Den 04/06/2010 kl. 01.10 skrev David Rhodus:
Doing a ./test.sh make crashes my -current machine pretty quickly.
It stops inBuilding in /usr/src/tools/regression/bin/mv
Well there you go. The regression tests are already useful :-)
The Makefile in tools/regression/bin/mv just runs 'sh
On Friday 04 June 2010 03:02:52 Marcelo/Porks wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:54:17 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:50:08 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 16:22:33
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Compiler bugs in gcc are probably just as hard to find as compiler bugs
in clang
There are two types of compiler bug: a) bug that produces bad code; b)
bug that makes the compiler crash.
Let's remember that
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:13:55AM +, b. f. wrote:
How did you obtain gcc4-errors?
bzgrep -q See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. Part
of ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/processonelog .
mcl
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
on 04/06/2010 11:13 b. f. said the following:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Compiler bugs in gcc are probably just as hard to find as compiler bugs
in clang
There are two types of compiler bug: a) bug that produces bad code; b)
bug that
On 6/4/10, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 04/06/2010 11:13 b. f. said the following:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Compiler bugs in gcc are probably just as hard to find as compiler bugs
in clang
There are two types of compiler
On 4 June 2010 12:52, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 04/06/2010 11:13 b. f. said the following:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
Compiler bugs in gcc are probably just as hard to find as compiler bugs
in clang
There are two types of
DragonFlyBSD and NetBSD use newer GCC?
This is the first time I hear about that.
No doubt about major Linux distributions, though.
AFAIK, NetBSD does it for quite a while since they have a different pov on
this.
http://www.thejemreport.com/content/view/317
That piece of journalism is
On 6/4/10, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 08:13:55AM +, b. f. wrote:
How did you obtain gcc4-errors?
bzgrep -q See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. Part
of ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/processonelog .
But are you actually building
On Thursday 03 June 2010 8:52:36 pm Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 01:22:05PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
From previous messages I don't think sparc64 is currently supported by
clang very well, if at all, so I think we'll still need gcc in the base
system for some time.
I'll
On Thursday 03 June 2010 9:45:56 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:30 PM, David Rhodus sdrho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a rc.conf variable to automatically save core on a panic and
reboot ?
Setting dumpdev=AUTO doesn't seem to do the trick.
# uname -a
FreeBSD
Den 03/06/2010 kl. 16.14 skrev Maxim Konovalov:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, 15:15+0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
I just wrote a shell script to recurse into the subdirectories and
run make on the Makefiles found. Unfortunately, some of the
Makefiles start running tests immediately, some have syntax
On 6/4/10, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 6/4/10, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 04/06/2010 11:13 b. f. said the following:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote:
NetBSD allows one to set HAVE_BINUTILS=2.19 and use
On 2010-06-04 01:24, David Rhodus wrote:
Anyone have a SUJ patch set for 8.x ?
http://www.andric.com/freebsd/suj/suj-stable8-r208287-1.diff.bz2
This backports SUJ from head to stable/8 (at r208799), by cherry-picking
the following revisions:
r207141 | jeff | 2010-04-24 09:05:35 +0200 (Sat,
Dear current@
On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD. We are going
to import clang/LLVM sources and put those into contrib/llvm (~45MB) and
the build infrastructure for it (lib/clang and usr.bin/clang). There's
also a small patch to hook it into the build. This patch is
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
On Friday 04 June 2010 03:02:52 Marcelo/Porks wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 17:54:17 Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010
On 06/04/10 08:26, Roman Divacky wrote:
Dear current@
On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD.
Excellent news! :) I am in favor of this, and look forward to a day of
using a FreeBSD system compiled as much as possible with clang.
During the ongoing discussion there were
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:00:25PM +0200, Dimitry Andric thus spake:
On 2010-06-04 01:24, David Rhodus wrote:
Anyone have a SUJ patch set for 8.x ?
http://www.andric.com/freebsd/suj/suj-stable8-r208287-1.diff.bz2
This backports SUJ from head to stable/8 (at r208799), by cherry-picking
the
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 09:59:15AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/04/10 08:26, Roman Divacky wrote:
Dear current@
On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD.
