buildworld failure: "don't know how to make thr_atfork.c"

2003-11-04 Thread Alex Wilkinson
CVSup'd today [Wed Nov 5 17:15:14 CST 2003] and buildworld fails. $ make buildworld . ===> lib/libpcap yacc -d -p pcapyy -o grammar.c /usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap/grammar.y ln -sf grammar.h tokdefs.h lex -t -Ppcapyy /usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap/scanner.l > scann

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-11-04 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-05 05:58:20 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-05 05:58:20 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-11-05 05:58:20 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs

[current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2003-11-04 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-05 05:30:02 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-05 05:30:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-11-05 05:30:02 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/

[current tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

2003-11-04 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-05 05:00:01 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-05 05:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-11-05 05:00:01 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/

Re: Fix for WINE on -CURRENT

2003-11-04 Thread Simon Barner
> can you make a patch for cdparanoia as well? > cdparanoia is also broken on recent -CURRENT and testing will be easy. There is already a PR. I will rewise my patch to use __FreeBSD__ in the patch file instead of using ${EXTRA_PATCHES}. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/57226 Thi

Re: Best Way To Get to current -CURRENT

2003-11-04 Thread Munish Chopra
On 2003-11-04 19:51 -0800, Jeffrey Katcher wrote: > I have a new system (IBM ThinkPad T40 (gorgeous, too :)). In order to use > the WiFi card (ath) I need to install -current. What's the accepted best way? > 1) Install 5.1-RELEASE and cvsup from there. > 2) Install 5-1-CURRENT snapshot and cvsup

Re: Fix for WINE on -CURRENT

2003-11-04 Thread Max Khon
Hello! On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:14:03PM -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > Below is a patch to fix WINE for the new ATA driver. > > I created this patch based on the ideals from a previous user > who had patched 3 other ports to work with -CURRENT's new ATA > driver. > > Could someone familar wit

Best Way To Get to current -CURRENT

2003-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Katcher
I have a new system (IBM ThinkPad T40 (gorgeous, too :)). In order to use the WiFi card (ath) I need to install -current. What's the accepted best way? 1) Install 5.1-RELEASE and cvsup from there. 2) Install 5-1-CURRENT snapshot and cvsup to "real" current. 3) Something else I haven't thought of.

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Eirik Oeverby wrote: > > Just for those interested: > > I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when > > my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and > > forth 8 times) that it *only* happens with SCHE

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Alex Wilkinson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:27:04AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > > > > Just for those interested: > > I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when > > my mouse goes haywire. And it's an a

panic with today's -current

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Sorry, all I have are these lines from messages. I returned and saw that the machine had rebooted. Nothing more: Nov 5 02:46:42 cale syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Nov 5 02:46:42 cale kernel: instruction pointer= 0x8:0xc054c85d Nov 5 02:46:42 cale kernel: stack pointer

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Alex Wilkinson wrote: On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:27:04AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote: Just for those interested: I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and forth 8 times) that it *only* happe

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Alex Wilkinson
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 12:27:04AM +0100, Eirik Oeverby wrote: Just for those interested: I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and forth 8 times)

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Eirik Oeverby wrote: Eirik Oeverby wrote: Just for those interested: I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and forth 8 times) that it *only* happens with SCHED_ULE and *only* with old versions (

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Eirik Oeverby wrote: Just for those interested: I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and forth 8 times) that it *only* happens with SCHED_ULE and *only* with old versions (~1.50) and the very la

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Just for those interested: I do *not* get any messages at all from the kernel (or elsewhere) when my mouse goes haywire. And it's an absolute truth (just tested back and forth 8 times) that it *only* happens with SCHED_ULE and *only* with old versions (~1.50) and the very latest ones (1.75 as I'

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Sheldon Hearn wrote: On (2003/11/04 09:29), Eirik Oeverby wrote: The problem is two parts: The mouse tends to 'lock up' for brief moments when the system is under load, in particular during heavy UI operations or when doing compile jobs and such. The second part of the problem is related, and is

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Scott Long
I've had this problem on my laptop since I bought it last year and started running -current. It's annoying, but luckily doesn't happen very often. My gut feeling here is that the psm driver isn't servicing its interrupts fast enough and characters are being dropped out of the FIFO. Maybe it's ti

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-11-04 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-04 22:43:43 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-04 22:43:43 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-11-04 22:43:43 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs

Re: Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Alex Wilkinson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:13:26PM +0100, Morten Johansen wrote: > Me too. Have had this problem since I got a "Intellimouse" PS/2 > wheel-mouse. (It worked fine with previous mice (no wheel)). > With any scheduler in 5-CURRENT and even more frequent in 4-S

Re: hw.ata.atapi_dma problem

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 23:11, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > ad0: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 > > > > So dma is NOT enabled although the sysctl is 1 > > For ATAPI devices you need hw.ata.atapi_dma=1.

