Both standard-supfile and kernel-supfile were edited to use the "."
tag along with the CVS server being cvsup.FreeBSDS.org; but, I'm still
getting the version error for config(8). It seems to me that my
problem may be the base system is out of sync with the source- I'm
using Whitehorn's 2010 snap
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Super Bisquit wrote:
> Okay,
> Will I need to restate all as "10_CURRENT" for the
> kernel(standard)-supfile or should I use the cvs-supfile as the
> template with 10.0_CURRENT as the tag?
You will need to change the tag in the standard supfile to:
*default releas
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:09:47AM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
> On 2/25/12, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
> >> Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
> >> I've used. Entered "env -i" stated as prefix to "make buildkernel
> >> KERNCONF=$VERSION" c
Okay,
Will I need to restate all as "10_CURRENT" for the
kernel(standard)-supfile or should I use the cvs-supfile as the
template with 10.0_CURRENT as the tag?
On 2/25/12, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
>> Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
>> I'
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
> Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
> I've used. Entered "env -i" stated as prefix to "make buildkernel
> KERNCONF=$VERSION" command.
>
> Kernel build stops with following immediate error:
> "ERROR: version of config(8) does not match
Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
I've used. Entered "env -i" stated as prefix to "make buildkernel
KERNCONF=$VERSION" command.
Kernel build stops with following immediate error:
"ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
config version = 67, version required = 600010.
Okay. Now I've
On 02/25/2012 06:34, Giovanni Trematerra wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
>>> subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then tried
>>> 2.8
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:41:59 -0800
Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800
> > Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If I understand correctly, the libgcc in base is pretty stripped
> >> down compared to "regular" libg
On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800
> Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the libgcc in base is pretty stripped
>> down compared to "regular" libgcc, because most of that
>> stuff is in our libc instead.
>>
>
> You und
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
>> subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then tried
>> 2.8 both give the same error.
>
> Backing out r23205
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:22:36PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> Try this for fixing the panic. New-bus was not clearing the description
> if a device's attach routine failed.
Thanks, this patch indeed fixes the panic.
./danfe
___
freebsd-current@freebs
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> Il 25 febbraio 2012 07:15, Doug Barton ha scritto:
>> On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
>>> subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then tried
>>>
Hi all,
Maybe some spam filters ate my mails so I am replying to current@.
Could anyone help to commit it?
Regards,
Jia-Shiun
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Jia-Shiun Li wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I've submitted a PR for this:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165271
>
> could y
Il 25 febbraio 2012 07:15, Doug Barton ha scritto:
> On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
>> subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then tried
>> 2.8 both give the same error.
Did you also rebuilt w
14 matches
Mail list logo