5.2-BETA - shooting self on the foot?

2003-11-29 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Hello FreeBSD-world, Can someone offer some advise on how I can shoot myself on the foot by installing 5.2-BETA via cvsup? What tag. -Wash -- +==+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington[EMAIL PROTECTED] Zzz

Re: 5.2-BETA - shooting self on the foot?

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:22:03AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Hello FreeBSD-world, Can someone offer some advise on how I can shoot myself on the foot by installing 5.2-BETA via cvsup? What tag. No tag, just cvsup -current as normal. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[Fwd: re: ath0 lost connection]

2003-11-29 Thread Marcos Biscaysaqu
Original Message Subject:re: ath0 lost connection Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:14:07 -0500 From: Kelley Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there. I have got running a PCI atheros wireless card on b/g

Buildworld failure on 5.1-REL

2003-11-29 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Hoping against hope! Still trying to fight out a problem which could possibly be a simple one compared to the others that I have seen. I have put a bzipped error text at the following URL. http://ns2.wananchi.com/~wash/FreeBSD/ Is there some clue in that file that can help me get a successful

Re: Buildworld failure on 5.1-REL

2003-11-29 Thread YONETANI Tomokazu
Hi. On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:42:36AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Hoping against hope! Still trying to fight out a problem which could possibly be a simple one compared to the others that I have seen. I have put a bzipped error text at the following URL.

Re: Buildworld failure on 5.1-REL

2003-11-29 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* YONETANI Tomokazu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20031129 12:17]: wrote: Hi. On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:42:36AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: Hoping against hope! Still trying to fight out a problem which could possibly be a simple one compared to the others that I have seen. I have put

Re: NSS and PAM (was Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static)

2003-11-29 Thread slave-mike
why does /bin/sh need NSS support? Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: [Threading intentionally broken.] On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:16:25AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: NSS and PAM do not overlap. They are complimentary and one cannot do the job of the

5.2-BETA: file system bugs considered harmful (was: 5.2-BETA: giving up on 4 buffers)

2003-11-29 Thread Matthias Andree
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not sure if the problem is known for the read-only case. It is the same problem as in the read-write case. ext2fs hangs onto buffers, so shutdown cannot tell if it can look at the buffers and considers them to be busy. Then since shutdown cannot

Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static

2003-11-29 Thread Matthias Andree
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How much do you intend to use NSS for? I mean, what's the point of adopting this cool infrastructure if all you are going to do

Cdrecord broken with 5.2Beta and ATAPICAM

2003-11-29 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, Since the ATAnG commit I'm no longer able to burn any Cd's. 5.X, 5.1R did work. scsidev: '1,0,0' scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 pregap1: -1 Cdrecord 2.00.3 (i386-unknown-freebsd5.2) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 Jörg Schilling TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM Using libscg version 'schily-0.7' Driveropts:

Xircom pccard couldn't load/attach

2003-11-29 Thread Ronald Klop
Hello, This card doesn't attach well. Other Xircom cards do. Nov 29 13:47:24 laptop kernel: xe0: Xircom CreditCard Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 11 function 0 config 39 on pccard0 Nov 29 13:47:24 laptop kernel: device_probe_and_attach: xe0 attach returned 12 Mail me if

Re: NSS and PAM

2003-11-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Replacing passwd/group/NSS/PAM/whatever with a real database or directory backend is a kind of holy grail for Unix that's been discussed for many years. You're mixing apples and oranges here. NSS and PAM are not backends in themselves; they are

Re: Xircom pccard couldn't load/attach (with uname -a info)

2003-11-29 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:17:01 +0100, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, This card doesn't attach well. Other Xircom cards do. Nov 29 13:47:24 laptop kernel: xe0: Xircom CreditCard Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 11 function 0 config 39 on pccard0 Nov 29 13:47:24

Re: NSS and PAM (was Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static)

2003-11-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
slave-mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: why does /bin/sh need NSS support? Because /bin/sh uses getpwnam(). We've been through this before. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: anoncvs

2003-11-29 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Sat, 29 Nov 2003 01:02:59 + (UTC), Matt Bell wrote: is there still an ongoing problem with anoncvs? anoncvs.freebsd.org(209.181.243.20):2401 failed: Connection refused Sorry, this box is waiting for console operation after upgrading failure. -- Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] // IMG

Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked

2003-11-29 Thread Bob Willcox
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:01:05PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Content-Description: signed data On Friday 28 November 2003 21:03, Tim Kientzle wrote: David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP. $

Re: named (bind) in jail does not start

2003-11-29 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Saturday 29 November 2003 15:23, Axel S. Gruner wrote: Ok, Port 53 is not in use in the jail nor the hostsystem. I think the problem is 0.0.0.0, and i have to bind named on the IP of the jail. I tested same named configuration on the hostsystem, i thought about some misconfigration, but

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:04:14PM +0100, Christian Laursen wrote: 20030829: The following rc.d scripts have been removed and should be deleted from your installation: atm2.sh atm3.sh devdb localdaemons network1 network2 network3. Depending on when you last

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing startup scripts to /etc/rc.d :-/ That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: named (bind) in jail does not start

2003-11-29 Thread Axel S. Gruner
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 15:29:40 +0100 Melvyn Sopacua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote something special: On Saturday 29 November 2003 15:23, Axel S. Gruner wrote: Ok, Port 53 is not in use in the jail nor the hostsystem. I think the problem is 0.0.0.0, and i have to bind named on the IP of the jail.

Re: NSS and PAM (was Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static)

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Coleman
slave-mike wrote: why does /bin/sh need NSS support? 1. If you are using pam_ldap, tilde expansion will be broken in /bin/sh without nss_ldap support. 2. Tilde expansion is required for POSIX conformance. It's not the strongest rationale. But it's something to consider. Richard Coleman [EMAIL

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing startup scripts to /etc/rc.d :-/ That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( Maybe

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. FreeBSD 5.2

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
[NOTE: This is being resent due to a cvs update error that caused an un-updated version of the TODO list to be sent out earlier] This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at:

Upgrade experience 5.1p10-5.2 Beta

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Smith
First I tried making world and kernel from the cvsup'ed standard supfile. This went OK. Then I did installkernel and installworld (in that order) and the second step crashed with messages that shared libraries were missing. (It's as if it installed some files before installing the shared

Re: 5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
Sigh. Try three to follow. My script was checking out only the www tree, and the checkout of the doc tree it depended on was gradually getting stale. At some point, it picked up a new dependency in the doc tree and the build broke. Hopefully third time will be the charm. Robert N M Watson

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
[NOTE: This is being resent due to a cvs update error that caused an un-updated version of the TODO list to be sent out earlier] This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at:

Re: Nvidia problem fixed in current?

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Smith
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Wednesday 26 November 2003 18:40, Justin Smith wrote: 1. Was the problem with the nvidia driver ever fixed? (I reported this more than a month ago --- the kernel nvidia driver only works with parameters set to lower the speed of the interface, and even then failed

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Coleman
Andreas Klemm wrote: The following rc.d scripts have been removed and should be deleted from your installation: atm2.sh atm3.sh devdb localdaemons network1 network2 network3. Depending on when you last updated world and used mergemaster(8) you may or may not

Re: Xircom pccard couldn't load/attach (with uname -a info)

2003-11-29 Thread Scott Mitchell
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 02:20:24PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote: On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 14:17:01 +0100, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, This card doesn't attach well. Other Xircom cards do. Nov 29 13:47:24 laptop kernel: xe0: Xircom CreditCard Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 at port

Re: Upgrade experience 5.1p10-5.2 Beta

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Smith
Are you running with GENERIC from 5.2-BETA? If so, you may wish to recompile your kernel with WITNESS and INVARIANTS turned off and see if that helps. These debugging features are critical during the development process, but also seriously impact performance and might make the difference you're

Re: Upgrade experience 5.1p10-5.2 Beta (update)

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Smith
This also fixed the scratchiness of the sound (sound had a kind of buzz to it, as though it was being played on a kazoo..) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Upgrade experience 5.1p10-5.2 Beta

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Justin Smith wrote: Are you running with GENERIC from 5.2-BETA? If so, you may wish to recompile your kernel with WITNESS and INVARIANTS turned off and see if that helps. These debugging features are critical during the development process, but also seriously impact