Excellent news! :) I am in favor of this, and look forward to a day of
using a FreeBSD system compiled as much
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dear current@
On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD. We are going
to import clang/LLVM sources and put those into contrib/llvm (~45MB) and
the build infrastructure for it (lib/clang and
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:59:15 +0300, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
2. Publish instructions on how to set up a different compiler for ports.
There's really no nice way to do it right now. We'll probably put something
on the wiki page[1], but there's only so much we can do when ports don't
2010/6/2 Andrius Morkūnas hinok...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:23:19 +0300, Alexander Best
alexbes...@uni-muenster.de wrote:
it seems for some reason gcc44 gets chosen at some point as compiler
instead of the base gcc. i DO have CC, CXX and CPP defined in my
/etc/make.conf so that
On 06/04/10 10:44, Andrius Morkūnas wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:59:15 +0300, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
2. Publish instructions on how to set up a different compiler for ports.
There's really no nice way to do it right now. We'll probably put something
on the wiki page[1], but
On 06/04/10 10:46, Alexander Best wrote:
src.conf should ALWAYS take priority over make.conf when
buildworld or buildkernel is being run.
Defining the same variables in different contexts is always a recipe for
the dreaded unpredictable results. Even if it were possible to create
the proper
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:52:32 +0300, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Sorry I wasn't clear. I'm not talking about compiling ports with clang
(which I also look forward to someday) I'm talking about installing a
version of gcc from ports and using that to compile all the other ports.
I'm
Hi.
I am working on driver for HPET event timers. It works mostly fine,
except after some cases when ioapic_assign_cpu() called while timer is
active. Under interrupt rate of 10KHz it is enough a dozen cpuset runs
to break it (with 1KHz - few dozens). When it happens, I can see that
timer is
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/04/10 10:46, Alexander Best wrote:
src.conf should ALWAYS take priority over make.conf when
buildworld or buildkernel is being run.
Defining the same variables in different contexts is always a recipe for
the
Wouldn't it be great, if /etc/make.conf disappeared completely?
To be replaced by /etc/src.conf for buildworld/kernel stuff.
And /etc/ports.conf for ports building stuff.
Er, and replaced by what for using make on the many things that are
neither in the base system, nor in FreeBSD Ports? The
I crashed a testbox running FreeBSD/i386 today which had SUJ enabled on its
/var partition. It encountered the following error when trying to fsck -p
during boot:
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ada0s1d
** Reading 16572416 byte journal from inode 4.
fsck_ufs: Sparse journal inode 4.
It then failed
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/04/10 10:46, Alexander Best wrote:
src.conf should ALWAYS take priority over make.conf when
buildworld or buildkernel is being run.
Defining the same variables in different contexts is always a recipe for the
dreaded
hi there. running HEAD, amd64 and r208806 i get this dmesg output
which doesn't look right:
ada0 at ahcich2 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0
ada0: SAMSUNG SP2504C VT100-50 ATA-7 SATA 2.x device
ada0: 300.000MB/s transferscd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0
cd0: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-H10N JL12
maybe you could add a ddb(8) command to your crontab? i for example
have this in my crontab:
@reboot /sbin/ddb script 'kdb.enter.panic=textdump set; capture on;
show pcpu; show allpcpu; bt; ps; show locks; show alllocks; show
lockedvnods; alltrace; call doadump'
cheers.
--
Alexander Best
On 06/04/10 11:39, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Wouldn't it be great, if /etc/make.conf disappeared completely?
No, since it's useful for things that are common to both src and ports,
and to stuff that is neither.
To be replaced
On 4 Jun 2010, at 14:55, John Baldwin wrote:
I crashed a testbox running FreeBSD/i386 today which had SUJ enabled on its
/var partition. It encountered the following error when trying to fsck -p
during boot:
** SU+J Recovering /dev/ada0s1d
** Reading 16572416 byte journal from inode 4.
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/04/10 11:39, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Wouldn't it be great, if /etc/make.conf disappeared completely?
No, since it's useful for things that are
On 06/04/10 11:28, Andrius Morkūnas wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:52:32 +0300, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Sorry I wasn't clear. I'm not talking about compiling ports with clang
(which I also look forward to someday) I'm talking about installing a
version of gcc from ports and using
100% agreement with Mark here.
On 06/03/10 17:19, Mark Linimon wrote:
I'm just catching up with this thread, so apologies if this has already
been pointed out elsewhere.
One of the things that has been discussed w/rt compilers for a while
(not just at the devsummit) was bending our minds
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
ports-mgmt/portconf.
portconf has horrible syntax, compared to make.conf/src.conf, at least
last I tried to use it (when it first came out). And this is geared
more toward
On 06/04/2010 12:59, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/04/10 08:26, Roman Divacky wrote:
Dear current@
On June 9th, we are importing clang/LLVM into FreeBSD HEAD.
Excellent news! :) I am in favor of this, and look forward to a day of
using a FreeBSD system compiled as much as possible with clang.
On 06/04/10 17:38, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/04/10 11:28, Andrius Morkūnas wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/custom-gcc/configuring-ports-gcc.html
Ok, everything in that section seems clear except this in 3.3:
It is possible to completely replace CFLAGS and/or define
40 matches
Mail list logo
