Shawn wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 03:40, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > It's actually unlikely that IBM will ever release enough documentation
> > to get a full 64 bit Linux running on a PPC 970, let alone FreeBSD,
> > and that you will be stuck with a 32 bit kernel that runs 64 bit apps,
> > and whic
Stephane Raimbault wrote:
> Well I went to go change my /boot/loader.conf options to reflect the
> following:
>
> kern.vm.kmem.size="35"
Assuming this is in pages, it is 1/3 of the total physical RAM in the
system. This is way too large, unless you have recompiled your kernel
to have 3G KVA
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > > for i386 it would be an alternate name for fuword32() and suword32()
> > > I'm not sure what it would be on other architectures
> >
> > fuword64 and suword64. PowerPC is like i386.
>
> PPC 970 explicitly supports mixed
Stephane Raimbault wrote:
> I recently realized that I was miss-understanding how much free memory I had
> on the system, and I doubt I even need the full 4Gig's.
>
> Perhaps I can re-confirm how to check how much free real memory is available
> on the system.
For 4G of physical RAM, with 3G of K
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chris BeHanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Can't they just redact that information from the spec.?
>
> Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
> what to do. Also, differ
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris BeHanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Can't they just redact that information from the spec.?
Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious
what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different
frequencies that a
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:21:23 -0400
> >
> > > The folks at Broadcom have not been willing to release any information
> > > on their 800.11g chips for fear of violating FCC regs. The required
> > > NDA
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:14:20PM +0200, Karel J. Bosschaart wrote:
> Not sure if this is useful, but I'm getting a perfectly reproducible
> panic when doing 'grep -R foo .' (as normal user) in a read-only
> mounted ntfs partition on a -current as of ~3 weeks ago:
>
[...]
> Panicstring: bundir
Attached is a patch that disables ever sending 6 byte commands to buses
that do not support them. Numerous USB devices hang when receiving a 6
byte command. For testing, this patch comments out the scsi_da quirks for
devices that I believe are addressed by this patch and no longer need the
quirk.
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Glen Gibb wrote:
> Whoops - it helps if I attach the patch :)
Glen,
This looks good to me -- I've committed the patch. If you pick up
acl_to_text.c:1.11, it should have it. Let me know if there are any
problems.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBS
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 16:46:12 -0400, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:53:21 -0400, Bill Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I
seem to have memory manga
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:55:10AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:07:30PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:57:58AM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> > > Apparently, On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:16:43AM +0300,
> > > Ruslan Ermilov said words to the
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:53:21 -0400, Bill Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I
seem to have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160,
so does the BSD bootstrap prog
At 12:12 PM -0700 7/24/03, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
So indeed, that 'make depend' had not finished before the
'make' for the object had started.
There's another possibility here: suppose two copies
of make are running simultaneously and both get to
this sequence at about the sa
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:53:21 -0400, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I
seem to have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160,
so does the BSD bootstrap program.
When I launch GNOME
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writ
es:
>+> One way or another: It is _not_ a GBDE problem.
>
>Hey, Poul! I'm not trying to show that gbde(4) is a buggy software,
>I'm not trying to destroy you work, your image or FreeBSD, really.
>
>I believe that this isn't bug in gbde(4),
Ahmed Al-Hindawi wrote:
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I
seem to have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160,
so does the BSD bootstrap program.
When I launch GNOME 2.2 everythings is good as gold untill I open the
System monitor program.
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I
seem to have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160,
so does the BSD bootstrap program.
When I launch GNOME 2.2 everythings is good as gold untill I open the
System monitor program. It says that I have 149
Hi,
I have 160Mb of SDRAM (PC100) on a 233Mhz CyrixInstead machine and I seem to
have memory mangament problems. The BIOS indicates I have 160, so does the
BSD bootstrap program.
When I launch GNOME 2.2 everythings is good as gold untill I open the System
monitor program. It says that I have 149 M
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
Wed Jul 23 20:08:06 EDT 2003 Starting make depend
in /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gzip
Wed Jul 23 20:08:07 EDT 2003 Finished make depend
in /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gzip
Wed Jul 23 20:08:09 EDT 2003 Starting make depen
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:38:02PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
+> >+> What you have found has nothing to do with GBDE, I think it is the
+> >+> usual "vnode backed md(4)" deadlock.
+> >
+> >Hmm? So you're trying to tell that this is somehow normal behaviour?
+>
+> We've had problems like this
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:07:30PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:57:58AM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> > Apparently, On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:16:43AM +0300,
> > Ruslan Ermilov said words to the effect of;
> >
> > > A similar change would be in order for sparc64.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:00:18AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Please provide more information, such as dmesg including the controller
> you are using. Also, you don't state if this is USB2.0 device or a
> USB1.1 device. This makes it hard to debug and understand.
