Hi all:
I am trying to compile the smaba34 but somehow it failed MD5 Checksum and
SHA256 Checksum:
# make all
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Found saved configuration for samba34-3.4.5_1
===
On 4 April 2010 11:02, gahn ipfr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all:
I am trying to compile the smaba34 but somehow it failed MD5 Checksum and
SHA256 Checksum:
# make all
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Found
I noticed my mini-ITX box (runnning -CURRENT) has been printing quite a few
npxdna in kernel mode! messages recently, so I added KDB support to find out
where they were coming from. The stack trace I got was:
npxdna in kernel mode!
KDB: stack backtrace:
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
I noticed my mini-ITX box (runnning -CURRENT) has been printing quite a few
npxdna in kernel mode! messages recently, so I added KDB support to find
out
where they were coming from. The stack trace I got was:
npxdna in kernel
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote
in 20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net:
ob The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
ob see no reason not to use them to enable or disable functionality whether
ob it involves a script in rc.d or not. The idea is to have a
No, my intension is not to compare IPv4 and IPv6 here. We have never
enable L3 address autoconfiguration without explicit configuration
before. This is reasonable and should be kept for IPv6, too.
Agree 100%. Having IPv6 SLAAC as the default is a bad idea.
On the other hand, I *do* like
On 3/26/10, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Xin LI wrote:
A MFC of this update is planned, but we will have to make some rather
aggressive changes against the library and more testing.
Please make sure that you have at least libxml2-2.7.6_2 in your ports tree
On 04.04.2010 13:24 (UTC+1), Garrett Cooper wrote:
On 3/26/10, Robert Watsonrwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Xin LI wrote:
A MFC of this update is planned, but we will have to make some rather
aggressive changes against the library and more testing.
Please make sure that you
Hi everyone,
Wasn't sure where to post this, so I'll try here as it involves -CURRENT
as well, and effort is probably best spent there.
Have acquired a MacMini Server model (4 GB RAM, 2 x 500 GB disk, and
no optical drive) to build a workshop training server. I am trying
to get FreeBSD to work
2010/4/4 Phil Regnauld pr+freebsd-curr...@x0.dk:
Hi everyone,
Wasn't sure where to post this, so I'll try here as it involves -CURRENT
as well, and effort is probably best spent there.
Have acquired a MacMini Server model (4 GB RAM, 2 x 500 GB disk, and
no optical drive) to build a workshop
Attilio Rao (attilio) writes:
I would start by compiling a debugging kernel and using serial port
for capturing, starting reporting the ACPI bug in the latest case,
then we can get useful informations.
Hi Attilio,
Any pointers on how to achieve that on a machine with no
on 04/04/2010 18:34 Phil Regnauld said the following:
Attilio Rao (attilio) writes:
I would start by compiling a debugging kernel and using serial port
for capturing, starting reporting the ACPI bug in the latest case,
then we can get useful informations.
Hi Attilio,
Any
Hi mav.
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:25:38 +0300
Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
spin lock 0xc3766680 (fvH) held by 0xc3613b48 (tid -1061308344) too long
panic: spin lock held too long
KDB: enter: panic
[ thread pid 0 tid 10 ]
Stopped at 0xc09dcb50 = kdb_enter+0x48:ldrb
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
On 04.04.2010 13:24 (UTC+1), Garrett Cooper wrote:
On 3/26/10, Robert Watsonrwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Xin LI wrote:
A MFC of this update is planned, but we will have to make some rather
aggressive
On 2010-Apr-03 19:01:52 -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
defer all questions about moving X out of the base system ...
Last I knew, X was not _in_ the base system :)
Well, that's an excellent topic for another bikeshed - Should X be
made part of the
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and
what needs to be fixed.
The following 3rd party libraries and all of their
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Wikipedia's article on FAT has this to say about the maximum size of
clusters:
The limit on partition size was dictated by the 8-bit signed count of
sectors per cluster, which had a maximum power-of-two value of 64. With
That seems unlikely. The
FYI, this happens with GENERIC, too.
Adam
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 16:54:47 -0400
Adam K Kirchhoff akirchhoff135...@comcast.net wrote:
I'm having some problems with iwi on -CURRENT.
FreeBSD scroll.ashke.com 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1: Sat Apr
3 EDT 2010
Hi,
It seems that fxp(4) has a long standing races between controller
and driver. The exotic RFD handling of controller is race prone as
we had seen old ethernet controllers. I could easily reproduce this
by rebooting system while netperf 64bytes UDP test is in progress.
If heavy RX frames hit
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I realize that this is most suitable for current@ and I'm
cross-posting, but I wanted to jot down all of the ports broken since
the zlib version bump so that we can keep track of what's going on and
what needs
Thanks for the reply, it's nice to get other viewpoints involved,
especially from those who have actual working knowledge of IPv6. I'm
going to snip the bits where we agree for ease of reading.
On 04/03/10 22:33, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:49:40 -0700
From: Doug Barton
On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote
in 20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net:
ob The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
ob see no reason not to use them to enable or disable functionality whether
ob it involves a script
On 04/04/10 02:51, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
No, my intension is not to compare IPv4 and IPv6 here. We have never
enable L3 address autoconfiguration without explicit configuration
before. This is reasonable and should be kept for IPv6, too.
Agree 100%. Having IPv6 SLAAC as the default
Hi all:
I am compiling xscreensaver-kde and it stooped with following errors:
Package tocloft Note: The document has chapter divisions.
) (/usr/local/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/hyperref/hyperref.sty
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:13:40 -0700
From: Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
On 04/04/10 02:41, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote
in 20100404053352.e6f751c...@ptavv.es.net:
ob The use of FACILITY_enable in rc.conf predates /etc/rc.d scripts and I
ob see no reason
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010/04/04 18:58, Garrett Cooper wrote:
[...]
As jsa@ so kindly pointed out, upgrading to r206057 temporarily
I think you really want = 206058 :(
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttp://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote
in 4bb7e224.6020...@freebsd.org:
do As we've discussed previously, you and I have a lot of disagreement on
do some of these principles. I'm going to outline my responses in some
do detail, however I'm also interested in what others have to say since I'd
do
27 matches
Mail list logo
