Re: Sound card troubles

2003-09-21 Thread Doug White
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Bruce Mackay wrote: Hey all, I get the following hang up when I try booting up, here's the problem area... pcm0: Intel ICH3 (82801CA) at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: unable to map IO port space device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 I'm running a

Re: if_sk build fails

2003-09-21 Thread Doug White
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Pawel Worach wrote: Hi! Last if_sk update broke buildkernel === sk rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../pci/if_sk.c /usr/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c:129:26: pci/yukonreg.h: No such file

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Will Andrews
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 07:24:07PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: OK, here's what we can do to fix this: 1) Put back -pthread in -current so all the ports don't fail 2) I will build a full set of -current packages with the -pthread error still in place, to determine the list of packages that

recursive lock problem.

2003-09-21 Thread David Gilbert
Running a recent current, I got a recursive lock panic with the lock first acquired in net80211/ieee80211_node.c:525 and reacquired in 547. The machine in question uses the following wi0 in hostap mode: wi0: Intersil Prism2.5 mem 0xcecff000-0xcecf irq 11 at device 17.0 on pci0 wi0: 802.11

Re: The bikeshed T-shirt

2003-09-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Can you add a no -pthread symbol to it? Can you give it a rest? You made a bad call, people are giving you grief for it. That is not a bikeshed. Warner ___ [EMAIL

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:44:35AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: What, precisely, do you object to in the above proposal? 1, 2, and 3. I don't think backing out -pthread change helps much in fixing ports... Again, why? Please explain

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:12:55AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: Because when things break, people fix them. There is no motivation (as seen in the last 2+ years) to fix something that isn't broken. Please also see:

Re: The bikeshed T-shirt

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Can you add a no -pthread symbol to it? Can you give it a rest? You made a bad call, people are giving you grief for it. That is not a bikeshed. It's just a

Re: The bikeshed T-shirt

2003-09-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : It's just a joke at my own expense. Sorry to imply otherwise. Yea. My snapping at you was out of line. I'm just a little frustrated and let it get the better of me. Please forgive me. Warner

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:12:55AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:44:35AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: What, precisely, do you object to in the above proposal? 1, 2, and 3. I don't think backing out -pthread change

re: StarOffice 6 under CURRENT

2003-09-21 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, FreeBSD bart 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #2: Sat Sep 20 20:34:05 PDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BART i386 I am having problems running staroffice under current. My question is is anyone else eperiencing this problem? The initial ports install runs fine but when

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:12:55AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:44:35AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: What, precisely, do you object to in the above proposal? 1, 2,

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:17:28AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: From what I've recently read, the freeze should be lifting this week. Can we hold off till then? Is a few more days going to matter? If the freeze continues longer than expected, I'll back the change out until it's over. I

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Mark Linimon
IMHO if the ports tree is unfrozen for the -pthreads fixes, the 4.9 release schedule will drift days if not weeks. While it's not as apparent as the kernel build issues, there are significant QA issues that go into the ports system. That's why the freeze is in place, to allow the QA process to

Re: if_sk build fails

2003-09-21 Thread Stuart Walsh
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:14:22 +0200 Pawel Worach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Last if_sk update broke buildkernel === sk rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../include /usr/src/sys/modules/sk/../../pci/if_sk.c

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Mark Linimon
I don't think committing fixes for -current breakages should cause problems for 4.9-RELEASE (especially with the caveat that they be compile tested on -stable). It takes several days to do the compile QA. That's assuming that no actual users are allowed to have time to test the changes before

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Will Andrews wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:17:28AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: From what I've recently read, the freeze should be lifting this week. Can we hold off till then? Is a few more days going to matter? If the freeze continues longer than expected,

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Doug Barton
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: Well, actually it is directly related. Part of the plan to transition to libpthread is making ports PTHREAD_LIBS compliant. As stated in that thread, if a libpthread exists on the system, autoconf/configure will pick it up and the port will also end

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled through the ports? They need to replace -pthread with their thread library of choice (e.g. -lc_r or

