Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Ade Lovett
It just means that folks didn't plan ahead and didn't think up proper contingency plans. First off, apologies to Garrett, I'm not picking on you directly, but I kinda knew this would come up. The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have chosen to do things a certain way.

Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0

2011-09-27 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 09/27/11 03:12, Eitan Adler wrote: The alternative is to fix burncd or backout the acd0 to cd0 change from 9.0 which may be the most desired solution because its obvious that no one researched the impact this change may have. This change may impact many ports that access cd/dvd drives for

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 27/09/2011, at 13:33, Ade Lovett wrote: That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on HEAD. PRs mentioning this will be gleefully closed referencing this message. I imagine you can work around

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread h h
Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote: With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while. The issue stems from configure scripts (to

Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0

2011-09-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote: Noting something in the documentation is fine. The point is that there's a lot of wasted electrons being tossed about about a fairly trivial issue: most of the apps that burn/use CDs were converted over to some logic

Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0

2011-09-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: .. and if someone would like to contribute patches to burncd to update it, I think there'd be at least one committer here who would be happy to help you get your changes into the tree. :-) Hi, I think we need something

Re: 9.0 beta2 the new bsdinstaller

2011-09-27 Thread deeptec...@gmail.com
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: deeptec...@gmail.com wrote: Fbsd8 wrote: 6. At the Complete screen when the reboot option is selected the cd/dvd drive should automatically open so the install media can be removed just like sysinstall does. If disc1.iso or

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, h h wrote: Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote: With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while. The issue

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread O. Hartmann
On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote: With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while. The issue stems

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
From Brett Glass br...@lariat.net: Unfortunately, due to past history, /usr is mixed-use. It normally contains both configuration information -- e.g. /usr/local/etc -- and more volatile data such as users' home directories. This prevents /usr/local/etc, which also contains mission-critical

FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 or 3?

2011-09-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
I see a thread, FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems. and now am curious about what is the current beta? I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64. Maybe the burncd problem, not working on SATA, is a temporary

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 or 3?

2011-09-27 Thread Lars Engels
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:06:53 + (GMT), Thomas Mueller wrote: I see a thread, FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems. and now am curious about what is the current beta? I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread Holger Kipp
Am 27.09.2011 um 10:48 schrieb Thomas Mueller: From Brett Glass br...@lariat.net: Unfortunately, due to past history, /usr is mixed-use. It normally contains both configuration information -- e.g. /usr/local/etc -- and more volatile data such as users' home directories. This prevents

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote: With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be expected, ports/

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread h h
Holger Kipp holger.k...@alogis.com writes: Am 27.09.2011 um 10:48 schrieb Thomas Mueller: From Brett Glass br...@lariat.net: Unfortunately, due to past history, /usr is mixed-use. It normally contains both configuration information -- e.g. /usr/local/etc -- and more volatile data such as

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-27 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:40 +0200, crsnet.pl wrote: Hello. I upgrade my FreeBSD 8.2-Release to FreeBSD 9-Beta and pkg_delete -f -a and add new (that same) pkgs with pkg_add. And system, xorgs, wine, opera, java, flash works ok, but... I find two things that dont works ;/ 1. Suspend.

Re: Choosing between DELAY(useconds) and pause()

2011-09-27 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:30 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:21:06 am Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:07 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Thursday 22 September 2011 19:55:23 David Somayajulu wrote: It appears that the pause() function cannot

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Eduardo Morras
At 11:18 27/09/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ... At least there will be a long rest after the move to 10 is complete.. until FreeBSD 100. Or move to hexadecimal $ export

outside the box (Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT)

2011-09-27 Thread perryh
Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote: The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have chosen to do things a certain way. Unfortunately for us (us being FreeBSD), we have now broken these conceptions by moving to a dual-digit major release. I don't suppose REVISION=A.1 i.e.

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-27 Thread crsnet.pl
Hi, Hello, thanks for reply. Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but build your wifi support as a module.) Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not. First i make kldunload if_iwn. When i try to suspend from X, Xorg close, i see console and

Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 problems.

2011-09-27 Thread crsnet.pl
I'm not sure why the machine panics when you unload uhci - if you can get any more information about the panic then please open a PR. As for the issue with suspend/resume hanging, can you please try the patch at http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1106041548370.26975 and see

Re: [Solved] FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-27 Thread crsnet.pl
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:21:23 +0800, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi, Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but build your wifi support as a module.) Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not. (And you haven't told us what your hardware is.)

