Re: OpenLDAP/nss_ldap/pam_ldap

2003-10-29 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 00:42, you wrote: I just checked the FreeBSD site and do not see any release 5.2 It is not release yet :) Once i can hurl this obsticle, i think FreeBSD might be a viable solution for me. Well, let be it then... I'm running -CURRENT with dynamic root and it works

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-29 Thread Karl M. Joch
David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Is this an ISA or PCI card? it is an easy i/o 8 PCI card. i

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 06:58:52PM +0100, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: First of all, the Partition Editor has the 'A' option to use all of the available HDD space. It creates a DOS-compatible slice (starting at sector 63 and ending on cylinder boundary). This is completely useless on servers and

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-29 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:11:53AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon? Is this an ISA

Re: Another ATAng failure.

2003-10-29 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems David Gilbert wrote: I have tried several times in recent days to burn DVDs with burncd, growisofs and cdrecord ... all of which worked before atang. Growisofs complains that it can't flush it's buffers. Burncd doesn't complain ... but the resulting disk is not mountable. I

Re: cp -Rp /a_dir/w_sub_dirs to gbde vnode on SmartMedia Card locks system

2003-10-29 Thread Alain Thivillon
Donald Creel [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) : This has been reproducible for the last few weeks. System will crash if I am strictly from ttyv(n) or using KDE3.x and drag and drop. I have no crashes but i see locks of gbde file systems (no more activity, system idle 100%, file systems

Re: Anyone object to the following change in libc?

2003-10-29 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: TLHarti Brandt wrote: TL When applying %*d%d to the string 123 the first 'd' format matches TL the string 123 and the conversion yields the number 123. This is then TL thrown away because assignment is suppressed. The next format specified TL finds an EOF

Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount
Hi, are anyone familiar with conditions where postfix may bring a 5.1-p10 server to a halt, making the server accept incoming ports (such as 22) but serve nothing, making getty(8) become non-respondent (pressing enter doesn't give any feedback) and making the server ignore ctrl-alt-del etc? I've

ULE top(1) times...

2003-10-29 Thread Sean Chittenden
I thought the wizards who can do math would find this amusing: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 11 root -160 0K12K RUN451:16 101.56% 101.56% idle 738 sean760 52836K 39620K select 16:46 0.78% 0.78%

Two crashes in CURRENT from October 7th, both mention Xint0x80_syscall()

2003-10-29 Thread Eivind Olsen
Hello. I've experienced some crashes here with FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT from October 7th. I tried yesterday to upgrade to a more recent CURRENT but it crashed (the 2nd. crash here). Both crashes stop at different places, but they both refer to Xint0x80_syscall - I don't know if this is relevant or

Re: ULE top(1) times...

2003-10-29 Thread Khairil Yusof
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 17:45, Sean Chittenden wrote: A ULE UP kernel compiled fresh tonight (2003-10-28). Not critical, but certainly interesting. -sc Anybody running ULE + KSE on an SMP kernel without any problems? My symptoms are as such: - idle and total cpu usage never goes above 54% -

Re: Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Christer Solskogen
Hi, are anyone familiar with conditions where postfix may bring a 5.1-p10 server to a halt, making the server accept incoming ports (such as 22) but serve nothing, making getty(8) become non-respondent (pressing enter doesn't give any feedback) and making the server ignore ctrl-alt-del etc?

Re: 5.1 - stl Kernel compile fails

2003-10-29 Thread Karl M. Joch
David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:11:53AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:11:33AM +0100, Karl M. Joch wrote: i added a stallion easy i/o to a 5.1 box. compiling the kernel fails with a lot of errors in stallion.c. any chance that this gets corrected soon?