>
> Also, I would recommen
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writ
es:
>+> dd if=3D/dev/null of=3D/mnt/test.file bs=3D1m count=3D512
>
>You mean /dev/zero? But this doesn't change anything.
Yes, /dev/zero of course.
>+> > # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /mnt/test.file -s 512M -u 1
>+>=20
>+> What you have
At 12:44 AM -0700 7/24/03, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:13:20PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> I was going to do some debugging of what 'make' is doing,
> but it looks like crunchgen gets confused if make has any
> kind of debugging flags turned on.
I just committed 1.14
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 05:03:23PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
+> ># touch /mnt/test.file
+>
+> You are probably missing:
+>
+> dd if=/dev/null of=/mnt/test.file bs=1m count=512
You mean /dev/zero? But this doesn't change anything.
+> ># mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /mnt/test.file -
Thanks! I just committed a fix (reproduced here for
your convenience).
Cheers.
--
Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon!
Index: etc/rc.subr
===
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writ
es:
# touch /mnt/test.file
You are probably missing:
dd if=/dev/null of=/mnt/test.file bs=1m count=512
# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /mnt/test.file -s 512M -u 1
What you have found has nothing to do with GBDE,
Occasionally, one of my systems gets rpc.lockd stuck using all of the
CPU cycles. I fix it by running '/etc/rc.d/nfslocking restart'. That
works but it shows there is a syntax error somewhere. Here is the
output that I get:
[: checkyesno: unexpected operator
Stopping statd.
[: checkyesno: un
Michael Carlson wrote:
I am using login.conf to set a minimul password length in the default
class and root class, after adding :minpasswordlen=8: to default and
:minpasswordlen=11: to root and then running
$ cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf
I can still use a password of 1 character. This is on FreeBSD
Michael Carlson wrote:
I am using login.conf to set a minimul password length in the default
class and root class, after adding :minpasswordlen=8: to default and
:minpasswordlen=11: to root and then running
$ cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf
I can still use a password of 1 character. This is on FreeBSD
I am using login.conf to set a minimul password length in the default class
and root class, after adding :minpasswordlen=8: to default and
:minpasswordlen=11: to root and then running
$ cap_mkdb /etc/login.conf
I can still use a password of 1 character. This is on FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE
i386. I h
It seems mitrohin a.s. wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> > >tagged queueing broken in -current? i have IBM ICxAV drives and want
> > >to use this feature. can i enable this block?
> >
> > Don't. It's very frequently broken by *hardware* and not worth t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writ
es:
> # touch /mnt/test.file
You are probably missing:
dd if=/dev/null of=/mnt/test.file bs=1m count=512
> # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /mnt/test.file -s 512M -u 1
What you have found has nothing to do with GBDE, I think
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek writ
es:
>
>On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:57:07PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>+> I've found deadlock in gbde(4) and/or md(4).
>
>Yes, it is gbde fault:
I don't know what you have found, but I can guarantee you that it is
_not_ gbde that holds
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> >tagged queueing broken in -current? i have IBM ICxAV drives and want
> >to use this feature. can i enable this block?
>
> Don't. It's very frequently broken by *hardware* and not worth the trouble
> in terms of performance.
h
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:26:53PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems mitrohin a.s. wrote:
> > ata-disk.c
> >
> > /* use tagged queueing if allowed and supported */
> > #if 0 /* disable tags for now */
> > if (ata_tags && ad_tagsupported(adp)) {
> > adp->num_tags = atadev->param->
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 03:57:07PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> I've found deadlock in gbde(4) and/or md(4).
Yes, it is gbde fault:
db> show lockedvnods
[...]
0xc3332920: tag ufs, type VREG, usecount 1, writecount 0, refcount 21, flags
(VV_OBJBUF), lock type
ufs: EXCL (count 1) by thread
mitrohin a.s. wrote:
helo.
ata-disk.c
/* use tagged queueing if allowed and supported */
#if 0 /* disable tags for now */
if (ata_tags && ad_tagsupported(adp)) {
adp->num_tags = atadev->param->queuelen;
adp->flags |= AD_F_TAG_ENABLED;
adp->device->channel->flags |=
On Thursday 24 July 2003 07:53 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello again!
> Sorry for trolling.
> I have just found one more way to have X and seculevel coexisting.
> It's applicable for desktops mostly.Here's the trick:
> Start the system with seculevel "-1", run startx and then type
> '/sbin/sys
Hello.
I've found deadlock in gbde(4) and/or md(4).