Was: More ULE bugs fixed. Is: Mouse problem?

2003-11-04 Thread Morten Johansen
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On (2003/11/04 09:29), Eirik Oeverby wrote: > The problem is two parts: The mouse tends to 'lock up' for brief moments > when the system is under load, in particular during heavy UI operations > or when doing compile jobs and such. > The second part of the

Re: hw.ata.atapi_dma problem

2003-11-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > ad0: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 > > So dma is NOT enabled although the sysctl is 1 For ATAPI devices you need hw.ata.atapi_dma=1. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail:

hw.ata.atapi_dma problem

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Salve, with today's -current (~21:30 UTC) I get hw.ata.atapi_dma listed again. But it's said to be 1 so dma should be enabled I think. dmesg says: Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc2d97570 ad0: 39083MB [79408/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master

Re: New and aPic question

2003-11-04 Thread Alex Wilkinson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:56:07PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: Yes. As long as you have 'device apic' in your kernel config, APICs will be used to route interrupts even on UP machines if the machine includes an MP Table or ACPI is being used and it c

Bug: nmount(2) lacks parameter checking.

2003-11-04 Thread Peter Edwards
Hi, Looking over the code for nmount(), I think I noticed a few bugs. (tried send-pr, but the lack of a web-front-end at freebsd.org, and a decent mail system locally means that's not a runner) nmount() calls vfs_nmount() pretty much directly after copying in the io vector from userland. vfs_nmount

Re: [Tillman: Upgraded to latest -current today, boot hangs on "ata3: resetting devices"]

2003-11-04 Thread Tillman Hodgson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:20:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 04-Nov-2003 Tillman Hodgson wrote: > > It occurs to me that this is likely related to the new interrupt code. > > that tends to imply that the fix is "wait a few days and re-cvsup", but > > I thought folks here would be intereste

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-11-04 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2003/11/04 09:29), Eirik Oeverby wrote: > > > The problem is two parts: The mouse tends to 'lock up' for brief moments > > when the system is under load, in particular during heavy UI operations > > or when doing compile jobs and such. > > The second

Re: DRM error messages - easy way to turn them off?

2003-11-04 Thread Michael L. Squires
> I've gone ahead and made it a debug message again in -current. It's Worked. I now get kernel: info: [drm] Initialized rdeon 1.9.0 20020828 on minor 0 kernel: drm0: [MPSAFE] Thanks! Mike Squires SM P6DGH/AiW 7200 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

RE: xl0 watchdog timeout

2003-11-04 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Subject: RE: xl0 watchdog timeout, On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:23:19 -0500 (EST), John Baldwin wrote: > Try disabling ACPI. ACPI is unable to route any of your PCI interrupts, I tried disabling ACPI. It works fine. Thanks John. > so all your PCI interrupts are hosed. You can try to talk with the fol

Re: Floppy drive not found by RELENG_5_1

2003-11-04 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Ok, to get back a working and floppydrive detection on FreeBSD/alpha: What's about the attached patch? I moved in fd_probe() if (fd->type == FDT_NONE && (fd->fdu == 0 || fd->fdu == 1)) { out of the #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__amd64__) block and created an #else section (like it wa

sed behaving badly?

2003-11-04 Thread walt
I got this nonsensical error from sed while trying to update python: /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's,/usr/doc/python-docs-,/usr/local/share/doc/python,g' /usr/ports/lang/python/work/Python-2.3.2/Lib/pydoc.py sed: /usr/ports/lang/python/work/Python-2.3.2/Lib/pydoc.py: No such file or directory But the

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Bruce Evans wrote: >> > - on a BP6, UP kernels without apic work except for cyintr(), but SMP >> > kernels have problems with missing interrupts for ata devices and hang >> > at boot time. >> >> Is this related to the ata-lowlevel commit you mentioned above? > > No. It looks l

RE: [Tillman: Upgraded to latest -current today, boot hangs on "ata3: resetting devices"]

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Tillman Hodgson wrote: > It occurs to me that this is likely related to the new interrupt code. > that tends to imply that the fix is "wait a few days and re-cvsup", but > I thought folks here would be interested in seeing Sparc64 feedback. The new interrupt code did not affect spa