Re: Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:51:59PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our default of net.inet6.ip6.v6only was off in 4.X, and was changed to on on 5.X to follow NetBSD's practice. This behavior on 5.X breaks RFC2553/3493, and the change was

Re: panic route.c:565

2003-10-29 Thread Florian C. Smeets
Sam Leffler wrote: Any chance you can get a stack trace the next time this happens? The LOR by itself is hard to go from... Hi Sam, i get a slightly different LOR. lock order reversal 1st 0xc2dd6c90 rtentry (rtentry) @ /space/src/sys/net/route.c:182 2nd 0xc2d4887c radix node head (radix

Re: buildworld fails with with de_AT locale

2003-10-29 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:18:39AM +0100, Bernhard Valenti wrote: hi, a buildworld with a de_AT locale fails in src/lib/libedit, the file fcnl.h that gets created is broken. i found that problem in the mailing list(april this year), and wonder if this has still not been fixed? It already

Re: snd_csa issues in -CURRENT

2003-10-29 Thread matti k
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:45:49 +1000 matti k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:36:56 +0200 Eirik Oeverby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I might also point out that there are two distinct kinds of distortion happening: The click/pop/crackle kind of distortion, and one where a sound

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Nipper
On 28 Oct 2003, David O'Brien wrote: It is NOT useless. Why do you think it is? Perhaps you don't relize that some BIOS's wont boot from a hard disk that isn't partitioned to agree with the specifications of the PeeCee. If you want to treat your PC as a Sun, don't -- buy a Sun, FreeBSD runs

Re: Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Nipper
On 29 Oct 2003, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote: are anyone familiar with conditions where postfix may bring a 5.1-p10 server to a halt, making the server accept incoming ports (such as 22) but serve nothing, making getty(8) become non-respondent (pressing enter doesn't give any

LOR in VM...

2003-10-29 Thread Antxon Gonzalez Castro
I don't know if this is a known problem, but... lock order reversal 1st 0xc25cb818 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1319 2nd 0xc0934b40 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pag er.c:1835 3rd 0xc1033534 vm object (vm object) @

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-10-29 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. FreeBSD 5.2

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-10-29 Thread Sergey A. Osokin
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:00:22AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: Desired features for 5.2-RELEASE

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-10-29 Thread Bruce Evans
Test for scheduling buildworlds: cd /usr/src/usr.bin for i in obj depend all do MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i done /tmp/zqz 21 (Run this with an empty /somewhere/obj. The all stage doesn't quite finish.) On an ABIT BP6 system

Re: Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-29 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Christian Weisgerber wrote: If we ship with a default of v6only off, then people will not fix software to open two sockets. This in turn means that turning v6only on will break this software. I find the notion of making people fix their software to not rely on RFC-defined behaviour

crash on 5.1 current (Re: FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2, Postfix locks 5.1-servers?)

2003-10-29 Thread Andy Hilker
Hi, i have similar problems described in see subject. Two differnet Servers: A) PIII 1 GHz Dual, Scsi, 1 GB RAM B) XEON 3.06 GHz Dual, Adaptec SCSI Raid, 4 GB RAM A runs fine, B crashes once a day between 12 and 24 hours uptime. B has Apache (2.0.47) with SSL, now i will log incoming https

Re: Forward: HEADS UP! Default value of ip6_v6only changed

2003-10-29 Thread Michael Nottebrock
I wrote: I find the notion of making people fix their software to not rely on RFC-defined behaviour problematic. I'm actually glad to see NetBSD reversed their unfortunate decision regarding the default (and OpenBSD's stunt of not even providing a knob is very evil indeed). I understand that

Re: lots of exclusive sleep mutex

2003-10-29 Thread Clive Lin
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:00:33AM +0800, Clive Lin wrote: Hi, I've seen lots of messages on rescent -CURRENT malloc() of 16 with the following non-sleepable locks held: exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0 (0xe044eca8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:351 malloc() of 16 with the

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: The first one: when I install -current on disk where WinXP on first slice, sysinstall brakes WinXP boot complete. I got 'Missing operation system' everytime. Even I've tried 'fixboot' and reinstall WinXP. Helps only 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:12:17 -0600, Mark Nipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: initial complaints, I do think that fdisk/disklabel in sysinstall need to be improved upon. They do not handle multi-terabyte disk arrays properly at all You should probably use GPT on multi-terabyte disk arrays.

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Doug White wrote: Missing operating system comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the BIOS. Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then. Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead. This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact system up with

Re: page fault in propagate_priority

2003-10-29 Thread John Baldwin
On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Oct 28), John Baldwin said: On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: I've gotten the following panic twice in the last few days. I'm pretty sure truss has something to do with it, since I just started trussing something when it paniced. No

Re: Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Tom
Usually if networking locks up like this, you should check the mbuf usage. It is possible for resource starvation to cause a situation where TCP connections are accepted, but can't be sent data. netstat -m If that doesn't work, I would recommend cvsup'ping one of the machines to -current.

