[current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-18 04:59:16 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-08-18 04:59:16 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-18 05:02:06 - building world TB --- cd /

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-18 04:00:11 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-18 04:00:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-18 04:02:59 - building world TB --- cd /

bsd.prog.mk duplicate script for target "loader"

2003-08-17 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
I'm seeing the following on today's current (Just cvsup'ed): ... ===> sys/boot/i386/btx/lib ===> sys/boot/i386/boot2 ===> sys/boot/i386/cdboot ===> sys/boot/i386/kgzldr ===> sys/boot/i386/libi386 ===> sys/boot/i386/loader "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk", line 38: warning: duplicate script for tar

Re: Slow Boot

2003-08-17 Thread Mike Atamas
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 22:35:14 -0400 (EDT) Andre Guibert de Bruet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > pciconf -vl Here is the output that it gave. I included everything because nothing particular struck me as relavent. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x80ac1043 chip=0x01e010de rev=0xc1 hd

Re: Slow Boot

2003-08-17 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:55:46PM -0400 I heard the voice of Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus: > > My best guess is that the chipset responds slowly to probes, thus it > takes a while to get the list of devices from it. However, I've never > looked into it any more than that. I've always presu

Re: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:54:43PM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > Stefan, > > This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. > > At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken > code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s.

Re: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
Stefan, This is a FAQ. In the future, please search the archives before posting. At this moment in time, 'p4' isn't a safe CPUTYPE (It produces broken code). 'p3' or 'i686' are what's recommended for Pentium 4s. You'll also want to make sure that your CFLAGS don't use optimization higher than -O

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 01:54:38AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I just got through with my commit spree to enable users to build /bin > and /sbin dynamically linked. To do this required a fair amount of > tweaking and moving around libraries and such dangerous equipment as I think this is a more

Re: RFC: Allow non-root users to use make distribution and makeinstallworld?

2003-08-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 10:58:51PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > The question now is, should I provide patches to make this work. Do "we" > actually want this to work? Or is anybody trying to run installworld as > non-user doing something completely stupid? I've committed the obivously correct

Re: Slow Boot

2003-08-17 Thread Kevin Oberman
I have been seeing this for some time (> 2 years) on my ASUS P5A based K6 system. I have no idea why it's doing it, but I re-boot so infrequently that I just have not worried about it. It does seem that it is less likely to happen after a true cold boot. (Cut main power.) I was seeing this with V4

Re: bluetooth working on 5.1-release

2003-08-17 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello Kim, > Have bluetooth almost working on 5.1-release, thank you Max. [...] > The device is a Belkin F8T001, at plugin it logs: > > Aug 17 16:43:01 radio kernel: ubt0: Broadcom Corp. BCM2033, rev 1.01/0.a0, > addr 2 > Aug 17 16:43:01 radio kernel: ubt0: Interface 0 endpoints: interrupt=0x8

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree, On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:28:53 +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > Thanks Gordon. I can save a space :-) I found another problem in src/Makefile.inc [snip] .if ${TARGET_ARCH} == ${MACHINE_ARCH} && !defined(DISTDIR) && \ (!defined(DEST

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-17 21:53:57 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-08-17 21:53:57 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-17 21:56:36 - building world TB

Re: RFC: Allow non-root users to use make distribution and makeinstallworld?

2003-08-17 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > I'm trying to build a new LiveCD based upon the Freesbie scripts, and > well, I don't want to require superuser privileges to build the LiveCD > image. While this is not a problem with 'make buildworld' 'make > distribution' in /usr/src/etc is "broken

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-17 20:55:11 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-08-17 20:55:11 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-17 20:57:48 - building world TB --- cd /home

bluetooth working on 5.1-release

2003-08-17 Thread Kim Culhan
Greetings current- Have bluetooth almost working on 5.1-release, thank you Max. On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > first of all - all kernel modules and user space tools were committed to > -current. so you do not have to use snapshots. all kernel modules are > connected to buildker

Re: cdcontrol no longer needs 'c' partition?

