Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following on rebooting panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Unfortunately, this system does not have a serial console and the panic locked it up tight. Only a hard reset brought the system back. I was just about to

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Don Lewis wrote: On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following on rebooting panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Unfortunately, this system does not have a serial console and the panic locked it up tight. Only a hard reset

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:02, Don Lewis wrote: On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following on rebooting panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Unfortunately, this system does not have a serial console and the panic locked it up tight. Only a

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:35:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:02, Don Lewis wrote: On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following on rebooting panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Unfortunately, this system does

Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Nate Lawson
Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival timings? I am very interested in our idle load characteristics. It seems most systems I've analyzed have an average idle interrupt rate of about 225 per second, dominated by the clk and rtc interrupts as shown below. clk irq0

Re: umass(4)/uhci(4) REALLY slow

2003-10-12 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Nate Lawson wrote this message on Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 17:34 -0700: 1 KB? If we upped it to 32 KB, it would be a more reasonable 1.2 MB/sec which is still well under the USB 1.1 max speed. If you get 1.2MB/sec (megabytes), then you have hit the max of USB 1.1, the max speed of USB 1.1 is

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:35:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:02, Don Lewis wrote: On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote: Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following on rebooting panic:

panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
afd0: REMOVABLE IOMEGA ZIP 250 ATAPI at ata1-master PIO3 acd0: CDROM SAMSUNG SC-148P at ata3-master PIO4 panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy Debugger(panic) Stopped at 0xc062f644 = Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,0xc0736c24 = in_Debugger.0 db trace

panic with -current kernel ata_timeout

2003-10-12 Thread C. Kukulies
with a -current cvsup I'm getting a kernel panic during boot: ata_timout soft_clock ithread fork_exit fork_trampoline __trap 0x1 -- Chris Christoph Kukulies kuku_at_physik.rwth-aachen.de ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy

2003-10-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Joe Marcus Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: See my previous email dated Sat, 11 Oct 2003 01:39:20 -0400 on the subject. It looks like the problem may have to do with CPU type (PIII in my case). My P4 laptop has the same -CURRENT, and does not experience the problem. It may also be

What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Josef Karthauser
I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that everything is fine for a few hours, and then the IP stack stops working. I can no longer ping anything on the local network, my default route drops out (which

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that everything is fine for a few hours, and then the IP stack stops working. I can no longer ping anything on the local

no kernel output after update

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
OS was -current from 8th Feb and I updated to recent one today. Now I have a new world, but forced to keep with the Feb kernel, because the new kernel gives absolutely no output. Console should be on vga. I already tried switching to a vga card and to disable int routing, because I often saw

Re: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA recovered from missing interrupt

2003-10-12 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:05:36PM -0500, Derek Ragona wrote: What type of drive is in your dell? I get this same error with an SATA drive and adapter. ad0: 28615MB IC25N030ATDA04-0 [58140/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 I believe it's an IBM Travelstar . -- Christoph P. U. Kukulies

[Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]
Hi all there haves been some problems with the pccard* for like 2 weeks i have not been abel to compile the kernel. fest it was the pccardvar.h was mising this:: // in pccard_mem_handle longoffset; /* mapped Offset on card */ #define PCCARD_MEM_ATTR 1 #define

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:37:44PM +, Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] wrote: Hi all there haves been some problems with the pccard* for like 2 weeks i have not been abel to compile the kernel. fest it was the pccardvar.h was mising this:: Did you follow all the instructions in UPDATING? I have

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN]
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:43:59 +0100 Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:37:44PM +, Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] wrote: Hi all there haves been some problems with the pccard* for like 2 weeks i have not been abel to compile the kernel. fest it was the

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that everything is fine for a few hours, and then the IP

Re: ATAng still causing a lot of pain.

