using head from 3 hours ago, this patch does not apply cleanly
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v15/head-v15-v3-extension.patch
The patch you are trying is just for experimental testing and can be
applied only on top of
head-v15-v3.patch (so you need to apply head-v15-v3.patch
On Thursday 08 July 2010 05:12:37 Andrew Thompson wrote:
On 8 July 2010 07:13, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Hi,
When supplying wpa_supplicant.conf with incorrect passwords, but a valid
SSID, I have seen kernel panics several times when using USB based WLAN
dongles. When
User and group quotas is no important enhancement?
We have to see the whole thing from a stability perspective as well -
OpenSolaris has by far less testing than Solaris 10.
Oracle cannot afford to feed his enterprise customers (and these are not
few) with untested code.
Dňa 7. 7. 2010 20:30,
Hi Martin,
If you're using it for NFS then that can be a good feature, but I see a lot
more folks complaining about lack of removal for log devices.
We've been using ZFS on OpenSolaris for DB servers since 2006 and OpenSolaris
bits are very stable. In most cases we've found ZFS under OSol to
Hi Jason,
as for me, I am ready to stand for the stability of my v15 upgrade, it
has been discussed with our zfs team, and we also see it as a kind of a
starting point.
We generally have two options:
a) push ZFS v15 now
- it has been already disussed
- we can continue with incremental upgrades
Hi,
Martin Matuska wrote:
For people just wanting to try the new features, I am providing mfsBSD
ISO's with ZFS-on-root install (don't forget the -V 15 flag to the
zfsinstall command):
http://mfsbsd.vx.sk/iso/8.1rc2-zfsv15-v3.iso (without symbols, 99 MB)
On Friday, July 02, 2010 12:55:38 pm David Naylor wrote:
On Friday 02 July 2010 14:57:35 René Ladan wrote:
2010/7/2 Yuri Pankov yuri.pan...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:46:41AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure this has been reported before but I am experience
On 07/08/10 11:06, Martin Matuska wrote:
Regarding performance, e.g. my PHP web servers with codebase in ZFS
yield 15-20% more req/s with v15 patch (as compared to v14).
Good enough reason for me (this is most of my workload, too), get it in
as soon as you're able :)
On 07/08/10 01:11, V. T. Mueller, Continum wrote:
Eric Masson schrieb:
Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org writes:
We decided not to go with v16 - the feature difference for FreeBSD
between v15 and v16 is zero.
(v16 = Common Multiprotocol SCSI Target (COMSTAR) for ISCSI export of
ZVOLS - we
fixed this and the mtree problem, as well. I hope this one
now works properly on amd64:
http://kovesdan.org/patches/iconv-20100708.diff
Gabor
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
When booting, I have strange message.
All work OK (processor with hyperthreading, but system seems it as 1 CPU ).
lissyara-gp# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of
TB --- 2010-07-08 16:25:02 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-08 16:25:02 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-07-08 16:25:02 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-08 16:25:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-08 16:25:23 -
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Alex Keda ad...@lissyara.su wrote:
From: Alex Keda ad...@lissyara.su
Subject: WARNING: Non-uniform processors.
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 4:42 PM
When booting, I have strange message.
All work OK (processor with hyperthreading, but system
08.07.2010 22:13, Super Biscuit ?:
--- On *Thu, 7/8/10, Alex Keda /ad...@lissyara.su/* wrote:
From: Alex Keda ad...@lissyara.su
Subject: WARNING: Non-uniform processors.
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 4:42 PM
When booting, I have
Hi Martin,
If 15 is the only one that will make it into FBSD9 then obviously
that's better than doing nothing.
I'll contact my folks on the ZFS dev team at Sun to pull the DB
enhancements and related ZFS versions.
-J
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi
On 2010-Jul-05 13:50:52 +0200, Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote:
As ZFS v15 is already being used in the Solaris 10 enterprise world, we
can consider it well-tested.
So we know if the ZFS in Solaris 10 includes any fixes that aren't
publicly available?
Direct link to the patch:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
These freezes and panics are due to the driver using a spin mutex instead of a
regular mutex for the per-file descriptor event_mtx. If you patch the driver
to change it to be a regular mutex I think that should fix the problems.
Can you give an
On 8. 7. 2010 22:04, Peter Jeremy wrote / napísal(a):
On 2010-Jul-05 13:50:52 +0200, Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote:
As ZFS v15 is already being used in the Solaris 10 enterprise world, we
can consider it well-tested.
So we know if the ZFS in Solaris 10 includes any fixes
On 08-07-2010 22:09, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
These freezes and panics are due to the driver using a spin mutex
instead of a
regular mutex for the per-file descriptor event_mtx. If you patch the
driver
to change it to be a regular mutex I think that
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:12 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:12 -
20 matches
Mail list logo
