The -R here does look suspicious. I'll look into that and the
test failure.
The -L handling here looks correct, though. Remember
that -L means follow symlinks, which means that foo/baz
should get created in the target as a directory and not as
a symlink, which is exactly what you've shown.
If
Tim Kientzle kient...@freebsd.org writes:
[...]
The -L handling here looks correct, though. Remember
that -L means follow symlinks, which means that foo/baz
should get created in the target as a directory and not as
a symlink, which is exactly what you've shown.
If you want blah/foo/baz to
Hi,
I'm looking for people who are using the Intel Compiler to build FreeBSD.
Please contact me off list, so I can get a rough estimate on how many people
are using it.
Regards,
--
Rui Paulo
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 07/28/10 04:27, Andriy Gapon wrote:
You do realize that ATA_CAM just (well, mostly) introduces a wrapper around
the
now aging ATA driver ?
No magic pixie dust to fix the bugs in it, but perhaps more ways to expose
them.
Sadly, I still haven't been able to identify where the buffer