2003-10-12 Thread Kirk Strauser
Further details: The ATA drive in questions is: ad0: 114473MB WDC WD1200JB-00DUA3 [232581/16/63] at ata0-master PIO4 The PIO4 comes from booting with 'hw.ata.ata_dma=0'; it would otherwise be UDMA66. Basically, if I use atacontrol to set that channel to WDMA2 or below, then I get no errors

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : i have just looked at it and don't see any info related to the pccard dev. : what are the instructions building both pcic and pccard in your kernel config? If so, don't do that. It is broken. pcic

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival : timings? In -stable I know that we service fast interrupts in 10us on a 666MHz machine 99.2% of the time. I don't know about non-fast

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival timings? I am very interested in our idle load characteristics. It seems According to machdep.siots, fast interrupt handler latency on an old Celeron266 is about 10 usec (max) for

cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Kargl
Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without any problems? There is a CD in the drive. cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-6401TA 1001 Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15) cd0:

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-10-12 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-12 16:00:02 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-12 16:00:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-10-12 16:00:02 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread Stuart Walsh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : i have just looked at it and don't see any info related to the pccard dev. : what are the instructions building both pcic and pccard in your kernel config? If so, don't do that. It is broken.

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. There appears to be a problem with the IP stack. What happens is that

Re: [Build Error]:: pccard

2003-10-12 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stuart Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Sebastian Yepes F. [ESN] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : i have just looked at it and don't see any info related to the pccard : dev. : : what are the instructions : :

Re: What's up with the IP stack?

2003-10-12 Thread Sam Leffler
On Sunday 12 October 2003 11:03 am, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Josef Karthauser wrote: I've just built and installed a new kernel, the first since Aug 6th. There

Re: Interrupt statistics?

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:55:03AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Does anyone have recent statistics for interrupt latency and arrival : timings? In -stable I know that we service fast interrupts in 10us on a

Re: no kernel output after update

2003-10-12 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:23:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: OS was -current from 8th Feb and I updated to recent one today. Now I have a new world, but forced to keep with the Feb kernel, because the new kernel gives absolutely no output. Console should be on vga. I already tried

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-10-12 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-12 18:35:24 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-12 18:35:24 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-10-12 18:35:24 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

HEADSUP: Bluetooth patch is about to be committed

2003-10-12 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Dear Hackers, In the next few hours i will be committing Bluetooth patch. The patch was reviewed by M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] and John Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] After commit i will re-cvsup my system and will do a full buildworld (could take 4-6 hours) to make sure everything works. Expect

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without any problems? There is a CD in the drive. cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 cd0: TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-6401TA 1001 Removable CD-ROM

ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken

2003-10-12 Thread Jeff Roberson
I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running afterwards. I'm going to look into the reports of some problems with nice, although I suspect that they could have been caused by the same issues. HTT is

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-10-12 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-10-12 20:01:41 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-10-12 20:01:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-10-12 20:01:41 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:51:50PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without any problems? There is a CD in the drive. cd0 at ahc0 bus 0

Re: Seeing system-lockups on recent current

2003-10-12 Thread Cy Schubert
I'm seeing similar lockups, however they started shortly after the new ATA code was committed. The lockups usually occur when there's a lot of ATA activity, e.g. filesystem or fsck. At the moment I can only guess as to what the problem might be (missing interrupt is my most educated guesss)

Re: boot hang: ata1: resetting devices .. done (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 08), Robert Ferguson said: I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs immediately after ad0: 35174MB IC25N040ATCS05-0 [71465/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ata1: resetting

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 14:29:38 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:51:50PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 10:26:54 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: Can I assume that the following error messages are erronous because cd0 appears to function without

Re: boot hang: ata1: resetting devices .. done (5.1-CURRENT, IBM T30)

2003-10-12 Thread Kenneth Culver
Quoting Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In the last episode (Oct 08), Robert Ferguson said: I see this problem as well. I'm running on a T40, with a DVD/CDRW in the ultrabay, and -CURRENT as of this morning. At boot, it hangs immediately after ad0: 35174MB IC25N040ATCS05-0 [71465/16/63]

Re: boot hang: ata1: resetting devices .. done (5.1-CURRENT, IBMT30)

2003-10-12 Thread Steve Ames
Backing out the most recent checkin to sys/dev/ata/ata-queue.c (i.e. reverting to version 1.6) makes the problem go away. I upgraded from an Oct 1 - Oct 12 kernel and saw the same hang. Backing out r1.6 fixed it for me too. me too Anyone tried going forward to 1.8?