Re: Sysinstall's fdisk/disklabel should be improved

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Nipper
On 29 Oct 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:12:17 -0600, Mark Nipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: initial complaints, I do think that fdisk/disklabel in sysinstall need to be improved upon. They do not handle multi-terabyte disk arrays properly at all You should probably

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-10-29 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: Test for scheduling buildworlds: cd /usr/src/usr.bin for i in obj depend all do MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/somewhere/obj time make -s -j16 $i done /tmp/zqz 21 (Run this with an empty /somewhere/obj. The all stage

Re: Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Andy Hilker
Hi, i am using current. Similar problems *without* postfix. Login via ssh results in print motd, but nothing more. Login on local console results in nothing after pressing enter on username. Andy You (Tom) wrote: Usually if networking locks up like this, you should check the mbuf usage.

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Darryl Okahata
Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel /boot/loader' instead. This is documented in the GRUB info doc. Again, I have set this exact system up with redhat on the first disk and it works perfectly. Grub do not supporting UFS2. So only

Re: page fault in propagate_priority

2003-10-29 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 29), John Baldwin said: On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Oct 28), John Baldwin said: On 28-Oct-2003 Dan Nelson wrote: The fault address is 0x24 so it looks like a null pointer dereference of some sort. I've added asserts to

Re: Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Tom
All the time or sometimes? An unresponsive local console means that the entire machine is blocked though, not just networking. I'm using 5-current right now, and obviously I'm able to type this e-mail. Tom On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Andy Hilker wrote: Hi, i am using current. Similar problems

Re: Postfix locks 5.1-servers?

2003-10-29 Thread Andy Hilker
Hi Tom, not all the time, sorry about my bad english :) Sometimes, mostly once a day... see another mail to list from me, sent a few hours ago. This mail describes the problems more detailed. This night i will change RAM to see if it was faulty. But i do not think so. Andy You (Tom) wrote:

HEADSUP: MPSAFE network drivers

2003-10-29 Thread Sam Leffler
I'm committing changes to mark various network drivers' interrupt handlers MPSAFE. To insure folks have a way to backout if they hit problems I've also added a tunable that lets you disable this w/o rebuilding your kernel. By default all network drivers that register an interrupt handler

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-29 Thread John Angelmo
Doug White wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that this was fixed last night in: src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8 src/lib/msun/src/e_scalb.c,v1.10 The fix was to use the old versions of isnan() and isinf()

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote: Doug White wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that this was fixed last night in: src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8

Re: sound LOR patches

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:24:28PM -0500, Mathew Kanner wrote: Hello All, I tried to fix some LOR in -current and attached you will find some patches. I sent these to the -sound list but I didn't get a response. (Maybe I should mention that I'm also part of the -sound list). So

Re: ethercons: ethernet console driver for 5-current

2003-10-29 Thread Cameron Murdoch
Robert Watson wrote: I had a fair amount of time over the last week running in disconnected operation, and realized I had too many cables under my desk, so I spent a bit of time exploring the FreeBSD console code. Robert, I just tried this out (version 0.4) and I like it!! Thanks for the great

Re: sound LOR patches

2003-10-29 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Oct 29, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:24:28PM -0500, Mathew Kanner wrote: Hello All, I tried to fix some LOR in -current and attached you will find some patches. I sent these to the -sound list but I didn't get a response. (Maybe I should mention that I'm

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-29 Thread Scott Long
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote: Doug White wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that this was fixed last night in:

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-29 Thread John Angelmo
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote: Doug White wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that this was fixed last night in: src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c,v1.8

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe libm.so is still

Re: __fpclassifyd problem

2003-10-29 Thread Scott Long
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Scott Long wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 09:13:37PM +0100, John Angelmo wrote: Doug White wrote: On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, David Schultz wrote: I'm just catching up on -CURRENT, but I wanted to point out that this

5.1-R and 5.1-C floppies will not boot on SuperMicro 6023P-8R

2003-10-29 Thread Stephane Raimbault
reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT-20031029-JPSNAP #0: Wed Oct 29 04:30:49 GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BOOTMFS Preloaded elf kernel /kernel at 0xc0af1000. Preloaded mfs_root /mfsroot at 0xc0af12c0. Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz

Re: 5.1-R and 5.1-C floppies will not boot on SuperMicro 6023P-8R

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:07:27PM -0700, Stephane Raimbault wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install 5.1-R or 5.1-C from floppies redirected output to serial port and it won't boot to the install screen. 4.9-R floppies with output redirected to serial port works and installs properly. This is

Re: 5.1-R and 5.1-C floppies will not boot on SuperMicro 6023P-8R

2003-10-29 Thread Stephane Raimbault
I followed the instructions found in the handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-advanced.html I've used this method for all my SuperMicro 6013P-8 servers some running 5.1-R and others 4.8-R Thanks, Stephane. - Original Message - From: Kris Kennaway

Re: 5.1-R and 5.1-C floppies will not boot on SuperMicro 6023P-8R

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:15:00PM -0700, Stephane Raimbault wrote: I followed the instructions found in the handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-advanced.html I've used this method for all my SuperMicro 6013P-8 servers some running 5.1-R and others

Lock up on boot with LS-120 and CURRENT

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Dixon
Hi, Using todays current, I'm finding that FreeBSD locks up completely on boot if I don't have a disk in my LS-120 drive. There is no panic, it just seems to freeze. I have included a dmesg from a boot with a disk in the drive and indicated the point at which it freezes without the disk in.

Re: problems with sysinstall

2003-10-29 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Doug White wrote: Missing operating system comes out of the DOS default bootblock, not the BIOS. Yes, I know. But I don't feel better then. It means you were barking up the wrong tree :) Don't use chainloader with FreeBSD. Use 'kernel

Current

2003-10-29 Thread Marcos Biscaysaqu
Hi There, Any time I try to install my 5.1 current version I have got this error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.5 not found and I need install all again someone can help me please thanks -- Marcos Biscaysaqu Systems Administrator ThePacific.Net Ltd.

java binary incompatibility on 5.x (Re: __fpclassifyd problem)

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe libm.so is still

Re: Current

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:53:44PM +1300, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote: Hi There, Any time I try to install my 5.1 current version I have got this error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libc.so.5 not found and I need install all again someone can help me please It sounds like you've made

Re: Problem w/ ACPI in -CURRENT: Update

2003-10-29 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote: On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: As far as debugging prints, add the following printfs to acpi_cmbat_get_bif(): printf(Before getting BIF\n); as = AcpiEvaluateObject(h, _BIF, NULL, bif_buffer); printf(After

Re: java binary incompatibility on 5.x (Re: __fpclassifyd problem)

2003-10-29 Thread Scott Long
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe

Re: java binary incompatibility on 5.x (Re: __fpclassifyd problem)

2003-10-29 Thread Greg Lewis
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:07:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an issue with both the

SATA Patch on FreeBSD 4.9

2003-10-29 Thread Anthony Fajri
dear all, i wanna patch my kernel so that my freebsd support SATA but, when i tried to download the patch, the patch wasn't completed http://people.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/sata.patch + return 0; } if (ch-flags ATA_DMA_ACTIVE) {

Re: java binary incompatibility on 5.x (Re: __fpclassifyd problem)

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:40:29PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:07:11PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with the libm fix from a few days

Palm and USB: 5-CURRENT, 4-CURRENT, or 4.9-RELEASE?

2003-10-29 Thread Jason Barnes
I am trying to get my Palm Tungsten-E to sync with my FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE from October 23 (about a week ago). I seem not to be able to access /dev/ucom0 from pilot-xfer or jpilot, and the PPP workaround that others have suggested I can't seem to quite get working. I have heard rumors

FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2

2003-10-29 Thread Branko F. Granar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. FreeBSD 5.1-p10 (and also possible other 5.1-pX version) can be remotely locked up if the following criteria is met: + apache2 has mod_ssl loaded and enabled + apache2 has the following configuration directives set to the following values:

Re: FreeBSD 5.1-p10 reproducible crash with Apache2

2003-10-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:37:56AM +0100, Branko F. Gra?nar wrote: Hi. FreeBSD 5.1-p10 (and also possible other 5.1-pX version) can be remotely locked up if the following criteria is met: + apache2 has mod_ssl loaded and enabled + apache2 has the following configuration directives set to