Re: Page fault

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Nils Andreas Hakansson wrote: > I've disabled softupdates because of > a panic("softdep_move_dependencies: need merge code"); Can't comment on this bit. Might want to send e-mail to Kirk directly. > Could someone take a look at this? > > pst: timeout mfa=0x0032d5d0 cmd=0x0

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Evans
> > The following is without the local changes: > > - cyintr(int unit) panics becauase it is passed a pointer to somewhere. > > I think all compat_isa devices are broken for unit 0 because unit 0 > > is represented by a null pointer. > > Ah, ok. Yes, this is a semantic change. To try and supp

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Well, a kernel without SMP and just 'device apic' should work fine, and >> a kernel with both SMP and 'device apic' should also work fine. > > But 'device apic' is necessary nowadays? Maybe that should be noted > so

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: >> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: >> > >> >> I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the >> >> machine boots fine in "Safe Mode", where DMA and hw.ata

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 19:38, John Baldwin wrote: > On 04-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 November 2003 18:19, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > >> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > >> >> > On Tu

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Tuesday 04 November 2003 18:19, John Baldwin wrote: >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: >> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: >> >> >> I somehow can't get at a

Re: if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 02:17:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > What is really strange is that "tun" is compiled in the kernel, but the > module is started anyway ??? > > $ kldstat > Id Refs AddressSize Name > 16 0xc040 35aef8 kernel > 21 0xc075b000 4cd10acpi.ko >

RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: > > HB>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > HB> > HB>JB> > HB>JB>On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> Hi, > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This

Re: Kernel Panic

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > Steve Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> For the past few weeks my -CURRENT system has been locking up. With a >> recent kernel (from 11/2) the following appears: >> >> Fault trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> fault virtual address = 0x24 >>

RE: New and aPic question

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hi all, > > with today's -current (with the new irq stuff) I get the following messages > wich I haven't had before: > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 > unknown: can't assign resources (port) > unknown: can't assign resources

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > Well, a kernel without SMP and just 'device apic' should work fine, and > a kernel with both SMP and 'device apic' should also work fine. But 'device apic' is necessary nowadays? Maybe that should be noted somewhere. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl

Page fault

2003-11-04 Thread Nils Andreas Hakansson
Hi all, I've got the following trying to debug FreeBSD current ( Mon Oct 27 16:34:36 CET 2003) on a serial terminal. Hardware: Supermicro x5da8 dual xeon 2.66Ghz 2GB ecc ddr ram Tekram 390u2we (system on a 36GB disc) promise sx6000 ( home on 6 WD1200JB (raid 5)) Intel(R) PRO/1000 (on motherboard

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > > >> I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the > >> machine boots fine in "Safe Mode", where DMA and hw.ata.wc is turned off. > > > > Ok, if I set hw.a

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 18:19, John Baldwin wrote: > On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > >> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > >> >> I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the > >> >

[Tillman: Upgraded to latest -current today, boot hangs on "ata3: resetting devices"]

2003-11-04 Thread Tillman Hodgson
It occurs to me that this is likely related to the new interrupt code. that tends to imply that the fix is "wait a few days and re-cvsup", but I thought folks here would be interested in seeing Sparc64 feedback. -T -- [It] contains "vegetable stabilizer" which sounds ominous. How unstable are v

Re: 5.1-R and 5.1-C floppies will not boot on SuperMicro 6023P-8R

2003-11-04 Thread Stephane Raimbault
for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK boot -v SMAP type=01 base= len=0009e400 SMAP type=02 base=0009e400 len=1c00 SMAP type=02 base=000dc000 len=00024000 SMAP type=01 base=0010 len=f7d

Re: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread Claus Guttesen
Hi. > > I also have an ASUS motherboard with an Intel 875P > > chipset. > > Can you post a dmesg? Note that if you want > hyperthreading, > you need to enable it in your BIOS. The ACPI (and > soon the > MPTable) drivers will not use HT CPUs unless HT is > enabled in > the BIOS. My test machine

RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: > > HB>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > HB> > HB>JB> > HB>JB>On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> Hi, > HB>JB>> > HB>JB>> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This

RE: xl0 watchdog timeout

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > Subject: RE: xl0 watchdog timeout, > On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:39:44 -0500 (EST), John Baldwin wrote: >> Can you please provide a full dmesg? > > yes. Try disabling ACPI. ACPI is unable to route any of your PCI interrupts, so all your PCI interrupts are

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: >> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: >> > >> >> I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the >> >> machine boots fine in "Safe Mode", where DMA and hw.a

RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: HB>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: HB> HB>JB> HB>JB>On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: HB>JB>> HB>JB>> Hi, HB>JB>> HB>JB>> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This HB>JB>> worked until yesterday, but with the new interru