LOR in dummynet

2003-10-12 Thread Jiri Mikulas
map02# uname -a FreeBSD map02.modrany.czf 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 12 22:33:45 CEST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROUTER i386 Oct 13 00:25:32 map02 kernel: lock order reversal Oct 13 00:25:32 map02 kernel: 1st 0xc301f194 inp (inp) @

Re: cd0 errors during probe?

2003-10-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kenneth D. Merry writes: Back when the cd(4) driver used the old slice code, it had a function, cdfirsttrackisdata(), that figured out whether the first track was an audio or data track. It would set the flags in the disk structure accordingly to tell the slice

panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps

2003-10-12 Thread Oliver Fischer
My notebook was a little bit panic this night. After rebooting I found this message in my system log: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps ? Regards, Oliver Fischer ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread John Reynolds
Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not have done everything right. Ever since the tail end of July it seems, any time I've tried to burn a CD with cdrecord (cdrtools 2.0.3 from

Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps

2003-10-12 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Oliver Fischer wrote: My notebook was a little bit panic this night. After rebooting I found this message in my system log: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps ? When are your sources from? Regards, Oliver Fischer

Re: ath(4) driver problems with WEP...

2003-10-12 Thread Sam Leffler
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 08:12 pm, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: I've got a Netgear WAG511 (Atheros 5212-based card) and a Netgear FWAG114 wireless router. I've been trying to get the card and the router talking under FreeBSD. (Both 802.11a and 802.11g work fine under Windows on the same

_mtx_assert() panic

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
One of the package machines died with this, running -current from a few days ago. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x1c fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc055ea8e stack pointer =

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not have done everything right. Ever since the tail end of July it seems, any

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread John Reynolds
[ On Sunday, October 12, Kris Kennaway wrote: ] Thanks..Alan made a commit which he thought might have fixed this, but someone else also claimed it did not. See also http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/56380 Kris Is there any more information that I can provide which

HEADS-UP: SADB_X_AALG_RIPEMD160HMAC was changed

2003-10-12 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, I've just corrected the value of SADB_X_AALG_RIPEMD160HMAC from 9 to 8. If you are using IPsec stuff, it breaks binary compatibility. When updating your kernel, you need to update libipsec, setkey, racoon and isakmpd appropriately. Sincerely, ---BeginMessage--- ume 2003/10/12

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:49:59PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: [ On Sunday, October 12, Kris Kennaway wrote: ] Thanks..Alan made a commit which he thought might have fixed this, but someone else also claimed it did not. See also

Re: ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken

2003-10-12 Thread Wade Majors
Jeff Roberson wrote: I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running afterwards. It think it seems better (hard to be sure) but the issue is still there for me. GNOME/Metacity Single Processor Athlon

Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained]

2003-10-12 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 09:18:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 06:32:21PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: Hi all, forgive me if I give incomplete information. This is the first time I've created a debugging kernel and gotten a dump after a panic, so I might not have done

Re: ULE status; interactivity fixed? nice uninvestigated, HTT broken

2003-10-12 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2003-10-13 01:33 -0400, Wade Majors wrote: Jeff Roberson wrote: I commited a fix that would have caused all of the jerky behaviors under some load. I was not able to reproduce this problem with kde running afterwards. It think it seems better (hard to be sure) but the issue is still

Kernel compile problem: Stop in /usr/src/sys/crypto/des/arch/i386/des_enc.S

2003-10-12 Thread Michael Langwiser
*** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/smbfs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MAJIN-20031012. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This occurs both when using the generic and my custom kernel config