SV: anoncvs

2003-11-29 Thread Matt Douhan
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Fran: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun Kuriyama anoncvs.freebsd.org(209.181.243.20):2401 failed: Connection refused Sorry, this box is waiting for console operation after upgrading failure. If it helps, cvsup4.se.freebsd.org also provides

Re: PII SMP system hangs during boot with ACPI enabled

2003-11-29 Thread George Hartzell
Nate Lawson writes: No way! Good (non-386) equipment is never to old. :) Please add debug.acpi.disable=cpu to loader.conf or type that in at the loader prompt. If it boots ok, we'll have to debug the acpi_cpu_startup path. Speaking of which, I have a Good (see above...) motherboard

Re: PII SMP system hangs during boot with ACPI enabled

2003-11-29 Thread John Polstra
On 29-Nov-2003 George Hartzell wrote: Speaking of which, I have a Good (see above...) motherboard looking for a worthy home. There's an alias [EMAIL PROTECTED] just for such offers. :-) John ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Upgrade experience 5.1p10-5.2 Beta

2003-11-29 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Saturday 29 November 2003 20:04, Robert Watson wrote: When we ship 5.2, it will presumably ship with the debugging features disabled in the GENERIC kernel, but enabled in a second DEBUG kernel in the same way we shipped 5.1. Quick q on this one: I have several configs now to trace

Re: Nvidia problem fixed in current?

2003-11-29 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Nov 29, Justin Smith wrote: [snip] The kernel nvidia driver worked fine in 5.1. It only STOPPED working when I upgraded to 5.2 beta (and rebuilt and reinstalled the kernel driver). This is a problem of 5.2 vs 5.1 something changed that stopped it from working. Perhaps some

Re: Time jumping on both 4.x and 5.x ...

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:04:16AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Content-Description: signed data On Saturday 29 November 2003 05:57, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59 and

Re: Time jumping on both 4.x and 5.x ...

2003-11-29 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: Are all affected machines multi-processor? None. Both are i386 UP (although the 4.9-RELEASE box is running an SMP-enabled kernel). -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to

Re: Time jumping on both 4.x and 5.x ...

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Content-Description: signed data On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: Are all affected machines multi-processor? None. Both are i386 UP (although the 4.9-RELEASE box is running an SMP-enabled kernel).

Re: Time jumping on both 4.x and 5.x ...

2003-11-29 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Saturday 29 November 2003 11:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: I didn't think 4.x SMP kernels could run on a UP machine. It's a pretty decent Pentium4 Mobo, I guess it meets the requirements for an SMP-Board running one CPU. From dmesg: Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R)

RE: Time jumping on both 4.x and 5.x ...

2003-11-29 Thread Don Bowman
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:32:28AM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: Content-Description: signed data On Saturday 29 November 2003 09:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: Are all affected machines multi-processor? None. Both are i386 UP (although

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031122 20:46] wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: This should make things work properly for apps that are linked against libc_r and use filedescriptor passing. Can someone review and approve it please? This isn't needed. Any time

Re: LOR w/5.2-BETA

2003-11-29 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:38:59PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:27:53AM +0100, Artur Poplawski wrote: lock order reversal 1st 0xc43d8ad4 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323 2nd 0xc098cf60 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @

Re: Nvidia problem fixed in current?

2003-11-29 Thread Uwe Laverenz
Justin Smith schrieb: The kernel nvidia driver worked fine in 5.1. It only STOPPED working when I upgraded to 5.2 beta (and rebuilt and reinstalled the kernel Same problem here, it used to work for a while and now gives me a scrambled picture immediately if I start X11. It looks similar to the

Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Damian Gerow
A couple days ago, I downloaded 20031116-JPSNAP to install on a new system -- this box had been running 5.1-R without issues for some time, but wasn't doing anything particular, and I had mucked up the 5.1 - 5.2 upgrade (statfs stuff). Whenever I boot the system into multi-user mode, I see a

Re: Apples linking

2003-11-29 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:46:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: FWIW: If FreeBSD wanted to use this approach, the safest way to do it would b to split the user and kernel address space mappings; in general, this will only mean modifying uiomove/copy{in|out}[str], and dealing with the address

