Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-08-15 02:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: ... Maybe things aren't being scheduled correctly and the added latency is killing performance? You might also try switching to SCHED_ULE to see if it helps. Most likely, s/ULE/4BSD/ here, and in the rest

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 06:30:01 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 06:30:01 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Adrian. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 2:20:48: AC Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can capture AC some KTR scheduler dumps? AC That way the scheduler peeps can feed this into schedgraph.py (and you AC can too!) to figure out what's going on. AC Maybe things

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 0:45:42: LS Answer looks trivial: router CPU is bottleneck. But here is one additional LS detail: `top' never shows less than 50% of idle when torrents are LS active. And `idle' time with torrents traffic is ALWAYS is higher than LS without them, but

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/14/2012 09:18 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-08-15 02:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: ... Maybe things aren't being scheduled correctly and the added latency is killing performance? You might also try switching to SCHED_ULE to see if it helps.

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Lev. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 0:45:42: LS Answer looks trivial: router CPU is bottleneck. But here is one additional LS detail: `top' never shows less than 50% of idle when torrents are LS active. And

Re: Soekris net4801 sees no disk devices with -CURRENT

2012-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. It seems your flash disk doesn't like PIO4 mode setting command for some reason. I would try to set different modes via hint.ata.0.mode=PIOX tunables. Also please tell more about that disk and how (mode, etc) it was working before. -- Alexander Motin

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 07:51:45 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 07:51:45 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
On 15.08.2012 03:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can capture some KTR scheduler dumps? That way the scheduler peeps can feed this into schedgraph.py (and you can too!) to figure out what's going on.

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Alexander. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 14:18:05: AM It is quite pointless to speculate without real info like mentioned AM above KTR_SCHED traces. Main thing I've learned about schedulers, things AM there never work as you expect. There are two many factors are relations AM to predict

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Lev. You wrote 15 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3=D1=83=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B0 2012 =D0=B3., 0:45:= 42: LS Answer looks trivial: router CPU is bottleneck. But here is one additi= onal LS detail: `top' never shows less than 50% of idle when torrents are LS active. And `idle'

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Ian. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 14:57:17: IF Are you sure it's a freeze and not a panic? I'm seeing very frequent Yes, I'm sure, because I have hardware console attached (serial one, connected to other computer on my network) and because it un-freeze after minute or two, and

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
On 15.08.2012 13:40, Lev Serebryakov wrote: You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 14:18:05: AM It is quite pointless to speculate without real info like mentioned AM above KTR_SCHED traces. Main thing I've learned about schedulers, things AM there never work as you expect. There are two many factors are

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Alexander. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 15:07:32: AM Yes, that is what I expected to see there. If you have timecounter other AM then i8254, you can release i8254 from those duties to allow using it as AM one-shot setting hint.attimer.0.timecounter=0. Otherwise there are no AM options

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
On 15.08.2012 14:11, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Alexander. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 15:07:32: AM Yes, that is what I expected to see there. If you have timecounter other AM then i8254, you can release i8254 from those duties to allow using it as AM one-shot setting

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Alexander. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 15:19:32: AM I've meant `kern.timecounter`. kern.timecounter.tick: 1 kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(800) i8254(0) dummy(-100) kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 kern.timecounter.tc.i8254.mask: 65535

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Lev. You wrote 15 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3=D1=83=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B0 2012 =D0=B3., 0:45:= 42: LS Answer looks trivial: router CPU is bottleneck. But here is one additi= onal LS detail: `top' never shows less than 50% of idle when torrents are LS active. And `idle'

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 09:38:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 09:38:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 10:05:31 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 10:05:31 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 13:04:53 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 13:04:53 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 11:45:15 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 11:45:15 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-15 Thread Alexander Motin
On 15.08.2012 14:23, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Alexander. You wrote 15 августа 2012 г., 15:19:32: AM I've meant `kern.timecounter`. kern.timecounter.tick: 1 kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(800) i8254(0) dummy(-100) kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0

Re: swp_pager_meta_build DoS printf

2012-08-15 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, August 13, 2012 1:49:38 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 2 July 2012 20:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: On 2. Jul 2012, at 14:36 , John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, July 01, 2012 8:23:31 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hey, hitting this printf in

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 14:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 14:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: swp_pager_meta_build DoS printf

2012-08-15 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 15 August 2012 19:21, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: On Monday, August 13, 2012 1:49:38 am Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 2 July 2012 20:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: On 2. Jul 2012, at 14:36 , John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday, July 01, 2012 8:23:31 am Bjoern

Re: zfsloader failure with r239244

2012-08-15 Thread Steve Wills
On 08/14/12 15:42, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 14.08.2012 21:03, Steve Wills wrote: Any ideas if this is a bug or something wrong with my system would be appreciated. Can you boot with serial console and show what show the `lsdev` command in the loader? And from the running system the

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 14:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 14:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 16:27:02 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 16:27:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

ftpd reset restart position (REST) at any command

2012-08-15 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
I try using mirror 2.9 (old, very old perl script) to mirror ftp site in passive mode and see don't working restart transfer: server ignored 'REST pos' command. This because in ftpcmd.y cleared restart_point: cmd_list : /* empty */ | cmd_list cmd {

Re: MS Hyper-v for FreeBSD announced

2012-08-15 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, Thanks for providing that link. I created a page on the FreeBSD wiki with links to info about Hyper-V on FreeBSD. I included the link which you provided. See: http://wiki.freebsd.org/HyperV -- Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.org On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Pedro Giffuni

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 18:02:03 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 18:02:03 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-08-15 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-15 18:11:24 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-15 18:11:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

r239290: boot problem

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Current. I have typical NanoBSD installation: 8GiB CF card patitioned with MBR into 4 slices. Slices 1 and 2 is used for code (active only one at any time) and 3 is used for configs and 4 for some mutable data. Slices 1 and 2 have only one BSD partition: `a'. boot0 in MBR is standard

Re: r239290: boot problem

2012-08-15 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Lev. You wrote 16 августа 2012 г., 2:27:44: LS I have typical NanoBSD installation: 8GiB CF card patitioned with LS MBR into 4 slices. Slices 1 and 2 is used for code (active only LS one at any time) and 3 is used for configs and 4 for some mutable LS data. Slices 1 and 2 have only one