Failure with 9.0 Beta1

2011-08-24 Thread Beech Rintoul
Trying to build today's current I get the following: cc -O2 -pipe -DATJOB_DIR=\/var/at/jobs/\ - DLFILE=\/var/at/jobs/.lockfile\ -DLOADAVG_MX=1.5 - DATSPOOL_DIR=\/var/at/spool\ -DVERSION=\2.9\ -DDAEMON_UID=1 - DDAEMON_GID=1 -DDEFAULT_BATCH_QUEUE=\'E\' -DDEFAULT_AT_QUEUE=\'c\' -

Re: Failure with 9.0 Beta1

2011-08-24 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Beech Rintoul be...@freebsd.org wrote: Trying to build today's current I get the following: Please update to HEAD and read UPDATING @ 20110815. There are several references in the archives last week and the week before to this build failure. Cheers, -Garrett

Re: Failure with 9.0 Beta1

2011-08-24 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 23 August 2011 23:43:14 Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Beech Rintoul be...@freebsd.org wrote: Trying to build today's current I get the following: Please update to HEAD and read UPDATING @ 20110815. There are several references in the archives last week

Re: Failure with 9.0 Beta1

2011-08-24 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 23 August 2011 23:24:30 Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:08:17 -0800 Beech Rintoul be...@freebsd.org wrote: Trying to build today's current I get the following: cc -O2 -pipe -DATJOB_DIR=\/var/at/jobs/\ - DLFILE=\/var/at/jobs/.lockfile\ -DLOADAVG_MX=1.5 -

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:09:41AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Ok, I'll admit I wasn't very fond of a fixed table that would

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Hiroki Sato
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote in 20110824082119.gj17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: ko Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: koOn Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:34:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote in 20110824082119.gj17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Rick Macklem

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Rick Macklem
Kostik Belousov wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:09:41AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Ok, I'll admit I wasn't very fond of a

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Rick Macklem
Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:34:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote in 20110824082119.gj17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:36:37AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:34:58PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote in 20110824082119.gj17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM

AW: Panic with 9.0 Beta 1 (arcmsr.c)

2011-08-24 Thread Uwe Grohnwaldt
Hi, I upgraded a fresh RELENG_8_2 to CURRENT and nearly everything works fine. I only have to wait about 3 minutes during boot. In dmesg I have many messages like this: arcmsr1: scsi id 17 lun 0 cmd=0x12 srb='0xff8462bd9780' ccb command time out!

FreeBSD mbufs() cache poisoning local priv escalation v2 by KCOPE

2011-08-24 Thread Victor Detoni
Oh shit guys! http://pastebin.com/dyKLRr0v ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: FreeBSD mbufs() cache poisoning local priv escalation v2 by KCOPE

2011-08-24 Thread Victor Detoni
Does Someone know if this was fixed? On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Victor Detoni victordet...@gmail.comwrote: Oh shit guys! http://pastebin.com/dyKLRr0v ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

AW: Panic with 9.0 Beta 1 (arcmsr.c)

2011-08-24 Thread Uwe Grohnwaldt
After this messages there are no visible disks. A camcontrol rescan all leads tot he same timeouts. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- curr...@freebsd.org] Im Auftrag von Uwe Grohnwaldt Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. August 2011 16:37 An:

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (24/08/2011 21:34), Hiroki Sato wrote: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote in 20110824082119.gj17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: ko Here's

Re: FreeBSD mbufs() cache poisoning local priv escalation v2 by KCOPE

2011-08-24 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:59:01AM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote: Does Someone know if this was fixed? On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Victor Detoni victordet...@gmail.comwrote: Oh shit guys! http://pastebin.com/dyKLRr0v It is already one year old... and it was fixed before this

Re: FreeBSD mbufs() cache poisoning local priv escalation v2 by KCOPE

2011-08-24 Thread Svein Skogen (Listmail account)
On 24.08.2011 16:59, Victor Detoni wrote: Does Someone know if this was fixed? On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Victor Detoni victordet...@gmail.comwrote: Oh shit guys! http://pastebin.com/dyKLRr0v http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:07.mbuf.asc Isn't this the one?

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Hiroki Sato
Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com wrote in 20110824150235.GA46460@tops: gl On (24/08/2011 21:34), Hiroki Sato wrote: gl Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote glin 20110824082119.gj17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: gl gl ko On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Hiroki Sato
Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote in 920337541.272757.1314192294772.javamail.r...@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca: rm Kostik Belousov wrote: rm On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:23:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: rm On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: rmPawel Jakub

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Hiroki Sato wrote: My opinion is using a hash function which occurs no collision in the well-known names is sufficient for our purpose because the number of file systems on a running system is small anyway and not changed frequently in most cases. I am not sure which

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:41:25PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:36:37AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Well, doesn't this result in the same issue as the fixed table? In other words, the developer has to supply the suggested byte for fsid and make sure that it

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Rick Macklem
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:41:25PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:36:37AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Well, doesn't this result in the same issue as the fixed table? In other words, the developer has to supply the suggested byte for

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Rick Macklem
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:41:25PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:36:37AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: Well, doesn't this result in the same issue as the fixed table? In other words, the developer has to supply the suggested byte for

Re: fsid change of ZFS?

2011-08-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Rick Macklem wrote: afs The current OpenAFS codebase uses the all-caps AFS. Judging by the omitted text, perhaps this should change. (We also don't use VFS_SET to set it, which I filed a bug about.) and here is my current rendition of the patch. (I took Gleb's

F_RDLCK lock to FreeBSD NFS server fails to R/O target file

2011-08-24 Thread John
Hi Fellow NFS'ers, I believe I have found the problem we've been having with read locks while attaching to a FreeBSD NFS server. In sys/nlm/nlm_prot_impl.c, function nlm_get_vfs_state(), there is a call to VOP_ACCESS() as follows: /* * Check cred. */

ath0 no longer attaches, cardbus problems?

2011-08-24 Thread Daniel Eischen
Hello, I have an older Dell 4150 laptop that takes forever to build world, so I don't update it that often. The last time I updated it was March 1, 2010. I just updated the system yesterday and ath0 (a Linksys PCCard) no longer attaches. The interesting thing is that ath0 is detected at

if_ath - should it be compiled without ath_hal support?

2011-08-24 Thread Garrett Cooper
I ran into the panic shown below because it appears that some array indexing went off into the weeds. I haven't seen this happen but once though when running a buildworld last night using r225089 on i386. This begs the question - is it wise to compile if_ath without ath_hal support today?

Re: ath0 no longer attaches, cardbus problems?

2011-08-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 25 August 2011 08:19, Daniel Eischen deisc...@freebsd.org wrote: I have an older Dell 4150 laptop that takes forever to build world, so I don't update it that often.  The last time I updated it was March 1, 2010.  I just updated the system yesterday and ath0 (a Linksys PCCard) no longer

Re: if_ath - should it be compiled without ath_hal support?

2011-08-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, On 25 August 2011 12:49, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:    I ran into the panic shown below because it appears that some array indexing went off into the weeds. I haven't seen this happen but once though when running a buildworld last night using r225089 on i386.    This begs