[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 06:25:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 06:25:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-01-18 06:25:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 06:25:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 06:25:19 -

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 11:30:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 11:30:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-01-18 11:30:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 11:30:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 11:30:13 -

Running linux ldconfig on tmpfs results in unkillable process

2011-01-18 Thread Beat Gätzi
Hi, I've a tinderbox which uses tmpfs to build ports. Every time I build a port which executes linux ldconfig it results in an unkillable process which uses 100% CPU. The problem is reproduceable without tinderbox: # uname -a FreeBSD daedalus.network.local 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #3

Re: fatal kernel trap (cpu 1): trap vector = 0x14 (Page Not Present)

2011-01-18 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:41:19PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On ia64 r216732 I got this panic: - - - - - - - - - - Prior Console Output - - - - - - - - - - cr.iip = 0xe482b8a0 cr.ipsr = 0x210080a6038 (ac,mfl,mfh,ic,i,dt,dfh,rt,cpl=0,it,ri=1) cr.isr

Re: Running linux ldconfig on tmpfs results in unkillable process

2011-01-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:16:27PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote: Hi, I've a tinderbox which uses tmpfs to build ports. Every time I build a port which executes linux ldconfig it results in an unkillable process which uses 100% CPU. The problem is reproduceable without tinderbox: # uname -a

Re: uma_zalloc_arg: zone 256 with non-sleepable exclusive rw ifnet_rw @ /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:414

2011-01-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, January 17, 2011 12:55:26 pm Sergey Kandaurov wrote: Hi, I see this malloc with non-sleepable on current during boot. It's strange that I don't see it if I boot via pxe/nfs. if_alloc() calls ifindex_alloc_locked() under IFNET_WLOCK() which might call if_grow(). Looks like a

Re: Soekris net5501-70 problem with loading ATA modules on FreeBSD-Current

2011-01-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 7:30:39 am Marek Salwerowicz wrote: Hi all, I am unable to dynamically load modules to support ATA disks on soekris net5501-70. Do you have hints for ata0 and ata1 in /boot/device.hints? Try removing them if so. -- John Baldwin

Re: Running linux ldconfig on tmpfs results in unkillable process

2011-01-18 Thread Beat Gätzi
On 18.01.2011 15:46, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:16:27PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote: Hi, I've a tinderbox which uses tmpfs to build ports. Every time I build a port which executes linux ldconfig it results in an unkillable process which uses 100% CPU. The problem is

Re: Running linux ldconfig on tmpfs results in unkillable process

2011-01-18 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:34:10PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote: On 18.01.2011 15:46, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:16:27PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote: Hi, I've a tinderbox which uses tmpfs to build ports. Every time I build a port which executes linux ldconfig it results in

Re: Running linux ldconfig on tmpfs results in unkillable process

2011-01-18 Thread Beat Gätzi
On 18.01.2011 17:13, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:34:10PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote: On 18.01.2011 15:46, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:16:27PM +0100, Beat G?tzi wrote: Hi, I've a tinderbox which uses tmpfs to build ports. Every time I build a port

Re: Loading uart module fails

2011-01-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, January 15, 2011 2:14:25 pm Bruce Cran wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:46:06 -0500 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: Can you get devinfo -rv output before you try to kldload uart? I've attached the devinfo output. Oh, the uart[01] devices already exist. I suspect if you

FreeBSD Installer Roadmap

2011-01-18 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
After some discussion with M. Warner Losh and Josh Paetzel of iX Systems, we've come up with the following roadmap for an installer for 9.0. Over the next month, we intend to try to adapt bsdinstall as the front-end for the more featureful, but lacking a terminal-compatible user interface,

Re: uma_zalloc_arg: zone 256 with non-sleepable exclusive rw ifnet_rw @ /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:414

2011-01-18 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 18 January 2011 17:54, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Monday, January 17, 2011 12:55:26 pm Sergey Kandaurov wrote: Hi, I see this malloc with non-sleepable on current during boot. It's strange that I don't see it if I boot via pxe/nfs. if_alloc() calls ifindex_alloc_locked()

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 16:35:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 16:35:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-01-18 16:35:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 16:35:15 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 16:35:15 -

Re: uma_zalloc_arg: zone 256 with non-sleepable exclusive rw ifnet_rw @ /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:414

2011-01-18 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, January 18, 2011 1:22:24 pm Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 18 January 2011 17:54, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Monday, January 17, 2011 12:55:26 pm Sergey Kandaurov wrote: Hi, I see this malloc with non-sleepable on current during boot. It's strange that I don't see

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 19:29:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 19:29:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2011-01-18 19:29:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:29:26 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:29:26 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 19:38:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 19:38:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2011-01-18 19:38:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:38:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:38:12 -

Re: FYI: clang static analyzer page has moved to http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/

2011-01-18 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Wednesday 05 January 2011 14:14:39 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: Now that I'm fairly confident that the stability issues with your.org's VMs have been resolved, I'd like to point you to the new and improved, semi-weekly analyzer runs at http://scan.freebsd.your.org/freebsd-head/ I came

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 19:28:04 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 19:28:04 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-01-18 19:28:04 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:28:21 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:28:21 -

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-01-18 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-01-18 19:24:50 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-01-18 19:24:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-01-18 19:24:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:25:01 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-01-18 19:25:01 -

Re: unknown mtx_assert at /usr/src/sys/x86/x86/io_apic.c:161

2011-01-18 Thread Michael Jung
On 1/14/11 8:55 PM, Michael Jung mi...@paymentallianceintl.com wrote: John: Thanks, I actually didn¹t see the MCA errors on the screen as the system has reloaded but noted them in the ddb.txt file last night. The Motherboard, CPU, Memory and PS were replaced today. I¹ll post back if

bsdbox example scripts

2011-01-18 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi all, I've put up the local bsdbox scripts that I'm using as a patch against -head. It populates the examples in src/share/examples/bsdbox along with diffs against a couple of build files to link it into the build. I plan on tidying up the makefiles a bit before committing it to -head.

Re: lockup with vidcontrol VESA_800x600

2011-01-18 Thread b. f.
Marc UBM Bocklet ubm.freebsd at googlemail.com wrote: Yesterday I upgraded to FreeBSD hostname 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #28: Sat Jan 8 17:05:30 CET 2011 and vidcontrol VESA_800x600 stopped working (again). I exchanged emails with jkim about a similar problem in February 2010

Re: lockup with vidcontrol VESA_800x600

2011-01-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 10:08 pm, b. f. wrote: Marc UBM Bocklet ubm.freebsd at googlemail.com wrote: Yesterday I upgraded to FreeBSD hostname 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #28: Sat Jan 8 17:05:30 CET 2011 and vidcontrol VESA_800x600 stopped working (again). I exchanged emails