CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-04 Thread PseudoCylon
Hello, Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock out and run(4) works fine in HOSTAP mode. Up time is 80 hours and counting. I even filed tax though it. The device supports up to 253 stations. I only tested with 2 station. If you have resources, please hit it with bunch of STAs. As usual

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-03-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-04 09:35:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-04 09:35:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-03-04 09:35:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-04 09:35:14 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-04 09:35:14 -

newfs failure on -current

2010-03-04 Thread C. Jayachandran
I'm testing this on the mips platform, but I think there is an issue with change that made sectorsize int64_t, because the ioctl DIOCGSECTORSIZE used to read sector size seems to take u_int. This quick change fixes it for me (sample patch - may be whitespace damaged). Index: sbin/newfs/newfs.c

propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread paradox
iam propose all the architecture move in a separate directory as is done in openbsd and netbsd ie #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch #mv -R /usr/src/sys/{amd64,arm,i386,ia64,mips,pc98,powerpc,sparc64,sun4v,xen,x86) /usr/src/sys/arch/ Would it ever done in freebsd?

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2010-03-04 14:51, paradox wrote: #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch #mv -R /usr/src/sys/{amd64,arm,i386,ia64,mips,pc98,powerpc,sparc64,sun4v,xen,x86) /usr/src/sys/arch/ Would it ever done in freebsd? Sure, right after the switch to git. ___

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:48:19 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org On 2010-03-04 14:51, paradox wrote: #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch #mv -R /usr/src/sys/{amd64,arm,i386,ia64,mips,pc98,powerpc,sparc64,sun4v,xen,x86) /usr/src/sys/arch/

Re: newfs failure on -current

2010-03-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 98a59be81003040504x6e97fbaeqeb10f8ea7bedb...@mail.gmail.com C. Jayachandran c.jayachand...@gmail.com writes: : I'm testing this on the mips platform, but I think there is an issue : with change that made sectorsize int64_t, because the ioctl : DIOCGSECTORSIZE used to read

Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver

2010-03-04 Thread Miki
2010/3/3 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org: On Tuesday 02 March 2010 2:08:55 pm Miki wrote: 2010/3/1 Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com: On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:45:32PM +0100, Miki wrote: Hi, Thanks for the work ! I have some problems here when I try to create a wlan interface :

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: 401095.35021...@web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com paradox ddkp...@yahoo.com writes: : iam propose all the architecture move in a separate directory : as is done in openbsd and netbsd : : ie : #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch : #mv -R

Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver

2010-03-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 04 March 2010 12:28:59 pm Miki wrote: 2010/3/3 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org: On Tuesday 02 March 2010 2:08:55 pm Miki wrote: 2010/3/1 Weongyo Jeong weongyo.je...@gmail.com: On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 08:45:32PM +0100, Miki wrote: Hi, Thanks for the work ! I have

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread Xin LI
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:20 AM, M. Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote: In message: 401095.35021...@web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com            paradox ddkp...@yahoo.com writes: : iam propose all the architecture move in a separate directory : as is done in openbsd and netbsd : : ie : #mkdir

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread Mark Linimon
There are two chief problems with a large-scale reorg of our src tree: - There are many companies who use FreeBSD as part of their business. In the case of ISPs or companies who use FreeBSD as a base of their products, this would make it much harder for them to synchronize their local

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread paradox
so, I really do not understand why it is so difficult to move a few folders in the shared folder is a big problem as is done in openbsd and netbsd http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/arch/?only_with_tag=MAIN http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/arch/ as you can see Well,

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi, * paradox ddkp...@yahoo.com wrote: Well, maybe my thoughts will be understood, then when the folder /usr/src/sys/ number of architectures to increase to ~ 50, [...] s/when/if/. ;-) I know this sounds lazy, but shouldn't we start discussing this problem by the time we support more than 10

Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir

2010-03-04 Thread paradox
* paradox wrote: Well, maybe my thoughts will be understood, then when the folder /usr/src/sys/ number of architectures to increase to ~ 50, [...] s/when/if/. ;-) more than ~ 5 years, it was necessary that would create /usr/src/sys/x86/

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-03-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-04 19:50:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-04 19:50:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-03-04 19:50:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-04 19:50:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-04 19:50:20 -

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-04 Thread Rui Paulo
Hi, On 4 Mar 2010, at 08:50, PseudoCylon wrote: Hello, Finally, I have fixed mysterious device lock out and run(4) works fine in HOSTAP mode. Up time is 80 hours and counting. I even filed tax though it. The device supports up to 253 stations. I only tested with 2 station. If you have

Questions about witness reports on sparc64

2010-03-04 Thread Nikolai Fetissov
Folks, I'm pretty new here, so feel free to use the clue stick :) Playing with current- on Sun Fire V210 I see more or less consistent lock reversal reports like the following: lock order reversal: 1st 0xc1c85fb8 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c:2559 2nd 0xf80002784600

Re: Questions about witness reports on sparc64

2010-03-04 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Nikolai Fetissov nikolai-free...@fetissov.org wrote: Folks, I'm pretty new here, so feel free to use the clue stick :) Playing with current- on Sun Fire V210 I see more or less consistent lock reversal reports like the following: : My questions are - is it

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-03-04 Thread PseudoCylon
- Original Message From: Rui Paulo rpa...@gmail.com To: PseudoCylon moonlightak...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 5:02:50 PM Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless Hi, This code is fine from a quick review. It just

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-03-04 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-03-05 06:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-03-05 06:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-03-05 06:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-03-05 06:05:14 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-03-05 06:05:14 -