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: Well, actually it is directly related. Part of the plan to transition to libpthread is making ports PTHREAD_LIBS compliant. As stated in that thread, if a libpthread exists on the system,

CIS is too long

2003-09-21 Thread Kenichi Niioka
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sat Sep 20 11:38:46 JST 2003 Sep 20 12:47:38 daemon kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/niioka/src/obj/usr/src/sys/DAEMON I'm getting the following errors when I insert my pccard. CIS is too long -- truncating pccard0: Card has no functions! cbb0: PC Card card activation

ncurses-5.3 buggy under 5.1-current

2003-09-21 Thread Vitalis
Hi! The installation of the ncurses-5.3 port leaves the system unusable for apps needing libncurses e.g. vi, sysinstall... The characters on output are severely scrambled. Its desinstallation solves the problem (the ncurses-5.2 from src/contrib works fine with 5.1-current). But some good ports

Unable to newfs/fsck partition on -current because of write failed.

2003-09-21 Thread Nicolai Petri
I'm running -current from september, 14 on my notebook. After an unclean shutdown (out of batteri) my /var filesystem died horrible. Now when i'm trying to do a fsck I always get write failed for a lot of blocks. I saw this error some months ago where I just wiped the fs with newfs. But now

Re: Unable to newfs/fsck partition on -current because of write failed.

2003-09-21 Thread Thorsten Greiner
* Nicolai Petri [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-21 12:23]: But now even newfs gives me Write failed. This seems a bit odd because i can easily do a dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0s2d and clear out the label. Any hints ? I'm thinking geom and/or blocksize problems. But that's just a guess. There was a

-current on laptop: panic: m_free detected a mbuf double free

2003-09-21 Thread Andreas Klemm
Update the status now on -current. I downloaded the last recent snapshot of 2003-09-20 from current.freebsd.org. Made a test ftp session using the live CDROM. Same like a week before. Panic if I download something big from my FreeBSD ftp server. 5.1 on my normal PIII PC works fine. This seems to

-current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Hello! I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there). I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted with -stable I've found the partition FS was broken. I think it's because of extended

Re: really 4.9 stability

2003-09-21 Thread Ceri Davies
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 09:14:40PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Everything has been rock-solid, no problems at all. Were it not for : PAE, I would say to go ahead and release it. That's good to hear. The

make release and md(4) problem

2003-09-21 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hi, when doing my first make release I noticed it stopped somewhere and hung :( 74830 p2 D+ 0:01.12 cpio -dump /mnt The host is i386 and TARGET ist sparc64 just to confuse. The base system runs a HEAD world/kernel from mid july. The above cpio must be from

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Dan Naumov
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 22:53, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-20, Daniel Eischen écrivait : No, using latest sources, with or without atapicam, does not solve the problem. It still hangs. Please try the patch below, it should at least work around the problem. I have rebuilt world after

Panic: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2003-09-21 Thread Markus Brueffer
Hi, I was playing around with CAM and got this reproducible panic: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x46 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x:0xc03962fe stack pointer = 0x10:0xd835b9b4 frame

Re: Getting -pthread support back into local source tree

2003-09-21 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Scot W. Hetzel wrote: From: Dan Naumov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Seeing as -pthread support has been removed from -CURRENT breaking _LOTS_ of ports, is it possible to get it back into a local source tree ? If so, how ? Thanks in advance. All you need to do is add: CONFIGURE_ENV+=

Re: Sound card troubles

2003-09-21 Thread Bruce Mackay
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Bruce Mackay wrote: Hey all, I get the following hang up when I try booting up, here's the problem area... pcm0: Intel ICH3 (82801CA) at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: unable to map

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-09-21, Dan Naumov écrivait : (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): Recovered Sense (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 1 80 0 ff 0 (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (probe2:ata1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait : The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me. Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date? Several fixes have been committed to both the ATA and the CAM subsystems

Re: CIS is too long

2003-09-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kenichi Niioka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I'm getting the following errors when I insert my pccard. : : CIS is too long -- truncating : pccard0: Card has no functions! : cbb0: PC Card card activation failed There's a small set of cards that aren't being

