On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 01:06:00 +
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
i tried adding the following to CFLAGS to prevent clang from using
any SSE* instructions, but it seems that doesn't work:
CFLAGS=-mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno-3dnow -mno-ssse3 returned:
fatal error: error in
On Sat Jan 1 11, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 01:06:00 +
Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
i tried adding the following to CFLAGS to prevent clang from using
any SSE* instructions, but it seems that doesn't work:
CFLAGS=-mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3
2010/12/31 poyop...@puripuri.plala.or.jp:
A happy new yaer Ren�+1,
At Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:35:05 +0100,
Ren�+1 Ladan wrote:
somewhere between 9.0-amd64 r216351 and r216738, I've noticed some
userland weirdness.
I suppose you've been hit by rtld bug between r216695[*1] and r216728[*2].
Hi,
Since a couple of days commands like ls(1) are very slow on one of my
tinderboxes. Checking with ktrace/kdump I see that the lstat syscall
takes about one second:
70559 ls 0.004644 CALL lstat(0x284472f8,0x28447298)
70559 ls 0.004651 NAMI Mk
70559 ls 0.004664 STRU
On Sat Jan 1 11, Beat Gätzi wrote:
Hi,
Since a couple of days commands like ls(1) are very slow on one of my
tinderboxes. Checking with ktrace/kdump I see that the lstat syscall
takes about one second:
70559 ls 0.004644 CALL lstat(0x284472f8,0x28447298)
70559 ls 0.004651
On 01.01.2011 16:10, Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Jan 1 11, Beat Gätzi wrote:
Hi,
Since a couple of days commands like ls(1) are very slow on one of my
tinderboxes. Checking with ktrace/kdump I see that the lstat syscall
takes about one second:
70559 ls 0.004644 CALL
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:10, Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Jan 1 11, Beat G?tzi wrote:
Hi,
Since a couple of days commands like ls(1) are very slow on one of my
tinderboxes. Checking with ktrace/kdump I see that the lstat syscall
On 01.01.2011 16:45, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:10, Alexander Best wrote:
On Sat Jan 1 11, Beat G?tzi wrote:
Hi,
Since a couple of days commands like ls(1) are very slow on one of my
tinderboxes. Checking with
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:00:56PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:45, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Check the output of sysctl kern.maxvnodes and vfs.numvnodes. I suspect
they are quite close or equial. If yes, consider increasing maxvnodes.
Another workaround, if you have huge nested
On 01.01.2011 17:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:00:56PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:45, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Check the output of sysctl kern.maxvnodes and vfs.numvnodes. I suspect
they are quite close or equial. If yes, consider increasing maxvnodes.
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 17:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:00:56PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:45, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Check the output of sysctl kern.maxvnodes and vfs.numvnodes. I suspect
they are
On 01.01.2011 17:46, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 17:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:00:56PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:45, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Check the output of sysctl kern.maxvnodes
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 17:46, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 17:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:00:56PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 16:45,
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:05:25AM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Monday 27 December 2010 01:32:56 Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:25:05PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
How about providing the info I asked for last time? Now that you have
build the necessary options into
2011/1/1 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
I'm getting the following with qbittorrent-23 which depends on
libtorrent-rasterbar-15 after the latest boost lib update:
qbittorrent
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): locale::facet::_S_create_c_locale name
On 01/01/2011 13:40, Alexander Churanov wrote:
2011/1/1 Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org:
I'm getting the following with qbittorrent-23 which depends on
libtorrent-rasterbar-15 after the latest boost lib update:
qbittorrent
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
On 1/1/11 9:26 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 17:46, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:42:58PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote:
On 01.01.2011 17:12, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:00:56PM +0100,
A happy new yaer Ren$(D+1(B,
At Fri, 31 Dec 2010 22:35:05 +0100,
Ren$(D+1(B Ladan wrote:
somewhere between 9.0-amd64 r216351 and r216738, I've noticed some
userland weirdness.
I suppose you've been hit by rtld bug between r216695[*1] and r216728[*2].
It broke certain kind of dynamic
18 matches
Mail list logo