Re: outside the box (Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT)

2011-09-27 Thread O. Hartmann
On 09/27/11 16:46, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote: The undeniable fact is that configure scripts in general have chosen to do things a certain way. Unfortunately for us (us being FreeBSD), we have now broken these conceptions by moving to a dual-digit major

Re: [Solved] FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hans, Why haven't those patches been committed? Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread krad
On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org wrote: With the

Re: [Solved] FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-27 Thread Gavin Atkinson
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 19:53 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hans, Why haven't those patches been committed? This patch is an absolute hack, and shouldn't be committed as it is. I would, however, appreciate some help in determining the correct solution. The solution may well involve not

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread h h
Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com writes: At 11:18 27/09/2011, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ... At least there will be a long rest after the move to 10 is complete.. until

Re: [Solved] FreeBSD 9-Beta3 on X300 2 problems

2011-09-27 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 13:53:41 Adrian Chadd wrote: Hans, Why haven't those patches been committed? I don't know. There is no reason that they shouldn't, except I believe pause() should have the checks for cold and resuming/suspending instead of USB. Must have been forgotten :-)

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Robert Huff
krad writes: we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8) Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years? Robert Huff ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 27 September 2011 20:22, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: krad writes:  we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)        Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years? Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-) Adrian

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Eitan Adler
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de: Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ... FreeBSD XP anyone? ___ freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:22:54AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: krad writes: we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8) Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years? Not quite. There they mostly said No way that this program will still be in use when

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 memstick USB image hangs my BIOS

2011-09-27 Thread Matt Thyer
On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD. I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board. I'm now watching it boot successfully

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Doug Rabson
On 27 September 2011 13:57, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 27 September 2011 20:22, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: krad writes: we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8) Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years? Our children

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Robert Huff
Adrian Chadd writes:  we can leave that to our grand children to figure out though 8)        Wasn't that what people said about two-digit years? Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-) Statistically, some of us will. Robert

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA 2, camcontrol readcap, no passthrough device found

2011-09-27 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following: Is camcontrol readcap supposed to work for an ATA disk? Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an ATA disk. I am sure that you know the answer. P.S. camcontrol, of course, can be extended to support the corresponding ATA

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:36:26 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: .. and as a follow up (and cc'ing attillo and freebsd-mips, in case it's relevant to other platforms and there's a MIPS specific thing to fix): * 2128: mi_switch to idle * 2129: kern_clocksource.c:762 - ie, cpu_idleclock() has

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/9/27 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org: On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:36:26 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: .. and as a follow up (and cc'ing attillo and freebsd-mips, in case it's relevant to other platforms and there's a MIPS specific thing to fix): * 2128: mi_switch to idle * 2129:

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:36:17AM -0400 I heard the voice of Robert Huff, and lo! it spake thus: Adrian Chadd writes: Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-) Statistically, some of us will. Actually, I had to deal with it just last week... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) |

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 09/27/11 16:27, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:36:17AM -0400 I heard the voice of Robert Huff, and lo! it spake thus: Adrian Chadd writes: Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-) Statistically, some of us will. Actually, I had to deal with it just last week...

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Alexander Motin
Adrian Chadd wrote: .. erm, sys/mips/mips/machdep.c: /* * call platform specific code to halt (until next interrupt) for the idle loop */ void cpu_idle(int busy) { KASSERT((mips_rd_status() MIPS_SR_INT_IE) != 0, (interrupts disabled in idle process.));

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Chris Rees
On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com  writes: On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovetta...@freebsd.org  wrote: With the advent

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. Adrian Chadd wrote: The AR71xx MIPS kernels didn't include PREEMPTION. This seems a bit silly, as it's needed by sched_4bsd to actually compile in the code in maybe_preempt(). So I added it, and it simply increased CPU use without fixing the issue. But yes, maybe_preempt() is now setting

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Alexander Motin
Alexander Motin wrote: Adrian Chadd wrote: .. erm, sys/mips/mips/machdep.c: /* * call platform specific code to halt (until next interrupt) for the idle loop */ void cpu_idle(int busy) { KASSERT((mips_rd_status() MIPS_SR_INT_IE) != 0, (interrupts disabled in

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 27 September 2011 23:56, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Yes it does. x86 does the same, but with more details. The general idea of the critical section is to block context switch out of idle thread until missed time events will be handled inside cpu_activeclock(). I was wrong.

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Alexander Motin
Adrian Chadd wrote: On 27 September 2011 23:56, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Yes it does. x86 does the same, but with more details. The general idea of the critical section is to block context switch out of idle thread until missed time events will be handled inside

Re[2]: Failure upgrading from 8-stable to current (9.0-Beta2)

2011-09-27 Thread Коньков Евгений
Hi, Garrett. No, that patch did not work. because + tzsetup $${optC} -r; \ run current installed tzsetup which use libdialog.so you must use just compiled one /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/tzsetup/tzsetup PS. I have 9-0Current 201101 upgrading to 9-0Beta2 20110925 I even try by hand setup ENV

Re: Choosing between DELAY(useconds) and pause()

2011-09-27 Thread Julian Elischer
On 9/27/11 4:12 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:30 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:21:06 am Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:07 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Thursday 22 September 2011 19:55:23 David Somayajulu wrote: It

Re: Choosing between DELAY(useconds) and pause()

2011-09-27 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:39:44AM -0600, Julian Elischer wrote: On 9/27/11 4:12 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 09:30 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:21:06 am Gavin Atkinson wrote: On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:07 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On

Re: ath / 802.11n performance issues and timer code

2011-09-27 Thread Alexander Motin
Adrian Chadd wrote: On 27 September 2011 23:56, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Yes it does. x86 does the same, but with more details. The general idea of the critical section is to block context switch out of idle thread until missed time events will be handled inside

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Sep 27, 2011 10:04 AM, Chris Rees cr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote: Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Sep 26,

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 memstick USB image hangs my BIOS

2011-09-27 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote: On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, Adrian Chaddadr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com wrote: I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not FreeBSD. I've booted the drive successfully on an older Via C3 board.