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 12:21] wrote: Descriptor's passed can't be closed because the uthread kernel does this: The weird part is that i'm doing a sendfile(2) using the descriptors and it appears that sendfile does the FD_LOCK thing on the descriptors so... ? int

Re: LOR w/5.2-BETA

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:23:42AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:38:59PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 12:27:53AM +0100, Artur Poplawski wrote: lock order reversal 1st 0xc43d8ad4 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:07:44PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: A couple days ago, I downloaded 20031116-JPSNAP to install on a new system -- this box had been running 5.1-R without issues for some time, but wasn't doing anything particular, and I had mucked up the 5.1 - 5.2 upgrade (statfs

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing startup scripts to /etc/rc.d :-/ That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( Well,

Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:25:08PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: All openldapXX-server ports do this for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db/pkg grep /etc/rc.d */+CONTEN* [...] openldap-server-2.1.23/+CONTENTS:@unexec /etc/rc.d/slapd stop 21 /dev/null || true

Re: recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vnode interlock @ /var/portbuild/sparc64/src-client/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_ihash.c:128

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
I got this on an alpha machine as well. Can someone track it down? msgbufp = 0xfc0023f85fe0 magic = 63062, size = 32736, r= 59046, w = 59565, ptr = 0xfc0023f7e000, cksum= 2511626 lock order reversal 1st 0xfc001a793d80 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @

Need example file for nsswitch.conf in /usr/share/examples

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Coleman
There really needs to be an example file for nsswitch.conf in /usr/share/example. For people new to FreeBSD 5.X, there is no outward sign that nsswitch is supported other than the nsswitch.conf(5) man page. Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 16:23]: over and over and over -- it makes the console essentially unusable. I think you're running into problems that have been fixed in subsequent weeks. Is there a reason you can't install the 5.2-BETA image? Well, that's good

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:43:44PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 16:23]: over and over and over -- it makes the console essentially unusable. I think you're running into problems that have been fixed in subsequent weeks. Is there a

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-29 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 17:18]: Can't you boot from the install floppy and then do a network install? Don't have any floppies handy right now. I /could/ go out and get some... But this is a little OT. I'll find some way to update my system, and respond back if

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( Well, er, a number of us do essentially nothing BUT ports QA. Do you actually review ports Makefiles? DES --

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031122 20:46] wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: This should make things work properly for apps that are linked against libc_r and use filedescriptor passing. Can someone review

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( Well, er, a number of us do essentially

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Daniel Eischen
[re@ removed] On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 12:21] wrote: Descriptor's passed can't be closed because the uthread kernel does this: The weird part is that i'm doing a sendfile(2) using the descriptors and it appears that

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: Do you actually review ports Makefiles? Not pre-review, but post-review, certainly. We also have an cluster of ~25 machines and a number of ports committers who spend their days

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Do you actually review ports Makefiles? You _are_ kidding here, right? Yes, the ports team does read over the ports Makefile. Yes, the bento cluster attempts to find all the problems that can be found by automated processes. Yes, my own code

Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
I forwarded the reports of timecounter problems to phk, and he asked that people who are seeing timecounter problems provide FULL details of their system configuration, including: * dmesg * kernel configuration * compiler options * time-related system configuration (whether ntpd/timed/ntpdate

Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

2003-11-29 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 6:27 PM +1100 11/27/03, Bruce Evans wrote: On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote: I have reformatted the numbers that Michael reported, into the following table: Static /bin/sh: Dynamic /bin/sh: real385m29.977s real455m44.852s = 18.22% user

Re: Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: * dmesg Attached ... * kernel configuration Attached ... * compiler options CFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -g -DKVA_PAGES=512 COPTFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -DKVA_PAGES=512 * time-related system configuration (whether ntpd/timed/ntpdate is running,

Re: no /dev/dsp.x

2003-11-29 Thread T Kellers
On Friday 28 November 2003 11:41 pm, T Kellers wrote: Thanks, I'll try disabling ACPI in device.hints, tomorrow. When I first upgraded from 5.1-RELEASE to 5.2-BETA on Monday, I had to disable ACPI on the FreeBSD text startup menu or the laptop wouldn't talk network with anything. Although

RE: Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Don Bowman
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I forwarded the reports of timecounter problems to phk, and he asked that people who are seeing timecounter problems provide FULL details of their system configuration, including: * dmesg * kernel configuration * compiler options *

RE: Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Don Bowman wrote: For this config (below), kern.timecounter.method=0 reproduces the problem, kern.timecounter.method=1 does not. Can anyone comment on what effect setting method to 1 has on the system? Like, would one notice a degradation in performance? Marc G.