2003-08-17 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Yes, the 'a' and 'c' partitions on CD drives are bogus, but this has nothing directly to do with GEOM, it is only a sideeffect of the semantic cleanups that went ahead of GEOM. The patch looks good to me, but I'd like somebody to test it before it gets committed. Any takers ? Poul-Henning In m

cdcontrol no longer needs 'c' partition?

2003-08-17 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, With GEOM in place, is the 'c' partition for a CD device no longer necessary for cdcontrol? At least on my system, the CD shows up as /dev/acd0, not as /dev/acd0c. --- src/usr.sbin/cdcontrol/cdcontrol.c.orig Sun Aug 17 17:25:46 2003 +++ src/usr.sbin/cdcontrol/cdcontrol.c Sun Aug 17 17:

Re: error: ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted

2003-08-17 Thread dave
At 01:57 PM 8/17/2003 gordon just fixed in the rev 1.22 of src/libexec/rtld-elf/Makefile, so CVSup and try it again. Cheers, Mezz it's fine now. thanks dave ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current

Re: [current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 12:58:12PM -0400, Tinderbox wrote: > >>> stage 4: building everything.. > [...] > cc -O -pipe -mcpu=ev4 -mtune=ev5 -mieee > -I/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha/src/secure/libexec/sftp-server/../../../crypto/openssh > -DNO_IDEA -o sftp-server sftp-commo

RE: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Hey, Just signed up for this list; so I just read the archive -- my question is: Will this be default when it's stable? Kind regards, Devon > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Gordon Tetlow > Verzonden: Sunday, August 17,

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 01:54:38AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I just got through with my commit spree to enable users to build /bin > and /sbin dynamically linked. To do this required a fair amount of > tweaking and moving around libraries and such dangerous equipment as > rtld-elf. If you have

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree, On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:05:34 -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: >> Thanks for reporting this. I've fixed it in rev 1.22 of >> src/libexec/rtld-elf/Makefile. > > Silly me forgot to honor DESTDIR. rev 1.23 is much better =) Thanks Gordon. I ca

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 11:51:36AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:47:42PM +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > > make installworld broken. > > > > ==>libexex/rtld-elf > > [snip] > > ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted > > *** Error code 1 > > > > any ide

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:53AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > nothing. The 16-bit cards have always had iss

Re: error: ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted

2003-08-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 13:41:17 -0500, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm getting a consistent error with cvsup from this morning during make installworld ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted I've done make cleandir and re-cvsup etc. Same error. amd 2400 asus mb. running cvsup/mak

Re: Slow Boot

2003-08-17 Thread Bill Moran
Mike Atamas wrote: When my system boots it seems to stall when it gets here: xa807,0xa400-0xa403,0xa000-0xa007 mem 0xe100-0xe10001ff irq 11 at device 11. 0 on pci1 ata2: at 0xe100 on atapci0 ata3: at 0xe100 on atapci0 It stalls for about 20-30 seconds and then continues booting. I can

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 08:47:42PM +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > make installworld broken. > > ==>libexex/rtld-elf > [snip] > ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted > *** Error code 1 > > any idea ? Thanks for reporting this. I've fixed it in rev 1.22 of src/libexec/rtld-elf

Re: bluetooth on 5.1-release or -current ?

2003-08-17 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello Kim, > Trying to get Max Yevmenkin's bluetooth stack running on 5.1-release. > > This with ngbt-fbsd-20030501.tar.gz from > > http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ first of all - all kernel modules and user space tools were committed to -current. so you do not have to use snapshots. all ke

error: ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted

2003-08-17 Thread dave
I'm getting a consistent error with cvsup from this morning during make installworld libexec/rtld-elf install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 -fschg -C -b ld-elf.so.1 /libexec install -o root -g wheel -m 444 rtld.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 /usr/share/man/man1/ld-elf.so.1.1.gz -> /usr/share/man/man1/rtl

[current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-17 16:58:13 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-08-17 16:58:13 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-17 16:59:51 - building world TB --- cd /

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-17 16:00:12 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-08-17 16:00:12 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-17 16:01:53 - building world TB --- cd /

bluetooth on 5.1-release or -current ?

