On 3 June 2011 13:05, Himali Patel wrote:
> Current branch of FreeBSD 9.0 doesn't have full support of 802.11n
> functionality. Any clue on by when the 802.11n support in FreeBSD will be
> available for Athero's chipset?
Hi,
The main thing that's left is TX aggregation. Everything else
(especia
Hi,
Current branch of FreeBSD 9.0 doesn't have full support of 802.11n
functionality. Any clue on by when the 802.11n support in FreeBSD will be
available for Athero's chipset?
Thanks,
Himali
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
Hi Luigi,
> we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
> FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
> very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
> modified ixgbe driver, which gives plenty of CPU cycles to handle
> multiple interfa
A compile-with clause in the sys/conf/files configuration file may
work for what you want, e.g. picking a random example:
dev/e1000/e1000_82542.c optional em | igb \
compile-with "${NORMAL_C} -I$S/dev/e1000"
- Joshua
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> In an at
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> In an attempt to build a kernel with -Wextra gives a number
> of warnings for
>
> 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration
>
> (in tcp_input.c, as an example).
>
> Is there any interest in trying to fix these ?
>
> HEAD/sy
Hi,
we have recently worked on a project, called netmap, which lets
FreeBSD send/receive packets at line rate even at 10 Gbit/s with
very low CPU overhead: one core at 1.33 GHz does 14.88 Mpps with a
modified ixgbe driver, which gives plenty of CPU cycles to handle
multiple interface and/or do usef
Hi list,
Today I needed to shut down my home server (FreeSBD9-CURRENT, 3 x 40GB
ATA HDD in RADZ1, ZFS only, GPT, i386) for a moment. After power up,
loader started to spin cursor indifinitely, and didn't load the kernel.
No error messages, no hints, just spinning cursor.
I tried booting from ot
2011/6/2 Ivan Voras :
> On 02/06/2011 14:23, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>> On 01/06/2011 20:21, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> Current maximum number of CPUs supported by the FreeBSD kernel is 32.
>>> That number cames from indirectly by the fact that we have a cpumask_t
>>> type, representing a mask of CPUs
On 02/06/2011 14:23, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 01/06/2011 20:21, Attilio Rao wrote:
Current maximum number of CPUs supported by the FreeBSD kernel is 32.
That number cames from indirectly by the fact that we have a cpumask_t
type, representing a mask of CPUs, which is an unsigned int right now.
I the
On 01/06/2011 20:21, Attilio Rao wrote:
Current maximum number of CPUs supported by the FreeBSD kernel is 32.
That number cames from indirectly by the fact that we have a cpumask_t
type, representing a mask of CPUs, which is an unsigned int right now.
I then made a patch that removes the cpumask_
Earlier last month I realized that some ports crashes on FreeBSD
9.0-CURRENT/smd64 (most recent sources), when compiled with CLANG. In
particular astro/stellarium and editors/leibreoffice (3.3.2) crashed.
Those crashes where recognized on all boxes with world compiled with
CLANG and
On 02.06.2011 2:17, Uwe Grohnwaldt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I build a kernel using src from svn. I have the same error.
> svn info shows Last Changed Rev: 222585
You should enable bootverbose mode and show all messages that
begins from GEOM_PART.
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
signature.asc
Description:
12 matches
Mail list logo