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 14:59] wrote: [re@ removed] On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 12:21] wrote: Descriptor's passed can't be closed because the uthread kernel does this: The weird part is that i'm

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 14:57] wrote: What do you suggest we do? Just close the file: if ((fd 0) || (fd = _thread_dtablesize) || (fd == _thread_kern_pipe[0]) || (fd == _thread_kern_pipe[1])) { /* * Don't allow silly

Need to trim the disc1 packages

2003-11-29 Thread Scott Long
All, We are badly overflowing the disc1 release ISO with packages, and need to trim it down. One package that could easily get axed is the linux-netscape-communicator package. It is 17MB in size, and is of questionable value since it is severely out of date. Does anyone still rely on it, or

Re: Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marc G. Fournier writes: Hmm, I'm not saying this makes sense, but at least there is an emergent pattern... Col#1 is duration of the shift, sorted in increasing order. Col#2 is the delta to the line above. Notice stratification on 50msec boundaries:

Re: Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Marc G. Fournier writes: On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Don Bowman wrote: For this config (below), kern.timecounter.method=0 reproduces the problem, kern.timecounter.method=1 does not. Can anyone comment on what effect setting method to 1 has on the system? Like, would one

Re: Need to trim the disc1 packages

2003-11-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 15:55] wrote: All, We are badly overflowing the disc1 release ISO with packages, and need to trim it down. One package that could easily get axed is the linux-netscape-communicator package. It is 17MB in size, and is of questionable value since it is

Re: no /dev/dsp.x

2003-11-29 Thread walt
T Kellers wrote: ...and subsequent kernel build/install with device pcm, not only didn't I have any pcm line in my dmesg, but I didn't have any snd_maestro3.ko entries in /boot/kernel... That's pretty weird. Do you have any other snd_* modules in /boot/kernel? You don't have NO_MODULES in

Re: Corrected gettimeofday() test code

2003-11-29 Thread Sten
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: I forwarded the reports of timecounter problems to phk, and he asked that people who are seeing timecounter problems provide FULL details of their system configuration, including: snip Please note that there are quite a few broken timecounters out

editors/openoffice-1.1: random g++ internal compiler error

2003-11-29 Thread Mikhail Manuilov
Stay current! Trying to build openoffice-1.1 from ports but when it comes to .cxx strange things begin In file included from /usr2/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/oo_1.1_src/ solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/vcl/svapp.hxx:87, from /usr2/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/oo_1.1_src/

Re: Need to trim the disc1 packages

2003-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:03:20PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 15:55] wrote: All, We are badly overflowing the disc1 release ISO with packages, and need to trim it down. One package that could easily get axed is the linux-netscape-communicator

Re: no /dev/dsp.x

2003-11-29 Thread Mathew Kanner
On Nov 29, T Kellers wrote: On Friday 28 November 2003 11:41 pm, T Kellers wrote: After fighting with the laptop for about an hour this morning before class, I decided to wipe out the FreeBSD slice and start over with 5.1-RELEASE. After that install and subsequent kernel build/install

Re: editors/openoffice-1.1: random g++ internal compiler error

2003-11-29 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 04:19:27AM +0600, Mikhail Manuilov wrote: vcl/settings.hxx:1165: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. dmake: Error code 1, while

Re: no /dev/dsp.x

2003-11-29 Thread T Kellers
On Saturday 29 November 2003 06:42 pm, walt wrote: T Kellers wrote: ...and subsequent kernel build/install with device pcm, not only didn't I have any pcm line in my dmesg, but I didn't have any snd_maestro3.ko entries in /boot/kernel... That's pretty weird. Do you have any other snd_*

Re: no /dev/dsp.x

2003-11-29 Thread T Kellers
On Saturday 29 November 2003 08:32 pm, Mathew Kanner wrote: On Nov 29, T Kellers wrote: On Friday 28 November 2003 11:41 pm, T Kellers wrote: After fighting with the laptop for about an hour this morning before class, I decided to wipe out the FreeBSD slice and start over with