2003-08-17 Thread Kim Culhan
Trying to get Max Yevmenkin's bluetooth stack running on 5.1-release. This with ngbt-fbsd-20030501.tar.gz from http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ Trying to start the stack, it returns: ./rc.bluetooth start ubt0 Could not execute command "reset". Operation timed out >From the syslog: ng_hc

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > make installworld broken. > > ==>libexex/rtld-elf > [snip] > ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted > *** Error code 1 > > any idea ? I'm guessing we need to remove the schg flag from the old ld-elf.so.1 before trying to replace

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:53AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > nothing. The 16-bit cards have always had issues on some machines or : > with some cards. rather than mapping the cis in, 0's are read back.

Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV

2003-08-17 Thread Stefan Bethke
I've got three machines having trouble doing a installworld, let alone a buildworld. One is a Dell Inspiron 8100 with a GeForce which used to run just fine on a 5.1-RC, which I updated yesterday. Two are brand-new Shuttle SS51G with a SIS chipset and 2 GHz Celeron, which I installed on Friday,

Slow Boot

2003-08-17 Thread Mike Atamas
When my system boots it seems to stall when it gets here: xa807,0xa400-0xa403,0xa000-0xa007 mem 0xe100-0xe10001ff irq 11 at device 11. 0 on pci1 ata2: at 0xe100 on atapci0 ata3: at 0xe100 on atapci0 It stalls for about 20-30 seconds and then continues booting. I can not figure out wh

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-17 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:53AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > nothing. The 16-bit cards have always had issues on some machines or > with some cards. rather than mapping the cis in, 0's are read back. I never had issues with this card in the same laptop since about 2 years under 4.x-STABLE.

[current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2003-08-17 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-08-17 11:12:46 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-08-17 11:12:46 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-08-17 11:14:47 - building world TB

Re: HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
make installworld broken. ==>libexex/rtld-elf [snip] ln: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Operation not permitted *** Error code 1 any idea ? -- Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://diary.waishi.jp/~yosimoto/diary/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis

Re: LOR with filedesc structure and Giant

2003-08-17 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Malone writes: >On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> At one point we have to say "Well, the locks we have above are solid, >> but we need to drop Giant below here" but if Witness sees a >> PICKUP_GIANT() as an acquisition of Gia

if_sis: performance tweaking

2003-08-17 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
This patch tweaks various thresholds in the DP8381[56] chip. On my Soekris 4801, the goes from 5-6 Mbit/sec to 30-40 Mbit/sec with this patch. Also included is Sams patch for the "short cable" problem". Tests, comments etc most welcome. Poul-Henning Index: if_sis.c ===

Re: LOR with filedesc structure and Giant

2003-08-17 Thread David Malone
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 10:18:43PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > At one point we have to say "Well, the locks we have above are solid, > but we need to drop Giant below here" but if Witness sees a > PICKUP_GIANT() as an acquisition of Giant, rather than as a > resumption of Giant, this clearly

SV: when should 5.x be stable enough for web servers

2003-08-17 Thread Matt Douhan
>-Ursprungligt meddelande- >Fran: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >On i386 hardware and two processors amd mp. should I wait for 5.2. We have been using for some time, we use -CURRENT as FireWalls and as webservers, we have half our production split between STABLE and -CURRENT machines, so that if/wh

HEADS UP: dynamic root support now in the tree

2003-08-17 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I just got through with my commit spree to enable users to build /bin and /sbin dynamically linked. To do this required a fair amount of tweaking and moving around libraries and such dangerous equipment as rtld-elf. If you have any systems that you are dearly in love with, now is not the time to cv

Re: usbd does not use detach

2003-08-17 Thread Jan Stocker
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 16:30, Olivier Cortes wrote: > Le Mer 06/08/2003 à 17:55, Jan Stocker a écrit : > > Does nobody has this problem or does noone use this feature? > > the problem i see with detach is the "utility" of the command. > but when detaching, the umount part should be done BEFORE d