Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Alexander Motin
Rui Paulo wrote: > On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: >> On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: The revision labeled: SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo Add another ICH7M chipset that works. >>

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Apr 17), Rui Paulo said: > On 16 Apr 2010, at 22:41, Ivan Voras wrote: > > I have a buildworld error here: > > > > clang -isystem /usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include/clang/1.5 -isystem > > /usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/tmp/usr/include -B/usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/tmp/usr/lib/ > > -L/usr/o

Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Rui Paulo
On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> The revision labeled: >>> >>> SVN rev 2

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Rui Paulo
On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The revision labeled: > > SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo > > Add another ICH7M chipset that works. > > .. is incorrect and will cause some laptops to not boot. So, in AHCI

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The revision labeled: >> >> SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo >> >> Add another ICH7M chi

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Doug Barton
It's generally also a good idea to cc the author of the change just in case they don't get to their -current mail in a timely manner. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of you

IPv6 configuration in rc.d (Was: Re: svn commit: r206408 ...)

2010-04-17 Thread Doug Barton
To add a little history to the discussion: In June of last year you posted a patch to the -rc list to update our treatment of IPv6 configuration in rc.d and bring it on par with how we configure IPv4. At the time I did not give your patch adequate review, and subsequent to it being committed a num

SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The revision labeled: SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo Add another ICH7M chipset that works. .. is incorrect and will cause some laptops to not boot. Of the following identifiers: {0x27c48086, 0x00, "Intel ICH7M",

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Roman Divacky
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 08:14:21PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-04-17 19:33, Roman Divacky wrote: > >what version of clang/llvm are you using? > > As I mentioned at the end of my previous post: > > >>I'm using the llvm-devel-2.7.r100430 port. > > This is the current devel/llvm-devel po

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2010-04-17 19:33, Roman Divacky wrote: what version of clang/llvm are you using? As I mentioned at the end of my previous post: I'm using the llvm-devel-2.7.r100430 port. This is the current devel/llvm-devel port, AFAICS? The system itself runs -CURRENT as of r206706. __

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Doug Barton
On 04/17/10 10:24, Andrius Morkūnas wrote: > On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:07:05 +0300, Dimitry Andric > wrote: >> Btw, http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang says to put these >> in src.conf, it does not mention make.conf. This is most likely the >> correct location, right? > > Either way wo

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Andrius Morkūnas
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:07:05 +0300, Dimitry Andric wrote: Btw, http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang says to put these in src.conf, it does not mention make.conf. This is most likely the correct location, right? Either way works, src.conf is probably more "correct" location, but it

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Roman Divacky
what version of clang/llvm are you using? On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 07:03:14PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-04-16 18:08, Roman Divacky wrote: > > cd clangbsd&& make buildworld > > Buildworld all goes well, until this stage: > > ---

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Roman Divacky
what version of clang/llvm are you using? On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:48:02AM -0500, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > Roman Divacky wrote: > > Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD > > world > > on i386/amd64 platforms (including all the C++ apps we have and itsel

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread James R. Van Artsdalen
Roman Divacky wrote: > Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD world > on i386/amd64 platforms (including all the C++ apps we have and itself) > and a bootable kernel. bigback:/usr/clangbsd# make buildworld . . . clang++ -O2 -pipe -I/usr/clangbsd/usr.bin/clang/lib/

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-17 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms >> on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk >> afterwards  show nothing. >> >> Should we allow it like linux does? > > Are you

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2010-04-17 11:58, Roman Divacky wrote: svn co http://svn.freebsd.org/base/projects/clangbsd/ clangbsd cd clangbsd&& make buildworld echo NO_WERROR=>> /etc/make.conf echo WERROR=>> /etc/make.conf you have to do those echos before the buildworld of course..

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2010-04-16 18:08, Roman Divacky wrote: cd clangbsd&& make buildworld Buildworld all goes well, until this stage: -- stage 4.2: building libraries -- cd /home/di

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-17 Thread Tim Kientzle
Paul B Mahol wrote: It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk afterwards show nothing. Should we allow it like linux does? Are you claiming there is a problem when FreeBSD reads such images or a problem

Re: svn commit: r206408 - in head: etc etc/defaults etc/rc.d share/man/man5

2010-04-17 Thread Hiroki Sato
Doug Barton wrote in <4bc8ee88.6000...@freebsd.org>: do> > or if the do> > commit hadn't happed in the middle of a discussion that died with do> > this. do> do> I took from the discussion the few things that we had achieved some form do> of consensus on, and chose to drop the rest of the topics

Re: HP, IBM and Supermicro Servers Compatibility.

2010-04-17 Thread Steven Hartland
We use Supermicro here extensively and have never had a single problem with them. We tend to combine them with Areca RAID cards which also work well with FreeBSD. Regards Steve - Original Message - From: "Juanito Cassemiro" To: Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:10 PM Subject: HP,

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Rui Paulo
On 16 Apr 2010, at 22:41, Ivan Voras wrote: > Roman Divacky wrote: > >> We kindly ask you to setup ClangBSD chroot and/or use clang compiled kernel >> and use it as you would normally use FreeBSD. Please report back > > I have a buildworld error here: > > clang -isystem /usr/obj/mt/clangbsd/t

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-17 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 4/17/10, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 17/04/2010 02:07 Paul B Mahol said the following: >> Hi, >> >> It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms >> on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk >> afterwards show nothing. > > Is it expected that everyone k

Re: ISO9660 4GB directory structures boundary limit and growisofs

2010-04-17 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 17/04/2010 02:07 Paul B Mahol said the following: > Hi, > > It is apparently not possible to make use of -use-the-force-luke=4gms > on FreeBSD when appending new session after 4GB. Mounted disk > afterwards show nothing. Is it expected that everyone knows what -use-the-force-luke=4gms is? >

Re: fix for compressed coredumps, please review

2010-04-17 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:16:14 -0700 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Can I get a review for this? > > summary: > If doing compressed cores and there is an error, we leak > resources unless this is fixed. > > > Index: imgact_elf.c > ===

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

2010-04-17 Thread Roman Divacky
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 06:08:18PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > Hi, > > ClangBSD is a branch of FreeBSD that aims at integrating clang > (clang.llvm.org) > into FreeBSD, replacing GCC as a system compiler. > > Recently, we've achieved the state when clang can compile all of FreeBSD world > on i