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-09-21, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto écrivait : I could not get a backtrace because infinite loop occured like this: Can't you drop into DDB at that point? Also, do you have up-to-date sources? Thomas. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait : The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me. Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date? Several fixes have been

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-09-21, Daniel Eischen écrivait : Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): Recovered Sense Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel:

Re: CIS is too long

2003-09-21 Thread Stuart Walsh
- Original Message - From: M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 5:50 PM Subject: Re: CIS is too long In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kenichi Niioka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I'm getting the

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-21, Daniel Eischen écrivait : Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0):

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current. It shows up as an X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver with three devices: /dev/ugen0, and the corresponding input (/dev/ugen0.1) and output endpoints

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Subject: Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt, On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:57:43 +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote: Can't you drop into DDB at that point? Ok, I will try it. Also, do you have up-to-date sources? Yes, of course. I have recent ones. -- Shin-ichi

Re: ncurses-5.3 buggy under 5.1-current

2003-09-21 Thread Vitalis
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 17:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what sort of bugs? (and is this a problem with the port, rather than ncurses). From: Vitalis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject: ncurses-5.3 buggy under 5.1-current This is the only article in this thread

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait : The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me. Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source tree up-to-date? Several fixes have been

Re: ports and -current

2003-09-21 Thread Tim Kientzle
John Birrell wrote: On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop. The timing on this really sucks because it breaks the ports tree for an extended period of time. While the fixes are simple, they haven't been made yet.

Re: ports and -current

2003-09-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : John Birrell wrote: : On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop. The timing on : this really sucks because it breaks the ports

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Subject: Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt, On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 03:01:28 +0900, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: Ok, I will try it. I tried to cvsup and make build installkernel. This kernel said: [snip] acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 2 steps (100% to 50.0%),

ATAng drives not probed

2003-09-21 Thread Anish Mistry
I'm getting intermittent problems on boot, sometimes it boots, most of the time not. When it stop it's at: ata0-master: pio=0x0c wdma=0x22 udma=0x45 cable=80pin dmesg -v from a full boot: http://am-productions.biz/docs/dmesg.txt -- Anish Mistry pgp0.pgp Description: signature

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-21, Daniel Eischen écrivait : Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Sep 21 12:40:28 sirius kernel: (cd0:ata0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition

Re: Sound card troubles

2003-09-21 Thread Doug White
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Bruce Mackay wrote: I actually tried hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range = 1 to no avail. I've tried building pcm into my kernel, I've tried loading them as modules with no success. I was reading somewhere that I may need hw.pci.enable_io_modes = 1 to use my sound

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Doug Barton
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled through the ports? They need to replace -pthread with

Re: 4.9 stability update

2003-09-21 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:35:12PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:21:20PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: We'd like to get a new poll on the stability and readiness of 4.9. Last night I upgraded my laptop and it hung partway thru the boot (immediately after the pcm0: line in the

Re: -current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Doug White
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there). I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted with -stable I've found the partition FS was

Re: really 4.9 stability

2003-09-21 Thread Doug White
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: I'm confused; how does one disable PAE? I don't see a kernel option for it. 'options PAE' turns it on. Without it turns it off. :) -- Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org

Re: -current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there). I newfs'ed it from -stable and wrote on it from -current. When I booted

Re: -current on laptop: panic: m_free detected a mbuf double free

2003-09-21 Thread Andreas Klemm
OLDCARD doesn't work as well. Tried to get my Xircom REM56G-100 to run with OLDCARD but card won't be detected by pccardd. ifconfig -a only shows lp0 and lo0. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Need a magic printfilter today ? - http://www.apsfilter.org/

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait : Thanks, the hang problems are fixed now. That's great news! No one told me that I was barking up the wrong tree... Ah, computers are fragile and playful things that always find creative and unexcepted ways of failing... :) Thomas. -- [EMAIL

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug Barton wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled through the

atapicam and dvd-r(w)

