kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread O. Hartmann
With today's update of sources (Revision: 223466 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: adrian Last Changed Rev: 223466 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting the kernel and

Re: Time keeping Issues with the low-resolution TSC timecounter

2011-06-23 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 21 June 2011 04:53 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Can you please try the attached patch? It should disable TSC/TSC-low timecounter for your CPU models, I think. Sorry, I attached a wrong patch. Please ignore the previous one and try this, instead. TSC-low is not

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: With today's update of sources (Revision: 223466 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: adrian Last Changed Rev: 223466 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 09:46:45 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 09:46:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2011-06-23 09:46:45 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 09:47:01 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 09:47:01 -

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting the kernel and ending up with the message (repeated every 60 seconds): run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config What's up? I backed out

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 09:35:38 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 09:35:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-06-23 09:35:38 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 09:36:01 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 09:36:01 -

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 09:28:37 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 09:28:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-06-23 09:28:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 09:28:57 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 09:28:57 -

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:54:46AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: With today's update of sources (Revision: 223466 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: adrian Last Changed Rev: 223466 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) FreeBSD

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 23.06.11 09:54, O. Hartmann wrote: With today's update of sources (Revision: 223466 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: adrian Last Changed Rev: 223466 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread O. Hartmann
On 06/23/11 13:10, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting the kernel and ending up with the message (repeated every 60 seconds): run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:35 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:35 -

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-23 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 22/06/2011 23:09 Kenneth D. Merry said the following: The GEOM event thread is stuck sleeping in the mtx_sleep() call above. So that tells me that one of several things is going on: - There is a path in the cd(4) driver where it can call cam_periph_hold() but not cam_periph_unhold().

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
Apparently there is another problem plain ATA CD/DVD related. With r223443 hangs nature is changed: I see no more waiting in caplck state, just xpt_thrd waiting in ccb_scan state forever and those repeated messages: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:51:36PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: More than once I've seen under qemu that the kernel boot non-deterministically gets stuck in the cd driver. Other people have also bumped into this. E.g., here's one of the reports that I googled up, it's not exactly the same as

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:38 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:38 -

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:10:20PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 23.06.2011 11:54, O. Hartmann wrote: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck in booting the kernel and ending up with the message (repeated every 60 seconds): run_interrupt_driven_hooks:

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:45 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:45 -

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 12:15:51 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 12:15:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2011-06-23 12:15:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 12:16:09 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 12:16:09 -

Kernel compile failure in ATH.

2011-06-23 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Hi Just got this error making a new kernel: cc -c -O -pipe -march=prescott -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -Wmissing-include-dirs

@r223471: panic: run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks: waited too long

2011-06-23 Thread David Wolfskill
I last built head at r223421; I upgraded sources to r223471. make buildworld was uneventful; building the kernel demonstrated that I needed the patch from r223474, which I applied (after which building the kernel was also uneventful). Here's a cut/paste from serial console of my build machine

Re: Kernel compile failure in ATH.

2011-06-23 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 03:21:28PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: Hi Just got this error making a new kernel: You need the patch from r223474: Author: adrian Date: Thu Jun 23 12:11:43 2011 New Revision: 223474 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223474 Log: add missing #define

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:47 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 11:20:47 -

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Motin
O. Hartmann wrote: With today's update of sources (Revision: 223466 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: adrian Last Changed Rev: 223466 Last Changed Date: 2011-06-23 08:55:29 +0200 (Do, 23 Jun 2011)) FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 won't boot anymore. The box gets stuck

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 13:27:05 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 13:27:05 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-06-23 13:27:05 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 13:27:17 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 13:27:17 -

Re: Time keeping Issues with the low-resolution TSC timecounter

2011-06-23 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Thursday 23 June 2011 04:21 am, Ian FREISLICH wrote: Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 21 June 2011 04:53 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Can you please try the attached patch? It should disable TSC/TSC-low timecounter for your CPU models, I think. Sorry, I attached a wrong patch. Please

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-23 Thread Andrey Chernov
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:09:19PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: Well, after looking at the code a little more, it looks like the lock that is being held is the periph lock, which is really just a flag. So 'show lock' wouldn't show anything relevant. Here's cam_periph_hold(): With recent

