Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> ps: for static library and loader, I derived the total size as the sum
> of the size of the text/data/bss section of the member object using :
>
> size *.o | awk 'BEGIN {text=0; data=0; bss=0;}; {text+=$1; data+=$2;
> bss+=$3}; END {pr
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Besides, for space-constrained things like boot2, you
> might not even be able to compile it when using non-standard settings,
> since the code might grow too large.
>
About the size, let's get some number
lib/libstand (library): (with
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-05-24 22:09, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Many Makefile (espectially under sys/boot/) overwrite the value of CFLAGS.
>> This is an issue if you want to generate code for a specific CPU as before
>> the
>> Makefile is interpreted,
On 05/24/2011 13:41, Dimitry Andric wrote:
So that is why these Makefiles purposefully overwrite CFLAGS, it is not
by accident.
In those cases adding comments to the Makefile is probably appropriate,
if they are not present already. Something to the effect of, "Purposely
overwriting CFLAGS be
On 2011-05-24 22:09, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Many Makefile (espectially under sys/boot/) overwrite the value of CFLAGS.
This is an issue if you want to generate code for a specific CPU as before the
Makefile is interpreted, CFLAGS might already have been set with CPU specific
settings by, which is
Many Makefile (espectially under sys/boot/) overwrite the value of CFLAGS.
This is an issue if you want to generate code for a specific CPU as before the
Makefile is interpreted, CFLAGS might already have been set with CPU specific
settings by , which is source from sys.mk.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud L
On 24/05/2011 13:24, Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
Over the next few days, I will be merging a number of TCP-related
locking changes, as well as changes to various network stack
infrastructure bits, such as the netisr implementation. The goal,
generally, has been to move us in the direction of
Dear all:
Over the next few days, I will be merging a number of TCP-related locking
changes, as well as changes to various network stack infrastructure bits, such
as the netisr implementation. The goal, generally, has been to move us in the
direction of supporting more clear CPU affinity for
Ivan Klymenko (fi...@ukr.net) on 24/05/2011 at 10:47 wrote:
> Update source tree to revision 29
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110524024613.0d87c41c
Sorry I should have checked the timestamp of the revision I had.
Thanks for your answer
--
bug
_
В Tue, 24 May 2011 09:34:18 +0200
Guy Brand пишет:
> Hello,
>
>
> With revision 218881, I hit an error in make installkernel:
>
> ===> mps (install)
> install -o root -g wheel -m 555 mps.ko /boot/kernel
> install -o root -g wheel -m 555 mps.ko.symbols /boot/kernel
> install
Hello,
With revision 218881, I hit an error in make installkernel:
===> mps (install)
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 mps.ko /boot/kernel
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 mps.ko.symbols /boot/kernel
install: mps.ko.symbols: No such file or directory
*** Error code 71
11 matches
Mail list logo
