on 31/07/2011 01:55 Rick Macklem said the following:
Andriv Gapon wrote:
on 26/07/2011 00:44 Rick Macklem said the following:
hrs sent me this panic. I'm wondering if it might be relevant to
this?
To 'this' what?
Well, my thinking was (and it is quite likely completely incorrect) is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right result,
e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks like the
escape character is missing here).
Is this a known issue?
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI delp...@delphij.net
as of r224290, the mnt_flag in the mount structure was changed from
32 to 64 bits. should __FreeBSD_version be bumped to reflect breakage
introduced by this change?
fusefs-kmod broke after the kernel was upgraded, and the ports failed
to build due to inconsistent data type as it is expecting
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:22:36 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right result,
e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks like the
escape character is missing here).
Is this a known issue?
Now it is :)
This is due to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/31/11 05:17, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:22:36 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right
result, e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks
like the escape
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 05:43:39 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On 07/31/11 05:17, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 01:22:36 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that weekly_catman is not generating the right
result, e.g. instead of a highlight NAME, it gives 1mNAME0m (looks
like
Just an observation:
- print_INTEL_info and print_INTEL_TLB are missing from amd64 identcpu.c
- print_INTEL_TLB doesn't cover all the codes defined by Intel specs
- not sure; perhaps print_INTEL_info should use deterministic cache parameters
as provided by CPUID 0x4 for a more complete
Hi! I'm writing because I'm having some issues with -CURRENT and clang in
amd64.
I first compiled latest revision at this date and everything went ok:
[0][root@Symphony ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD Symphony.Gl 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Sun Jul 10 10:38:28
ART 2011
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/07/2011 01:55 Rick Macklem said the following:
Andriv Gapon wrote:
on 26/07/2011 00:44 Rick Macklem said the following:
hrs sent me this panic. I'm wondering if it might be relevant to
this?
To 'this' what?
Well, my thinking was (and it is quite likely
on 31/07/2011 22:03 Rick Macklem said the following:
Ok, so if the scheduler spin lock is being held too long, what could
cause this, if it isn't a scheduler bug?
I can't think of how NFS would affect this beyond causing a heavy I/O
load, but if there is some way it does, I suppose I need to
Dňa 30. 7. 2011 17:29, Alexander Leidinger wrote / napísal(a):
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:11:37 +0200 Martin Matuska m...@freebsd.org
wrote:
The attached patch allows better fine-tuning of jails started via
/etc/rc.d, uses the new jail(8) flags (-c -m), the persist parameter
and adds ZFS
Abdriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/07/2011 22:03 Rick Macklem said the following:
Ok, so if the scheduler spin lock is being held too long, what could
cause this, if it isn't a scheduler bug?
I can't think of how NFS would affect this beyond causing a heavy
I/O
load, but if there is some way
Hi,
I just tried to build VMware modules for FreeBSD9-BETA1 and noticed
the ifnet Member Function
void (*if_watchdog)(struct ifnet *ifp)
was removed from net/if_var.h.
Is there a suggested replacement?
PS:
The man page for ifnet(9) does not reflect the remove of this
(now missing) Member
13 matches
Mail list logo