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread David Wolfskill
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it. Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org Depriving a girl or boy of

Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread David O'Brien
Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two years with no problems. I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on TMPFS either. Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 16:00:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 16:00:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-23 16:00:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 16:00:15 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 16:00:15 -

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Matthew Jacob
I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two years with no

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Jun 23 11, Matthew Jacob wrote: I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander V. Chernikov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Jacob wrote: I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, Sounds good to me. The tmpfs(5) man page should be patched also. -- Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.org On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:31 AM, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Chris Rees
On 23 June 2011 17:31, David O'Brien obr...@freebsd.org wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two years with no problems. I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on TMPFS either. Index:

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Olivier Smedts
2011/6/23 Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@ipfw.ru: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Jacob wrote: I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64 system. On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David O'Brien wrote:

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Matthew Jacob
I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on TMPFS either. There was some issues with sendfile(2) and mmap(2) causing kernel hangs in some cases. vim triggers such hangs for me. However, those problems were fixed and MFCed (afair). Can you sway when?

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:31:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: Does anyone object to this patch? David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two years with no problems. I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on TMPFS either. Index:

Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered highly experimental

2011-06-23 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (23/06/2011 20:44), Olivier Smedts wrote: 2011/6/23 Alexander V. Chernikov melif...@ipfw.ru: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Jacob wrote: I gave up on using it after a brief try earlier this year. I can't remember the details, but it did lock up my amd64

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 06/23/11 18:29, David Wolfskill wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it. Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me. Peace, david Me, too. Thanks, Oliver

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 06/23/11 16:57, Hartmann, O. wrote: On 06/23/11 18:29, David Wolfskill wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 06:12:54PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: ... SVN rev 223443 broke ATAPI support. SVN rev 223475 should fix it. Thanks -- that did resolve the issue for me. Peace, david Me, too. Thanks,

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Alexander Motin
Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I'm still having problems with an ATA bus containing a DVD drive and a Zip driver (da). Can't it be some different problem? What are the symptoms? -- Alexander Motin ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

current status of digi driver

2011-06-23 Thread David Boyd
While attempting to upgrade our comm servers from 7.4-RELEASE to 8.2-RELEASE, I discovered that the digi driver didn't make the grade. I searched the archives and found discussions in August 2008 concerning drivers that were disconnected for lack of MPSAFEness. The threads continued right up to

Re: kernel broken: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after XXX seconds for xpt_config

2011-06-23 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 06/23/11 17:17, Alexander Motin wrote: Nathan Whitehorn wrote: I'm still having problems with an ATA bus containing a DVD drive and a Zip driver (da). Can't it be some different problem? What are the symptoms? Hanging in run_interrupt_driven_config_hooks, immediately after probing the

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-23 21:50:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-23 21:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-23 21:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-23 21:50:22 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-23 21:50:22 -

Re: current status of digi driver

2011-06-23 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, David Boyd wrote: While attempting to upgrade our comm servers from 7.4-RELEASE to 8.2-RELEASE, I discovered that the digi driver didn't make the grade. I searched the archives and found discussions in August 2008 concerning drivers that were disconnected for lack of

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-23 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi, I need some people testing the following patch: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223486 svn up and build a new kernel. Try to remove all USB devices from kernel config except the host controllers and USB keyboard. Then put the following file into /etc/devd/

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-23 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
On 6/22/11 4:09 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:13:25 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:04PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: These two are interesting: http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/1249/21062011014m.jpg

Re: misc/157903: automated kldload for USB class devices

2011-06-23 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 24 June 2011 04:37:25 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Hi, I need some people testing the following patch: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/223486 svn up and build a new kernel. Try to remove all USB devices from kernel config except the host controllers and USB keyboard.

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2011-06-23 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2011-06-24 03:40:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-06-24 03:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2011-06-24 03:40:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-06-24 03:40:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-06-24 03:40:20 -

Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)

2011-06-23 Thread Scott Long
On Jun 23, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: On 6/22/11 4:09 PM, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:13:25 +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:54:04PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: These two are interesting: