my dual-processor box. My current suspicion is that it somehow relates to the same pcb_ext being freed twice. I do not need OpenOffice to trigger the bug, on SMP configuration it happens all the time. In the meantime the box did not panic

curses header conflict (wchar_t,wint_t)

2003-06-02 Thread Till Plewe
When trying to install python2.3 on either stable or current the python curses module doesn't build. I get the following compiler complaints: STABLE (line numbers in brackets are from CURRENT) /usr/include/ncurses.h:236(289): conflicting types for `wchar_t' /usr/include/stdlib.h:58(57):

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 02 Jun 2003 17:38:28 +1000 Mark Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Umm shouldn't you be trying to umount /mnt ? I retested this and now used /mnt in the umount invocation... (blushI hope I'm awake now./blush). It umounts now successfully. I noticed some commits to the vfs layer between my

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Petri Helenius
So far I´ve tried asr and aac, both cards end up in kernel panics and/or array hang in a few minutes (multiple hardware platforms so I don´t think the motherboard is to blame) After the bad experience with asr I thought I give aac a try with somewhat similar results. And asr does not work with 4G

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Petri Helenius
If you rewind to last October, RAIDFrame worked well. Unfortunately, some kernel interfaces changed in between now and then and RAIDFrame was left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get paid $0 to work on

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2003.06.02 11:18:34 +0300, Petri Helenius wrote: So far I´ve tried asr and aac, both cards end up in kernel panics and/or array hang in a few minutes (multiple hardware platforms so I don´t think the motherboard is to blame) I have an asr based RAID controller (Adaptec 2400A), though it is

Re: Native JDK with libthr/libkse

2003-06-02 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2003/06/01 23:53), Narvi wrote: The absence of credible Java support in FreeBSD has lost us significant penetration in the past, and it would be disastrous if the perceptions of the past shaped the future. credible rather sounds like 'comes on the installation cd, doesn't have

Re: malloc non-sleepablelocks held messages for nvidia.ko at boottime

2003-06-02 Thread Julian St.
Hello, almost the same here: FreeBSD jmmr.no-ip.com 5.1-BETA FreeBSD 5.1-BETA #16: Sat May 31 15:51:17 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/BSD5ROUTER i386 Interesting lines from dmesg: Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel/nvidia.ko at 0xc05cb1f4. ... nvidia0: RIVA TNT2

Re: Remove absolute symlink in $MAKEOBJDIR

2003-06-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: In usual buildworld, we have absolute symbolic links in $MAKEOBJDIR. This causes built $MAKEOBJDIR can use to install the world on other boxen only if same /usr/src (or etc.) location and same $MAKEOBJDIR. I'm using this patch for months to avoid this

Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO

2003-06-02 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 11:46:34 -0600 Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've mounted many MSDOS filesystems recently without problems. Do have any other information about this? Did you verify that there were no open vnodes on the filesystem? I just copied 13 GB from

Re: Native JDK with libthr/libkse

2003-06-02 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On (2003/06/01 23:53), Narvi wrote: The absence of credible Java support in FreeBSD has lost us significant penetration in the past, and it would be disastrous if the perceptions of the past shaped the future. credible rather sounds like

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:36:18AM +0300, Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get paid $0 to work on RAIDframe. Not being a native english speaker I probably

Re: raidframe

2003-06-02 Thread Petri Helenius
FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste your time. This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone. IMO, software does not magically get better but it must be actively being used and

MAXLOGNAME 17 ?

2003-06-02 Thread milo
Hi, in my service I have one box linux runing openldap with five thousand accounts. Many servers linux do authentication in this box and everything is fine. We also use box freebsd 4, however without this feature because not works nss_ldap in this version. Well, whith the begin of the 5.1, a

Re: MAXLOGNAME 17 ?

2003-06-02 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0300 I heard the voice of milo, and lo! it spake thus: I think that change this value can resolv. After one cvsup of current, my login and syslogd were compiled again but not works. Then I did one attach with gdb in login and I watched that mistake was in