TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:22 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:22 -
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:24 -
TB --- 2010-07-09 05:09:28 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 05:09:28 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-07-09 05:09:28 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 05:09:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 05:09:46 -
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:26 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 04:25:26 -
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:20:18 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:20:18 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:20:18 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:20:39 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:20:39 -
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:12:49 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:12:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:12:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:13:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-07-09 06:13:04 -
On 07/08/10 18:42, Alex Keda wrote:
When booting, I have strange message.
All work OK (processor with hyperthreading, but system seems it as 1 CPU ).
lissyara-gp# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2010 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
Hello,
I'd like to remind you the deadline to submit the status report for your
project, which is set to July 15th, 2010. To this date, I have received
only one report; please find some time and write a few words about your
current work.
Thanks!
Original Message
Subject:
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 5:52:10 pm Rene Ladan wrote:
On 08-07-2010 22:09, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
These freezes and panics are due to the driver using a spin mutex
instead of a
regular mutex for the per-file descriptor event_mtx. If you patch the
In order to come up with the most convoluted problem possible, I present
to you screen shots of a panic from a FreeBSD VM running in QEMU
emulation under RedHat's KVM infrastructure.
I presented a perfectly functional USB partition from my host machine to
the VM. Then I attempted to mount the
On Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:46:59 pm John Baldwin wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
to doing so?
On Friday, July 09, 2010 4:21:51 pm John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 10, 2010 1:46:59 pm John Baldwin wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an
alternate
tool for updating /etc during
On Friday 09 July 2010 19:12:59 Sean Bruno wrote:
In order to come up with the most convoluted problem possible, I present
to you screen shots of a panic from a FreeBSD VM running in QEMU
emulation under RedHat's KVM infrastructure.
I presented a perfectly functional USB partition from my
On 2010-Jul-08 23:30:33 +0200, Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Looking at the patchset, the most critical issue (IMHO) that doesn't
appear to have been addressed is the interaction between ZFS ARC and
the VM cache used by UFS/NFS: arc_memory_throttle() is still making
decisions solely
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:16 -0500, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 09 July 2010 19:12:59 Sean Bruno wrote:
In order to come up with the most convoluted problem possible, I present
to you screen shots of a panic from a FreeBSD VM running in QEMU
emulation under RedHat's KVM
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Friday 09 July 2010 19:12:59 Sean Bruno wrote:
In order to come up with the most convoluted problem possible, I present
to you screen shots of a panic from a FreeBSD VM running in QEMU
emulation under RedHat's KVM infrastructure.
I presented a perfectly
16 matches
Mail list logo