On Jun 26, 2012 7:07 AM, "Wojciech Puchar"
wrote:
>
> as well as we don't depend of /proc for normal operation we shouldn't for
say /proc/sysctl
>
> improvements are welcome, better documentation is welcome, changes to
what is OK - isn't.
/proc/sysctl might be useful. Just because Linux uses it
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Boris Popov wrote:
> On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
>> getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
>
> It is interesting, that the old drive with this code are still alive.
> Most lik
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:03:28AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> > I've observed a panic in recent -current several times but I only
> > have a picture of the backtrace:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/panic_tmpfs.jpg
> >
> > Does this look at all familiar to anyone?
>
On 26.06.2012 6:56, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> purpose. However, if I can avoid to re-design that wheel too, by
> getting access to scfs(4) code, I will.
It is interesting, that the old drive with this code are still alive.
Most likely, FS related part will need serious attention because of
numerou
Hello Kevin,
May you rebuild your kernel with some options that will make the dump of
the crash easier to send to people?
Try to follow these steps:
1) Configure KERNEL with the folowing options:
options KDB
options GDB
options DDB
2) Configure rc.conf:
dumpdev="/dev/ad0s1
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>>
>> from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
>> /*
>>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
>> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
> There is this:
>
> http://s
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
There is this:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/4.7/sys/miscfs/kernfs/
--
Adam Vande More
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
> sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
>
> from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
> /*
> * These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the
Hi folks,
I find myself in a situation where I need to directly explore the
sysctl(8) tree from my program. The tricky part is this:
from `src/sbin/sysctl.c':
/*
* These functions uses a presently undocumented interface to the kernel
* to walk the tree and get the type so it can print the value
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:03:28AM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> I've observed a panic in recent -current several times but I only
> have a picture of the backtrace:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kevlo/panic_tmpfs.jpg
>
> Does this look at all familiar to anyone?
Can you look up the line corresponding
11 matches
Mail list logo