On 06.06.12 05:31, Erich wrote:
On 05 June 2012 10:55:57 Chris Rees wrote:
It is absolutely a bad idea for beginners to be using tagged/dated
ports trees-- they are not supported and will lead to many complaints
about problems that were solved since the tag.
How do they fall back when things
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On 06.06.12 05:35, Erich wrote:
Warning: Be very careful to specify any tag= fields correctly. Some tags are
valid only for certain collections of files. If you specify an incorrect or
misspelled tag, CVSup will delete files which you probably do not want deleted.
In particular, use only
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
Hi,
On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote:
But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree?
Entire tree.
my problem with this is that the
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 05:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-06 07:05:57 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 07:05:57 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:56:07 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:56:07 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:16:24 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:16:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On 2012-06-06 00:07, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Buildworld completes successfully with ccache switched off, it fails
otherwise, system was built WITH_CLANG_IS_CC previously.
...
In file included from /usr/src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c:1:
/usr/src/lib/libc/net/getaddrinfo.c:467:15: error:
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:50:02 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 08:50:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On 06/06/12 10:41, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de [2012-06-03 22:55 +0200]:
... I spent now two complete days watching my boxes updating their
ports. Several ports do not compile anymore (inkscape, libreoffice,
libxul, to name some of the very hurting
Hi,
let me rite the answer on top before my mouse scrolling down.
I am fully aware of what you are writing. I am saying this from the point of
view people have when they start with FreeBSD.
This little help would make them feel much much saver.
I know that it would not change much in real
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
know what you are doing, as several of us have explained more than once.
is my English really this bad?
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Kalchev
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 2:46 AM
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?
On 06.06.12 05:31, Erich
TB --- 2012-06-06 11:40:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-06 11:40:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to compile without
intervention. The Maintainers do give a very good shot to make them stable
but sometimes one person
On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to compile without
intervention. The
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, Erich erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com wrote:
No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
know what you are doing, as several of us
In parallel is the discussion why so little people are using FreeBSD.
Do you understand what I want to say?
Erich
I would say there are 3 main things.
1) the 3rd party apps, which has already been covered of how overpowering it
can appear to newbies. Not going into depth anymore
2) lack
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 15:15:24 Chris Rees wrote:
On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
date, and ports are current but not
On 6 June 2012 11:49, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
This is because clang suppresses a number of warnings for specific
patterns in macros. Since ccache passes clang the preprocessed file,
those suppressions will not work, and some additional warnings can be
triggered.
See also the
On 2012-06-06 18:51, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Worked a treat, now it barfs on libelf
...
/usr/src/lib/libelf/elf_scn.c:198:41: error: equality comparison with
extraneous parentheses [-Werror,-Wparentheses-equality]
if (((e-e_u.e_elf.e_scn)-stqh_first == ((void *)0))) {
On 06/06/12 16:15, Chris Rees wrote:
On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 9:21:22 Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Overall I see it as packages are flat stable at the cost of being out of
date, and ports are current but not guaranteed to
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Mark Linimon wrote:
It's not particularly easy to see this on cvsweb. But let's take a look
at a random Mk/bsd.*.mk file via 'cvs log':
RCS file: /home/FreeBSD/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.apache.mk,v
Working file: bsd.apache.mk
head: 1.36
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
Hi,
On 06 June 2012 21:59:49 O. Hartmann wrote:
On 06/06/12 16:15, Chris Rees wrote:
On 6 June 2012 14:48, Erich Dollansky er...@alogreentechnologies.com
wrote:
Those minor issues are, having the recent mess in front of my eyes, a
simple negative exaggeration. What is that price worth,
TB --- 2012-06-07 05:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-07 05:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
28 matches
Mail list logo
