Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ?

2012-08-20 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 8/20/2012 6:59 PM, Scott Long wrote: On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Matthew Jacob wrote: On 8/18/2012 2:36 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <50300540.9060...@feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes: [...] that there might be a measurable difference for having to copy 4K (unaligned) than 1K

Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ?

2012-08-20 Thread Scott Long
On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > On 8/18/2012 2:36 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <50300540.9060...@feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes: >> >>> [...] that there might be a measurable >>> difference for having to copy 4K (unaligned) than 1K (unaligned) to >>> kernel s

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 19:40:33 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 19:40:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: OpenLDAP/SASL2 problem in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT WAS: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

2012-08-20 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 08/18/12 22:31, schrieb Adam McDougall: > On 8/18/2012 4:07 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: >> My setups on all boxes using OpenLDAP, the port >> net/opendldap24-client/server has security/cyrus-sasl2 enabled. >> I use nsswitch and nascd. >> >> The problem: >> I can not anymore install or reinstall (usin

Re: buildworld c++ internal error

2012-08-20 Thread Randy Bush
-O allowed it to buildworld! randy ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[HEADSUP] geli(4) weak master key generation on -CURRENT

2012-08-20 Thread Simon L. B. Nielsen
Hello, If you are not using geli(4) on -CURRENT (AKA FreeBSD 10) you can safely ignore this mail. If you are, please read on! -CURRENT users of geli(4) should be advised that, a geli(4) device may have weak master key, if the provider is created on -CURRENT system built against source code betwee

Re: buildworld c++ internal error

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Aug-20 07:17:59 +0900, Randy Bush wrote: >the only thing a night's sleep got me was the idea of attaching an >external sata drive and putting swap on it. You can also swap to a file via NFS. -- Peter Jeremy pgp62N8KdUtmP.pgp Description: PGP signature

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 18:30:32 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 18:30:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule

2012-08-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, Since 1.0-rc6 release, everything looks ready for a final release of 1.0, I'll give more details on the release commit bit :) this is planned for 30th august 2012. Current was supposed to switch to pkgng by default today, it has been delayed until the nvidia-driver is fixed with pkgng. Th

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-20 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/20/2012 06:32, Alexander Motin wrote: > I have no plans to converge them. I've just found problem in ULE, that > was replicated into 4BSD and it would be strange to fix one without > another. But fixing it exposed another old problem specific to 4BSD, > which I fixed reusing logically equival

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-08-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
Fixed. On 20 August 2012 11:30, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE > FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 > d...@free

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 16:50:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: kernel page fult for a valid pointer?

2012-08-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, August 20, 2012 9:49:48 am Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:04 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Saturday, August 18, 2012 2:29:26 pm Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am wondering is there a reason for getting "Fatal trap 12: page > >> fault while in ke

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 13:59:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 13:59:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 13:24:39 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 13:24:39 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 14:01:22 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 14:01:22 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory

2012-08-20 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: >> > >> > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> > >> >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim K

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-08-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
... I'll fix that. Honestly, it built for me.. Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: FreeBSD buildkernel fails @r239409 in sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c

2012-08-20 Thread Adrian Chadd
Yup, I forgot an #ifdef ATH_DEBUG. I'll fix it shortly. Adrian On 20 August 2012 05:09, David Wolfskill wrote: > This is using clang: > > ... stage 3.2: building everything > cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 > MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE= GROFF_BI

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 12:12:32 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 12:12:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ?

2012-08-20 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 8/20/2012 5:24 AM, John Baldwin wrote: On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:05:11 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <5030033b.4060...@feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes: On 8/18/2012 1:32 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Shouldn't we at least increase it to pagesize ? What data suggests to you i

Re: kernel page fult for a valid pointer?

2012-08-20 Thread Monthadar Al Jaberi
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:04 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, August 18, 2012 2:29:26 pm Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am wondering is there a reason for getting "Fatal trap 12: page >> fault while in kernel mode" "supervisor read, page not present" for an >> address used to be v

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-20 Thread Alexander Motin
On 20.08.2012 13:25, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/20/2012 02:59, Alexander Motin wrote: On 20.08.2012 11:32, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/15/2012 03:18, Alexander Motin wrote: On 15.08.2012 03:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: Would you be willing to compile a kernel

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ?

2012-08-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:05:11 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <5030033b.4060...@feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >On 8/18/2012 1:32 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Shouldn't we at least increase it to pagesize ? > >> > >What data suggests to you it would be better at pagesize?

Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory

2012-08-20 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote: > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>> > >>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenk

Re: BUFSIZ = 1024, still ?

2012-08-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:36:46 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <50300540.9060...@feral.com>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >If you're going to talk about making a change to defaults, the default > >MAXPHYS and DLFTPHYS have been undersized for years now. > > Indeed, but as I understand i

Re: kernel page fult for a valid pointer?

2012-08-20 Thread John Baldwin
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 2:29:26 pm Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > Hi, > > I am wondering is there a reason for getting "Fatal trap 12: page > fault while in kernel mode" "supervisor read, page not present" for an > address used to be valid in kernel space? > > I dont really understand why I am

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 10:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

FreeBSD buildkernel fails @r239409 in sys/dev/ath/if_ath_tx.c

2012-08-20 Thread David Wolfskill
This is using clang: ... >>> stage 3.2: building everything cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE= GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=

Re: make package fails in chroot: tar: getvfsbyname failed: No such file or directory

2012-08-20 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:20 AM, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: >>> Hi, I have a wrapper script that builds packages

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 07:45:14 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 07:45:14 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-20 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/20/2012 02:59, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 20.08.2012 11:32, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 08/15/2012 03:18, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> On 15.08.2012 03:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can captur

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 08:58:06 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 08:58:06 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-20 Thread Alexander Motin
On 20.08.2012 11:32, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/15/2012 03:18, Alexander Motin wrote: On 15.08.2012 03:09, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can capture some KTR scheduler dumps? That way the scheduler peeps c

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-08-20 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-08-20 07:18:24 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-08-20 07:18:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: CURRENT as gateway on not-so-fast hardware: where is a bottlneck?

2012-08-20 Thread Doug Barton
On 08/15/2012 03:18, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 15.08.2012 03:09, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 12:20 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> Would you be willing to compile a kernel with KTR so you can capture >>> some KTR scheduler dumps? >>> >>> That way the scheduler peeps can feed this into schedgr

Re: gptzfsboot problem on HP P410i Smart Array

2012-08-20 Thread Bjorn Larsson
Hi Andrey, We are installing freeBSD using ZFS as root filesystem using the GPT method as described on the freeBSD ZFS wiki. We are creating a GPT boot partition with the gptzfsboot program embedded and then a zroot partition with the freeBSD binaries. This works well and boots on every system we