On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Can anyone explain to me why the dynamically linked version is significantly
slower? What are the extra steps involved compared to a statically linked
binary?
At the risk of dramatically over-simplifying….
When a static binary is
Am 04/30/12 13:44, schrieb Jean-Sébastien Pédron:
On 30.04.2012 08:11, O. Hartmann wrote:
Repeating the build ends up at the same stage as it stopped when
building on regular basis - for my understanding.
You say you have two boxes running 10-CURRENT: do they run the same
SVN revision? A
Den 01/05/2012 kl. 07.52 skrev Tim Kientzle:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Can anyone explain to me why the dynamically linked version is significantly
slower? What are the extra steps involved compared to a statically linked
binary?
At the risk of dramatically
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Den 01/05/2012 kl. 07.52 skrev Tim Kientzle:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Can anyone explain to me why the dynamically linked version is
significantly slower? What are the extra steps involved
On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
In particular, from the beginning of ether_output() to the
final call to ether_output_frame() the code takes slightly
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
In particular, from the beginning of
On May 1, 2012, at 11:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
I read this week this article on Phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=amd_r600g_llvmnum=1
Well, it looks promising to me in terms of having also OpenCL
capabilities for GPGPU, but as the report says, the code is not finished
and still in a very preliminary stage.
What is
Al 30/04/2012 21:34, En/na Jason Evans ha escrit:
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:13 AM, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
the kde team is seeing some strange problems with the new version (4.8.1) of
devel/dbus-qt4 with current. It does work with stable. I also suspect that the
problem described below is
On 1. May 2012, at 15:40 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:27:42AM -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
On Apr 20, 2012, at 15:03 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Continuing my profiling on network performance, another place
were we waste a lot of time is if_ethersubr.c::ether_output()
. I have now put it at
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap/20120501-netmap_drop.diff
cheers
luigi
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current
Den 01/05/2012 kl. 15.55 skrev Gary Palmer:
If you want a high-level view of what goes on run
ldd `which ls`
check that it has libraries to load and doesn't say not a dynamic ELF
executable, and then run:
ktrace ls
kdump | more
All the system calls related to resolving and
12 matches
Mail list logo