Re: Kernel Panic

2003-11-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
Steve Ames <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the past few weeks my -CURRENT system has been locking up. With a > recent kernel (from 11/2) the following appears: > > Fault trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address = 0x24 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present >

Re: New and aPic question

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 17:10, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hi all, > > with today's -current (with the new irq stuff) I get the following messages > wich I haven't had before: > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 > unknown: can't assign resources (port) > unknown: can't

RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Harti Brandt wrote: HB>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: HB> HB>JB> HB>JB>On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: HB>JB>> HB>JB>> Hi, HB>JB>> HB>JB>> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This HB>JB>> worked until yesterday, but with the new interru

New and aPic question

2003-11-04 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hi all, with today's -current (with the new irq stuff) I get the following messages wich I haven't had before: vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown:

RE: xl0 watchdog timeout

2003-11-04 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
Subject: RE: xl0 watchdog timeout, On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:39:44 -0500 (EST), John Baldwin wrote: > Can you please provide a full dmesg? yes. Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University

RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread Harti Brandt
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: JB> JB>On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: JB>> JB>> Hi, JB>> JB>> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This JB>> worked until yesterday, but with the new interrupt code it doesn't boot JB>> anymore. It works for the standard HZ,

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > > >> I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the > >> machine boots fine in "Safe Mode", where DMA and hw.ata.wc is turned off. > > > > Ok, if I set hw

Re: HEADSUP: if_xname changes incoming

2003-11-04 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2003/11/03 13:38), Brooks Davis wrote: > I've sent mail to both his FreeBSD address and the one on the IPFilter > homepage. If anyone knows a reliable way to communicate with him, that > would be useful. The latter address works, but he's terrible with email, by his own admission. If you do

Kernel Panic

2003-11-04 Thread Steve Ames
For the past few weeks my -CURRENT system has been locking up. With a recent kernel (from 11/2) the following appears: Fault trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc049d0db stack pointer

RE: xl0 watchdog timeout

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > After cvsup and make world, I could't use xl0 and kernel said "kernel: > xl0: watchdog timeout". > ># dmesg > [snip] > xl0: <3Com 3c920B-EMB Integrated Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe400-0xe47f > mem 0xea > 02-0xea02007f irq 10 at device 18.0 on pci0

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > >> I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the >> machine boots fine in "Safe Mode", where DMA and hw.ata.wc is turned off. > > Ok, if I set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 in loader.conf, it boots fine. Could t

RE: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Harti Brandt wrote: > > Hi, > > I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This > worked until yesterday, but with the new interrupt code it doesn't boot > anymore. It works for the standard HZ, but if I set HZ=1000 I get a double > fault. I suspect a race c

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-11-04 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2003/11/04 09:29), Eirik Oeverby wrote: > The problem is two parts: The mouse tends to 'lock up' for brief moments > when the system is under load, in particular during heavy UI operations > or when doing compile jobs and such. > The second part of the problem is related, and is manifested by

Re: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 04-Nov-2003 Claus Guttesen wrote: > Hi. > >> I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run >> at HZ=1. This >> worked until yesterday, but with the new interrupt >> code it doesn't boot >> anymore. It works for the standard HZ, but if I set >> HZ=1000 I get a double > > Compiled a

Re: if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Matteo Riondato wrote: Well, it did not change anything :( What is really strange is that "tun" is compiled in the kernel, but the module is started anyway ??? I had the same problem last year and solved it by removing device tun from the kernel configuration file. Yes, I though about it. But s

Re: if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Matteo Riondato
Il Mar, 2003-11-04 alle 14:17, Antoine Jacoutot ha scritto: > Max Laier wrote: > > AJ> > > AJ> module_register: module if_tun already exists! > > AJ> Module if_tun failed to register: 17 > > AJ> can't re-use a leaf (if_tun_debug)! > > AJ> --

Re: New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread Claus Guttesen
Hi. > I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run > at HZ=1. This > worked until yesterday, but with the new interrupt > code it doesn't boot > anymore. It works for the standard HZ, but if I set > HZ=1000 I get a double Compiled a new kernel with source from Nov. 3'rd where SMP and

Re: if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Max Laier wrote: > AJ> > AJ> module_register: module if_tun already exists! > AJ> Module if_tun failed to register: 17 > AJ> can't re-use a leaf (if_tun_debug)! > AJ> > AJ> Is there a kernel option I m