2003-09-21 Thread Sascha Holzleiter
Hi, i still have problems with atapicam and atang, while booting with atapicam i get these messages: Sep 21 23:30:17 dreamland kernel: atapci0: Intel ICH4 UDMA100 controller port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 10 at device 31.1 on pci0 Sep 21 23:30:17 dreamland kernel: ata0: at

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Hi, I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current. It shows up as an X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver with three devices: /dev/ugen0, and

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Lars Eggert
Bernd, Bernd Walter wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: static char init1[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14 }; static char init2[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20 }; Are you shure that the above is correct data for the device? The IO error could

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:32:28PM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Bernd, Bernd Walter wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:33AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: static char init1[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14 }; static char init2[]= { 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x20, 0x14, 0x20, 0x20, 0x20 }; Are you

Re: ATAng no good for me/REQUEST_SENSE recovered from missing interrupt

2003-09-21 Thread Dan Naumov
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:07, Thomas Quinot wrote: Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait : Thanks, the hang problems are fixed now. That's great news! I am also very grateful for your fix. I now seem to be able to run -CURRENT on my home desktop without any issues whatsoever :) No one

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Dan Naumov
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote: We've already been over this before. The problem is not as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that don't have -pthread. And those platforms would be? Sincerely, Dan Naumov ___ [EMAIL

atapicam error messages at boot/appears to work nonetheless

2003-09-21 Thread Matthias Andree
I'm getting complaints from ata or atapicam during boot-up, but my CD-ROM seems fine (reading, at least). ACPI enabled, sym driver enabled + in use with a 875 chip (Tekram DC-390F) and cd0, da0, sa0, sa1. Is this something to worry about? dmesg excerpt: ... atapci0: VIA 82C686A UDMA66

Re: ACPI and a Toshiba Tecra 8000

2003-09-21 Thread Andrew Thompson
Nate Lawson wrote: On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Andrew Thompson wrote: It has helped and the laptop is able to suspend with the serial cable attached (further than before). It now panics on the first resume with the following (gdb output at bottom). I think the serial cable is masking the problem as

Re: -current brake ufs for -stable

2003-09-21 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: I've installed both -current and -stable on my box. One of partition I plan to share betwen them (place ports/distfiles there). I newfs'ed it from

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Lars Eggert wrote: I'm trying to get the USB RF remote control that comes with some ATI Wonder cards to do something meaningful under -current. Can I recommend the use of libusb for the abstracting of the USB layer? It would allow your driver/interface to work on all

Re: X10 Wireless Technology Inc USB Receiver

2003-09-21 Thread Lars Eggert
Bernd, Bernd Walter wrote: What does USB_DEBUG with hw.usb.debug=2 and hw.usb.ugen.debug=2 say? it says this: usbd_setup_pipe: dev=0xc3f9d980 iface=0xc3efbaa0 ep=0xc3f192c8 pipe=0xdb936974 ugenwrite: transfer 5 bytes usbd_intr_transfer: start transfer 5 bytes usbd_intr_transfer: transferred 0

No/weird mixer in -CURRENT

2003-09-21 Thread Damian Gerow
I just set up a new box with -CURRENT on it, using 20030918-JPSNAP (cvsup'ed the next day), and I'm having some really strange things going on with volume control. aumix won't complain, and will successfully query the mixer device. I can set the volume levels to my hearts content, but the

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dan Naumov wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote: We've already been over this before. The problem is not as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that don't have -pthread. And those platforms would be? Solaris for one: bash-2.05$

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Dan Naumov wrote: On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 00:42, Daniel Eischen wrote: We've already been over this before. The problem is not as bad as you think, and there are other platforms that don't have -pthread. And those

g_up panic, finally with stack trace!

2003-09-21 Thread Andrey Chernov
This is 10days old kernel panic, the same type I report before, but now I use dont-sync-on-panic sysctl, so some stack trace finally available: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction

Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current)

2003-09-21 Thread Scott Long
Doug Barton wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, John Birrell wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:25:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: I am a little confused about one thing though. What is going to happen to third party apps that use -pthread that aren't compiled through the ports? They need to replace