Hey, Baldie:
/usr/src/sys/modules/amr/../../dev/amr/amr.c:970:1: error: function
'amr_periodic' is not needed and will not be emitted
[-Werror,-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
amr_periodic(void *data)
^
1 error generated.
*** [amr.o] Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/amr.
2012/8/30 Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl:
Yes, if I would answer 'yes' to using journal, there would be unexpected
free inodes (?) or something like that in syslog and inconsistencies if full
fsck
would be performed.
That's normally the case, yes, but not here.
Basically if I have
Hi All,
I've it at 9.1-PRERELEASE and I've got a chance to test at CURRENT.
It's the same (mind a line with udp4 *:768 at sockstat info):
-
% sockstat -4l | grep rpcbind
% grep rpcbind /etc/rc.conf.local
rpcbind_flags=-h 192.168.119.6
rpcbind_enable=YES
% sudo /etc/rc.d/rpcbind start
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Борис Самородов b...@passap.ru wrote:
Hi All,
I've it at 9.1-PRERELEASE and I've got a chance to test at CURRENT.
It's the same (mind a line with udp4 *:768 at sockstat info):
-
% sockstat -4l | grep rpcbind
% grep rpcbind /etc/rc.conf.local
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Борис Самородов b...@passap.ru wrote:
Hi All,
I've it at 9.1-PRERELEASE and I've got a chance to test at CURRENT.
It's the same (mind a line with udp4 *:768 at sockstat info):
-
%
31.08.2012 12:34, Maxim Konovalov пишет:
Please file a PR against rc ASAP.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/117711
I see. Thanks.
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
On 2012-08-31 09:34, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/src/sys/modules/amr/../../dev/amr/amr.c:970:1: error: function
'amr_periodic' is not needed and will not be emitted
[-Werror,-Wunneeded-internal-declaration]
The one call to get the callout to amr_periodic() started seems to
Dimitry Andric wrote:
The one call to get the callout to amr_periodic() started seems to have
been commented out in r239912:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/amr/amr.c?r1=239912r2=239911pathrev=239912
If the function isn't necessary anymore, it could just be deleted, or
#ifdef'd
On Aug 31, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com wrote:
On 2012-08-31 09:34, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/src/sys/modules/amr/../../dev/amr/amr.c:970:1: error: function
'amr_periodic' is not needed and will not be emitted
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:07:48PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:42:31PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I agree with John on all counts here. Further, the idea of a
31.08.2012 12:14, Garrett Cooper пишет:
Please file a PR against rc ASAP.
Can someone file a PR on the matter? (ENOTIME for me)
Thanks!
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
Please file a PR against rc ASAP.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/117711
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:37:17AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Detailed description of mistakes in these files and correct implementation:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165710
A developer at $work (Isilon) developed a slightly simpler patch than
that based on our
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:13:01 am deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
The one call to get the callout to amr_periodic() started seems to have
been commented out in r239912:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/amr/amr.c?r1=239912r2=239911pathrev=239912
If
On Friday, August 31, 2012 7:06:53 am Andrey Simonenko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:37:17AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Detailed description of mistakes in these files and correct
implementation:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/165710
A developer at $work
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:12:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 7:06:53 am Andrey Simonenko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:37:17AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Detailed description of mistakes in these files and correct
implementation:
On 31 Aug 2012 13:15, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
On Aug 30, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30/08/2012 22:44, John Nielsen wrote:
After dialog(1) exits the script has a list of packages to mark as
automatic. Is there a non-SQL way to efficiently get the inverse?
I.e. the set { all_packages -
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Борис Самородов b...@passap.ru wrote:
31.08.2012 12:34, Maxim Konovalov пишет:
Please file a PR against rc ASAP.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/117711
I see. Thanks.
Looks like Matteo Riondato had created a patch for the problem in
Marin Atanasov Nikolov dna...@gmail.com wrote:
This is just to share with you that soon after the official 1.0
release of pkgng we now have basic plugins support in pkgng's
development branch.
[...]
It's not perfect or covering everything, but it will give you a quick
start though :)
How
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:27:09PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Marin Atanasov Nikolov dna...@gmail.com wrote:
This is just to share with you that soon after the official 1.0
release of pkgng we now have basic plugins support in pkgng's
development branch.
[...]
It's not perfect or
That's normally the case, yes, but not here.
Are you saying that if using journal, inconsistencies
in 'clean' fs are expected?
Basically I'm saying that apparently here journal
does nothing after enabling it.
Usually after really hard power dip, I need
to manually fsck as all symptoms of
On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
I agree with John on all counts here. Further, the idea of a
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:10:24 pm Chris Rees wrote:
On 30 Aug 2012 18:03, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
On 31 August 2012 16:47, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote:
On 31-08-2012 14:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:10:50AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton
Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
How about the ability to add new commands to pkg?
For example something like pkg cutleaves via plugins would be cool.
I think 'pkg autoremove' already does this.
Does autoremove show you all the leaves and ask which ones you want
removed? I honestly don't
On 8/31/2012 11:03 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
How about the ability to add new commands to pkg?
For example something like pkg cutleaves via plugins would be cool.
I think 'pkg autoremove' already does this.
Does autoremove show you all the leaves and ask
On Friday, August 31, 2012 9:41:13 am Chris Rees wrote:
On 31 Aug 2012 13:15, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, August 31, 2012 5:59:10 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 01:02:06PM -1000, Doug Barton wrote:
On 08/30/2012 07:32 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
I have patches to add locking to aha(4) and mark it MPSAFE. The patches are
from HEAD but should apply to 8 or 9. If you test it on 8 or 9 please enable
INVARIANTS for at least the initial testing. Thanks.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/aha_locking.patch
--
John Baldwin
Hi,
I think the details of the patch would need to be worked out a bit,
but I think you are on the right track.
I think it would be nice to:
(1) Have deprecation warnings in the legacy pkg_* tools.
If someone types pkg_add, maybe warn them that
it is deprecated, and they
On 2012-08-30 18:43, Eir Nym wrote:
On 30 August 2012 20:16, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
It seems the WERROR= in the xfs module Makefile was right there from the
start, but it was never removed. I have compiled it using gcc, and
there are actually no warnings from gcc at all.
I have patches to add locking to ahb(4) and mark it MPSAFE. The
patches are from HEAD but should apply to 8 or 9. If you test it on 8
or 9 please enable INVARIANTS for at least the initial testing. Thanks.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/ahb_locking.patch
--
John Baldwin
On 31 August 2012 09:15, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
No, because it already knows which you installed and which were pulled
in as dependencies. There's a recent thread on ports@ regarding pkg2ng
and marking your imported packages as automatic or not.
There is a usecase for looking
On 8/31/2012 10:15 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 31 August 2012 09:15, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote:
No, because it already knows which you installed and which were pulled
in as dependencies. There's a recent thread on ports@ regarding pkg2ng
and marking your imported packages as
38 matches
Mail list logo
