[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-02 06:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-02 06:20:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-04-02 06:20:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-02 06:23:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-02 06:23:19 -

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-02 08:39:42 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-02 08:39:42 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-04-02 08:39:42 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-02 08:41:17 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-02 08:41:17 -

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-02 08:39:17 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-02 08:39:17 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-04-02 08:39:17 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-02 08:41:27 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-02 08:41:27 -

Re: Awkward booting issue

2012-04-02 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Mark wrote: Hi, I have been trying to get FreeBSD 9 amd64 to boot on my 1U server but am unsuccesful and am out of ideas. I tried to boot the iso from CD-ROM, I tried multiple USB memory sticks and I even tried to boot from hard discs, I'll explain this further below. Oddly enough

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (29/03/2012 21:49), O. Hartmann wrote: Am 03/29/12 18:14, schrieb David Wolfskill: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:18:06PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: I was wondering if there are some objections using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run. ... My question is whether there are objections using TMPFS

Re: x220 notes

2012-04-02 Thread Любомир Григоров
Well I can't do the brightness switching. acpi_call port is installed, but: # kldload acpi_call kldload: can't load acpi_call: No such file or directory # acpi_call -p '\VBRC' -i 14 ioctl: Device not configured At least closing the lid turns off the monitor (not going to sleep), which is OK to

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread grarpamp
I commonly use mfs for /var and /tmp. Sometimes even symlinking /var/tmp - /tmp to save ram. Mostly because I want nothing leftover in them on boot, and it's fast. rc/mtree/etc takes care of populating them. /, /boot, /usr and /usr/local are read-only. [nssswitch host.conf still needs fixed to

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:31:19PM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: ... In any case, effective maximum usable size for tmpfs involves SIZE_MAX (~4G) PAGE_SIZE (4K, in my case). size_t is 64-bit on 64-bit archs. OK. Still, the requirement that the size specification be in bytes is

FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: clientsoftware crashes since make world of today at revision r233779

2012-04-02 Thread O. Hartmann
Hello out there. My FreeBSD 10 box is at revision r233779. I updated the sources this morning and made a buildworld successfully. After a reboot of the box, I witness several bad issues. Firefox, for instance, is droppimng a core now when starting. Using portmaster for updates produces a lot of

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread David Wolfskill
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:31:19PM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: ... You could try the patch attached. It adds support for size option suffixes (like 1g) and introduces swap limit (part of the older patch, not sure if it's any use). Patch is against 10-CURRENT. Older version:

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: clientsoftware crashes since make world of today at revision r233779

2012-04-02 Thread Alex Keda
02.04.2012 16:32, O. Hartmann пишет: Hello out there. My FreeBSD 10 box is at revision r233779. I updated the sources this morning and made a buildworld successfully. After a reboot of the box, I witness several bad issues. Firefox, for instance, is droppimng a core now when starting. Using

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: clientsoftware crashes since make world of today at revision r233779

2012-04-02 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:32:51 +0200 O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Hello out there. My FreeBSD 10 box is at revision r233779. I updated the sources this morning and made a buildworld successfully. After a reboot of the box, I witness several bad issues. Firefox, for

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: clientsoftware crashes since make world of today at revision r233779

2012-04-02 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:06:38 -0400 Alexander Kabaev kab...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:32:51 +0200 O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Hello out there. My FreeBSD 10 box is at revision r233779. I updated the sources this morning and made a buildworld

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: clientsoftware crashes since make world of today at revision r233779

2012-04-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 4f79abf1.70...@lissyara.su, Alex Keda writes: 02.04.2012 16:32, O. Hartmann пишет: Firefox, for instance, is droppimng a core now when starting. I tried r233749M and saw the same thing. This Warning looks non-ignorable to me, but I havn't investigated: === gnu/lib/libssp

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread jb
jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes: ... Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com 1:01 AM (16 hours ago) My experiences with using tmpfs as /tmp -- It works fine. until it doesn't. I've had mountpoints run out of space, checked df and the mountpoint had been reduced to something

