On Friday, December 10, 2010 8:13:01 pm Tom Uffner wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
pci0:serial bus, USB at device 16.0 (no driver attached)
pci0:serial bus, USB at device 16.1 (no driver attached)
pci0:serial bus, USB at device 16.2 (no driver attached)
pci0:serial bus, USB at device
John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, December 10, 2010 8:13:01 pm Tom Uffner wrote:
no...@pci0:0:16:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x80ed1043 chip=0x30381106
rev=0x81 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'VIA Technologies, Inc.'
device = 'VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (All VIA Chipsets)'
On Monday, December 13, 2010 11:30:00 am Tom Uffner wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, December 10, 2010 8:13:01 pm Tom Uffner wrote:
no...@pci0:0:16:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x80ed1043 chip=0x30381106
rev=0x81 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'VIA Technologies, Inc.'
device
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
#
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
When applying the patch be sure to use correct options for patch(1)!:
# cd /usr/src
# fetch
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:56PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Hi.
The new patchset is ready for testing:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20101212.patch.bz2
You can also download the whole source tree already patched from here:
Alexander Best wrote:
any thoughts on this patch? it adds files which will be removed when
WITHOUT_SYSCONS is set. also it makes sure sysinstall(8) and sade(8) only get
installed when WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL wasn't defined and also that any related
executables and manual pages get removed if in fact
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:00:31PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
What's the expected behaviour for the sendfile changes as
sendfile is one of the problems we have here with the
double memory allocation required for it under ZFS compared
to UFS. Does this patch address that?
No. The patch