New interrupt stuff breaks ASUS 2 CPU system

2003-11-04 Thread Harti Brandt
Hi, I have an ASUS system with 2 CPUs that I need to run at HZ=1. This worked until yesterday, but with the new interrupt code it doesn't boot anymore. It works for the standard HZ, but if I set HZ=1000 I get a double fault. I suspect a race condition in the interrupt handling. My config file

Re: if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Max Laier
Hello Antoine, Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 10:55:22 AM, you wrote: AJ> I just migrated a 4.8 server to -CURRENT and I have one question. AJ> At boot time I get the following message: AJ> AJ> module_register: module if_tun already exists! AJ> Module

Re: xl0 watchdog timeout

2003-11-04 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shin-ichi Yoshimoto wrote: > After cvsup and make world, I could't use xl0 and kernel said "kernel: > xl0: watchdog timeout". > > # dmesg > [snip] > xl0: <3Com 3c920B-EMB Integrated Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe400-0xe47f > mem 0xea > 02-0xea02007f irq 10 at device 18.0 on pc

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > I somehow can't get at a good vmcore :-(. But I found out that the > machine boots fine in "Safe Mode", where DMA and hw.ata.wc is turned off. Ok, if I set hw.ata.ata_dma=0 in loader.conf, it boots fine. Could there be some issue with ATAng + new interrup

Re: new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > I've yet to find out if I can get a good vmcore + backtrace, but I'm > having a machine that panics when going from singleuser to multiuser on > boot with a new kernel from today. > > The panicking process is 'idle', the trap number is 30, and it says > "unk

xl0 watchdog timeout

2003-11-04 Thread Shin-ichi Yoshimoto
After cvsup and make world, I could't use xl0 and kernel said "kernel: xl0: watchdog timeout". # dmesg [snip] xl0: <3Com 3c920B-EMB Integrated Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xe400-0xe47f mem 0xea 02-0xea02007f irq 10 at device 18.0 on pci0 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:75:3c:6b:ad miibus0: on xl0

new interrupt code: panic when going multiuser

2003-11-04 Thread Lukas Ertl
Hi, I've yet to find out if I can get a good vmcore + backtrace, but I'm having a machine that panics when going from singleuser to multiuser on boot with a new kernel from today. The panicking process is 'idle', the trap number is 30, and it says "unknown/reserved trap". More info is coming as

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-11-04 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-04 09:10:17 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-04 09:10:17 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-11-04 09:10:17 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs

if_tun failed to register

2003-11-04 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Hi :) I just migrated a 4.8 server to -CURRENT and I have one question. At boot time I get the following message: module_register: module if_tun already exists! Module if_tun failed to register: 17 can't re-use a leaf (if_tun_debug)! --

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-11-04 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-04 07:40:27 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-04 07:40:27 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-11-04 07:40:27 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs

Re: NULL td passed to propagate_priority() when using xmms...

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > On 01-Nov-2003 Soren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Sean Chittenden wrote: > >> Howdy. I'm not sure if this is a ULE bug or a KSE bug, or both, but, > >> for those interested (this is using ule 1.67, rebuilding world now), > >> here's my stack. I couldn't f

Re: HELP: ServerWorks data corruption after 350 MB with BerkeleyD B 4.0?

2003-11-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Anshuman Kanwar wrote: Ehem, this machine is NOT ServerWorks based, its Intel... > rack2-102.nyc# pciconf -l > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x254c8086 rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x060400 card=0x chip=0x25438086 rev=0x01 > hdr=

Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
Jeff Roberson wrote: On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Eirik Oeverby wrote: Hi, Just recompiled yesterday, running sched_ule.c 1.75. It seems to have re-introduced the bogus mouse events I talked about earlier, after a period of having no problems with it. The change happened between 1.69 and 1.75, and there'

Re: HEADSUP: Committing new interrupt code, tree will be broken

2003-11-04 Thread Eirik Oeverby
John Baldwin wrote: I'm committing the new i386 interrupt and SMP code, so buckle your seat belts. :) I'll be intentionally breaking the kernel build at the start and re-enable it with the last commit when I am done. Is this *only* for SMP systems, or will the interrupt code also affect UNIprocess

Re: APM not working on Dell Latitude D600

2003-11-04 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:37:26PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > Cc'd to Stijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > Many thanks Stijn, for making that patch available! No problem, but I'd like it if you also thank Mark Santcroos for making that patch in the first place -- I'm just the messenger here... > So no

Re: ip_output panics on recent -CURRENT

2003-11-04 Thread Andrea Campi
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:38:56PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > The problem appears to be caused by someone reclaming routing table entries > while they are in use. This would likely be a reference counting problem. > > You didn't provide any information about system kernel config or hardware >