Re: 9.0 base.txz ftp download time out
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Fbsd8 wrote: > I have a scripted ftp download for 8.x and 9.0 distribution files. > When I target 8.x releases it downloads the multiple distribution files > without any problems. To get the complete group takes about 20 minutes and > ends cleanly. > > But when I try to fetch the 9.0 base.txz file it says 100% completed and > then times out. It also runs about 20 minutes just to download the > single file. I do get the base.txz file downloaded but it ends uncleanly > saying it timed out. > > All the mirrors issue standard login messages saying there are > restrictions in effect. My question is there some restriction about time > allowed per file downloaded? And now that the layout of the 9.0 > distribution files has changed to a large file compared to many small > files in a directory as for 8.0 is this causing the base.txz file > download to time out? IE: does the ftp restrictions need to be changed > for the new 9.0 distribution file? > > Here is log of my ftp run. This is a non-answer as I have not seen this, but have you tried bittorrent? For this sort of thing it is vastly faster than ftp. If you have a fast connection to the Internet, you will be amazed by the speed. http://torrents.freebsd.org:8080 If you need a client, I can recommend azureas and deluge from ports. (Actually, it's been a while since I used deluge, but it worked last I tried. Both are in ports/net-p2p. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: PEBKAC
What I did was rebuild config(8)from source and then started buildkernel.
Thanks to all for the help.
On 2/26/12, Paul Mather wrote:
> There is no RELENG_10 yet. If you want 10.0 sources you have to track HEAD
> ("." in your supfile) right now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Super Bisquit wrote:
>
>> Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
>> I've used. Entered "env -i" stated as prefix to "make buildkernel
>> KERNCONF=$VERSION" command.
>>
>> Kernel build stops with following immediate error:
>> "ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
>> config version = 67, version required = 600010.
>>
>> Okay. Now I've looked at the standard-supfile and notice that the tag
>> is at RELENG=8.
>>
>> Now, if I change this to tag=RELENG_10- and I've already asked for
>> where the 10.0 sources are with no replies- will the system crap out
>> on me?
>> ___
>> freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ppc
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ppc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>
>
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Not all IDEs are so out of data. Netbeans is quite current (7.1). Eclipse is pretty close to the commonly available version as well. Have you tried building codelite from their sources? I may give it a try, just out of curiosity... From: O. Hartmann To: Eduardo Morras Cc: Current FreeBSD ; Ports FreeBSD Sent: Sun, February 26, 2012 4:48:36 AM Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD! On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: > At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even >> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is >> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE >> was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated >> version in the ports suited our needs. >> >> Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I >> filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. >> >> I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use >> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried >> devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of >> configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and >> not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. >> >> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many >> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, >> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. >> >> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, >> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the >> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks >> is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. >> >> Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm >> also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity >> to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE >> is needed. >> >> Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. > > Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on > ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to > configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) > >> Oliver > > ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Am 23.02.2012 12:22, schrieb O. Hartmann: > Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even > for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is > written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE > was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated > version in the ports suited our needs. > > Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I > filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. Anjuta compiles fine for me on 9-STABLE with GCC, but I can reproduce the build failure with clang that you've filed there. The following lines were also posted as bug-followup: --- (Note I'm not a member of the gnome@ team.) While I can reproduce the build failure with clang (possibly related to the "not portable" warnings your're seeing), building anjuta with gcc works fine for me. Can you post the command lines and relevant configuration files (like make.conf) that you've used to attempt a build with GCC? Chances are you haven't thoroughly switched to GCC. For me, using portmaster's -m option wouldn't work. Note that you can pass V=1 as make argument to get the full compiler command lines, rather than the short "CC" "CCLD" lines, to see what's actually happening. --- Please check the lines above. The relevant lines from the PR seem to be: --- *** Warning: Linking the executable benchmark against the loadable module *** libanjuta-symbol-db.so is not portable! ./../.libs/libanjuta-symbol-db.so: undefined reference to `sdb_engine_get_statement_by_query_id' ./../.libs/libanjuta-symbol-db.so: undefined reference to `sdb_engine_get_tuple_id_by_unique_name' clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) gmake[6]: *** [benchmark] Error 1 --- Chances are that these are genuine bugs in the Anjuta build system. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: PEBKAC
On 26 February 2012 05:38, Super Bisquit wrote: > Both standard-supfile and kernel-supfile were edited to use the "." > tag along with the CVS server being cvsup.FreeBSDS.org; but, I'm still > getting the version error for config(8). It seems to me that my > problem may be the base system is out of sync with the source- I'm > using Whitehorn's 2010 snapshot because the recent versions won't > load on my machine. Not too sure about compiling config from > usr.sbin since doing this the recent time caused errors. So, I'm > thinking that either I need to keep "make buildkernel" from checking > config version- which I don't know how to do- or wgetting version > 600010 of config(8)- of which I don't know which server has that > version. Have you tried just removing your entire src tree and re-csupping? Looks like it might be polluted somewhere... Chris ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote: > At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even >> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is >> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE >> was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated >> version in the ports suited our needs. >> >> Anjuta does not compile anymore for a long time. I do not know why, I >> filed a PR (ports/161494). So I was looking for an alternative. >> >> I looked for some alternatives. The IDE should be configurable to use >> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried >> devel/CodeBlocks, but CodeBlocks is narrowminded in terms of >> configuration of an alternative compiler and I find it really hard and >> not intuitiv to reconfigure the usage of CLANG. >> >> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many >> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE, >> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD. >> >> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA, >> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the >> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks >> is incapable of being easily adapted to CLANG. >> >> Befor people tend to start a flame war: yes, I'm fine with vi and I'm >> also fine with vim/gvim, but our students need to have the opportunity >> to work with an IDE and our projects are partially that large, so an IDE >> is needed. >> >> Thanks a lot for your patience and recommendations in advance. > > Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on > ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to > configure for use with clang/llvm. Codelite looks nice. But why is codelite setup in editors/codelite and not in devel/codelite as other IDEs? By the way, do all IDEs supported by FreeBSD suffer from being outdated and aged eons? CodeLite 3.5 is at this very moment the most recent version and claims to provide a much better LLVM/CLANG support. Hope I can convince the maintainer by sending a PR ;-) > >> Oliver > > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
9.0 base.txz ftp download time out
I have a scripted ftp download for 8.x and 9.0 distribution files. When I target 8.x releases it downloads the multiple distribution files without any problems. To get the complete group takes about 20 minutes and ends cleanly. But when I try to fetch the 9.0 base.txz file it says 100% completed and then times out. It also runs about 20 minutes just to download the single file. I do get the base.txz file downloaded but it ends uncleanly saying it timed out. All the mirrors issue standard login messages saying there are restrictions in effect. My question is there some restriction about time allowed per file downloaded? And now that the layout of the 9.0 distribution files has changed to a large file compared to many small files in a directory as for 8.0 is this causing the base.txz file download to time out? IE: does the ftp restrictions need to be changed for the new 9.0 distribution file? Here is log of my ftp run. 230 Anonymous access granted, restrictions apply Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. prompt off Interactive mode off. cd /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/9.0-RELEASE 250 CWD command successful epsv4 off EPSV/EPRT on IPv4 off. mreget base.txz doc.txz local: base.txz remote: base.txz 227 Entering Passive Mode (137,189,4,14,221,218). 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for base.txz (54107736 bytes) 100% |***| 52839 KiB 42.93 KiB/s 00:00 ETA 421 Service not available, remote server timed out. Connection closed. 54107736 bytes received in 21:30 (40.93 KiB/s) ftp: No control connection for command ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
