Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-08 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 8 May 2012 05:14, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: On 05/07/2012 13:11, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: I got this with today's

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-08 Thread O. Hartmann
On 05/07/12 22:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: ... The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-08 Thread O. Hartmann
On 05/07/12 20:22, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: ... The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-08 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT? We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-08 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/05/2012 08:51 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ as libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, while it is unbundled with clang. So the internal cppunit was probably not needed in the environment

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-08 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 08/05/2012 08:53, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT? We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-08 Thread Robert Huff
(Late to the party - there was a pile-up on the backbone just outside of Barcelona.) On FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Mar 11 08:20:02 EDT 2012 amd64 I am unable to compile libreoffice-3.5.latest version using either Clang or gcc-4.6. The make.conf is appended.

[HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hi Folks, Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more features, the ideas mostly taken from the latest GNU sort) and it is efficient. I just updated the textproc/bsdsort port to the latest version so

Re: jemalloc: jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: p[i] == 0

2012-05-08 Thread Steve Wills
On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote: How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by r234569, so if you're still seeing problems after that revision, there's another problem we need to figure out. (By the way, it's possible for an application to trigger this assertion,

Re: [CFT] Ralink RT2860, RT2870, RT3060, RT3090 support

2012-05-08 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Bernhard Schmidt bschm...@freebsd.org wrote: Please apply attached patch (also here [1]) on top of the first one, it fixes channel switching for = 3070 (called the wrong function, doh..) as well as a bgscan issue. [1]

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-08 Thread Peter Holm
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:11:53PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote: I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Michael Scholz
___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

CURRENT as of 5/8/2012 make release

2012-05-08 Thread Outback Dingo
Ive noticed trying a make release on CURRENT that it appears to be looping deeper and deeper, does this appear normal to anyone else??? a usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/release/dist/usr/src/sys/dev/malo/if_malohal.h a

Re: jemalloc: jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: p[i] == 0

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote: How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by r234569, so if you're still seeing problems after that revision, there's another problem we need to figure out. (By the

Re: jemalloc: jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: p[i] == 0

2012-05-08 Thread Jason Evans
On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote: How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by r234569, so if you're still seeing problems after that revision, there's

Re: jemalloc: jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: p[i] == 0

2012-05-08 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote: How recent is your system? This problem should have been fixed by

Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Michael Scholz
Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Oleg Moskalenko has been working very hard on BSD sort and by now we think it is compatible with the base version (and has even more features, the ideas mostly taken from the latest GNU sort) and it is efficient. I just updated the textproc/bsdsort port to the latest

RE: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Oleg Moskalenko
Thank you, Michael. We will check this. Oleg -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scholz Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 3:08 PM To: Gabor Kovesdan Cc: FreeBSD Current; Oleg Moskalenko Subject: Re:

RE: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Oleg Moskalenko
Hi Michael We found the problem. In the ispell port, an unusual form of deprecated sort syntax for the key field(s) is used. There are three forms of key field(s) specification: POSIX standard: $ sort -kPOS1[,POS2] Documented deprecated form: $ sort +POS1 [-POS2] Undocumented deprecated form:

Re: jemalloc: jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: p[i] == 0

2012-05-08 Thread Jason Evans
On May 8, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 02:47:59PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote: On May 8, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 12:48:17PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote: On 05/08/12 00:46, Jason Evans wrote: How recent is your

MALLOC_PRODUCTION

2012-05-08 Thread Beech Rintoul
I'm a bit unclear where to define MALLOC_PRODUCTION. does it go in make.conf or src.conf? Beech ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

RE: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Oleg Moskalenko
Michael, The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older syntax forms. I tested it with ispell ports and it builds just fine. We will update the bsdsort port soon. Thanks ! Oleg -Original

RE: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort coming to -CURRENT

2012-05-08 Thread Michael Scholz
On Tue, 8 May 2012, Oleg Moskalenko wrote: Michael, The situation is actually more complex than I described in my email, but the good news is that we already have a fix that supports all older syntax forms. I tested it with ispell ports and it builds just fine. We will update the bsdsort

panic: incorrect npmc count

2012-05-08 Thread Peter Jeremy
[This may be a duplicate because I forgot to update my subscription after changing address but I've also corrected a typo] (I've copied fabient@ because r233628 appears to have been the last commit in this area). I've just updated a P4 test box from r232545 to r235127 and it now panics during