TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-21 09:40:00 -
Hi,
I have created a PORT at last, its in the 'port' directory in the usual place:
https://github.com/vermaden/automount/
Its my first PORT so feel free to bash me about my mistakes ;)
After latest 'commits' I think that its ready for day-to-day use.
To make 'full advantage' of *automount*
Hi,
I created a kernel config for i386/amd64 (should work on -current and
9.x) and a suitable loader.conf which:
- tries to provide as much features as GENERIC (I lost one or two disk
controllers, they are not available as a module... or I didn't find
them)
- incorporates some more
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
- if_cxgb
- if_cxgbe
- if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only?
- if_hme: is compiled as a
I was wondering if anyone is aware of any ongoing effort to support the on
CPU temp sensors on the AMD K15 CPU's
amdtemp only supports up to K11 so far as I can tell
Sam Fourman Jr.
Titan# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989,
On 02/21/12 09:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not
be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_mxge
Speaking for mxge, it requires the better part of 1MB worth of
firmware files, and it is a rather uncommon
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
No specific reason for these two:
- if_cxgb
- if_cxgbe
But I do prefer to load them as modules (and as
Sorry about the cross post, but I can't tell if this
a -current issue of a -ports issue. Unfortunately,
I updated my freebsd 10.0 systems and the lang/gcc
port during the same timeframe.
I have compiled my math library and several programs
with gfortran, which is installed by lang/gcc (pkg_info
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
Sorry about the cross post, but I can't tell if this
a -current issue of a -ports issue. Unfortunately,
I updated my freebsd 10.0 systems and the lang/gcc
port during the same timeframe.
I have compiled my math library and
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by /home/kargl/bin/halfspace
not foundtroutmask:kargl[211]
(Note, the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:42:59AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is used by
the ports collections to build a large number of other
ports, so others are likely to hit this issue.
The same applies to
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is used by
the ports collections to build a large number of other
ports, so
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
that this is a heads up for gerald@. lang/gcc is used by
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:42 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
Original Message
Subject:
Effect of Processor and Memory on
KDE4 execution speed
Date:
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:39:36 -0500
From:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:22:50AM +0100, Mel Flynn wrote:
On 2/21/2012 23:32, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes
On 2/21/2012 23:32, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
that this is a heads up for
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:36PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
that this is a heads up for
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be)
in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
- if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
No specific reason for these two:
- if_cxgb
-
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:42:59 -0800
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
- if_cxgb
- if_cxgbe
Last time I tried
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:52:08 -0800
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:36PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:44:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.comwrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:42 -0800, Robison, Dave wrote:
Original Message
Subject:
Effect of Processor and Memory on
KDE4 execution speed
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
that this is a heads up for
On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
3) Add a new option to ldconfig to prepend new libraries to
the hints files and fix the ports to use this option instead
of -m.
You don't want system binaries that want /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
to
TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-22 05:04:07 -
29 matches
Mail list logo