Here is a complete procedure hot to repeat it:
# touch /mnt/test.file
# mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /mnt/test.file -s 512M -u 1
# mkdir /etc/gbde
# gbde init /dev/md1 -L /etc/gbde/md1
Enter new passphrase:
It seems mitrohin a.s. wrote:
> ata-disk.c
>
> /* use tagged queueing if allowed and supported */
> #if 0 /* disable tags for now */
> if (ata_tags && ad_tagsupported(adp)) {
> adp->num_tags = atadev->param->queuelen;
> adp->flags |= AD_F_TAG_ENABLED;
> adp->device->chann
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 03:40, Terry Lambert wrote:
> It's actually unlikely that IBM will ever release enough documentation
> to get a full 64 bit Linux running on a PPC 970, let alone FreeBSD,
> and that you will be stuck with a 32 bit kernel that runs 64 bit apps,
> and which talks to IBM's intern
helo.
ata-disk.c
/* use tagged queueing if allowed and supported */
#if 0 /* disable tags for now */
if (ata_tags && ad_tagsupported(adp)) {
adp->num_tags = atadev->param->queuelen;
adp->flags |= AD_F_TAG_ENABLED;
adp->device->channel->flags |= ATA_QUEUED;
> Yeah. My drive shows up as UDMA133 also. What I did notice is that
> my WD Raptor was slightly outperformed a few times on UFS2 by
> my actual
> ATA-100 Western Digital drive. This seems somewhat bad as the Raptor
> costs a hell of a lot more and one would hope that it would pound the
> ATA-1
Hi,
Not sure if this is useful, but I'm getting a perfectly reproducible
panic when doing 'grep -R foo .' (as normal user) in a read-only
mounted ntfs partition on a -current as of ~3 weeks ago:
Good dump found on device /dev/ad0s2b
Architecture: i386
Architecture version: 1
Dump length: 25
atapci1: port
0xd000-0xd00f,0xcc00-0xcc03,0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007
irq 9 at device 31.2 on pci0
...
ata2: at 0xc000 on atapci1
ad4: success setting UDMA133 on Intel ICH5 chip
ad4: ATA-6 disk at ata2-master
ad4: 114473MB (234441648 sectors), 232581 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512
Hi there!
There's currently an inconsistency in how various makefiles
(that use crypto bits) check if these bits are available.
All of them check for the NOCRYPT knob, and some of them
also check if src/crypto/ exists, and some not. None of
them also check if src/secure/ exists, which is the wher
It seems John Reynolds wrote:
> Hi all, a few weeks back I had asked whether -current supported ICH5's S-ATA
> and Søren stated that he'd put code in to detect it and it "should work" but
> there wasn't a lot of feedback yet from users. Well, I have some feedback. I
> just got a new spiffy 120Gb Se
Thanks for getting back to me regarding that point Scott.
I recently realized that I was miss-understanding how much free memory I had
on the system, and I doubt I even need the full 4Gig's.
Perhaps I can re-confirm how to check how much free real memory is available
on the system.
Looking at th
Hi Bosko,
Well I went to go change my /boot/loader.conf options to reflect the
following:
kern.vm.kmem.size="35"
kern.ipc.nmbclusters="8192"
and enabled "options DDB" in my kernel.
Unfortunately, I ran into a problem on the reboot, the SMP kernel would fail
to load due to some of my /boot/
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > for i386 it would be an alternate name for fuword32() and suword32()
> > I'm not sure what it would be on other architectures
>
> fuword64 and suword64. PowerPC is like i386.
PPC 970 explicitly supports mixed mode programming between user
and kernel, as do most oth
Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'd like to have a "suptr and fuptr" to be able to save and read
> user pointers in a "machine independent" manner..
> at the moment ia need to know the size of a pointer and select the
> appropriate 32 or 64 version.. It would jus tbe another ENTRY files in
> support.[sS]
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:48:41PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
+> I'd like to have a "suptr and fuptr" to be able to save and read
+> user pointers in a "machine independent" manner..
+> at the moment ia need to know the size of a pointer and select the
+> appropriate 32 or 64 version.. It would
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:13:20PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 8:14 PM -0400 7/23/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >
> >So indeed, that 'make depend' had not finished before
> >the 'make' for the object had started.
>
> I was going to do some debugging of what 'make' is doing, but
> it look
Hi all, a few weeks back I had asked whether -current supported ICH5's S-ATA
and Søren stated that he'd put code in to detect it and it "should work" but
there wasn't a lot of feedback yet from users. Well, I have some feedback. I
just got a new spiffy 120Gb Seagate S-ATA drive today and I can say
56 matches
Mail list logo