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread Chris Rees
On 2 Apr 2012 16:47, jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote: jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes: ... Chuck Burns brea...@gmail.com 1:01 AM (16 hours ago) My experiences with using tmpfs as /tmp -- It works fine. until it doesn't. I've had mountpoints run out of space, checked df and the

Potential deadlock on mbuf

2012-04-02 Thread Alexandre Martins
Dear, I have currently having troubles with a basic socket stress. The socket are setup to use non-blocking I/O. During this stress-test, the kernel is running mbuf exhaustion, the goal is to see system limits. If the program make a write on a socket during this mbuf exhaustion, it become

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-02 14:10:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-02 14:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-04-02 14:10:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-02 14:13:49 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-02 14:13:49 -

Re: Build error in bin/sh/jobs.c if DEBUG=2

2012-04-02 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 04:14:24PM +0200, Kristof Provost wrote: While chasing down an odd issue with alignment faults I activated debugging in bin/sh. bin/sh/Makefile has a commented out line (# DEBUG_FLAGS+= -g -DDEBUG=2 -fno-inline) to do this so that's what I did. This fails to compile

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-02 16:26:56 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-02 16:26:56 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-04-02 16:26:56 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-02 16:29:16 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-02 16:29:16 -

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-02 16:25:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-02 16:25:59 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-04-02 16:25:59 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-02 16:27:40 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-02 16:27:40 -

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64: clientsoftware crashes since make world of today at revision r233779

2012-04-02 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 04/02/12 16:06, schrieb Alexander Kabaev: On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:32:51 +0200 O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: Hello out there. My FreeBSD 10 box is at revision r233779. I updated the sources this morning and made a buildworld successfully. After a reboot of the box,

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (02/04/2012 06:26), David Wolfskill wrote: On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:31:19PM +0300, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: ... You could try the patch attached. It adds support for size option suffixes (like 1g) and introduces swap limit (part of the older patch, not sure if it's any use). Patch is

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread Chuck Burns
On 4/2/2012 10:52 AM, Chris Rees wrote: This is a known issue with ZFS. Is that your case? Chris Yes. Interesting that it happens only with ZFS. and jb, thanks, I could've sworn I'd hit Reply to list - thanks for forwarding it for me. Chuck

ixgbe-2.4.4 compile error

2012-04-02 Thread Rudy
I used the 9.0-RELEASE memstick to install, did a cvsup to STABLE... When I downloaded Intel's (Jack's) ixgbe driver, I got an error: Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/local/src/ixgbe-2.4.4/src @ - /usr/src/sys machine - /usr/src/sys/amd64/include awk -f

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

2012-04-02 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/29/2012 13:52, Xin Li wrote: On 03/29/12 09:41, Chris Rees wrote: On 29 Mar 2012 16:49, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: I was wondering if there are some objections using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run. I figured out

Re: x220 notes

2012-04-02 Thread matt
On 04/01/12 22:49, Kevin Oberman wrote: 2012/4/1 Любомир Григоровnm.kn...@gmail.com: Well I can't do the brightness switching. acpi_call port is installed, but: # kldload acpi_call kldload: can't load acpi_call: No such file or directory # acpi_call -p '\VBRC' -i 14 ioctl: Device not

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-04-02 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-04-03 01:10:03 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-04-03 01:10:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2012-04-03 01:10:03 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-04-03 01:10:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-04-03 01:10:46 -

Re: x220 notes

2012-04-02 Thread Любомир Григоров
Interesting. So brightness value is changed, but not acted upon then when using the hotkeys? I could care less about suspend/resume as I don't really use it. Brightness and the fan (thanks for reminding me about the corruption) are what is killing my use. I have a SSD so even though boot isn't

Re: x220 notes

2012-04-02 Thread matt
On 04/02/12 18:42, Любомир Григоров wrote: Interesting. So brightness value is changed, but not acted upon then when using the hotkeys? Yes, value changes with no effect when hotkeys are pressed...I am not sure why there is no effect. I could care less about suspend/resume as I don't really