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-29 Thread Oliver Eikemeier
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:25:08PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: All openldapXX-server ports do this for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/db/pkg grep /etc/rc.d */+CONTEN* [...] openldap-server-2.1.23/+CONTENTS:@unexec /etc/rc.d/slapd stop 21 /dev/null || true

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Oliver Eikemeier
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing startup scripts to /etc/rc.d :-/ That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-29 Thread Oliver Eikemeier
Mark Linimon wrote: On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Do you actually review ports Makefiles? You _are_ kidding here, right? Yes, the ports team does read over the ports Makefile. Yes, the bento cluster attempts to find all the problems that can be found by automated processes.

installworld to DESTDIR: touch: not found

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
I'm in the throes of updating my diskless boot boxes to 5.2-BETA from my 5.1-CURRENT build box. I did a buildworld, and am now doing an installworld to a DESTDIR. cboss# make installworld DESTDIR=/cboss/devel/nfsroot/crash2.cboss.tislabs.com/ ...

Re: installworld to DESTDIR: touch: not found

2003-11-29 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 29 November 2003 07:05 pm, Robert Watson wrote: I'm in the throes of updating my diskless boot boxes to 5.2-BETA from my 5.1-CURRENT build box. I did a buildworld, and am now doing an installworld to a DESTDIR. cboss# make installworld

Re: installworld to DESTDIR: touch: not found

2003-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Kent Stewart wrote: This kind of error frequently happens when your clock is off. Make thinks the date of the cvsuped source is newer than the file it created and tries to create it again. Do you run cmos at UTC or local. If local, did you adjkerntz -i. A few people

named (bind) in jail does not start

2003-11-29 Thread Axel S. Gruner
Hi. I have configured named in jail (FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10). If i want to start named in the jail /usr/sbin/named i get this error message: opensocket_f: bind([0.0.0.0].53): Address already in use Ok, Port 53 is not in use in the jail nor the hostsystem. I think the problem is 0.0.0.0,

Re: named (bind) in jail does not start

2003-11-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:23:48PM +0100, Axel S. Gruner wrote: Hi. I have configured named in jail (FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10). If i want to start named in the jail /usr/sbin/named i get this error message: opensocket_f: bind([0.0.0.0].53): Address already in use Ok, Port 53 is

Re: named (bind) in jail does not start

2003-11-29 Thread Pawel Malachowski
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:29:40PM +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: Ok, Port 53 is not in use in the jail nor the hostsystem. I think the problem is 0.0.0.0, and i have to bind named on the IP of the jail. I tested same named configuration on the hostsystem, i thought about some

Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-29 Thread Will Andrews
Hi, Ever since I found the set of commits which broke probing this disk on/about September 1, I have attempted to boot a JPSNAP about once a week. Up to this day, on which I tried 5.2-BETA (official ISO), it has never again probed this drive correctly. I'm using it with a: [EMAIL

Re: Need to trim the disc1 packages

2003-11-29 Thread Ryan
Kris Kennaway said: Please make concrete suggestions by looking at the print-cdrom-packages script and the sizes of the packages on ftp.freebsd.org. Kris My recommendations to remove: gimp-1.2.5 gimp-print-4.2.5 tcl-8.3.5_2 ; Why are there 2 TCL packages? tcl-8.4.4_1,1 is also included,

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 14:57] wrote: What do you suggest we do? Just close the file: if ((fd 0) || (fd = _thread_dtablesize) || (fd == _thread_kern_pipe[0]) || (fd == _thread_kern_pipe[1])) {

Re: [PATCH] please review. file descriptor passing for libc_r.

2003-11-29 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Seems like a good diff. * Daniel Eischen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031129 21:41] wrote: You should just call close() if the fd has not been initialized. Index: uthread_close.c === RCS file:

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-29 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 23:56, Will Andrews wrote: Hi, Ever since I found the set of commits which broke probing this disk on/about September 1, I have attempted to boot a JPSNAP about once a week. Up to this day, on which I tried 5.2-BETA (official ISO), it has never again probed this drive