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote: With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while. The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completely at random) assuming that FreeBSD would

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Vlad Galu
On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote: With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while. The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something

Re: SCSI descriptor sense changes, testing needed

2011-09-27 Thread Fabian Keil
Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 21:27:22 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote: I have attached a set of patches against head that implement SCSI descriptor sense support for CAM. Anyway, I'd appreciate any testing and

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode -- Stopped at atomic_subtract_int+0x4

2011-09-27 Thread Fabian Keil
I pretty reproducible get the following (handtranscribed) panic when sending an zfs snapshot to geli provider based on an USB stick that disappears (due to a bug, or because it's unplugged): Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0: apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x288

Passive FTP

2011-09-27 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
I keep forgetting that fetch(1) defaults to active FTP, because login.conf(5) sets the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable, but every once in a while I try to pkg_add -r in single-user mode or using sudo(1) and it breaks. I have therefore flipped the switch and made passive FTP the default.

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On Sep 27, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: It's more exciting than that. FreeBSD = 10 is already seized by Apple :) http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/q=__FreeBSD__%5CW%2B10type=cs MacOS X doesn't define __FreeBSD__ either in CPP macros or the system headers: % touch foo.h;

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Sep-26 19:48:23 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: The problem with /boot on a dedicated partition is the the kernel, since at least 8.x, is installed by default with a vast majority of crap. That's all the .symbols, that 99% of FreeBSD

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2011-Sep-26 21:29:18 -0700, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: MBR allows 4 slices (which Windows and most of the world call partitions). Windows also allows the creation of Extended Partitions, but FreeBSD does not support these. They result in device named with an 's' for slice. E.g.

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread Doug Barton
On 09/27/2011 14:24, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2011-Sep-26 21:29:18 -0700, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: MBR allows 4 slices (which Windows and most of the world call partitions). Windows also allows the creation of Extended Partitions, but FreeBSD does not support these. They result

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 memstick USB image hangs my BIOS

2011-09-27 Thread Matt Thyer
On Sep 28, 2011 4:11 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote: On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, Adrian Chaddadr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin Obermankob6...@gmail.com wrote: I suspect that the thumb drive is the issue, not

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA 2, camcontrol readcap, no passthrough device found

2011-09-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote: on 27/09/2011 02:02 Craig Rodrigues said the following: Is camcontrol readcap supposed to work for an ATA disk? Or, rephrased - is a SCSI command supposed to work for an ATA disk. I am sure that you know the answer. P.S.

Re: Experiences with FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2

2011-09-27 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote: On 2011-Sep-26 19:48:23 -0400, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: The problem with /boot on a dedicated partition is the the kernel, since at least 8.x, is installed by

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 memstick USB image hangs my BIOS

2011-09-27 Thread Matt Thyer
On Sep 28, 2011 7:15 AM, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 28, 2011 4:11 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org wrote: On 09/27/11 08:24, Matt Thyer wrote: On Sep 26, 2011 2:33 PM, Adrian Chaddadr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 26 September 2011 12:56, Kevin

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread Michael Butler
On 09/27/11 02:37, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On 27/09/2011, at 13:33, Ade Lovett wrote: That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on HEAD. PRs mentioning this will be gleefully closed referencing

[CFT] hostap mode fixes with ath(4)

2011-09-27 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi all, I've just committed some hostap related ath(4) and ath_hal fixes to -HEAD. I've been testing these in my local 11n tree for the last few weeks and they've improved stability with all the 11n NICs but it has had the most impact when using the AR9220/AR9280 NICs. I'd appreciate it if I

Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT

2011-09-27 Thread h h
Michael Butler i...@protected-networks.net writes: On 09/27/11 02:37, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On 27/09/2011, at 13:33, Ade Lovett wrote: That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on HEAD. PRs

Compat symlinks for /dev/acd0?

2011-09-27 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, When the ATA_CAM option is enabled in the kernel, we create compatibility symlinks for /dev/ada devices, such as: /dev/ad8s1@ - ada0s1 We don't do this for ATAPI CD-ROM devices. Any reason *not* to do this for ATAPI CD-ROM devices? i.e. /dev/cd0 - acd0 It's a minor thing, but will